Know why McCain wants to distance himself from former Senator Phil Gramm? It is not just because of Gramm's recent obnoxious remarks calling Americans "a nation of whiners" and that unemployed Americans are in "a mental recession." In fact, those remarks were so obnoxious that I wonder if they were engineered just to provide McCain an excuse for publicly distancing himself from Gramm. This issue is a lot deeper than it looks on the surface.
When Gramm was a Senator he was chair of the Committee on Banking, and in that capacity he was able to push through the legislation now known as the "Enron Loophole." This loophole allowed US investment banks to bypass the Federal regulations governing futures trading, and is the reason why the investment banks were able to falsely inflate the prices of oil, wheat, corn and other commodities through massive futures trading, causing your costs of gas, heating oil and food to go through the roof.
Gramm was a member of McCain's campaign team, but now Gramms' name is turning to mud. In addition to the Enron loophole, Gramm pushed through the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act in 1999, which got rid of the laws that seperate banking, insurance and brokerage activities in America. Essentially, this Act did away with all of the good laws written after the Great Depression to protect us from another Wall Street/Banking Industry collapse. That's right, Gramm stripped the system of it's safe guards nine years ago, and guess what? The value of the dollar has nose-dived, Wall Street is highly unstable, and we are in the midst of a recession.
Now you could say that this is not Gramm's fault, that he didn't know what the outcome of his actions would be. However, it turns out that the same investment banks that benefited from the Enron loophole and from the Gramm Act gave more than a million dollars to Gramm's campaign. Uh oh. A Congressional hearing is going to be convened to investigate this. And McCain wants to have noting to do with Gramm, wants us to forget that Gramm has been a key player on McCain's campaign team. Gramm was McCain's campaign CO-CHAIR and LEADING ECONOMIC ADVISER. Previously, McCain had said that he planned to appoint Gramm as SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY. It looks like McCain is scratching that idea, now that the public is finding out about Gramm. Didn't McCain's team bother to find out about Gramm before publicly considering him as Secretary of the Treasury?
With Gramm in the driver's seat as McCain's leading economic adviser, now you know why economists and analysts are saying that McCain's economic policy plans are untenable.
In the Driver’s Seat
The CEO of Nissan and Renault on turnarounds.
NEWSWEEK Chairman Richard M. Smith's video series on leadership.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
Ever since Lee Iacocca saved Chrysler from doom in the 1980s, CEOs who succeed in turnarounds are accustomed to some degree of adulation. But few become as celebrated as Carlos Ghosn, whose efforts to bring Nissan back from the brink turned him into a Japanese hero—one who's even inspired a manga comic book. Since 2005, Ghosn has served as CEO of both Nissan and Renault, making him an extreme example of a global executive. Ghosn recently received The Award for Transcultural Leadership from INSEAD, the international business school with campuses in France and Singapore. Each year, the school honors an individual who exemplifies the importance and necessity of working across borders. While in Manhattan for the awards ceremony, Ghosn talked with NEWSWEEK Chairman Richard M. Smith about the challenges facing automakers and the tricks to a turnaround. Edited excerpts:…"
NEWSWEEK Chairman Richard M. Smith's video series on leadership.
Smith:
What do you think the average manager can learn from your experience in doing this simultaneous CEO job?
Ghosn: More and more, in any company, managers are dealing with different cultures. Companies are going global, but the teams are being divided and scattered all over the planet. If you're head of engineering, you have to deal with divisions in Vietnam or China, and you have to work across cultures. You have to know how to motivate people who think very differently than you, who have different kinds of sensitivities, so I think the most important message is to get prepared to deal with teams who are multicultural, who do not think the same way.
You weren
'
t very popular when you took over Nissan. How did you decide what to do first?
When you start in an environment that you don't know at all, and when there is an emergency, you need to act fast. The first step is obvious: you have to listen. You have to establish a diagnosis of the situation not by making analyses by yourself, but trying to analyze from data and from interviews you're having with many people at different levels of the company. So establish a diagnosis; listen and interact with many people, and make sure you have the right priorities before you share this diagnosis and the plan with everybody.
Many observers say a Japanese executive couldn
'
t have taken the steps you took at Nissan. Is that true?
It could have been done by a Japanese executive, but it could not have been done by somebody who was coming from inside Nissan because there was so much linked to the past of the company that needed to be severed. It's much more likely that somebody from outside the company would be able to do it. If it's a foreigner, it's a double outsider, but a Japanese executive with good experience and a strong character coming from outside Nissan would have been able to do that.
How do you know when an outside leader is required?
When you need a breakthrough. When you really need to sever ties with the past. When you need to make sure that all questions are being asked, that there's no taboo. When you need to really question the basic culture. An outsider surrounded by people who know the company very well, who can advise and be a sparring partner—that is the best setting for reviving a company.
Why are auto companies any different than other business?
Because most of the future of the car manufacturer is not visible. It's in their pipeline, in products coming and the sourcing of these products … If you do not assess what [a carmaker] is working on today, you do not understand what may happen three to five years down the road.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »









Discuss