Out and Down

Explain to your daughter why she will lose the choice over her body because he parents didnt vote for the candidate with the closest platform to the one they supported great choice more war and a worse economy!

HEY ! MS.

DO YOU LIKE THE WAY BILL CLINTON USES THE MOUTH OF WOMEN AS HIS WEENIE REPOSITORY ?

DO YOU LIKE THE WAY YOUR HERO WITCH HILLARY STANDS BY HER ADULTEROUS MAN ?

SOME HERO ?

Not completely true we have a Republican Form of democracy for a reason and we have the Electoral College, close though!

Bono, AMEN to that!

Well spoken

Please have the decency to back up your claims Judas!

To bboopster45: Based on your line of questions, I have to assume one of the three things.

(1.) Either you failed basic American history where it is written in all text books that a person born in America with the slightest fraction of African blood is to be classified a 'Negro' (aka African-American). Yes, we all know this is stupid logic but it served the purpose of our nation's institutionalized racist agenda. But I do find it interesting that after 140 years since Lincoln and his Union soldiers freed the slaves, the hypocritical Moral Evangelical Right has remained quiet and not a peep from them to address the illogical inconsistencies.

(2.) ....Or you are foreign born and understandably see this as an absurd issue. A man born from a Kenyan father and American women is somehow 'not' classified as a Kenyan-American, or an American of Kenyan descent. The absurdity also applies to Tiger Woods. Although is Tiger's father is 50%-African-American, 25%-Chinese, 25%-Native-American and his mother is 100%-Thai; the American institutions still (indirectly) classify Tiger as 'Black'. And with all Tiger's money and with all Obama's political connections, America and especially the religious right & Appalachia folks still continue to push these two great Americans into boxes that makes them feel secure, untainted and better about themselves.

(3.) ....Or maybe this was a weak attempt on your part to discredit Barack Obama, or insinuate things that are not true. If that is the case you have failed miserably because you are so pathetically transparent with your predispositions in full bloom.

Will somebody please explain to ALL these Hillary supporters that Barack is NOT to blame for Hillary;s loss? I cleary dont see how they think they owe Obama payback. How about Hillary's poor campaign team?? and Obama had no say in the DNC party rules! He did NOT make them

As someone posted before - if you seek revenge, start by digging two graves. If McCain wins and it is the Hillary supporters that put him over the top, you'll get one month of satisfaction followed by three years and eleven months that will be just like the last eight years. If you think the price is worth it, then my all means, vote for McCain. I don't think too many people will.

A truth is that it doesn't matter which Democratic candidate was chosen as far as the general election is concerned: The Republican are going to lose the presidency in November; it happens that it will be to Obama and not Hillary, but 2008 is a year of correction and it's the Republicans that will be corrected.

I would suggest that the heightened over/hypersensitivities need to be toned down a notch or two here and everybody just CALM DOWN. The article is not sexist.The suggestion for depression in Hillary was because she came sooo CLOSE that she could TASTE it. That's not the case for the others (white men) whom both she AND Obama knocked out of the race early on, clearly giving them enough time for defeat to be felt as an eventuality/eventual reality. They had enough time to adjust to defeat. That is also the reason why examples such as Kennedy (a man) et. al. losing close races wee given. The depression factor isn't exclusive to females; it's because of how CLOSE she got. The same would have been said of Obama if the results were in reverse. It is an historic election on the Democratic side, which is why it was so covered by the media, unlike Huckabee's and Romney's performances (plus they didn't garner - either one of them - HALF of the popular Republican vote, like Hillary and Barack split the Democratic popular vote). To ignore the historical significance of the Democratic primary and/or to ignore the horserace, edge-of-your-seat closeness of the whole thing, and act like the Republican primaries should hae been covered the same way, or other races between all white men, is PREPOSTEROUS. No one even knew at the onset of this race if both she AND Obama would be knocked out by any or all of the other Democratic contenders due to sexism and racism, as all the rest were white males (Richardson half white and half hispanic). That they were the ONLY two contenders left is remarkable; and, sexism, therefore, was no more the reason for her campaign failure - (Obama's campaign was run differently/different stragedy - focusing on different/caucus states, and more high brow campaign on different theme ("change" vs. experience, i.e. Washington insider/old politics) - plus, he didn't have to let go of top campaign strategists/senior advisors, like Hillary had to let go of Mark Penn, or have Bill sticking his foot in his mouth for him, like he did, stumping for Hillary, and he didn't go into debt) - her failure was no more the result of sexism, than his marginal victory was due reverse racism. It's going to CONTINUE to dominate the media spotlight just because of who they are, a black person and a woman. You can't act like we are post sexist or post racial until we know how this all plays out until the end (the GE isn't yet, and we still don't know yet if Obama may choose Clinton as V.P, still making her the historically first woman V.P., while he becomes the first African American president, should their ticket win the election). As long as history could still be being made here, the media ISN'T going to let this alone. We all just need to take a little breather here.

Retrothyme maybe you should remove your strap on and shove it down your throat to shut yourself up.

gee retrothyme i don't see where the artical was intended to single out women. It just so happens that the person who lost is a woman. You should take off that strap on that your wearing and stuff it down your ignorant throat to shut yourself up.