Vote for McBama

Kboogie: CNN's liberal piece on Mcain (WoW, real suprise there) has already been discredited and shunned by even Demorcatic party insiders as not holding merit. Look, do you not rememeber the John Kerry swiftboat deal? I'm sure that was hogwash to you then. Flip the coin, and suddenly Dems that served with Mcain are aouthrized to say anything to shame him and you gobble it up.

When the man can't lift his arms above his chest due to the torure he endured there, what kind of special treatment do you believe he got?

You people who have the audacity, the dispicably vile ability, to call a man a traitor after he physically sacrificed his body for the good of his nation should be drug out somewhere and have the same kind of inflictions cast upon you so that you can know what sacrifice is. It is shameful to call someone who is now physically disabled BECAUSE of his servise to his country a traitor--just because it serves your own political agenda. It makes you classless, and low--and yet again shows how loathsome the Dem party really is.

Even your own party leaders call him nothing short of war hero moron!

By the way Kboogie--when you say womanizer, do you reference this on the same level as the Clinton-Lewinski scandal--when Bill lied right to your face on national TV about it?

I'll bet you would have voted for him again anyway.

These issues don't matter.

Pow's against Mcain--not okay
Swift boat against KErry--okay
Womanizing Mcain--not okay
Lewinski--that's okay

You don't care about these things unless it is a republican it is happening to.

You will vote Dem even if the Devil himself was your candidate for pres.

'I ceased to advertise my
mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to
suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to
whites.'

From Dreams of My Father : 'I found a solace in
nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity
against my mothers race.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'There was something about
him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself,
maybe. And white.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'It remained necessary to
prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to
the black masses, to strike out and name names.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'I never emulate white men
and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It
was into my father's image, the black man, son of
Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought
in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm,
DuBois and Mandela.'


Will the Obama damage control bots please explain how any of these statements would be acceptable in ANY context? Furthermore, has anyone yet to ask dear ole Michelle if she's ever used the word WHITEY before?

JUST SO YOU KNOW I'M SICK OF ALL THE THIS IS HISTORIC TIME FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT BULL *** IT WILL BE HISTORIC WHEN WE CAN ELECT SOMEONE WHO DON'T LIE TROUGH THIER TEETH TO GET ELECTED ALL THIS IS BULL *** PLAIN AND SIMPLE THE PARTIES DON'T CARE HOW WE FEEL THEY JUST DO WHATEVER THEY CAN TO GET THIER PERSON ELECTED AND WE FIGHT IT OUT ON THESES *** BLOGS WAKE UP PEOPLE ALL OF THE CANIDATES SUCK REAL BAD ARE CHOICES ARE DUMB OR DUMBER WHICH ONE DO YOU LIKE ???

Chindog your an idiot. How many years we have been voting for white presidents is irrelavant as it pertains to that argument. In order to move beyond racial divisiveness, we have to come to a point where ehnicity holds no bearing what so ever, Saying that it is now okay to vote for someone based on the color of their skin because we haven't before is postumously absurd. It does nothing for movement into equality, and only highlights the fact that we have not moved an inch closer towards civil unity within this country.

The premise of civil rights is that all men are created equal and should not be judged based upon the background OF ethnicity.

It does not come with a tag line I have ever read that said--oh, wait--unless there is a good reason to do so.

We should be choosing the leader of our country based on qualification--not to make history, not because he is one color or another.

True racism lies within the anger of people like you who become irrate when this fact is pointed out.

If Obama is elected president, I hope it is based on the merits of his ability to lead us--not just because he is black.

Hypocrite: a person who pretends to have virtues, moral, or relegious beliefs, principles etc,. that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie his or her public statements.

Arguing not to make decisions based on race, while you vote for a man based soley on the color of his skin IS hypocritical.

You can choose to be politicaly correct (like that has gotten us far) about the issue, or look at the true conotation of its nature. Allowing any race, white or black, to practice such measures is an act grounded within the rationale of guilt or pity alone, and does absolutely nothing to help propel the cause of civil liberty any more forward.

Be PC

But don't be stupid

Glad to know that out of all the incoherent postings strung about within the rhetoric, you believe it is I, who am most in need as it pertains to self-impovement. I will make sure to edit the content of my future posts so that they may more adequately represent the proper usage of our English language.

But while you are making suggestions for the likes of future reference--why don't you give Jack999 a whirl--cause I can't understand a word he is saying.

Or, is there just something in particular about me that you felt was more worth your while?

Oh happy day!!!!!!!!!! Bad news for McGremlin.......

Today's Gallup - "Since Hillary Clinton decided to concede the Democratic nomination to Barack Obama last week, Obama has established a lead over Republican John McCain in general-election polling. Obama's gains have come more from women than men, though he has picked up among both groups in recent days.
Obama's lead among women has now expanded from five percentage points to 13."

Wait guys, it gets better..........

"One of Clinton's core groups of supporters during the nomination phase of the campaign was older women. During the last few days of her active candidacy, Clinton led McCain by 51% to 41% among women aged 50 and older, while Obama trailed McCain among this group, 46% to 43%.

Since Clinton suspended her campaign, older women's vote preferences have shifted toward Obama, so that he now enjoys a six-point advantage over McCain."

Oh happy day!!!!!! The TRAITOR, CROOK, FRAUD, WOMANIZER is slowly dying!!!

SPORTLOCK09 .......your understanding of Obama books is just like a Kindergarten kids trying to figure out what's the "theme" of the book,those matured adult had reads it foind very manifest and fasinating of one's truly visons. Ask your uncle Sam help to read on your behalf for your better understanding.

If you read his book, The Audacity of Hope, you can see clearly not only that he is a man of conviction but that he does have a plan for our domestic woes. Details of his plans are also posted on his website. On a cursory view of his statements without knowledge of the aforementioned details make him look like he's being politically expedient, but in fact, he simply holds views that do not neatly fit into the media's cookie cutter narrative.

Sadly, it is not about the issues Chindog.

What Hill wants is to undermine the election of Obama, make sure Mcain is elected, so that she can run again in 2012--that is all that matters. Haven't you seen enough of how the Clinon's operate to know this. Her party insiders are probably already privy to it. They all know it, and it will just take some time for the unravelling plot to trickle down to everyone else. When it does, I just hope that all these stauch Clinton supporters remember, and realize, it has never been about the issues--it has always been about the Clinton's

Joe: You are still trying to argue that 95% of African Americans voted for Obama because they all believe in his views. Can you explain why he does not carry that number with any other demographic, or why not even a white president that I can recall has ever carried such an overwhelming majority with ANY demographic in the past?

Trying to convinve people that it just so happens that this particular group of people are the only ones who side with his views so consistenty because of his stance on issues, and not because they are of the same ethnic background is kind of a hard sell.

Comment: MCCAIN OBAMA
Income Avg. tax bill Avg. tax bill
Over $2.9M -$269,364 +$701,885
$603K and up -$45,361 +$115,974
$227K-$603K -$7,871 +$12
$161K-$227K -$4,380 -$2,789
$112K-$161K -$2,614 -$2,204
$66K-$112K -$1,009 -$1,290
$38K-$66K -$319 -$1,042
$19K-$38K -$113 -$892
Under $19K -$19 -$567

I want people to look at what kind of savings you will get if your voting for McCain and if your voting for Obama. Take a look and you tell me who you are voting for.