Barack’s Bounce

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 06/20/2008 7:18:13 PM

    TIME TO PRACTICE WHAT WE PREACH TO OUR OWN CHILDREN AND THAT IS ON-LINE TACTICS!
    1. TRUST NO ONE
    2. THE PERSON ON THE OTHER KEYBOARD IS UNKNOWN TO YOU!
    3. TRUST NO ONE
    4. DON'T LET THE OTHER KEYBOARDS PISS YOU OFF!! AS YOU HAVE NO CLUE,, WHAT THEY ARE! WHO THEY ARE! OR EVEN WHERE THEY ARE, OR WHO THEY SUPPORT.
    5. TRUST NO ONE
    6. RUSH REPUBLICANS COME HERE TO POSE!! AS CLINTON OR OBAMA SUPPORTERS!!! TO KEEP THE WEDGE IN DEEP, PISS US OFF, DRIVE US APART, AND OF COURSE LIE THROUGH THERE TEETH! ERGO: DO NOT GET PISSED OFF, JUST BRUSH THEM OFF, LIKE FLEES!
    7. TRUST NO ONE
    LATER "RUSH REPUBLICANS, AND IF YOU FOLKS WANT TO TAKE TO HEART, WHAT MCCAIN SUPPORTERS ARE SAYING!!!! REMEMBER THEY ARE NOT DEMS, AND ONLY WISH TO CAUSE CONFLICT!!! NOT DISCUSSION!! YOU ALL KNOW WHO YOU ARE!! YOU HAVE BEEN INTERFERING IN THIS FOR MONTHS, AND MONTHS. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, REPUBLICAN SUPPORTING *****!
    8. TRUST NO ONE

    • Posted By: ApostasyUSA @ 06/20/2008 7:21:27 PM

      I think "TRUST NO ONE".....should read:

      "Challenge EVERYONE"

      • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 06/20/2008 7:29:02 PM

        HARD TO CHALLANGE A FIGMENT OF THE KEYBOARD. YOU MAY CHALLANGE WHAT YOU KNOW TO BE TRUE, AND TRUTH ON-LINE IS A FOLLY TO SAY THE LEAST!

        • Posted By: ApostasyUSA @ 06/20/2008 7:34:22 PM

          TRUTH ON-LINE IS A FOLLY TO SAY THE LEAST!


          WHAT?

          There is no bigger truth than what you FIND online.

          The truth only exists in the mind that perceives it.

    • Posted By: loriw @ 06/20/2008 7:29:47 PM

      Paranoid?

  • Posted By: Straight Talk Hawk @ 06/20/2008 7:32:37 PM

    McAmnesty tells conservative Republicans and Independents to "go F yourselves, my friends" and thinks he will be elected by the liberal establishment media, crossover liberals, and illegal aliens that got him "nominated" because they thought he would be the weakest candidate. How's that working out for ya, Johnny? McAmnesty will do the impossible--in a right of center country he will enable a confirmed socialist to be elected President of the United States. DUMP MCAMNESTY NOW!!!

  • Posted By: Jim F. @ 06/20/2008 7:25:16 PM

    The National Journal says Barack Obama is the most liberal. How can you defend the radical Obama voting against a bill that would have protected a baby born alive during an abortion procedure? There is no protection of the life of the mother in that case which makes his negative vote absolutely insidious.

    Look up the definition of Socialism. Democrats have been busy as of late mentioning nationalizing the oil industry and the health industry. And by the way, the Democrat-controlled Congress has a lower approval rating than Bush.

    • Posted By: stubbleface @ 06/20/2008 7:27:38 PM

      Have you heard of Social Security? Does that term frighten you too?

      • Posted By: ApostasyUSA @ 06/20/2008 7:32:30 PM

        The posty did start their comment with the "The National Journal says".

  • Posted By: The "O" Team @ 06/20/2008 7:30:44 PM

    C'MON... Where are all of the TYPICAL BIG MOUTHS @...

  • Posted By: notroubleatall1963 @ 06/20/2008 7:30:11 PM

    I hope after Obama is elected, someone does an expose on the WAR CRIMES of Bush and CHENEY and subjects them to the World Court in the Hague.

  • Posted By: The "O" Team @ 06/20/2008 7:28:00 PM

    President Bush has tought us all very valuable lesson...

    PARENTS, DON'T SPOIL YOUR KIDS...

    PARENTS, DON'T LEAVE YOUR KIDS OVER THE DRUNK UNCLES HOUSE...

    PARENTS, PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOUR CHILD IS RECEIVING AND ADEQUATE EDUCATION, PARTICULARLY IN THE MASTERY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE...........

    Now I really understand why Michelle Obama, is finally proud to be an AMERICAN...

    Not-so-CURIOUS George is finally, taking his act, ON THE ROAD....





    AND YOU VOTED FOR BUSH-LITE................... WHY???

    That man was truely and embarassment to our Nation... His speeches were like listening to, some ole dumb country drunk... WE COULDN'T TELL IF HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SPEAKING AT THE UNITED NATIONS or THE BOAR'S NEST..............

  • Posted By: toadrw @ 06/20/2008 6:49:02 PM

    Read the Newsweek Poll Methodology (9B) and you'll see of the people who took this poll 53 leaned Democratic and 35 leaned Republican. There's your 15 points. This is all you need to read in this story... Democrat Michael Dukakis enjoyed a 54 percent to 38 percent lead over George H.W. Bush. But Bush wound up winning handily. Obama is going to need a 40 point lead if he keeps making statement saying the problem isn't the high gas prices it is just that they've gone up too fast. What a joke!

    • Posted By: Michael Sheridan - Sacramento @ 06/20/2008 7:27:58 PM

      Um, Toad, exactly what do you expect a pollster to do--look for a group split exactly down the middle Dem/Reep? That's ridiculous. So long as the sampling was truly random, then the difference between the 53 PER CENT of those polled (896 registered voters) who are or lean Democrat and the 35 PER CENT of those polled who are or lean Republican is just an interesting datum. Had the poll been taken exclusively in California, the Dems would have had an even larger lead and had it been taken in Texas, I'd venture a guess that the Reeps would have looked a lot stronger. This is a bad time for Republicans, so it isn't surprising that at the time of this poll, their numbers might be in steep decline.

  • Posted By: j.n @ 06/20/2008 7:26:11 PM

    It is not hard to see why Obama is fifteen points ahead of McCain with McCain in Canada campaigning and attacting Obama,someone should tell McCain that Canadians do not vote in US elections and that he is wasting valuable time.

  • Posted By: stubbleface @ 06/20/2008 7:18:52 PM

    Now it's the Iraq War? I thought it was the war on terror? The Iraqis don't even have an army to fight an Iraq War. Please make up your minds.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 06/20/2008 7:23:02 PM

      DON'T YOU MEAN "PLEASE MAKE UP MY MIND"?

  • Posted By: jstar1027@hotmail.com @ 06/20/2008 7:06:31 PM

    I'll never understand people who equate democrats with spending and taxes. Right now the richest 1% in this country have recieved a majority of the increase in income and productivity, yet enjoy tax cuts from the republicans. Right now the Bush Administration is spending so much money on a war... money that could be given back to lower and middle class people in this country, or could at least be spent on schools, healthcare, renewable energy, etc.

    Republicans are just as guilty of taxing and spening... only their version benefits the very few.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 06/20/2008 7:21:06 PM

      iT'S NOT ABOUT THE ACT OF TAXING IT'S THE QUESTIONS AS TO WHERE IS IT SPENT? LAST DEM IN OFFICE THEY ALSO CALLED A TAX AND SPEND, WELL HE DID TAX "EVERYONE" AND SPENT IT PAYING OFF THE DEFICIT! I KNOW HOW DARE HE!!! HOW DARE HE NOT! WELL SPENT IN MY BOOK!

  • Posted By: mjno @ 06/20/2008 7:20:04 PM

    YEAH right? Representative sample, I doubt. Obama is losing ground.

  • Posted By: The "O" Team @ 06/20/2008 7:17:10 PM

    OBAMAbots...

    WE WILL MOST CERTAINLY HAVE TO COMMENCE WITH THE RAPID, RE-EDUCATION OF OUR POLITICAL FOES...

    YOU, MY OBAMABOTS, MUST BE PREPARED TO LEAD BY EXAMPLE...

    AND WE WILL TRANSFORM AMERICA INTO THE WORLD LEADER, IT WAS DESTINED TO BE...

    GOBAMA

  • Posted By: The "O" Team @ 06/20/2008 7:11:40 PM

    NEWSFLASH*** : (Today's NEWS is dedicated to shareboose and Orally Holler)

    The latest numbers on voter dissatisfaction suggest that Obama may enjoy more than one bounce. The new poll finds that only 14 percent of Americans say they are satisfied with the direction of the country. That matches the previous low point on this measure recorded in June 1992, when a brief recession contributed to Bill Clinton's victory over Bush's father, incumbent George H.W. Bush. Overall, voters see Obama as the preferred agent of "change" by a margin of 51 percent to 27 percent. Younger voters, in particular, are more likely to see Obama that way: those 18 to 39 favor the Illinois senator by 66 percent to 27 percent. The two candidates are statistically tied among older voters.

    I WON'T BOTHER TO DO ANY BADGERING TODAY... NEWSWEEK COLUMNIST, MICHAEL HIRSH'S "EXCLUSIVE", HAS SO CONCISELY STATED AND THEN EXPLAINED...

    THE OBVIOUS...

    KUDO'S MR. HIRSH...

    so..................................................... In these times of confusion and political misconduct... you just might need some help (hopefully Our Lord and Saviour, JESUS CHRIST) but if you're nice, of reasonable intelligence (that might not apply to sharenews) and if you can find them.......................................

    then..........

    maybe..........

    YOU, CAN .............................................................. HIRE THE O-Team!!!!! ;)

    da.............ta..................dot..............daaaaaaaaaaaaa..............................da..........ta..........da...................................................da..........ta...............dot.........daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..........................da.......ta..........da









    THIS MESSAGE WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY, ALL OF THE LOVING HILLBILLarY & Mc'CAIN'T SUPPORTERS WHO HAD BEGGED FOR, THE "O" TEAMS FORGIVENESS AND THE OTHERS THAT FINALLY CAME AROUND TO HAVING, REASONALBE INTELLIGENCE AND LOVE FOR AMERICA...

    OBAMA in '08


  • Posted By: EvanG88 @ 06/20/2008 7:09:42 PM

    You mean a weak conservative with very little experience like George W. Bush? Get real, I don't even think you have an understanding of what socialism is if you think Obama is socialist. A liberal? Definitely. The most liberal? A complete crock. Everytime a democrat wins the nomination suddenly he becomes "the most liberal", no one is buying that anymore.

  • Posted By: ApostasyUSA @ 06/20/2008 7:08:26 PM

    The Republican = a stunning lack of competency?

  • Posted By: RickS @ 06/20/2008 6:52:45 PM

    We're screwed.

    Bush and Reagan overcame worse to much more qualified opponents.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 06/20/2008 7:04:05 PM

      ya you remember the Iran/Contra scandal. Reagan bought the hostages and his seat in the WH, plain and "oh i forget" oh ya simple! Ask FOX ,and there star reporter in the region he helped arm!!! Oliver North, or as last time I saw him, it was Col. Oliver North!

  • Posted By: tozzcat @ 06/20/2008 7:03:07 PM

    Why would anyone beleive a left wing Newweek? Do you think we are so stupid?

  • Posted By: kurosawaquilter @ 06/20/2008 7:02:06 PM

    This is a good man and an intelligent one as well. For all of us who have had our fill and then some of Mr. Bush, I say , "Thank you for running Barack Obama!"

  • Posted By: PleaseSaveAmerica @ 06/20/2008 6:58:05 PM

    It's time to look in the mirror people and start taking some personal and collective responsibility re: our energy policy.

    My energy policy would have the meta title of "Our generation sacrifices for the good of future generations". This means investing as much money as feasibly possible (with higher taxes as part of that money, yes) into weaning from oil to solar and wind (near infinite sources of sustainable energy). I would consider hydrogen and nuclear as part of that plan too. But I would say right now "Today is the day our dependence on oil begins to end. No more drilling. If gas prices go up, so be it. But in 25 years we will not have to answer to anybody regarding energy. And my kids will be better off for it"

  • Posted By: Skysarge @ 06/20/2008 6:58:05 PM

    OBama....a vote for change? A new way of doing business in Washington? Dream on Obamanians
    The only "change" will be the money-contributing partners the White House does business with, and how far left he and the congress can swing the political pendelum. Hold onto your wallets. Tax cuts - gone, new taxes - found, and 'change' the places to throw our money away. away. .

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse