‘Anything Not to Go Back’

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: bluebird3 @ 06/08/2008 10:06:31 AM

    It is inexcusable that many in the military are on their 2nd, 3rd and even 4th tours of duty in Iraq. It would be bad enough had it been a neccessary war. However, it is a war based on the arrogance of the current inhabitant of the White House and his greedy little partner in crime down there in the bunker, aided and abetted by Don Rumsfeld, Condi Rice, & Co. accompanied by a "side dish" of non-intellegence by the CIA and no guts by anybody except the men and women in uniform. And I include "we the people" in the "no guts" category. When it became apparent that we had been duped, we should have taken the necessary steps to pressure congress for impeachment. Having said all that, I do believe we need a draft - it should never have been eliminated. The burden of defending and protecting this country should be shared by all. It is especially apparent at this point when we are breaking the back and the psyche of the all volunteer forces.

    • Posted By: KD Denton @ 06/08/2008 11:54:45 AM

      The burden of defending and protecting the United States is shared by all, the government is even nice enough to give me a little tax return back every year for it.

      As for the need to reinstitute the draft, get real. The overall quality of the military would erode, and examples of this can be found in history when the US enacted drafts - WW2 and Vietnam, specifically. Drafts are also contradictory to the very ideals of American liberties, freedom, let alone democracy itself; let alone the idea of a draft makes no economical sense at all. Forcing people to serve in the military against their will? In a war where the very fate of the country is at stake, sure, a draft makes sense, but not in any other case. The current Iraq conflict (and it's not a war as no declaration of such was made by Congress) and the "war on terrorism" certainly don't warrant drafts, as the legalities of using the military in those roles is certainly questionable.

      • Posted By: OBWan @ 06/08/2008 12:33:11 PM

        KD Denton - Say what? tax return - gee I always pay taxes.
        Agree with the last sentence in 2nd paragraph.

        A draft does bring the reality of military action to all. The horrors both of death and wounded are hid from the American public at large, because of the sanitizing of cover.

        Only 1 of 600 Americans is an active duty solder. 2% of the US military is made up of non-US citizens and from September 11, 2001 to December 2006, 4600 foreigners received US citizenship while serving in the military. Maybe that's what we could do with those 12 million that cross the border (LOL).

        No, I do not support a draft. Perhaps, the Israeli's have this one right - they also have exceptions. I will leave you with this thought.

        With liberty comes great responsibilities to protect those freedoms, both from a military and non-military aspect. We (all of us) have not done a very good job the last seven years.

        • Posted By: joe_mama @ 06/09/2008 8:42:24 AM

          " 2% of the US military is made up of non-US citizens and from September 11, 2001 to December 2006, 4600 foreigners received US citizenship while serving in the military. Maybe that's what we could do with those 12 million that cross the border (LOL)."

          regarding the illegals: it's not just a joke....I predicted "citizenship-for-service" as one of the ultimate solutions for the illegal immigration debate years ago and the longer the issue goes unresolved the more likely we are to see it come to fruition.

          • Posted By: OBWan @ 06/09/2008 6:56:55 PM

            Joe-mama
            There are strict requirements in allowing non-US citizens to serve in the military. Service must be on case-by-case basis.

            The real concern is do we have citizen soldiers or mercenaries.

      • Posted By: bluebird3 @ 06/08/2008 1:54:06 PM

        Why don't you run on over, spend a few months embedded with the troops and come back and report to us on "the conflict" in Iraq. I really doubt that 5 year old Johnny will grow up and tell his teenaged friends that his Dad or Mom was killed in the Iraq "Conflict." Neither Johnny nor I care that congress did not declare "war." If lots of people are dying at the hands of lots of other people, good money is being thrown after bad to the extent that we may never climb out of this hole, and some people are making a "killing"........well, little Johnny and I will just remain in denial.

    • Posted By: rif2422 @ 06/08/2008 1:06:35 PM

      Inexcusable??? Do you know what you're talking about??? Have you talked to any of these men or women in the military? As a vet I can tell you when you're in the military this is what you expect and yes even what you want. I just regret im not over there with them now. Our military is the best in the world and trust me, they want to to win this fight. They want you, Yes YOU, to give them more time and resources. If you talk to the troops themselves they will tell you that we've turned a corner with the surge and the surge has worked. Give it time, the military, and the grunts and groundpounders want to finish this thing off. Not only that but the Iraqi military is finally shaping up and becoming a cohesive fighting unit.
      Furthermore, our military is the best in the world at what they do, and it is because it is made up fully by volunteers. They don't want people like you in it, you'd be the first one shooting yourself in the leg because you're scared to go to work. Let the men and women who do this for a living do their job and you can keep pounding away on the keyboard using words like "impeachment'. And making people like me laugh.

      • Posted By: bluebird3 @ 06/08/2008 1:56:51 PM

        You have frightened me into silence...........................I find the thought of making "people like you" laugh very scary indeed............Is that you down there in the bunker, Dick?

        • Posted By: odanny @ 06/08/2008 10:32:13 PM

          Dude, keep drinking the Kool Aid, Lenin conied the phrase "useful idiot", and you make it true.

      • Posted By: Tappy McWidestance @ 06/08/2008 1:23:12 PM

        You are an idiot. War is always the last resort. And when you go to war, you go prepared. You have a plan, you have the best equipment, and you have overwhelming force. None of this happened in Iraq. War in Iraq wasn't a last resort (Hell, it wasn't even the country that attacked us), Bush sent the troops in without proper equipment, and as we all know, there was absolutely no plan! I also regret that you're not over there as well. Iraq is the perfect place for a war monger.

        • Posted By: midnight05 @ 06/08/2008 2:39:05 PM

          This war was fought to convince mommy that son had a bigger thing than Daddy and that she chose the wrong one. This is the first openly Oedipal war we have ever fought. It is strictly an attempt by Baby Bush to outdo Papa.

  • Posted By: hjack5555 @ 06/09/2008 5:10:24 PM

    Mr John H.. Jackman 1335 S.W CENTURY COURT McMinnville OR 97128 503-435-2369 E-Mail: hjack5555@comcast.net and I am the one who sent information about we service connected veterans to see if anyone out there even cared. for my book I have found no one who even gives a *****about the 18 vets per day who comit suicide are the many that are homeless I FOUGHT IN 3 WARS

  • Posted By: hjack5555 @ 06/09/2008 5:01:01 PM

    25yrs svc ret May 70 8yrs college 100%svc con disabled. I have fought a lonely battle for disabled veterans rights for 38 yrs. and not one elected official even cares to listen to our cry for help. I have all the evidence needed to investigate this disgrace. Records are direct from VA files on me. Proof they lied to President, Vice President and they did not even care. We fought and many died for our country.They don't Care ABOUT US

  • Posted By: hjack5555 @ 06/09/2008 4:52:21 PM

    25 yrs svc ret May 70 8yrs college 100% svc con disabled. Now why does all news media not have the courage to investigate why 6,500 veterans take their own life each year(18 per day) 1/4th all homeles are vets and all driven there by the disgraceful way they are treated by the VA regional offices I have 38 years of proof direct from VA own records. They knowingly lied to President,Vice President DOES ANYONE CARE

  • Posted By: hjack5555 @ 06/09/2008 4:42:55 PM

    WHY DOES ALL NEWS MEDIA AVOID WRITING ABOUT THE 6,500 VETERANS WHO ARE DRIVEN TO SUICIDE BY THE DISGRACEFUL TREATMENT BY THE VA REGIONAL OFFICES. I RETIRED MAY 70 WITH 8 YEARS OF COLLEGE HAVE BATTLED FOR 38 YEARS AND HAVE BEEN THAT LINE MANY TIMES. WHEN WILL ANY NEWS MEDIA HAVE THE COURAGE TO INVESTIGATE OR EVEN HEAR OUR CRY

  • Posted By: gmac32794 @ 06/09/2008 3:54:36 PM

    I have to laugh when I hear comments about Saddam's WMD program and how it was a threat to America. How would he have launched a nuclear attack on the US? He had no submarines, missles, or bombers with nuclear capabilities. How was he going to launch this attack? Strap the nukes onto a camel and swim them over here?

  • Posted By: lnlrothx3 @ 06/08/2008 11:21:10 PM

    I will be deploying again in april. The soldiers harming them selves are idiots who don't need to be on the battle field. All you people who want the draft back are of two camps, First are the ones that want the draft back so that others besides themselves will be sent ( Cowards) and next are those that what the draft to help turn the American people againest the military ( Traitors). I do not want any of you on my battlefield!!!! Both kinds are the worst *** this country has to offer.

    • Posted By: Daves3 @ 06/08/2008 11:31:08 PM

      I am no Traitor, the whole country should share the pain, not just you... If I get drafted so be it as long os the decision makers kids get drafted too. Then i would be at peace with this... I question you on how you call people cowards and traitors just because we speak our minds... this is America and this is what your fighting for correct, freedom of speech? The draft with no exceptions, if there is a good reason to go to war and all other options are exhausted, then war it is... but no cowards will evade the draft with College differments like the coward Dick Cheney.

      • Posted By: summer4077 @ 06/09/2008 8:52:52 AM

        Don't you love how that's the only argument they have? Name calling? Opponents of the 'war' aka occupation can give many factual supporting evidence to their argument, but all supporters of it can do is resort to childish name calling.
        I want American lives saved. If they absolutely must lose their lives, I want it done over a damn good reason. This whole supposed evidence of WMDs that didn't pan out is infuriating. It's a sham that Bushy and his cronies used for their own personal gain. Did they care that 4,000+ are dead and thousands more wounded? No. It's not their son/daughter/mother/father.
        So I want lives saved. How does that make me a coward or unpatriotic (another insult flung at opponents)?

        • Posted By: onepoker @ 06/09/2008 2:46:19 PM

          weenie! Just kidding couldnt resist.

          Wmd- how about the fact that Saddam had used Gas weapons on his own people for evidence. He wiped out an entire kurd village women and children murdered. Bush made his decision based on Evidence that Saddam may have been interested in transfering weapons of mass destruction to Terrorists for profit. This evidence turned out to be false but He didnt want to see a gas attack in Los Angeles So I can hardly fault him for being aggressive.

          The war never was about oil despite the perception don't you think Bushes oil buddies would of profited more from a lack of supply of oil than from exploiting the oil of a conquered country. We have no interest in stealing Iraqs oil. Did we steal the resources from Japan after wwII? Did we steal the resources from Germany or Italy? No we stabilized the countries rebuilt their economies and now veiw them as our great allies.

          Being a republican im too dumb to remember what else you talked about but im sure it was wrong also! :)

          • Posted By: gmac32794 @ 06/09/2008 3:48:31 PM

            I have to laugh when I hear comments about Saddam's WMD program and how it was a threat to America. How would he have launched a nuclear attack on the US? He had no submarines or bombers with nuclear capabilities. How was he going to launch this attack? Strap the nukes onto a camel and swim them over here?

    • Posted By: onepoker @ 06/09/2008 2:38:31 PM

      Thank you for your service! Most americans are with you and you will win this war. by the way there is a great book out by a guy named Michael Yon called the moment of Truth in Iraq I highly recommend reading it as it has great insight into just how we can win this war.

    • Posted By: B.B. Wolf @ 06/09/2008 12:04:41 AM

      The draft will be a fine idea when things really start to get bad. American draftees have a long and glorious history of kicking ass. Vietnam is not the war by which all wars are judged; likewise, Vietnam era draftees are not the draftees by which all draftees should be judged. The draft works.

      • Posted By: gmac32794 @ 06/09/2008 2:08:41 PM

        I must respectfully disagree with your comments. While there are certainly Americans who do not like the military, it is just plain wrong to categorize those of us in favor of the draft as either traitors or cowards. The draft would restore reason to this country. It is much easier to send someone else's kid off to die in an unjust war than to send your own. Common sense dictates that If every American had something at stake in the Bush-Cheney-Republican War then there wouldn't have been such a rush to start one. We only have two ways to prevent some other not-so-bright Prez to start a war like this one in the future: 1.Elect a non-Republican, or 2: Bring back the draft and eliminate deferments, making all men and women of draft age eligible to go to war on the President's whim.

        One more thing, I am a Viet Nam era veteran and my son is currently in the Army. Every generation of my family has served in the military since the Civil War. There are no traitors and no cowards in my family.

    • Posted By: Daves3 @ 06/08/2008 11:38:13 PM

      Also, it's not to be against the military, but against bad decision making. Look at GW, the bulb is dim there and with the draft in place with no exceptions will force a fool like him to make sure he is doing the right thing. Getting the country involved in a war should have have a damn good reason to make people die!

  • Posted By: Karenn1 @ 06/08/2008 11:49:07 AM

    What do we expect, soldiers saying Iwill go back for the third,fourth time happily. Get real these soldier did not intend to join the foreign legion.Fight for commander and chief who is only interested in the oil fields.Threaten to veto G I Bill vet benifits.These soldiers don';t want to die for Corporations and in vain.

    • Posted By: rif2422 @ 06/08/2008 1:12:59 PM

      what are you talking about vetoing GI benefits? do you know what you're talking about? In a 4 yr period that a soldier enlists, he will not go more than twice unless he re-enlists. So get your facts straight, if he is going 3-4 times it's because he wants to. And nobody is getting their GI Bill taken away from them, the new GI bill up includes paying for full schooling and housing for every soldiers since '03, I'm a vet and i can totally understand the hesitation behind that. 4 yrs of schooling and housing? It wasn't in the contract when I joined so I'm curious why they're just throwing out there to every person that served since '03. I'm not complaining just wondering why they think they need to do that the GI Bill as it is is pretty **** good. Up to 1400 bucks a month tax free.

      • Posted By: zades @ 06/08/2008 5:00:49 PM

        You are sorely mislead, brother. I am a veteran as well, and many of my friends (who are still in the military) were exposed to ten month (if not less) periods at home between deployments. In addition there is that wonderful stop-loss program that truly considers whether you would be a more productive citizen by going back to civilian life or staying in and helping secure the oil fields of Iraq...you know, the country that you swore to defend...

        My heart goes out to my brothers and sisters whom have had to inflict injuries on themselves to avoid this war...or returning to it. I did my year in '04 and vowed to get out--one way or another--in '05. People scream of patriotism and the like, but this war has nothing to do with being patriotic. Its about facing the reality as to how you've been mislead and doing something about it. Period. Staying in the military and getting your life absolutely demolished while protecting the honorable flag of Iraq is not what I would say is ideal for any dedicated citizen of the United States of America. That's preposterous and wreaks of propagandist victimization.

        Lastly, the G.I. Bill modification is wonderful. Why would you object supporting a soldier's post-military aspirations while chunks of Government money goes to private companies..? Its amazing that you see this ordeal as "throwing [money] out there" and not saying thank you for VOLUNTEERING to risk your life...

        What veteran you are NOT...

        • Posted By: onepoker @ 06/09/2008 3:32:27 PM

          as a veteran you've earned the right to your opinion no matter how stupid it is! Mccain thought the GI bill should reward those that didnt get out after one tour more than those who did. He also thought giving such great benefits after one tour would lead to more people leaving military service which is not helpful when you are in a war.

      • Posted By: midnight05 @ 06/08/2008 2:34:59 PM

        Jesus died for your sins. Our soldiers are dying for Bush's sins, for Cheney's sins. for Halliburton's sins and for anything but what makes sense. Bush started this war because his mother preferred to shag his father and he wants to prove he's got a bigger...well, you know.

    • Posted By: KD Denton @ 06/08/2008 12:01:10 PM

      But they are dying for big business and strategic resource control. You honestly think the "war" in Iraq is about the freedom of the Iraqi's and spreading American democracy? Those are merely side benefits. Don't let the neo-cons fool you, NO WAR IN AMERICA'S HISTORY WAS EVER FOUGHT FOR LIBERTY.

      • Posted By: ChicoCDM @ 06/08/2008 2:37:22 PM

        KD Denton - I'm sure you are voting for Obama - and maybe you might also want to redesign our flag - or even lets not have a flag at all - gosh the thought of wearing it on the lapel - "how does waving a flag show partitism - disband our military - hey why don't you guys have a tea party in Iran and "Find peace in our time." Better yet as a good gesture why don't we just HELP Iran with their nulcear program in HOPEs that they will find kindness in their hearts to join us in Western Civilization maybe they might even convert to Christianity. NO ONE HAS EVER TRIED THAT. Cause our foreign policy has failed miserably since we added all 50 stars to the stripes - and HELL the international community what they are doing SUCKS too - so lets tell them to stop trying. Let Obama solve all the world problems with a CHANGE. SARCATICALLY (for you dense folks.)

      • Posted By: rif2422 @ 06/08/2008 1:16:02 PM

        Um ever heard of the Revolutionary War? You know, Paul Revere, George Washington, and that beer guy Samuel Adams? I'm pretty sure since they didnt pay taxes for like 7 yrs after the war, they were fighting for freedom, but you're probably too smart to believe in all that crap they put in history books. "Thats just the man trying to keep you down Bro"

  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/09/2008 12:54:21 PM

    if you buy into the obama thing then you will have buyers remorse in 2010

    • Posted By: maryctaurus @ 06/09/2008 3:24:39 PM

      I thought this was supposed to be about our soldiers? You've got plenty of other places to discuss Obama.

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 06/09/2008 1:25:48 PM

      We're not 'buying' into anything. We make the right choice. No remorse.

  • Posted By: Daves3 @ 06/08/2008 10:16:40 PM

    One thing I strongly believe in is to bring back the draft and the war tax and no exceptions like College deferment. If you are able with two arms and two legs then your shipped off. I also would make sure each politicians kids go too so we all share the pain and this I know in my heart will make war truly the last resort. Men like Cheney when differed his way out of Vietnam or GW in the national guard during Nam (thanks to Dad) with such ease send an volunteer army out to war. Makes me sick!

    • Posted By: onepoker @ 06/09/2008 2:50:22 PM

      Mccains son is serving now!

  • Posted By: Nins @ 06/08/2008 10:30:56 PM

    Sorry, ArmyRanger, but I think you are misinformed about Obama's military stance. I'm a Republican and I was relieved to hear Obama say that while he wants a slow (18 month or more) withdrawal from Iraq, he wants to increase our presence in Afganistan and aggressively go after Al Queda. He also states that we need to put more money into the military budget in the near future, and increase the number of men and women in uniform, as well as provide important services to returning veterans. Obama comes across as rather hard nosed and pro-military, he just thinks that the war in Iraq was ill-conceived, since it was based on false intelligence (the weapons of mass destruction that never materialized) and was started without the support of the international community. It so happens that 69% of Americans agree with him about this, and since we are a majority rule democracy, a well-planned withdrawal from Iraq is THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

    As to your assertion that oil prices are at an all-time high because Muslims want Obama to be president, I'm not sure I follow you reasoning at all. Yes, much of the world's oil belongs to Muslim countries, who can set whatever prices they want. However, US based corporations like ExxonMobile also collude in this price fixing which is draining America and making us weaker economically. Both Clinton and Obama have faced this head on, saying that we need energy independence from oil, something I heartily agree with. So even though I haven't voted Democrat since Nixon was impeached, I'm breaking my 30 year GOP streak and voting for Obama this year, because our country is in DIRE STRAITS financially, and I want a President who realizes that we need to take action on our oil dependence, rather than Bush/McCain who obviously are in the oil industry up to their necks.

    However, Army, I do have to commend you on your obvious patriotism. I just think that maybe you have been mis-informed about Obama's stance on the military, and about his supposed Muslim affiliations. There is a lot of nonsense floating around in the media. I'm sorry if it has effected your views, and I hope that you will go to the trouble of looking up Obama's real views, especially since he is likely to be our next President.

    • Posted By: onepoker @ 06/09/2008 2:48:54 PM

      The good thing about Obama is because he hasn't articulated any of his plans his followers can make them up to suit any argument they encounter.

  • Posted By: AltEnergy @ 06/09/2008 2:00:11 AM

    Honorable Member of Congress,
    Please vote to block Iraq war funding until Congress implements the following changes to any Iraq war funding bill:

    1. Cut Iraq war funding to HALF of the requested amount and continue to dial it down in successive funding cycles. This will send a message that we don???t intend to occupy Iraq indefinitely. It would also be a fair compromise between pro-war and anti-war factions.

    2. Finance the Iraq and Afghanistan wars on a PAY-AS-YOU-GO basis. If we can stop increasing the deficit with war spending, that will be one less factor to weaken the dollar and raise the cost of oil.

    3. Fund the CURRENT FISCAL YEAR ONLY so that there is less latitude and less money available to continue the war in Iraq.

    68% of the public oppose the war in Iraq (CNN poll 4/28/08.) I hope that Congress??? actions on Iraq war funding will reflect this supermajority of public opinion.

    • Posted By: onepoker @ 06/09/2008 2:20:17 PM

      Dear honorable member of congress - Please double the budget for the war so we can win it quicker. Give our men and women air conditioning in their fighting vehicles. Provide them the best weaponry and armor available. Please Put the funds in place so General Petreaus can build a lasting infrastructure in Iraq listen to your Generals who are on the ground working with the Iraqi people and ignore the ignorant cowards who would abandon our friends the Iraqis to Cruel and inhumane Islamo fascists.

  • Posted By: yourcountry @ 06/09/2008 12:03:04 AM

    A 14 year old kid was working at a Forward Operating Base near the Tigris River(1st Armored Division ,2003 Active Duty), I asked him why he was working instead at the new school? He said I have to provide for my family since my father was killed. I asked him how he was killed. He said that he was dragged out of his house and shot by the Iraqi Military, (during Hussein reign) because he was suspected of 'conspiring against the government??? that is sure some tasty Kool-aid. I guess that kid was part of the great conspiracy for the government to get the oil, hmm why then do we get the majority of the oil from Canada. http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html
    I guess you are right it is all a big lie.
    As far as the soldiers that are harming themselves, there are other ways of getting out of overseas duty; of course, one has to relinquish their benefits in the process.
    What it boils down to is that no one wants to go to war, and if one does, that individual has bigger problems. However, if one signs contracts then they are obligated to fulfill that contract with integrity. That is one of its main purposes, looking for an 'out' because they are faced with an obligation to do another tour is a breach of that contract. Being in a first tour and not able to deal with it, they should have not signed on again. I have reenlisted (Guard) with the knowledge that I will be going back overseas in the next year no matter who is president (not that I am a gung-ho soldier) but with open eyes, but I have signed a contract which I am bound too.
    To R.R was stationed in 1/37 Armored Division Frieburg, Germany Jan 2002-Nov.2004 OIF 1
    To those that do not want to deploy, there are easier ways to get out of the military; of course, you will have to give up your benefits???.
    One can believe anything they wish, at the end of the day I sleep well. Plus, I am finished with speaking about things while thier are people with less than nothing. And those with more judge others.
    Peace

    • Posted By: Daves3 @ 06/09/2008 12:16:01 AM

      I could only imagine what it may have been like under Saddams reign, but that is not enough of a good reason to invade a country... with that logic we would would have to invade a good half of the world to get all the bad guys. Who's next, North Korea with one million in uniform? They kill there own people just for speaking there minds... so why don't we invade them? Could it be that they have nukes already and some how we managed not to go to war with them for decades by some miracle? look at the people who planned this Iraq war: http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.vandenbergforcongress.com/images/RumsfeldHussein.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.vandenbergforcongress.com/iraq.htm&h=468&w=667&sz=31&hl=en&start=3&sig2=AVyJlJpbYzVbKdsg1qTkvw&um=1&tbnid=rQdItaXEz9WOoM:&tbnh=97&tbnw=138&ei=o69MSPWwNoTGesLPvfME&prev=/images%3Fq%3Drumsfeld%2Bhussein%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN

      A nice pic of the former secretary of defense Donnald Rumsfeld shaking hands with the very man we took down. I want our boys back home and enough of the B***** reasons of why to stay!

      • Posted By: summer4077 @ 06/09/2008 8:38:54 AM

        Exactly. Why Iraq? Why not N. Korea, China, Russia, Cuba, or any of the other countries that treat their citizens terribly? Because we know they'd give us a run for our money. They DO have WMDs, but we haven't invaded them, because we know they'd USE them on us! Bushy knew full well that Iraq didn't have squat, that's why he invaded.
        Bush Sr. had Saddam cornered in the Persian Gulf war, yet he let him go. Why? Because he knew taking him out would destabilize the entire region. Too bad Dubya didn't listen to his daddy.

        • Posted By: LC972 @ 06/09/2008 11:58:52 AM

          Ever wonder why North Korea has nukes? Your beloved lib Clinton gave them the technology.

          • Posted By: gmac32794 @ 06/09/2008 1:59:12 PM

            Please substantiate your claim that Clinton gave the North Koreans nuclear technology. I seem to recall that they got it from the Chinese.

            • Posted By: summer4077 @ 06/09/2008 2:16:31 PM

              I can tell you that Clinton did NOT give them that technology. My brother was in the US Navy during Clinton's years, on a nuclear submarine. One of their frequent missions was to patrol around N. Korea and gain intelligence about their nuke program (which is now wide knowledge that it exists). If Clinton were funding that and giving it to them, why would the military be looking for info??

          • Posted By: gmac32794 @ 06/09/2008 1:57:58 PM

            Please substantiate your comment that Clinton gave the North Koreans nuclear technology. I thought they got it from the Chinese.

  • Posted By: mikez @ 06/09/2008 4:14:02 AM

    Posted By: zades @ 06/08/2008 17:18:49
    Comment: Thank you. You're a real soldier. I doubt that some of the people on here who perpetrate as having had the military experience during war time are being genuine.

    Who wants to die for Iraq? That's the question... Especially when Bin Laden is still running around, making videos, and ensuring threats.


    Maybe its because your so afraid to come back, thats why all these people are still running around. Im retired from the military and i am now back in Baghdad working. You should try it sometime instead of complaining about Osama still being alive.

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/09/2008 12:49:23 PM

      nobody in the U.S. Military goes to die for thier country but they damn sure will kill for it and just so you know only 1.1/2 % are not wanting to go back to iraq and thier probably democrates........ most of our troops want to finish the job and then come home and not have to go back and do it over if they are pulled out before the job is done

  • Posted By: robertkjjj @ 06/09/2008 1:06:59 AM

    Just WHAT did these people think they were signing up for when they voluntarily joined the military? Starbucks barista? Target cashier? Head waiter? Parking cars? Computer programmer? Mail room sorter? Nordstrom stockroom boy? Sorry, but I have zilch sympathy for people who join the military and then whine and complain because it's hard and dangerous. It's no secret this is a intense job, and nobody put a gun to their head to make them join. Why not instead do an article on the 99% who willingly and honorably serve and do as they are told, rather on the handful of slackers and traitors and criminals that refuse to go back? Oh, and it's pathetic and obvious that the liberals on this forum only seem to agree with the 1% who break their vows and contract with the government, and not
    only dishonor themselves but the entire USA. The libs can't help showing their true colors: they hate the military, and anyone who works or leads in it.

    • Posted By: joe_mama @ 06/09/2008 5:56:20 AM

      Robert,

      It appears as though you are talking out of your right cheek. People did not "volunteer" full multiple, extended tours....especially not those in the reserve. My good friend was injured in Iraq; not from enemy fire, but from lugging around an 80 pound gear bag in 120 degree weather (blew out his knee and his shoulder). Did I mention he was 47 year old reservist on his FIRST tour in Iraq. And, no, he did not shoot himself before returning to Iraq the SECOND time, he did as he was told and now has a degenerative shoulder and knee condition (for which he is still drawing compensation) to prove it.

      By comparison, nobody served more than one tour in Vietnam....unless they volunteered.

      The reality, my dear friend, is that, without the draft, it's really easy to be cavalier and say, "just deal with it". You know you won't have to, so you can just rip on anybody who cannot "deal with it."

      BTW, I'm a liberal, and I love our military and our military leaders. I just hate people like you (and our President), who never had to deal with the realities of war and are so quick to push our brothers, sisters, cousins, aunts, and unlces into harms way.

      • Posted By: summer4077 @ 06/09/2008 8:28:21 AM

        I understand that there are soldiers and families that are upset about multiple tours. But when you sign up for the military, you essentially become property of the Federal government. You don't get to pick and choose where you go, or when. Multiple tours are unfortunate, but are part of the deal. And reservists DID sign up for that. Maybe they didn't expect to be sent to war, and definitely not so many times, but when you willingly sign up for the military in ANY form, be it full-time or reserve, you are agreeing at will to their terms. If you don't want to be sent to a combat zone, don't sign up.
        As an aside, I don't think we should be in Iraq. I didn't support us going there in the first place, and I find it funny that many of the supporters from 2003 have turned tail and cried foul now that they realize what being in Iraq means. Now that it's hit home, many people say it's unfair. Where were you back then? People like me were shunned as 'liberals' (like it's a dirty word) for not wanting Americans sent to a pointless death. We had the foresight to realize it wasn't going to be a month-long thing.

        • Posted By: joe_mama @ 06/09/2008 10:17:57 AM

          Summer,

          I hear you, but I must respectfully disagree with you regarding the reservists.

          First off, my friend was active duty for 15 years before the "peace dividend" downsized him. He took the "early-retirement-go-to-the-reserves" option. Others left the military all together. He spent the last 10 years as a recruiter in the reserves. He didn't just volunteer for extra cash or to learn computers, he did it because he felt loyalty to the services.

          Secondly: if you are in the reserves and you're due out in May, but your unit is deployed until September, guess what? You're staying until September, and possibly longer if there are no replacements available.

          In short, I do not doubt that they have to go, I'm just very concerned that we have nobody but 40-somethings left. It's an indication that our military is overtaxed, over stretched, and as thin as it's ever been in American history.

          Oh, and, for the record, I was one of the liberals who said the fall of the Soviets meant we didn't need a large Army. The so-called "peace dividend". I know now that was a mistake, and freely admit we were wrong.

          • Posted By: summer4077 @ 06/09/2008 11:27:55 AM

            First of all, thanks for the respectful reply!
            I understand your friend's frustration. My brother was in the Navy for 6 years during peace time: 1994-2000. Upon his discharge, he went into the reserves. He would have went to Iraq had he not held the position he still holds as a civilian working on an Air Force base in OK. He's one of the upper level guys that works on the planes electrical and computer systems, so I guess they felt he was more needed there.
            Point being, had he not held that job he would have went to Iraq. Our family was pretty bitter about that and happy for the near miss, but we accepted the fact that it's part of the military life. It's not always fair. Heck, most of the time it probably isn't fair, or at least it doesn't seem like it to the civilians. But that's the military. You willingly sign up to serve your country and abide by all the terms that come with it.

            That said, I commend your friend for his service to our country. He has served bravely and done his job, whether he agreed with it or not. But regarding the guys in this story, I can't neccessarily respect those that sign up without carefully considering the repercussions, then harm themselves to not go back. My dad was drafted in the Vietnam war...he went, served his time, and came home. My friend's dad, however, took the coward's way out and intentionally injured himself to avoid going. I just can't respect that. Never will. If I am ever drafted (which, as a woman, will probably not happen in the years I'll be young enough to serve) I will go. I won't jump off a roof, or shoot my foot, or whatever the case may be. I'll go, just like every male in my family has done.

  • Posted By: news8111 @ 06/08/2008 11:42:17 AM

    One wonders how many people died or were hurt during the Clinton years, protecting him from all those scorned women and Hillary.

    From LBJ through to Richard Nixon's departure by 'copter, care to tell us how many died in useless combat in 'Nam and the rest of Indo China?

    As a nation we just cannot seem to survive without finding some reason to kill innocent people in other nations, be it Japan where we dropped the A-bomb even when it was crystal clear the Japs had no fight left, to the Korean conflict, through the Vietnam years, till our Saudi/Kuwaiti financed adventures in Iraq circa 1991 and 2003. With an invasion of Grenada in between somewhere, LOL.

    We the people or we the sheep?

    • Posted By: joe_mama @ 06/09/2008 8:37:47 AM

      Moreover, the U.S. military estimated up to 1 million casualties in a Japanese land invasion.

      I'm not proud of the bomb, but in war you have to do what you have to do.

    • Posted By: rif2422 @ 06/08/2008 1:20:23 PM

      Wow, are you kidding me??? People are so so misinformed, there was no doubt that the Japanese were fighting to the end. Did you not see or hear the dude that hid out on the island and fought into the 70's? you freaking nut bag get a god **** clue if you're going to write on these message boards you're embarrassing yourself. Have you not heard of the rape of Nanking? Or something called the Bataan Death March? Seriously man inform yourself before you make yourself look silly with statements like that.

  • Posted By: R Lawrence @ 06/08/2008 3:00:07 PM

    Wrong War! Wrong Reasons! Wrong Place!!!! And most important - By the Wrong Camander In Chief!!!!!!!!!
    Anyone that argues with these wrongs is just not informed or is ill-informed.

    • Posted By: jgrisham @ 06/09/2008 3:58:38 AM

      It is Commander in Chief...not camander and anyone that argues this needs to get a dictionary.

  • Posted By: descendfromgrace @ 06/09/2008 1:48:08 AM

    robert, people who voluntarily join the military don't tend to be liberals--so what exactly are you saying really?

  • Posted By: Karenn1 @ 06/09/2008 1:03:30 AM

    Get real in Iraq we have no american troops,corporation soldier is what they now are.They have become what they thought they were their to fight.Sad and all in vain.So Anything Not to Go Back is just the ones who do not want to continue the genocide.

  • Posted By: B.B. Wolf @ 06/09/2008 12:01:49 AM

    Think things are bad now? wait until we China and Russia establish themselves as the dominant forces in the middle east. I truly sympathize with our soldiers but this fight is necessary, I don't care what Barack Obama says. McCain is right on this one.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse