Not the Party She Planned

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

As expected, the meat of Clinton's speech was her endorsement of Obama, who sealed up the nomination on Tuesday night after he earned the majority of the party's delegates. After such a long and divisive series of primary elections, Clinton's support of the Illinois senator was considered to be the first—and most important—step for the party to rally together to face the presumptive Republican nominee John McCain in November. "We may have started on separate journeys—but today, our paths have merged," Clinton said, referencing her former disagreements with Obama. "And we are all heading toward the same destination, united and more ready than ever to win."

But to some supporters, it wasn't enough. "It doesn't matter what she says here," said Lee Richmond, who had voted for Hillary and drove from Baltimore to hear the speech. "Voting for president is a big deal. "I still want to hear what he says. He hasn't said very much yet." Another supporter said she was reluctant to consider Obama and wasn't yet convinced that Clinton truly meant her endorsement of the Illinois senator. "She just ran against this guy for over a year, supporting him now is something that she has to say."

That's exactly it, said Larry Sabato, a political science professor at the University of Virginia. "It has to be a full-throated endorsement because she has no choice; she still has ambitions," he said. Many who came to see Clinton speak said that the vice presidency would be nice, with one supporter saying he didn't want to "jinx her chances" by talking about it. Clinton told lawmakers early in the week that she was "open" to the idea before meeting privately with Obama on Thursday evening. Campaign spokesman Elleithee said his candidate is not interfering in the selection process and there have been no official discussions. Supporters also buzzed about Clinton being nominated as a Supreme Court justice should Obama win this fall, and, of course, another presidential bid in 2012.

For now, Clinton's speech expressed few reservations about an Obama presidency. Her speech made generous references to Obama as "the next president" and at one point, she began listing what she said were the country's biggest problems (health care, high energy prices, the war in Iraq) following each bullet point with a shout "and that's why we need to help elect Barack Obama president!" The gesture of throwing her movement's support behind Obama was more than history has required of political second-place finishers. In 1976, Ronald Reagan did the bare minimum in his half-hearted endorsement of Gerald Ford, and did very little when asked to campaign for him. And, says Sabato, "look what happened to him."

Clinton clearly was looking to her political future. But this one day in Washington was clearly an odd experience for the Clinton family, which hasn't had to make a formal political concession since 1980 when Bill lost his re-election bid as governor of Arkansas. Of course, surrendering quietly is also not very Clinton-like. Bill did fight back and the voters returned him to office two years later.

© 2008

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Payday Loan Advocate @ 10/21/2008 5:01:24 AM

    In the classic novel, Brave New World, author Aldous Huxley issues a ???warning??? of what would happen if the government took complete control of our daily lives. First published in 1932, Huxley wrote the piece in speculation of how his hometown of London may look in the year 2540, pending the continuation of programs to end war, conflict, suffering, and antagonistic (aka: ???free???) thought. In other words, it is what the world would look like if nobody could utilize their voice, or live how people today want to, free of the iron fist of the various levels of government. Many people criticized Huxley for this, his fifth and most well-known novel, upon its release and still do to this day. Controversy or not, several seeds have been planted in America, which have made for some frightening similarities to this classic piece of literature. Yes, the socialist and communist movements have been around for several generations in America, though it hasn???t taken such prevalence until this one. This is thanks, in no small part, to politicians who are trying to put so many things under the exclusive control of the government. In parts of Los Angeles, for example, crooked elected officials have passed restrictions on where fast food restaurants can set up new shops. Yes, that???s correct; the ???man??? is telling you that you can???t go get a hamburger in South Los Angeles, and you???re going to like it. But, what are worse are state and national politicians, who are trying to take away your access to fast and easy payday loans. This is because the politicians are just trying to muster up enough votes for office, so that they can further their own self-interests. Surely, action is needed to fight the government???s ever-tightening stranglehold on all of us. Post Courtesy of Personal Money StoreProfessional Blogging TeamFeed Back: 1-866-641-3406Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.htmlBlog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/

  • Posted By: Payday Loan Advocate @ 10/08/2008 11:59:09 PM

    The payday loan industry has been the key target for corrupt politicians, from all sides, seeking an increase in voter support at the expense of what???s best for the general public. Governors of several states including, Georgia, North Carolina, and Oregon completely drove payday loan businesses out of their states. The negative effects of driving out payday loan companies from these states, appears to have not been the best idea for its??? citizens. For instance, in Georgia, the bankruptcy filings, bounced checks and foreclosures all grew overwhelmingly after the cash advance option was taken away from them. In spite of this downbeat information, following the closure of payday loans in these states, several other governors continue to try and follow suit. Leading national politicians, such as presidential hopeful Barack Obama, are now making it their mission to eliminate the industry completely once and for all. Should such efforts be judged successful, the possibility is very real for increased unemployment rates, more debt, more foreclosures and an even more crippled economy.

    Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
    Professional Blogging Team
    Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
    Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
    Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/

  • Posted By: Payday Loan Advocate @ 10/04/2008 3:29:35 AM

    High profile politicians, including Barack Obama, are seeking to limit the American peoples??? access to on-demand, short term financial assistance. Some cities and towns are trying to impose restrictions on where these legitimate businesses can set up shop. Even worse, several states, including Georgia and North Carolina, have successfully imposed all-out bans on the industry, with several more attempting to follow suit. Citizens all across the nation are seeking to have their voices heard by fighting legislation that would obliterate the <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com">Payday Loans</a> industry nationwide; Obama, and other misinformed political officials, are pushing for a complete ban in the name of personal political gain, regardless of the hundreds of thousands of potential lost jobs in an already turbulent economy.

 
 
The Peek
 
 
MEDIA

Just a year after buying The Wall Street Journal, the press rapscallion has revitalized the fusty paper.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu