No finagling at the top alone will restore the American economy. 75 percent of the economy is driven by the spending of ordinary consumers and they are frightened. Call it PTS and it will not be cured easily. The distribution of free booze and Prozac will jerk start spending again. That is the only quick fix that is possible.
We Ask: When Will the Pain Go Away?
NEWSWEEK's Business Roundtable experts assess the damage—and offer solutions.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
The big risk to the future is political, not economic
Larry Lindsey, former governor of the Federal Reserve and former economic adviser to President George W. Bush
The American economy has been the engine of global growth for the last quarter century. That has been a conscious policy choice by administrations of both parties as well as the objective of the nonpartisan Federal Reserve. We did so not only for our own benefit, but also as a means of promoting growth and stability in the emerging parts of the world, particularly in Asia. This has probably been the most successful use of America's "soft power" in our history.
No policy is without its costs and trade-offs. To achieve our ends we relied on a robust consumer sector with unprecedented access to easy and cheap credit. Homeownership rates, the number of cars per driver and the ownership of a whole range of consumer durables hit new records. But many consumers became overextended, and now American growth has hit a temporary limit. Consumer retrenchment is likely to go on for a while, probably through most of 2009, producing an extended period of slow growth and quite possibly a recession.
Although the developing world has come a long way, it is still quite dependent on American growth and will inevitably slow. After three years of record-setting global growth of 5 percent or higher, the global economy will likely slow to around 3 percent growth. Then global growth will pick up again.
The biggest risk to our future comes from politics, not economics. Politicians seeking to exploit voter unease are calling for significant changes in the bipartisan policies that have produced a quarter century of global prosperity. Demands for a rollback in free trade are particularly troubling, but so are calls for a return to punitive tax rates, significantly enhanced regulation and a retreat from America's commitment to underwriting global security. Whatever our current problems, reversing an approach that produced victory in the cold war and cemented nearly two decades of peace and prosperity is simply not a prudent course.
Bad for the Republicans, good for the Democrats
Robert Reich, secretary of Labor under Bill Clinton, and author of "Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life"
I think the reports we've been hearing that the United States will rebound in the second half of this year are overoptimistic. I don't know where the demand to create economic growth will come from. Exports can't fill the gap, and I worry that the perfect storm of rising fuel and food prices and declining home prices has put consumers in a bind. Real median incomes are lower than they were in 2000, and consumer debt is higher. People can't get money out of their homes anymore.
Consumer confidence is dropping, and the concern has been growing for years. It's a deeper phenomenon than the short-term issues. Americans work more hours than the Europeans or the Japanese, and have gone deep into debt. I don't think recovery from this recession will be vigorous.










Discuss