SPONSORED BY:
PSYCHOLOGY

Why Didn't Anyone Help?

An expert discusses the tape of an accident that illustrated 'the bystander effect.'

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The accident—a 78-year-old man hit by a car and flung into the air—was shocking enough. Worse, was what happened in the minutes that followed: nothing. Traffic continued to drive by and pedestrians apparently ignored the injured man lying in the street. The tape of the May 30 accident in Hartford, Conn., was widely viewed—and discussed. Why did no one help? What was wrong with those people?

It turned out that several bystanders did call 911 immediately after the accident. Still, the image that lingered was of cold-hearted indifference. Social psychologists have long been interested in questions of collective behavior. The hesitation of a crowd member to come to a victim's aid is part of a phenomenon known as "the bystander effect." Arie Kruglanski, a professor of social psychology at the University of Maryland, College Park, has studied how people make judgments and how these attitudes affect their actions toward others. Kruglanski talked to NEWSWEEK's Imani Cheers. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: Why don't people always respond to someone in trouble?
Arie Kruglanski:
There is research suggesting that there is a diffusion of responsibility when a group of people witnesses an emergency. The individual assumes that since there are others, they will do something about it and the burden of responsibility isn't therefore on her or him.

Are there social factors that affect the way a group of people might react when they see an accident or other emergency situation?
The more people there are in the emergency situation, the less likely is the individual to take action. An individual alone, however, might feel responsible and act. A social norm that one should take action would likely be helpful. America is a very individualistic society where people take care of themselves and don't meddle in other people's business. This norm encourages inaction in emergencies.

Are health-care professionals or public servants more likely to aid in emergencies, or is it an individual thing?
This would depend on whether they have what social psychologist Peter Gollwitzer calls an "implementation intention"—a plan of action that individuals develop for emergencies. It could be formed in the course of these individuals' professional training. For instance, a police officer is trained to act when witnessing an act of violence against people or property.

Are there cultural or regional differences in the way people respond when someone needs help?
There most probably are. It all depends on societal norms as to whether other people's problems are something one should care about. In highly individualistic societies, such norms are less likely to exist than in collectivistic societies.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: youbetyourlife @ 06/15/2009 5:02:11 PM

    Come on Atheist. We all serve somthing, either God or ourselves. We are a nation of atheists who say they are Christians.
    "Why do you call me 'Lord, Lord,' and not do what I tell you?" Luke 6: 46
    THE GOOD SAMARITAN
    Luke 10:30-37 And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee. Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbor unto him that fell among the thieves? And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.

  • Posted By: Thewhitesmiter @ 07/22/2008 1:42:05 PM

    Maybe they thought the man was faking the whole thing just to win a lawsuit. When there's so many law and criminal action dramas on television at night people are too busy during the day to give a thought about why a nonwhite person would be laying in the middle of the street hoping to get hit by a car.

  • Posted By: DaProf @ 07/18/2008 7:09:03 PM

    Say what you will, but it's my Christian faith that always has motivated me to step in and take risks in order to help others. It's become an instinct. When others are retreating and running away from the crazy person, I'm stepping forward to contain them, prevent others from getting hurt, take down license numbers, etc. It's good that atheists and agnostics can find other motivations for acting to help others, but it's the fact that Jesus was willing to suffer and give up His life for me, and the example of so many Christian martyrs, that motivates me. I suppose I could have been born with it, and it's unrelated to my faith, but I doubt it.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now