After the Vows

Same Sex Marriage is an ABOMBANATION Against GOD! This is really sad for us as a people. But the day will come when God,( not me, the supreme court, not the govenor, or the Gay or Strait will have the last Word.

Science has proven nothing but theory and as always people that want to believe it jump on the bandwagon. But hey it's OK. Man-boy marriage is next along with bestiality marriage. If that bothers you you should see a therapist. After all younger people do not have a problem with it as long as we keep shoving lies down their throats. talk to someone to make man-boy and bestiality less traumatic to you, you bigoted normal person!

SAN FRANCISCO, CA. (IP)* ??? Two bisexual men are demanding a marriage license to wed their female partner. John, Ken and Sharon have lived in a committed relationship for eleven years. The three claim they are just as committed to each other as couples in any gay or heterosexual relationship.

???I want my whole relationship to be legitimate and not just two-thirds???, said Ken. The redefining of marriage to include gay relationships has opened the door to other lifestyle relationships demanding marriage equality. The same argument of non-discrimination and equal protection is being used to justify their demand.

???Denying us the marriage right is discrimination based on sexual orientation???, said John. ???Limiting marriage to two people is in direct conflict with the reality of my sexual orientation. What about equal protection and the pursuit of happiness????

Legal experts say the groundwork has been laid for other alternative lifestyle relationships to make demands for marriage equality. The questions remain of how the legal system and social services will handle diverse marital situations, divorces, and child custody issues.

* - The above is a fictitious story by Imaginary Press but is likely to be seen if we continue with the redefining of marriage.

I dont think that courts have the right to say that gay marriage is ok, when the majority of their state has said no. These officials are appointed to represent the poeople, simply because the constitution doesnt say "no gay marrage" doesnt mean that they intended marriage to include homosexuals. I have no problem with gay people, but I dont believe that gay marriage is appropriate. I understand that they may want to be able to apply for insurance benifits and other privledges that come with marriage. I believe that they should be granted many of them, but I dont think that what they have should be termed the same thing as what I would share with a man.

Employers should have the right to deny benefits to gay couples if they do not support gay marriage. I will absolutely not give any health benefits to gay marriage partners. The states can vote all they want on what is right and wrong in their opinions. My company won't conform to this nonsense.

An anti-Gay marriage cartoon-

http://faithmouse.blogspot.com/2008/06/anti-gay-marriage-cartoon-gone-awry.html

Alot of us heterosexuals welcome gays into the unique pain of marrige, because we know the exquisite pain of divorce will follow. The gays deserve to share the pain and will soon realize the bureaucracy discriminates against no one but screws all equally. Give me two gay lawyers for a ' gay to gay' divorce and I will be in heaven. Cable TV will never be the same. Gays in high definition all day, every day: I can't think of another development more positve for gay viewers. The rest of us will have to watch old , subversively gay, movies and resist the best we can. Get married , be happy, and start the divorce countdown!

The biggest "fallout" is the foundation of this wholesale charade: the fact that the California Supreme Court took it upon themselves to overturn the clearly declared will of the people of California who had voted via a legal referendum against the same sex union crap. Something is going terribly awry in this country as our courts become more and more activist in overturning elections (and I'm NOT talking about Gore--the man LOST in every recount that was held), legislating from the bench, tweaking laws to suit the campaign of the moment, etc. There's something terribly wrong going on here, and this ignoring of the election results by the California Supreme Court is potentially as evil as the thing they have perpetrated--legalizing the evil called sodomy. Two separate issues, but one reflecting on the other. God help the United States. The next time you hear some public official sign off with the obligatory "God Bless America" stop and evaluate whether that official is asking America to bless God--or is simply a part of "spit in God's face and then ask Him to bless us" crowd.

Shame has nothing to do with hate.
If God had wanted homosexuality, He would have created us with a penis and a vagina.

I acknowledge the confusion inherent in redefining state laws, benefit policies and procedures, and I especially acknowledge the feelings of people who are against same-sex marriage. But laws effecting all of us must not be mandated according to the feelings and beliefs of some of us. Marriage is a civil matter; a government-issued license is required, religious rituals are not. This is America, and it wouldn't be if we all held the same convictions. The "Golden Rule" doesn't end with 'except'.

You want a definitive argument against same-sex marriages? Here it is. The basis for allowing same-sex marriages is non-discrimination and equal protection regardless of sexual orientation. This same basis can eventually be used to demand that bisexuals be allowed to marry both their male and female partner. This is equal protection isn't it? Their sexual orientation is bisexual. I can hear the arguments now: 'Bisexuals were born that way! Why do you deny them their happiness?' How about, 'There are more adults to raise the children so the bisexual triad marriage is actually better than a two person marriage.' When bisexual marriages win their way in the courts with liberal activist judges, the polygamists will be close behind. IF MARRIAGE CAN MEAN ANYTHING, IT MEANS NOTHING!!!!!

Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender activitsts are happy with the incremental redefining of marriage if this is what it will take. Of course, they will never make that public. If the public knew their true intentions, the once sympathetic public would turn against these activists and same-sex marriages because they will soon figure out that, IF MARRIAGE CAN MEAN ANYTHING, IT MEANS NOTHING!!!!!!!

I was ashamed to see my governor walked in the gay parade holding his daughter hand. I'm so glad I did not vote for him. He is a disgrace to the Commonwealth.

you canalways tell what kind of mentality you are dealing with when an un-educated ignoramus extrapolates the argument to people marrying their underage children, a farm goat, a car battery or a toaster .. i guess when you are insecure in your own straight marriage, then you need to interfere with someone else's joy and relationship. The constitution DEMANDS equlaity for ALL it's citizens, .. and not let MOB RULES Majority with a Torch and PitchForkk Mentality decide who the Constitution Equally Protects ..

Under equal protection, neither the Commonwealth of Massachusetts nor the State of California can deny marriage to polygamists, NAMBLA, or those who wish to marry inanimate objects or animals. (A woman in CA "married" her house, and a woman in England "married" a dolphin.)
There are other ways to obtain the same legal rights without opening Pandora's Box.