« Prev Page

McCain's Power Outage

factcheck.org

See All

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Regulation certainly plays a contributing role, but the bottom line is that owning a refinery is tough business. We've laid out the cost/benefit analysis of operating a refinery here and found that it would take 13 years of operation for one to turn a profit. However, there are still groups that are trying.

Quote Meltdown
McCain was off the mark in his Wednesday speech when he said, "Senator Obama says, 'I am not a nuclear energy proponent.' I think that makes him a nuclear energy opponent, though he does have a knack for nuance and it's not entirely clear."

Obama's answer to a question about alternative energy sources at an Iowa town hall in December was certainly nuanced: It was nearly three minutes long. But it also made clear that he is not an opponent of nuclear energy:

Obama, Dec. 30, 2007: There is no perfect energy source; everything has some problems, right now. We haven't found it yet. ... I have not ruled out nuclear as part of that package, but only so far, as it is clean and safe. I have the same attitude with respect to coal. ... There is no one single optimal solution and we have to try everything to see what works.

In addition, Obama signed on as a cosponsor to the McCain-Lieberman cap-and-trade climate change bill, which contains billions in subsidies for nuclear power, and he supported the 2005 energy bill, which has billions more.

Cap-and-Trade: Game or Mandate?
McCain has lately taken to denying that he favors "mandatory" limits on greenhouse gas emissions, even though a government-imposed limit is central to the "cap and trade" legislation that he favors and has sponsored.

The 2003 bill he sponsored jointly with then-Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman (now an Independent) laid out a cap-and-trade system, which would put the brakes on the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by requiring utilities and other industries to limit emissions. Companies would be issued credits for carbon dioxide emissions; those that ratcheted down their CO2 production sufficiently could sell unused credits to others that needed them. But the cornerstone of any serious cap-and-trade proposal is the "cap" on the overall amount of CO2 being released, which would shrink over time. That's also part of a 2007 bill McCain sponsored and the energy proposal he has put forth as a presidential candidate.

Yet McCain has been soft-pedaling the "cap" part of the equation. In several recent appearances, he has denied that his plan contains any mandates. In January, NBC moderatorTim Russert asked McCain about cap-and-trade at a Republican debate:

Russert, Jan. 24: Senator McCain, you are in favor of mandatory caps.
McCain: No, I'm in favor of cap-and-trade. And Joe Lieberman and I, one of my favorite Democrats and I, have proposed that – and we did the same thing with acid rain. They're doing it in Europe now, although not very well.

And all we are saying is, "Look, if you can reduce your greenhouse gas emissions, you earn a credit. If somebody else is going to increase theirs, you can sell it to them." And, meanwhile, we have a gradual reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

« Prev Page

Member Comments

Posted By: Nins @ 07/12/2008 6:44:35 PM

Know why McCain wants to distance himself from former Senator Phil Gramm? It's not because of Gramm's obnoxious remarks calling Americans "a nation of whiners" who are in "a mental recession." Those remarks were so ascerbic that they may've been made just to give McCain an excuse to distance himself from Gramm. This issue is a lot deeper than it looks on the surface.

When Gramm was a Senator he was Chairman of the Banking Committee. He pushed through the legislation known as the "Enron Loophole." This loophole allowed US investment banks to bypass Federal regulations governing futures trading, and is the reason why investment banks were able to falsely inflate the prices of oil, wheat, corn and other commodities through massive futures trading, causing your costs of gas, heating oil and food to go through the roof.

Gramm also created the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act, which got rid of the laws that seperate banking, insurance and brokerage activities in America. The Gramm Act was touted as a new way to protect consumer privacy, but the real meat on the Act's bones was banking deregulation. Essentially, this Act did away with laws written after the Great Depression to protect us from another Wall Street/Banking Industry collapse. That's right, Gramm stripped the system of it's safe guards nine years ago, and guess what? The value of the dollar has nose-dived, four major economic institutions have failed, Wall Street is unstable, and we are in a worsening recession.

Notably, the US investment banks that gained the most from the Enron Loophole and from the Gramm Act contributed more than a million dollars to Gramm's campaign.

Currently Gramm is Vice Chairman of UBS, the Swiss Bank that came up with the idea of "death bonds." Worse, though, UBS is involved in a scam where they sold auction rate securities to American customers. Auction rate securities are supposed to be as safe as cash, but the way UBS did it, the fees garnished by their in-house investment bankers were intentionally higher than the return on the securities, ripping off their American customers. The Massachusetts Attorney General has already filed charges against UBS, and private brokers world-wide have dropped UBS stock. UBS is forecasted to lose 82.91% of it's value in 2008. We are talking about the corporate bank where Gramm is Vice Chairman. Looking at his track record there and at the havoc he has wrought on the US economy through the Senate Banking Committee, it's clear that either Gramm is a criminal or grossly incompetent.

Now McCain wants nothing to do with Gramm, wants us to forget Gramm has been a key player on McCain's team. Gramm was McCain's campaign CO-CHAIR and LEADING ECONOMIC ADVISOR. Previously, McCain had said that he planned to appoint Gramm as SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.

With Gramm as McCain's leading economic advisor, now you know why economists and analysts say that McCain's economic policy plans are untenable.
Posted By: ik.nha.tun@gmail.com @ 07/06/2008 8:19:10 PM

In my opinion, just because Bush McSame3 aka John McCain has windmills and solar panels in his commercials background, FACTCHECK.ORG has done a magnificient job of informing the public that those (windmills and solar panels are just hollywood props). McCain is more for the drilling offshore regardless of what it does to the environment, drilling in Anwar regardless of what it does to that refuge, just drilling for oil anywhere. Where is America's independence from oil if we're still drilling for oil?

I love it...McCain did a 'MAVERICK' commercial. Supposedly breaking away from his party. He is rather the chameleon. Problem is WE'RE NOT BUYING IT. Listen, if the Republican parties loyalist constituency, 'The Religious Right' can not support him because they know he isn't REAL why should we?

This total and just FAIRYTALE like policy he 's 'dreaming up' is just the tip of the 'MELTING ICEBERG', when it comes to his policy on Global Warming. McCain is not really concerned. Anything for political expediency. Yes, America still needs oil. How do we go about getting it? Seems to me this fake 'WHITE HAT', wearing 'TWO GUN' packing, 'COWBOY BOOT wearing, MYTHOLGICAL 'Maverick' John McCain' ideolog, is totally on-board with more of this 'ROGUE' administrations policies of Covert Operations in 'OIL RICH COUNTRIES' A sort of Occupy and Steal policy. He desires to OCCUPY oil Rich Nations and call it something like , "THE WAR ON TERROR" Been there done that, got a tee-shirt, it's a LIE.

Senator Bush McSame is for '...100+ years in Iraq, he's stated, 'It really isn't important when the troops come home....what's more important is the casualties'. I.E. enough American and coalition force trooops (over 8000 dead), haven't lost thier lives, nor (over 2 million innocent Iraqi Mothers, Fathers, brothers and sisters, and innocent babies have died) , that's still not enough. Remember he sang his 'PSTD DRUNKEN' version of, ' BombbombbomB, BombbomB, IRAN'. McSame is nothing more than a WARMONGERING 'ROGUE politician who's desire is WAR AND MORE WAR. A War on the Oil rich so we may replenish our National treasury. He doesn't have a REAL PLAN TO FIX ENRGY AT ALL. He's totally on board with a continued Bush MISUSE of our military mights, WAR effort.
Posted By: metzlerd @ 07/02/2008 11:38:48 PM

"America needs energy independence and part of that is oil because we cannot move entirely away from oil."
- America does need energy independence, and oil does not have to be part of it. Obviously it is today, and during the conversion it would be, but there is no reason we can't use alternative fuels. We just haven't had the stimulus necessary to do it. It requires significant infrastructure updates, and that can only be coordinated by our government.

"Global warming:
McCain did stand up against the majority of the GOP, including Bush five years go when he worked with Lieberman on the McCain-Lieberman Global Warming Bill."

That is true although I would disagree with McCains assessment, as mentioned in the article, on sounding the alarm. The alarm was being sounded years before. Republicans especially were denying and continue to deny that it is really a problem. They are of the opinion that man can do whatever he wants and it will not affect his environment. I would commend McCain for being one of the first of the Republicans to stand up to the rest though.