Out and Down
If history is any guide, Hillary Clinton's next battle will be with the painful reality of loss.
When does reality—not just the political, but the personal—finally penetrate the emotions of a losing presidential candidate? For Hillary Clinton, it was not last Tuesday night. She had just given a semi-defiant non-concession speech to Barack Obama and had repaired to the 14th floor at Baruch College in Manhattan, where the bar was open and her big money people were milling about, half-watching the cable talk shows on large flat-screen TVs. As CNN's Jeffrey Toobin described "the deranged narcissism of the Clintons," many of the Hillaryites muttered about the press. "A lot of the women, and not just the women, were very emotional about how she'd been treated during the campaign, the sexism, and wanted her not to yield," Clinton's national finance co-chair, Mark Aronchick, recalled to NEWSWEEK. Aronchick says he told the candidate that she needed to get on Obama's ticket. Hillary did not respond, but she seemed calm and grateful for all the support. "She was patting her heart, listening very closely, taking it in," says Aronchick. Hillary's husband "was walking around chewing on a cigar, chatting it up with people," says Aronchick. The ex-president appeared, to Aronchick at least, to be in a great mood.
It is not easy to deliver the bad news to a candidate. On a conference call the next day, several of her fellow senators shied away. "That call was basically: 'You have time to settle this. It's been a tough race, you must be exhausted, take your time'," says a participant of the call who declined to be identified discussing a private conversation. A short while later, however, with superdelegates swinging fast to Obama, some members of the House took a tougher line on a second call. Barney Frank, a veteran Massachusetts congressman with a sharp tongue, told Clinton that she should announce her support of Obama "as soon as possible," says someone who was on this call and asked to remain anonymous for the same reason. Clinton guardedly responded, "I'm moving in that direction." Someone asked, "When?" She replied, "Next week." That's when Charlie Rangel, the gravel-voiced New York congressman who is the powerful chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, spoke up and pressed—hard. Rangel would not reveal exactly what he told Clinton, but he later quipped to reporters that he and his fellow New York congressmen "are with her to the end. But we thought the end was the end." The candidate finally faced the political facts. "I'll do it Friday," she said. (She did it last Saturday. In a gracious concession speech at the National Building Museum in Washington, she endorsed Obama. "Today, as I suspend my campaign, I congratulate him," she told about 2,000 cheering supporters.)
Clinton betrayed no emotion on the phone call. "She's not a voice cracker," says a top adviser who did not wish to be identified talking about her personality. "She's good at the game face … It was very matter-of-fact." Indeed, on the plane down to Washington late Tuesday night, when she could have been up forward, "pretending to sleep," Hillary was wandering through the cabin, eating pizza, joking and telling her supporters "not to worry" about how she was doing, says longtime friend Susie Tompkins Buell, who was on the plane. Another aide, who also asked to not be identified, said: "She isn't going to crawl under the covers for the next six months. How many times have they danced on her grave?" The Clintons are accustomed to public humiliations. Though Bill Clinton lashed out at Vanity Fair reporter Todd Purdum as "sleazy," "slimy" and a "scumbag" for printing persistent rumors that Clinton has been misbehaving on the private jet of a billionaire friend, a Hillary strategist who did not want to be quoted says that she and her husband are resigned to prurient assaults. Theirs is a history of coming back from the sort of defeats that would mortify most people.
And yet history strongly suggests that Hillary Clinton is in for a tough time. Whether it is called "decompression" or, perhaps more honestly, depression, the crash is almost inevitable. "To run for the presidency, to come close and lose, you can be the most well-adjusted person on earth, but there is no one who is not going to find that an enormous shock," says presidential historian Michael Beschloss. In retrospect, Hillary was beaten in early May, after she lost badly in North Carolina and won narrowly in Indiana. The campaign, in one of many blunders, had raised expectations for both states that were dashed. Yet, perhaps to convince herself, Hillary hung on to hope—indeed, she seemed fiercely, almost giddily resilient in the final month. "The campaign bubble is made up of fervent supporters and passionate crowds that want her to win, and whatever the pundits are saying, whatever the math is, there's still that thought that maybe we can pull this out," says Doris Kearns Goodwin, author of biographies about Lincoln, FDR and LBJ. "I also think that maybe a candidate intuitively knows, as in Hillary's case, that once she pulled out, the depression would really sink in."
Hillary could put off the day of emotional reckoning by becoming Obama's running mate. But she may have wrecked whatever small chance she had of winning a place on the ticket by her stubborn performance last Tuesday night when she asked, "What does Hillary want?" One thing she wants is to be back in the White House, at least as No. 2. Some of her own top aides cringed a bit at her performance—"too strident," says one of them, asking to remain anonymous as he described last-second wrangling over the tone of the speech. Senator Clinton ran the risk that Obama would see her bid as bullying, staging a shakedown that would make him seem weak. She later tried to tamp down speculation, but the damage was done. (Obama said he planned on taking his time with his veep choice.)
Hillary's political life is hardly over. She can go back to the Senate and perhaps play a leading role in winning a massive health-care bill for a possible Obama administration. Sen. Ted Kennedy returned to the Senate after losing to Jimmy Carter in 1980 and became, arguably, one of the greatest lawmakers since Henry Clay and Daniel Webster. But Kennedy had seniority after serving 18 years in the Senate, notes Goodwin, while Hillary is 36th in seniority out of 49 Democratic senators—many of whom backed Obama. Kennedy was able to become a key member of several important committees, and "he had also loved the Senate all along. He always felt that it was his home," says Goodwin. Some suggest Hillary could be Senate majority leader, but that seems doubtful. The current majority leader, Harry Reid, is popular with colleagues. She might run for governor of New York in 2010 against incumbent David Paterson, but "if he were to run again, and he was considered a popular governor, I think it would be very hard to run against him, another African-American in a Democratic primary," says Goodwin.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: mrubchak @ 11/16/2008 2:20:42 PM
Comment:
exert are you serious or just congenitally illitertate??? exert ia verb--look it up. You are after a noun. Let me help: the word id excerpt
Posted By: mrubchak @ 11/16/2008 2:13:05 PM
Comment: It is THEIR standard not "there." Before sounding off, learn to spell
Posted By: Nins @ 07/11/2008 12:20:37 AM
Comment: Know why McCain wants to distance himself from former Senator Phil Gramm? It is not just because of Gramm's recent obnoxious remarks calling Americans "a nation of whiners" and that unemployed Americans are in "a mental recession." In fact, those remarks were so obnoxious that I wonder if they were engineered just to provide McCain an excuse for publicly distancing himself from Gramm. This issue is a lot deeper than it looks on the surface.
When Gramm was a Senator he was chair of the Committee on Banking, and in that capacity he was able to push through the legislation now known as the "Enron Loophole." This loophole allowed US investment banks to bypass the Federal regulations governing futures trading, and is the reason why the investment banks were able to falsely inflate the prices of oil, wheat, corn and other commodities through massive futures trading, causing your costs of gas, heating oil and food to go through the roof.
Gramm was a member of McCain's campaign team, but now Gramms' name is turning to mud. In addition to the Enron loophole, Gramm pushed through the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act in 1999, which got rid of the laws that seperate banking, insurance and brokerage activities in America. Essentially, this Act did away with all of the good laws written after the Great Depression to protect us from another Wall Street/Banking Industry collapse. That's right, Gramm stripped the system of it's safe guards nine years ago, and guess what? The value of the dollar has nose-dived, Wall Street is highly unstable, and we are in the midst of a recession.
Now you could say that this is not Gramm's fault, that he didn't know what the outcome of his actions would be. However, it turns out that the same investment banks that benefited from the Enron loophole and from the Gramm Act gave more than a million dollars to Gramm's campaign. Uh oh. A Congressional hearing is going to be convened to investigate this. And McCain wants to have noting to do with Gramm, wants us to forget that Gramm has been a key player on McCain's campaign team. Gramm was McCain's campaign CO-CHAIR and LEADING ECONOMIC ADVISER.
With Gramm in the driver's seat as his leading economic adviser, now you know why economists and analysts are saying that McCain's economic policy plans are untenable.