Dealing in Justice

Every constitution,i
in every democratic government provide guarantee,
humanrights.

but it is right say,
some of the countries ,
human right are badlly voilated and sbused.

We should inquire the reason,
behind this act.

World powers see their interests,
providing protection to their interests,
they have appointe their me,
or take a figure on the required place.


For example,
embattled president of Paikistan ,
was a sign of hate,
in the united states,s'eyes,
and after the incident of 9/11,
he become the star,in the eyes of Anerican leader,
and subsequently front line ally against the war on terror.

having american support,
Musharraf abused human rights,
he not only voilated the constitution,
but also fired on apex court,
and arrested all the judges,
whowere understood the sign of justice,


So i would like to say here in that ,
some time dictatore voilate the human rights,
and some distatore inclined to so ,
on the indication of foriegn supper powers.

You've got these wacko's that refuse to beleive that a war background changes the rules. The President wanted to tune i on converstations of terrorists who were plotting against us during a war. That is the difference between that , and just listening to anybody's conversation. Also the digitalanalysis is not listening in to ANY conversation, omly those supportring terrorism.. cklivans@cableone.net

Maybe it's because the world is overpopulated.........

It is deeply lamentable that the UN charter for upholding the basic human rights has been ignored time after time, even by the nations which first formulated it and nations that champion democracy.

perhaps this is because in spite of promises to the contrary most nations abuse their own citizens and accuse the west of horrible crimes. Call is PC fatigue. If the kindest nations are accused while the worst are ignored then whats the point of Amnesty international, what credibility do the have. Anwer _none_

Hey, I'm not really sure what they're doing there. All I know is that my family, friends, and myself are safe from harm, I've felt no loss in any liberties and there hasn't been a terrorist attack in 7 yrs. Whatever they're doing is working....

The lack of respect of human rights has been around for a long time. Since the dawn of civilization, rulers and the powerful already knew how to instill fear into their subjects to perpetuate their often evil reign ??? without shame, without remorse.

The situation seems to worsen nowadays. The fundamental principle of respect for others appears to be worthless, albeit stated constitutionally in practically all countries. Human rights are not protected in many countries; people are imprisoned without trial for months if not years.

It is deeply lamentable that the UN charter for upholding the basic human rights has been ignored time after time, even by the nations which first formulated it and nations that champion democracy.

The acute indifference to human rights and the ignorance of sincere respect to humanity are the roots of global conflicts and terrorism. As long as human beings continue to be consumed by the fire of intolerance and hatred, peace on earth will only be an eternal illusion.
(Tan Boon Tee)

I don't agree that the world is losing respect for Human Rights. I think the Global media is shining a light on places that had no respect for Human Rights to begin with.

This is the best article in this magazine/site that I have had the good fortune to be able to read and I agree wholeheartedly with every single aspect of it. Thank you so very much for putting this article in here, and it is nice to see that some men who lead the country have this excellent foresight. It renews my faith in my country..........thank you for allowing my opinion.......skd500

PoliticallyIncorrect... I would criticize ANY person that has done what Bush and his administration has done, be it Obama, McCain, Bush, Clinton etc. I must not be the only one that feels this way, because I think the majority of people in America are fed up with Bush's war for $$$$$. You, my friend are in the small minority of Americans that think he is doing the "right thing". That's OK, it takes all kinds to make the world go round and you must be one of those. You can have your opinion and I can have mine, but if "W" had his way, neither of us would. Keep on keepin' on, I am not going to sway your opinion and you will not sway mine. Have a good evening.

PoliticallyIncorrect... Saddam was indeed a criminal in his own right. He was also crazy, and power hungry. There are MORE DANGEROUS dictators in the world (KIM JONG IL) and by far, greater injustices in places in Africa (RAWANDA) as well as others. Why aren't we dealing with the dictatorships in those places? The answer is clear...There can be no money made in these areas of injustice. The Bush Administration would
rather make money than to save the world from unjust powers. Again, it all boils down to $$$$$. The American people for the most part have witnessed this and are disgusted with the greed that fuels the fires of war. I am one of these people. BUSH MUST BE MADE ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS ACTIONS BOTH AT HOME AND ABROAD!!

Pulpfiction, you are funny. You misrepresent people's words so that your soapbox speeches sound more appealing. We are NOT at war with the people of Iraq. We were at war with a bloodthirsty dictator and his band of cronies. The war could have been conducted better, but if you knew what you were talking about, you would KNOW that we are not at war with the people of Iraq. Our fight goes on against other thugs and criminals who are very much in the same mold as the criminals who attacked us on 9/11. And what does "in the name of the Bush Administration" mean? You are hung up on Bush and you just need to get over it. He will be gone soon, and then who will you and your liberal friends blame?? Certainly not Obama.....