Why It’s Worse Than You Think

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Tommypie @ 06/09/2008 12:54:46 PM

    Americans are spoiled regarding gas prices. Just visit Europe and discover howm mcuh youpay for gas over there. Food, too, is much less expensive in the United States than overeas. But Americans have to kvetch and complain while people in the third world are dying from hunger and malnutrition. AND, we are not in a recession although the liberal media is trying to push us into one to make Mr. Bush look bad. After all, this is an election year, and B. Hussein Obama, the darling of the media, must be pictured as the solution for all thee ills of the land. We are in a economic slowdown and times are not good economically, but we are not in a recession.

    • Posted By: dubldoc @ 06/09/2008 1:04:07 PM

      Tommypie, you speak like a disingenuous Lawyer when you say we are not in a recession... ok, we havent hit the classic defintion, YET......BUT if you look at ANY poll, 85-90+% of Americans think otherwise.
      Hmmmm, "the liberal media are trying to push us into one"...., a typical Karl Rove type idiotic comment with no facts to back it up (as if any Admin types ever let THAT get in the way of public comment).
      Now, I can agree that Americans are somewhat spoiled, I've lived in four countries and can attest to that. I can also attest to the fact that Freedom is precious and I'm VERY PISSED about the way the Neocons have used the Constituion as toilet paper.... PS, I'm a recently retired Army Major, I was willing to put MY ass on the line, did you??

  • Posted By: xeyeldinTX @ 06/09/2008 1:02:19 PM

    There is a lot of arguing and finger pointing Dem vs. Rep on this board. Bottom line is we are in for some very rough times. Over the last 40 years we have systematically built a house of cards and it is now facing hurricane winds. We have eroded to almost nothing our manufacturing base, the detriment of that alone would have crippled us long ago were it not for the rise in personal spending which converted us to a mostly consumer economy. Think about this, it use to be considered shameful to have debt, but with the rise of the credit card industry it has largely become the norm. So it was almost easy to ignore the stagnating wages that has happened through the largest sector of our population, our poor and middle class. Now, loaded with personal debt, crushed by rising prices, we are faced with a national deficit that is staggering, war that is escalating in the Middle East, and the devaluation of our currency. It doesn't have to be the end of America. But it won't matter which party is in office. It will take a lot of pain and a lot of fortitude on the part of the American people to pull us out of this crisis. It will take admitting that our policies on trade and industry have led us to this past and a determination to fix them. It will take taxes and tariffs on foreign goods to encourage growth in jobs here on American soil. It will take rethinking one of the stupidest immigration policies imaginable. As one poster said, the propaganda that protectionism is a dirty word was many of the great lies bought and sold in this country. Our government's job 1 is to PROTECT this country, and one of the most important ways to do this is to protect the financial well-being of ALL its citizens. All I can say, is the cure is gonna hurt, and its going to hurt for a long time.

  • Posted By: ByeByeBush @ 06/08/2008 11:54:42 PM

    You yankess are so fookin stupid. Bread and Circuses boys, it all about the Bread and Circuses, mixed in with a good dollop of fear. It worked for the Romans, and its working in the waning years of your Empire. America is a good place to make money, and that's it. Your societ is fooked, and you have NO culture. Oh, I'll be retiring in the South of France on my vineyard, but thanks for asking patriotic wanker...

    • Posted By: onepoker @ 06/09/2008 12:55:11 PM

      the south of France would be speaking German now if it wasnt for us so piss off Wanker!

  • Posted By: technophile55 @ 06/09/2008 12:53:06 PM

    " If the army is exposed to a prolonged campaign, the nation's resources will not suffice. No nation has ever benefited from protracted warfare."
    (50 permanent US military bases in Iraq to protect the flow of oil )
    "Those skilled in doing battle do not raise troops twice... " (stay the course, stay the course, stay the course, surge)
    "A nation can be impoverished by the army .... Those in proximity to the army will sell goods at high prices." (Halliburton, Blackwater, and cronies)
    "When goods are expensive, the citizens' wealth will be exhausted. When their wealth is exhausted, the peasantry will be afflicted with increased taxes." (or the tax called inflation, if there's no longer gold currency)
    Quotes from the www.sonshi.com translation of Sun Tzu's "Art of War" ca. 500 B.C. Parenthetical comments are mine.
    Too bad Bush doesn't grasp "those who fail to learn the lessons of history ..." any better than "fool me once..."

  • Posted By: peace and love @ 06/09/2008 12:38:38 PM

    Hung Lo: I thought you guys said that the left-wingers don't pray. Get your incorrect generalizations straight.

  • Posted By: dreamwvr74 @ 06/09/2008 10:58:55 AM

    Brian1956, you really do need to get a reality check. Yes, that clown that is in the Whitehouse, is responsible for our economy eing the way that it is. When he came into office, this country had a surplus. He immediately did away with what we had in surplus and put this country into the current recession. Maybe you haven't heard, but the clown still hasn't stated how he's going to pay for the cost of the wars that he put us in. Maybe you haven't heard that not only are we destroying two countries, but we will be rebuilding them likewise, and just who is going to have to foot he cost of these wars. No I don't like taxes any more than you do, but this clown has certainly put us in a situation that will force us to pay higher taxes. Or mabe you haven't considered just who is buying all of our debt - China and Russia. What is it all about - oil and who controls the oil.

    While you state that we have an 'almost unlimted reserves', just how is it going to be replinished if we are draining it every day? It takes years to replinish what we are using. Yes, I do agree that we should develop alternate resources and we really should have started that process back in 1974, but here we are today. Special interest starts right there in the Whitehouse as you have to key people there who are sleeping with all of the lobbyists. Since when has the Vice President has as much to say about how this country is ran, as it has been with the current administration. Look at all of the crooks that came in office in 2001 through day present; look at all of the lies and stealing that has been done by this administration. All one has to do is open their eyes and see what is right in front of them. This President and his entire administration should be locked up behind bars permanently for all of the lying and stealing they have done.

    Yes, America is ready for a change!

    • Posted By: Brianb1956 @ 06/09/2008 11:36:45 AM

      It seems that you have an ax to grind with Bush and your perception that he actually controls the economy. You are wrong about that. It's not the President that controls spending, it's the congress. Please research your civics. You will become better informed. While I will agree that the war is costing us a lot of money, I do believe that stragtegically it was necessary. Since our country and economy is driven by oil... and you are free to state otherwise, our major interest is to make sure that the middle east has a certain stability.

      The better plan is for us to open up the spigot and drill our own oil. If we made this announcement the price of oil would plummet. It happened in the 80's Reagan announced that we were going to start converting coal into oil. The price per barrel dropped from $39.00 per barrel to $17.00 per barrel over night. Look it up.

      • Posted By: dubldoc @ 06/09/2008 12:32:11 PM

        Brian1956, semms you are the one needing the lesson in civics and history....the Repubs have controlled nearly all branches of Govt for 19 of the past 27 yrs, and now that the Dems have a SLIGHT majority in Congress, it does them little good as GWB has just recently found his veto pen, and only now has stopped any spending increases (you may remember Gov't has increased hugely under his tenure?)
        Does it not bother any of you 'conservatives' that under GWB's watch the dollar is down 40% against other world currencies? That mortgage deliquincies are the highest in the past 50-60 yrs?? Can any of you explain how, with the notable exception of Tommy Franks, virtually EVERY leading military officer expressed serious doubts about listening to Rumsfeld and Cheney with their dumbass idea that Iraq could be stabilized with only 100K troops?? And NOW he has the cojones to say "we should listen to the Generals"???? And were supposed to listen to yet ANOTHER campaign of 'fear and smear' by the RNC??

        Youre kidding, right??

      • Posted By: raddave @ 06/09/2008 12:05:22 PM

        Then why have we desabilized the Middle east? the President does control spending, along with Congress. He has veto power, which he has used alot since the dems gained control of congress.

  • Posted By: HungLo @ 06/09/2008 12:29:48 PM

    All the left-wingers keep on praying for economic recession so they can blame it on Bush. Lets face it, everything was fine until that piece of sh*t democrat congress came along and screwed everything up with their uncontrollable spending and economic policies. Notice how the country's economic troubles only came about over the last 2 years. Marxism at its best, what else can I say.

  • Posted By: HungLo @ 06/09/2008 12:29:17 PM

    All the left-wingers keep on praying for economic recession so they can blame it on Bush. Lets face it, everything was fine until that piece of sh*t democrat congress came along and screwed everything up with their uncontrollable spending and economic policies. Notice how the country's economic troubles only came about over the last 2 years. Marxism at its best, what else can I say.

  • Posted By: Last Redoubt @ 06/09/2008 9:03:52 AM

    Global Peak Oil. There is no economics of energy. Energy is economics. Energy is the ability to do work. Less energy, less work. Declining energy, declining work.

    The rest of the world may disconnect from the U.S. Economy, but they have hitched their wagons to the same thing that made the U.S. the power it was in the 90's: Cheap energy. Cheap energy is gone. If the U.S. cannot maintain it's standard of living with only 300 million people, how can the rest of the world hope to raise and sustain the standard of living for over 6 billioin people?

    The bottom line is that things are even worse than this article suggests. Check out www.dieoff.com to find out why humans are not smarter than yeast. Google and watch "Oil, Smoke and Mirrors". It was produced in 2006. In it they predicted exactly what is happening today and on the same scale. This is not a little downturn. Things will NOT get worse before they get better. Things will simply get worse and worse until enough dieoff occurs that we reach a sustainable global population.

    • Posted By: onepoker @ 06/09/2008 12:24:03 PM

      I would hate to wake up in the morning if I was you. The truth is as the world catches up to us in lifestyle we will have more consumers purchasing more high end items. The world is becoming more efficient which will allow more free time for people. Life is getting better for everyone on the planet. Yes there is suffering in the world but there was suffering before its just now the people who are suffering have a bigger voice. Have a little faith in the world its a big nasty cruel place but there are good people out there doing good things. Just look at the good The Gates foundation is doing. Before he was doing charity his buisness was a huge creator of good in the world You can *** about him creating a monopoly but no one can argue his innovations haven't made the planet better. How much more efficent is your office with windows instead of a typewriter.

  • Posted By: WhatJustice? @ 06/09/2008 11:51:23 AM

    I 'm one that's not look for the govn't to make life better. Gave up one that one. I am looking for them to stop making it worse by wasting taxdollars! While you're asking what you can do, ask how your country is going to be accountable for your elected officials actions and spending. Answer: leave it for you and your kids to deal with.

    • Posted By: dubldoc @ 06/09/2008 12:19:25 PM

      WhatJustice, I agree with your cooments about wasting tax dollars...we could start with what will likely be the LARGEST (adjusted for inflation) TAXPAYER EXPENDITUE IN AMERICAN HISTORY...no, not WWII, I'm talking about dumbazz GWB and the Iraq war!!! Next time a 'conservative' tells you how they'll protect your money...RUN!!

  • Posted By: Brianb1956 @ 06/09/2008 10:25:55 AM

    Any idiot who believes that the president has anything to do with our economy crisis is completely brainwashed by the liberal media. What happened in 2006? Democrats called for change and they were elected into power. Well people, what change has occured? Higher fuel prices, a slowdown in our economy, jobs are being lost, and we are continuing down a road where economic disaster is the ultimate end. The democrats wanted change - they got it - at our expense.

    Now we have a democrat running for president that is still spouting the word change. The problem is, change hasn't been defined in any way. What is that change? Democrats in 2006 didn't define change and you see where that has gotten us. What's Obama's plan? $10 per gallon gasoline? Maxine Waters spelled out her plan of action - Socialize the oil companies. She's a what? That's right she's a democrat. If you don't see where the democrats are taking us, you live in a bubble and have no concept of what a socialized government will bring us. We are almost there, putting Obama in office will seal the deal. Welcome to the socialist government of USSA.

    Drill out own resources. Get off the foreign oil bandwagon. Prices will come back down to a reasonable level. Write your Congressmen/Senators/President and tell them to lift the moritorium on drilling in our territorial waters and Anwar. We have enough oil reserves underground in those areas to last over 100 years. Plenty of time for the development of alternative fuel sources. Build Nuclear plants. Cheap, safe energy. Oil from Shale in the mountians - cost per barrel - $25.00. Almost unlimited reserves. Oil from Coal - Cost per barrel - $30.00. People, we are being deceived by our democratic controlled government because of special interests and their march for socialism. Wake up before it's too late.

    • Posted By: Brianb1956 @ 06/09/2008 10:54:22 AM

      One other thing - do you enjoy being able to post comments like this? With a socialist government the freedom of speech you enjoy today will be taken away. For all you Bush haters, that means you won't be able to tell anyone out there how much you hate him anymore. Just think of how that will make you feel. Well, I guess it won't matter anyway because your misguided and feeble attempts to blame one man are juvenile anyway. It's amazing how you, who hate Bush, fail to recognize the way congress has handled the economy. Keep putting career politicians in office that are robbing you by selling the American people a bill of goods that will lead to our demise. It is a real shame that the education system has failed you by not teaching that it's congress who controls government spending and not the President.

      • Posted By: Brianb1956 @ 06/09/2008 11:56:03 AM

        So blame him. I'm not stopping you. Support Obama. I'm not stopping you there either. I'm sure you voted for Jimmy Carter too. I suppose you felt his policies were better than Bush's.

        I never said I supported everythng Bush has done but he's not to blame for everything on the planet like most anti-Bush bloggers are so freely saying. Oh, one more thing - Congress does control the spending this country does. They are the ones responsible for the trouble we are in. You don't know the rationale for any trade agreement. You can ONLY speculate.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 06/09/2008 12:14:15 PM

          Actually I was only nine when Carter was elected, so no I did not vote for him.

      • Posted By: raddave @ 06/09/2008 11:19:33 AM

        You are getting socialism and communism mixed up. Countries such as Germany and France have socialistic systems and the citizens there enjoy more personal liberties than we do in our own country

        • Posted By: Brianb1956 @ 06/09/2008 11:48:31 AM

          You think so? Go live there.

          • Posted By: raddave @ 06/09/2008 12:10:48 PM

            I haved lived there, for the past three years, defending the freedoms that you enjoy.

    • Posted By: joe_mama @ 06/09/2008 11:20:23 AM

      On the contrary, brian,

      1) President Bush (not Congress) sent us to war. War creates uncertainty. Investors don't like uncertainty.

      2) The President must sign off on any budget that Congress sends him. There is no line item veto, so, if he doesn't like it, he can just send it back to Congress and have them re-do it.

      3) Gov't spending is a major part of the macroeconomic picture. If I have to explain what that means, you won't get it.

      4) The President negotiates trade agreements and tariffs, not Congress (President Bush has been in a trade war with EU since he came to office).

      5) The President interprets and applies regulatory controls to the financial markets. As early as 2003, the SEC knew that hedge funds were dangerous and need to be regulated. President Bush resisted, and, as a result, hedge funds are essential secret investments which can do really well -- like CT-based Amaranth Advisers, which made $9 billion by early 2006-- or really poorly --like CT-based Amaranth Advisers, which went on to lose $5 billion in one week (later in 2006) due to risky investment strategies which they were not required to dislcose (source: http://gbr.pepperdine.edu/071/hedgefunds.html).

      More on regulation: "The problem wasn't necessarily too much regulation or too little," said Ross Levine, a Brown University professor who studies the banking system. "The problem was regulators did not adapt to financial innovation and make sure that information was transparent. No regulator looked broadly at the conflicts of interests being created." (source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/31/AR2008033102356_2.html?nav=rss_email/components&sid=ST2008033100743).

      In other words, the President did not direct regulators to consider these potential conflicts of interest (such as selling and rating the same securities, or monitoring loan brokers and no-doc loans).


      So, yes, Brian, the President plays a major role in the economy. You may want to try doing a little research before you post.

  • Posted By: crockette @ 06/09/2008 12:11:43 PM

    How long before we have to strap on our six-guns ( nine mils), to protect our lives and our goods from those that will be losing it all??

  • Posted By: SKILLIONAIRE @ 06/09/2008 9:44:18 AM

    AS AN ECONOMIST I LAUGH AT ALL YOUR MISUNDERSTANDINGS

    • Posted By: onepoker @ 06/09/2008 12:05:03 PM

      Just cause you got an A in consumer math doesn't make you an economist!

  • Posted By: ljw54321 @ 06/09/2008 12:00:39 PM

    Brian1954....what world do you live in? we had to invade Iraq to "bring some stability to the middle east? what stability? the run up in oil prices since we invaded was largely driven by anxiety and uncertainty resulting from GHB's idiotic decision to invade. Also, it was Jimmy Carter who first promoted turning coal, tar sands, oil shale, etc into fuel (remember synfuels). And Ronald Reagan who ridiculed it during the campaign. this article we're commenting on makes the point that the US economy no longer dominates the oil market. Your reference to Reagan's announcement does not hold....I suppose your solution would involve drilling in ANWAR and off the Florida coast, and bomb,bomb,bombing Iran.

  • Posted By: Micky Marsh @ 06/09/2008 11:44:01 AM

    Yes, I hate the word quick fix, only lead to pot - holes which eventually will sink the economy, no thanks.

  • Posted By: justwondering @ 06/09/2008 11:38:19 AM

    I have read all of these comments. I am wondering if anyone has the answers to these questions.
    How much of the billions spent on the Iraq war goes to the wonderful people in our military?
    How much goes to U.S. companies that support the military, companies that hire people ?
    Why do the Dems promote class warefare by making the "bad" people that make the most money pay more taxes?
    Why do so many people look to the gov't to make their lives better? Even JFK had it right by saying "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country"
    Why don't you write an uplifting article vs. a pessemistic one. Maybe something to empower everyone to pull themselves up and not vent at politicians.

  • Posted By: taylor1313 @ 06/09/2008 11:14:21 AM

    Busy is an idiot and an imbecile. How anyone can still defend this man is insane. This moron has used the military incorrectly just so he could try and control more oil. He has devastated the economy because all he cares about is his rich brethren. If he would crack down on what the huge corporations are doing then a huge portion of the economic problems we are facing could be avoided. The miltary is on the verge of self inmploding because we are overusing the current troops and not replenishing our numbers. Who would want to enlist with this man as their commander in cheif? I served as a SGT for 6 years in the Army and did my duty. I live in the middle class. I see my military brethren and middle class brethren hurtying because this jerk wanted more oil and it makes me sick.

  • Posted By: ppcgm @ 06/09/2008 11:08:43 AM

    Worse than we think ... maybe ... it's certainly not worse than some of us think, because I for one think it's going to continue getting worse for some time to come. The wealth and power have gone where the manufacturing went. The economic power of the petroleum exporting countries will be short lived as they blow it all on fancy baubles for the few in ruling power. But the enduring transfer of wealth and power to China, India and even to our Central and South American neighbors who have been soaking up the manufacturing like thirsty sponges will endure long after the U.S. is a sad footnote in the history books. We gave it all away. And now it's too late to get it back, at least within the lifetimes of most who are reading this. Prices are increasing globally and few of those commodities are produced here anymore. So our declining wealth will continue to flow out as prices rise on the imports we are now dependent on. It's not just oil. Go down to Sears and tell them you want a car battery that was made in the U. S. There aren't any. It's a long list. And the international inflation is going to suck us dry, thanks to idiotic trade agreements and failure to protect American jobs and American industries by short-sighted politicians who still pretend that protectionism is a dirty word. The results of that foolish and blindered thinking will drag us down into the longest lasting economic depression since the sinking of the Spanish armada. We do all remember when Spain was a world power, right ? The failure to protect the American standard of living has brought us to the brink of financial disaster. And all the Fed's feeble efforts to pull us back from the edge of that cliff will prove to be a drop of water in the ocean.

  • Posted By: dmihailescu @ 06/09/2008 10:42:33 AM

    US is in deep trouble in the long run.
    The economy is already running on fumes because of the huge debt and trade deficit.
    How long will we find lenders to keep us on life support for the promise of a spectacular US rebound?
    I see the same technology used overseas as we use in US, so why would someone invest in US rather than Asia where the slave labor cost is 10-15 times lower than American labor.
    I just can't picture an American being 10-15 times more productive than a slave using the same technology?
    The only way to rich parity is basically to decrease wages in US.
    If you thought education is our cutting edge, think again: the education is almost free overseas and we import plenty of talent by entancig it with a higher pay. Once that's gone, there would be no more competitive for the US economy and that would be the end.

  • Posted By: jpmonte @ 06/09/2008 10:42:16 AM

    Right On, Brian...glad someone out there gets it!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse