I read your article about the brothel tax - and just wanted to add my two cents. The reason why the state rejected the idea was because this wasn't about a tax at all. The brothels have been trying to convince people that they can rescue our budget by contributing tax dollars. kThey use publicity stunts like this one recently to try and convince people why they should be allowed to expand into Clark County. Their porpaganda is that if they were allowed tto run brothels in Clark County - they would contribute more tax dollars. What they fail to point out is the tax money lost. In Pahrump where they are now - they paid $300,000 in taxes last year. However, Kal Kan and other large companies moved their businesses out of state because they did not want to be in the same county as the brothels - which cost the state $800,000 in taxes last year. This doesn't even factor in the businesses that specifically told Pahrump they would not open a business in the same county as a brothel. We have companies not having conventions in Vegas right now because of the perceived concept that brothels do exist now in Vegas. To actually open one is going to cost even more convention business. Amsterdam shut down their red light district where brothels were legal because it was proven to increase the amount of sex trafficking, illegal prostitution, drugs, money laundering and violent crimes. This puts more of a strain on the money for our police departments. For every dollar they might contribute in taxes - brothels cost the state/county they are in about $8.00.
Jody
www.tapsdirectory.org









Discuss