Did somebody hypnotize this man to make him stay with the Republicans so doggedly? It just doesn't seem that a conscious person would do that. I'll doggone sure thank you, Ted, for what you did for him, whether he thanked you or not.
On health care, Iraq and other issues, even some Republicans fear the party's image is badly tarnished. Can McCain restore the luster?
Did somebody hypnotize this man to make him stay with the Republicans so doggedly? It just doesn't seem that a conscious person would do that. I'll doggone sure thank you, Ted, for what you did for him, whether he thanked you or not.
No kidding! Why does he continue to contribute 60%(!!!!!) to the party that snubbed him and his child? I know a family who have first hand experience with Ted Kennedy's compassion through a similar situation. And now through this gentleman's story we all know how our President and his "ranchhands" react to citizens (a Texan even!!) in need. Keep this in mind if you are even considering a vote for McBush in the fall.
McCain can easily restore the luster....all he has to do is say " Change We Can Believe In '. It worked for Barack Hussein Obama...he sucked in 45 million voters with that mantra.
McCain is a good guy however he promotes misguided policies. THE BIGGEST BEING THE IRAQ WAR.
JUST LIKE HILLARY HE JUST DOESN"T GET IT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT OUT OF IRAQ. THE IRAQ WAR IS WHAT GAVE OBAMA A VICTORY IN IOWA. McCAIN is going to get SMOKED in this election unless he changes his stance on IRAQ.
"NO AMERICAN LIFE IS WORTH IRAQI FREEDOM.
ANYONE WHO DISAGREES IS NOT A REAL AMERICAN" eddiewhere 2008
There is this argument out there that I hear our troops repeating over and over agian. WE CANNOT LEAVE UNTIL THE JOB IS DONE WE CANNOT LET OUR BROTHERS DIE IN VAIN.
NOW THAT IS REAL BUL****. THAT STATEMENT IS GOVERNMENT IDEOLOGY AND NOT MILITARY IDEOLOGY.
COLIN POWELL SAID IT BEST. DEFINE YOUR MISSION CLEARLY SET YOUR OBJECTIVES AND USE OVERWHELMING FORCE AKA SHOCK AND AWE to accomplish your mission.
WE HAVE NO CLEAR AGENDA and NO CLEAR OBJECTIVES. WE ARE NOT SURE. SO HOW ON EARTH CAN WE JUSTIFY THE LOSS OF MORE AMERICAN LIVES. AS LONG AS WE STAY IN IRAQ YOUNG AMERICANS WILL CONTINUE TO DIE IN VAIN. WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE MADE OUR POINT VERY CLEAR. WE ARE SICK OF IRAQ AND WE ARE SICK OF OUR DEPENDENCY ON MIDDLE EASTERN OIL.
OBAMA WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
THE LAST FALLACY I WANT TO ADDRESS IS THAT THE SURGE IS WORKING.
THIS ARGUMENT IS SO CRAZY THAT IT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
SURGE means temporary. OUR TROOPS PRESENCE IN THAT COUNTRY OF IRAQ IS THE MAIN REASON FUNDAMENTALIST HAVE FOR ATTACKING US.
WE NEED A PRESIDENT THAT WILL DO WHAT IS BEST FOR AMERICA NOT WHAT IS BEST FOR IRAQ.
THE LATEST FALLACY IS THAT WE SHOULD STAY UNTIL WE WIN. WE HAVE ALREADY LOST.ESPECIALLY THE AMERICAN TAX PAYER and those poor AMERICAN SOLDIERS WHO LOST THEIR LIFE FOR NO LEGITIMATE REASON. THE BLIND JUST CANNOT SEE THAT.
THERE IS ONE CLEAR WINNER IN THIS WAR, HALLIBURTON AND OTHER PRIVATE CONTRACT FIRMS WHO FUNNELED BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, WITH THE HELP OF DICK CHENEY, FROM THE AMERICAN TAX PAYER.
LAUTENBERG REPORT CHECK IT OUT.
McCain is a good guy however he promotes misguided policies. THE BIGGEST BEING THE IRAQ WAR.
JUST LIKE HILLARY HE JUST DOESN"T GET IT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT OUT OF IRAQ. THE IRAQ WAR IS WHAT GAVE OBAMA A VICTORY IN IOWA. McCAIN is going to get SMOKED in this election unless he changes his stance on IRAQ.
"NO AMERICAN LIFE IS WORTH IRAQI FREEDOM.
ANYONE WHO DISAGREES IS NOT A REAL AMERICAN" eddiewhere 2008
There is this argument out there that I hear our troops repeating over and over agian. WE CANNOT LEAVE UNTIL THE JOB IS DONE WE CANNOT LET OUR BROTHERS DIE IN VAIN.
NOW THAT IS REAL BUL****. THAT STATEMENT IS GOVERNMENT IDEOLOGY AND NOT MILITARY IDEOLOGY.
COLIN POWELL SAID IT BEST. DEFINE YOUR MISSION CLEARLY SET YOUR OBJECTIVES AND USE OVERWHELMING FORCE AKA SHOCK AND AWE to accomplish your mission.
WE HAVE NO CLEAR AGENDA and NO CLEAR OBJECTIVES. WE ARE NOT SURE. SO HOW ON EARTH CAN WE JUSTIFY THE LOSS OF MORE AMERICAN LIVES. AS LONG AS WE STAY IN IRAQ YOUNG AMERICANS WILL CONTINUE TO DIE IN VAIN. WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE MADE OUR POINT VERY CLEAR. WE ARE SICK OF IRAQ AND WE ARE SICK OF OUR DEPENDENCY ON MIDDLE EASTERN OIL.
OBAMA WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
THE LAST FALLACY I WANT TO ADDRESS IS THAT THE SURGE IS WORKING.
THIS ARGUMENT IS SO CRAZY THAT IT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
SURGE means temporary. OUR TROOPS PRESENCE IN THAT COUNTRY OF IRAQ IS THE MAIN REASON FUNDAMENTALIST HAVE FOR ATTACKING US.
WE NEED A PRESIDENT THAT WILL DO WHAT IS BEST FOR AMERICA NOT WHAT IS BEST FOR IRAQ.
THE LATEST FALLACY IS THAT WE SHOULD STAY UNTIL WE WIN. WE HAVE ALREADY LOST. THE BLIND JUST CANNOT SEE THAT.
Eleanor Clift could consult an article that appeared in the Los Angeles Times, June 20, called "The Real McCain" by Eric Alterman and George Zornick. If she did, she would discover that McCain the maverick is largely a myth fabricated by the media.
According to this article, McCain has repudiated any and all of his moderate stances, flip-flopping on waterboarding, torture, taxcuts and spying. According to this aarticle which cited date from VoteView.com McCain was considered the 2nd most conservative congressman in 2005-2006. His voting record supported Bush's decisions 90% of the time. In 2007, he voted for Bush's proposals 95 % of the time and in 2008 he got a perfect voting score. That voting record is not the credientials of a maverick.
McCain can try to "distance" himself from Bush as much as possible - but only to maintain the false image of being a maverick. For all his straight talk, he cannot explain the reason that he has supported all of Bush's disastrous economic policies. In terms of saving the environment, McCain is only interested in drilling for more oil (which will have virtually no effect on the price of oil but disastrous effects on global warming and the environment.) He also favors massive subsidies to the nuclear energy - with no guarantees of safety or any feasible plan to dispose of nuclear wastes - shackling this country an enormous tax burden for thousands of years. These positions reflect the wishes of the lobbyists that support him, not the interests of the public or the future of the world, which has about 35 years to live - if you calculate the amount of carbon dioxide and methane getting pumped into the atomosphere.
McCain is not a new brand of Republican. He's the same mean corrupt, mean old GOP with a different label. We need to elect Obama and his allies with a landslide majority.
P.S. According to my visit to the CNN website, Lou Dobbs is having a hizzy fit because Michael Bloomberg is campaigning in Florida for - Would you believe???!!!! - Obama. Is Bloomberg still a possible McCain running mate?
Mccain Feingold-campaign finance reform opposed by republicans endorsed by MCCain
Wacky view on global warming opposed by republicans endorsed by MCCain
Gun control- MCCain for a little bit Republicans for none of it.
Economic views far more in line with Democrat party than Republican-
MCCain has been a pain in our ass for his whole career so don't get on here and claim it is a media thing his views are in opposition to mine on a regular basis.
Dear OnePoker,
The things you refer to about McCain being a moderate all happened years ago. Since 2004, McCain has voted 100% with the religious right. McCain was a moderate/liberal voter for a four year period, from 2000-2004. In late 1999, McCain got unfairly swift boated by Bush. The great Texas Republican political machine laid McCain to waste, and McCain was mad as hell. He started voting against the party line and against Bush. He suddenly supported abortion rights, opposed the Bush tax cuts, co-sponsored a patient's bill of rights with Kennedy and Edwards, and got on the environmental bandwagon with John Kerry. He called Jerry Falwell "an agent of intolerance." My gosh, he actually tried to crack down on gun shows in legislation he put forth with then-Democrat Joe Lieberman. And in 2001, when Senator Jeffords of Vermont switched from Republican to Independent in an effort to counteract Bush's stranglehold on the Senate, McCain announced that he was considering becoming a Democrat, and went into a pow-wow with Senator Tom Daschle at his Sedona ranch. And did you know that John Kerry floated the idea of having McCain as his VP in '04? That was to have cemented his status as a newly-minted Democrat.
But instead of joining Kerry, McCain suddenly switched his affiliation, came out in support of Bush in '04, and jettisoned his liberal image. Suddenly, it was the "old" McCain from the 1980s back in the saddle, the neo-conservative, take no prisoners Creationist. Against abortion. For the war. The SAME man who opposed a Federal amendment banning gay marriage and openly met with gay groups now was pushing a gay marriage ban in Arizona. The SAME man who said in 1999 that he was opposed to overturning Roe vs. Wade, now suddenly in 2007 is promising that he will stack the deck in the Supreme Court with religious right judges and overturn Roe vs. Wade.
But the religious right isn't so sure about him. He's supported so many different opposing positions at so many times, that they are afraid that they are getting played in the name of McCain's political expediency.
You don't have to take my word for this. Watch news clips of McCain talking about the same issues in different years, which proves what I have written. Get on the Straight Talk Express and get it straight from the horse's mouth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEtZlR3zp4c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ajm5JTf7jZs&feature=related
Hey Nins good to hear from you- MCCain has sided with the left when he felt the right was out of line. And He went hard against Bush when Bushes Policies were losing this war. His views on domestic partnerships are rooted in a sense of fairness. He believes Gays should have the same rights as heterosexual people but believes that Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. He is pro domestic partnerships and against Gay marriage.
I personally am for gay marriage but understand those who think a domestic partnership is the only sensible solution. I would support a domestic partnership law or a Gay marriage law but I am in the minority. Most Americans are opposed to Gay Marriage and a large number are against domestic partnerships.
One area where MCCain has gone against the grain was when the republicans were heavily against the Martin Luther King Holiday in AZ. MCCain was scheduled to speak and when it was his turn to address the republican crowd he Yelled "you guys are making us look like idiots support this holiday" The holiday is now recognized in Arizona. He was at first against it because like all republicans he was against another paid holiday for government workers. Once Columbus day was dropped as a state holiday it made room for the Martin Luther King day.
Did you mean Obama? He is the myth fabricated by the liberal America hater media.
Some of you who read my posts about investment banks driving up the price of oil through commodities futures trading did not believe me that this was a real issue, despite the fact that the Senate is investigating it. Well, it really is an issue and an important one, so important that the Department of Justice is going to investigate.
Senator Obama announced a plan to crack down on excessive energy speculation and fully close the loophole in the CFTC regulations that I referred to in my blog. This loophole is also called the "Enron Loophole" because it was created by McCain campaign co-chair Phil Gramm at the behest of Enron lobbyists, and exempts most trading on energy commodities from regulation. As a result, the CFTC is unable to oversee the oil futures market or investigate cases where excessive speculation is driving up oil prices. Just last month, John Hofmesiter, President of Shell Oil Company, says that the proper, uninflated production price of a barrel of crude oil is no more than $65.
http://www.financialpost.com/reports/oil-watch/story.html?id=532747
Clarence Cazalot, CEO of Marathon Oil, stated in November of 2007 that "$100 oil just isn't justified by the physical demand on the market - it is speculation on the futures market that is driving this."
http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/12/markets/oil_hundred/index.htm?postversion=2007111216
Larry Chom, Chief Economist of Platt's, states in a recent Businessweek article that speculation is adding at least $50 to the price of every barrel of oil. You can read this article in the May 13, 2008 edition of Businessweek, but it is no longer available on their website unless you are a member.
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2008/
To see what Senator Obama is doing to correct this serious problem and lower the price of gas and oil, go to his website:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stateupdates/gG5Rzb
Now THAT is my kind of President! Sees the problem, and moves to fix it, while Bush and McCain are sitting on their hands.
A vote for John "Baghdad Bob" McCain is a suicide vote. Why vote against your own interest when McCain has show his true colors in his voting record that said no to the new Veterans GI Bill, No to healthcare for children, no to global warming, no to pulling our brave, but tired soldiers from Iraq,and more than likely he will say no to anything that is good for America.
We need to get out of Iraq and transfer responsibility and management of that country to the IRAQ's themselves. THEY SHOULD be backed by a multinational force led by Middle Eastern countries until they are able to fight extremist on their own.
Our unilateral approach in the MIDDLE EAST has to come to an end. ECONOMICALLY, IRAQ IS KILLING the average tax payer and making a few private contractors and oil firms rich.
We need Oil. WE NEED OIL. Therefore, getting rid of the Iranian regime is at the top of our agenda.
The majority in Iran want change but not under and American led invasion. It has to be done from within. We lost the support of moderate Arabs and Muslims over the last six years. Hopefully, PRESIDENT OBAMA can empower this group and encourage them to meet with their counterparts.
Inotherwords there should be an alliance between all moderates in the Middle East, JEWS, ARABs, MUSLIMS, ect... These forces must be self motivated by a common cause, Peace. IF this group can be strengthened they themselves will defeat or at least contain the force of extremism.
WE must strengthen the forces behind peace and weaken those against peace on both sides.
THE UNITED STATES CANNOT SOLVE THE CONFLICT IN THE MIDDLE EAST. WE CAN ONLY STRENGHTEN AND SUPPORT THE PEOPLE OF THE MIDDLE EAST TO SOLVE THEIR OWN PROBLEMS.
IN THE SHORT RUN WE NEED MIDDLE EASTERN OIL. THIS COMPLICATES OUR ROLE OVER THERE.
WE Should have had an ENERGY SUMMIT TEN YEARS AGO. WE NEED TO COME UP WITH A TWENTY YEAR PLAN to RID OURSELVES of OIL DEPENDENCY IN THE MIDDLE EAST. TWENTY YEARS WILL GO BY LIKE NOTHING. WE HAVE TO START NOW.
THE most dangerous threats are the ones you do not see coming. LIKE CHINA, RUSSIA, EASTERN EUROPEAN organized crime. Monitoring these entities will be our great challenge.
ARE WE READY FOR CYBER WAR. I DON't THINK SO.
I declare a new level of Bias has been reached. Congratulations Newsweek!!!!
by the way most Republicans are very aware of the troubles facing them and only newsweek could find a die hard republican that had to run to Kennedy because all the republicans turned on him and his crippled child.
Now I see why so many people hate republicans hell I even hate myself after this article. Down with the tryranny.
I am glad you've seen the light! You're Obama bumper sticker is in the mail.
Great I will put it right between my NRA sticker and my Exxon Mobile sticker.
A memo for Eleanor Clift. Stop your liberal tactics! I have read enough of your articles to see that your favorite topics are "pushing the gays agenda and bashing family values". Liberalism is a mental disorder as many people say. So keep up your good work of destroying America fiber!!!!!
Some of you who read my posts about investment banks driving up the price of oil through commodities futures trading did not believe me that this was a real issue, despite the fact that the Senate is investigating it. Well, it really is an issue and an important one, so important the the Department of Justice is going to investigate.
Today Senator Obama announced a plan today to crack down on excessive energy speculation and fully close the loophole in the CFTC regulations that I referred to in my blog. This loophole is also called the "Enron Loophole" because it was created by McCain Campaign co-chair Phil Gramm at the behest of Enron lobbyists, and exempts most trading on energy commodities from regulation. As a result, the CFTC is unable to oversee the oil futures market or investigate cases where excessive speculation is driving up oil prices. Just last month, John Hofmesiter, President of Shell Oil Company, says that the proper, uninflated production price of a barrel of crude oil is no more than $65.
http://www.financialpost.com/reports/oil-watch/story.html?id=532747
Clarence Cazalot, CEO of Marathon Oil, stated in November of 2007 that "$100 oil just isn't justified by the physical demand on the market - it is speculation on the futures market that is driving this."
http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/12/markets/oil_hundred/index.htm?postversion=2007111216
Larry Chom, Chief Economist of Platt's, states in a recent Businessweek article that speculation is adding at least $50 to the price of every barrel of oil. You can read this article in the May 13, 2008 edition of Businessweek, but it is no longer available on their website unless you are a member.
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2008/
To see what Senator Obama is doing to correct this serious problem and lower the price of gas and oil, go to his website:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stateupdates/gG5Rzb
Now THAT is my kind of President! Sees the problem, and moves to fix it, while Bush and McCain are sitting on their hands.
Barack Hussein Obama is a puppet, he has no clue about energy. I feel sorry for the people who believe about "his change scam". He will not be willing to do the right thing when it comes to energy policies. He is owned by the "Ethanol Lobbyists" who are financing his campaign. He has been traveling with his friend Tom Daschle , the former Senate majority leader from South Dakota who is a big ethanol backer and has close ties to the powerful agri-business "Archer Daniels Midland". We all know that ethanol from corn will not do the trick and that Brazil (an up and coming financial power in the world) has been using ethanol from sugar cane more succesfully. In addition, France that is so loved by the leftist liberal has about 80% of its energy from nuclear power. Thus, Obama opposing to drilling, nuclear power and even ethanol from sugar cane rather than corn ( which will increase hunger in the world since since human being can no longer afford the price of corn). You may want to read the article of " LARRY ROHTER " a journalist for one of the most liberal newspaper agency in the US "The New York time" called "Obama camp closely linked with ethanol, Industry endorsed by candidate has provided some of his top advisers. I wonder if it is a tactic of the New York Times to soften people reaction when the story gets out in main tream media, because it will be out. Obama notion of change is nothing than the introduction in the White House of corrupted politic "South Chicago-style." As much as I think bush is a moron, I trust him better than Obama because he is not audacious enough to play the American people. Obama has no intention to change anything when it comes to energy policy. The guy is an egomaniac that will do and say anything to get to power. He will play us the same way that he played the poor black people in South Chicago. Let them believe that he is helping their causes, while he is getting mega investment with crooks like Rezko. We the American people will not be fooled by Obama. He is just another typical politician that will flip flop anytime just for another buck. By the way, the Saudis are smart. They can increase the price of oil as much as that want and make more money to finance terrorists because they know that many of our politicians are selfish crooks that only care about their pocket. They know that most of our politicians will not have the courage to block special interest and truly do whats best for American energy policy. They know that liberal who are so crazy about the environment will put animal first and will not allow drilling and nuclear power. therefore, they can increase the price as much as they want. If we elect Obama and his ethanol lobbyists, we will be sorry because 2 years from now, when the price of a gallon of gas hikes to $10.00 just like it is in Europe, we will wish that did save a barrel of oil in your cool basement when the price was $4.50 a ga
Would you please stop referring the Republican Party as a brand! The sins of the Republican Party can not be erased by simply "re-branding". "Brand" = Propaganda.
Would you please stop referring the Republican Party as a brand! The sins of the Republican Party can not be erased by simply "re-branding". "Brand" = Propaganda.
I am a conservative democrat and I will not be voting for Barack Hussein Obama. He is all for spending. He has no idea about Economics. The worst thing that can happen is a tax hike. The bottom line is when companies have to pay more taxes, they will either lay off more workers or move overseas. Abouth healthcare, there is a shortage of primary care physicians. After being in debt for thousands of $$$$$$ (student loans), the physicians are not about to get a pay cut and being dictated by people who have no medical background. Therefore, free healthcare will not happen in the US. This is not the ex- Soviet Union. People who can afford a competent physician will be paying out f pocket. The problem with healthcare is because too many illegal immigrant s and too many people on welfare are not contributiong and the hospital have to raise their fees enormously so that there can be above water. The problem is that none of the candidates are willing to talk about the real issues. MCain is not a tru republican, he is more in the middle of the road while Obama is way far left ( a socialist like the late Francois Mitterand in France). We have a better chance with him because contrairly to Obama he is a very humble man, he has no egocentricity and he loves his country.
I mean, as faithful as dogs are, even a dog will go hunting for a new owner after being kicked so many times.
The one thing that made Bush different from all the other Republicans before him was he was a Compassionate Conservative.
I am confident if we Conservatives remove all compassion from our party we will once again be strong.
You must be working with a different definition for compassionate than the rest of us. The only think compassionate about Bush was .... well, nothing.
There is no way Bloomberg will run with McCain. Obama maybe but not McCain. McCain is (a) a loser and Bloomberg doesn't like losing. He would rather spend the next four years working in philanthropy figuring out how to distribute four billion dollars. Obama might give him a more attractive pitch. Obama needs Bloomberg's proven competence to show potential wavering Republicans that he's not a wild-eyed liberal and Bloomberg's record of having run something is a plus.
Yeah, except that Obama's record shows that he is indeed a "wild-eyed liberal"
Sorry, Jimbo, but you are wrong about that. Obama has some liberal viewpoints and some conservative ones. Overall, I would say that he is a moderate. Obama is fiscally responsible, which is what Republicans are supposed to be. And his "liberal" programs, like paying for college tuition, have a huge economic motive: to train a skilled workforce so we can compete in the 21st century global market. Obviously, we have lost the manufacturing sectpr, it is long gone to China, Mexico, Brazil and India. Obama wants to make us competitive as scientists and engineers so we can be the world leader in technology and regain our economic supremacy.
That is a complete synthesis of Democrat and Republican ideals, a mixture of conservative and liberal, and very pro-American. As a Republican, I am all for it. I only wish the GOP had a candidate as good as Obama.
IF you have the most liberal voting record in the senate you are a liberal. Quit trying to paint your duck to look like a chicken we just wont buy it. Lying to various groups about having a more centrist view does not change your record or who you are.
Either Bloomberg or Hegel as Obama's VP would make me stand up and cheer.
The Republicans deserve to reap the misery they have sown. They collectively, with the leadership (?) of Clown George W, have taken advantage of the everyday people of this country at every opportunity they have had. In the words of their Great Communicator : Are you better off than you were 4 years ago? How about 8 years ago? Old Ronny is rollin' in his grave......
Indeed. I tell my right-wing Republican friend all the time, I prefer Obama, but I would still laugh my a$$ off if Hillary got elected. After giving us 8 years of George W. Doofus, REPUBLICANS DESERVE HILLARY!
We'll never know, but I'm convinced a large number of those rabid, right-wing zealots who loved to bash the Clintons secretly fantasize about Hillary The Dominatrix!
We will leave the secret fantasies to Bill and the interns/.
Not even Solomon's wisdom could restore what the current administration has done to this country,.
But if we sawed Obama in half it would be a good start. (this was not a threat just a joke I am not implying anyone should saw anyone in half)
Maybe holyroller can!!!!
the Most correct statement yet thank you ,honest!
The successful Republican message about fear and loathing will work better this time around than ever. After all Obama is not just sympathetic to minority issues, he is black. All the years of subtle but deep racism are part of the Republican DNA. Since the days of Nixon's silent majority, through to Bush's compassionate conservative; the Republican party has been the American white party. They get the white vote no matter who they run. McCain will get the white vote like all previous Republican candidates. It is amusing to see the media portray McCain as the underdog. When the Democrats selected Obama they insured a victory for McCain. It will take at least another few generations before a minority candidate has a real chance. McCain may not be the best candidate but he is too white to lose.
your a disgusting individual if you believe that load of crap.
You couldn't be more wrong. If Colin Powell had run in 2000, he would have won in a landslide.
Excues me I'm white and not voting for Mclame! now what! I guessI'm off white, cause like every AMERICAN I'M A HEINZ 57, all mixed!!!
You comments do not mirror current reality and polling. Reach further, it makes you look that more in denial!
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss