SPONSORED BY:

Justice For Our Justice

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Then the backsliding started. Prodded by America to retain Musharraf, the government complied and did nothing to restore the judiciary. Promises were made, but one deadline after another slipped by.

After two months, we lawyers returned to the streets, calling for a long march toward Parliament. Starting on June 9, marchers from all parts of the country, including Khurram and I, began to converge in Islamabad. Gazing over the sea of humanity in the early-morning hours of Saturday, June 14, I felt that virtually the whole of Pakistan—a nation distinguished more by its violent differences than its commonalities—had come together on a single issue: justice for the chief justice.

This was not a stereotypical mob baying for any brutish form of recourse. It was, instead, a gathering simply demanding fairness under the law. Though few of the non-lawyers in the crowd could have recited the concepts by name, the assembled citizens were taking a stand for basic principles like habeas corpus, the ideas of the Magna Carta (which proclaims the supremacy of law) and the spirit of the U.S. Bill of Rights—all of which have been squashed by Musharraf. Above all, however, they were there to support the kind of judges, like Chaudhry, who treat these concepts not as mere words but as a solemn compact between the state and its citizens.

As the first rays of the Saturday sun streaked over Parliament, I delivered the concluding speech, and this remarkable crowd, the biggest in Pakistan's recent history, dispersed peacefully for the trip home. Not a shot was fired or a pane of glass broken. Yet more than 200,000 Pakistanis had managed to make their point: they wanted their judges back.

Yet as I walked off stage I found myself wondering if the governing coalition, the general or his backers in America had been listening. Unfortunately, the signs aren't promising. A few days later at the award ceremony for Khurram, the U.S. ambassador blithely ignored his brave call for justice. Khurram himself is now in the protective custody of his terrified parents. They fear that Pakistan's notorious intelligence agencies, known for their propensity for making inconvenient people disappear, could move against him.

This very tendency was one more thing that had landed Pakistan's chief justice in trouble—he had repeatedly demanded due process and habeas corpus for all prisoners, even those picked up by the military.

For Khurram's sake, and that of every other Pakistani, we need our chief justice back now.

Ahsan is president of the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan and the leader of the Lawyers’ Movement.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mohd sheikh @ 06/22/2008 2:49:22 PM

    Barrister Aitizaz Ahsan is our Pakistan Bar Association President. He has since, March 2007, been sincerely campaigning for the restoration of the rule of law and independence of judiciary and restoration of 60 deposed justices.

    Leadership of Pakistan Peoples Party and Muslim League ???N were out of country. They came back to Pakistan through National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO). Asif Ali Zardari widower of Benazir Bhutto was facing corruption and other criminal cases while Nawaz Sharief had been exiled by General Mhsharraf. Chief Justice of Pakistan had started delivering justice independently. His Banker Prime Minister Shoukat Aziz has been selling assets of Pakistan to his favourits buyers at through away prices and he was doing all sorts of financial corruption with the support of General Musharraf. Now he has virtually run away from the country. Security Agencies of General Musharraf had been making people of Pakistan untraceable and most of them were handed over to United States on payment of money without due process of law of extradition.

    Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftkhar Mohammad Choudhry had started entertaining petitions of untraceable persons families. General Musharraf and Prime Minister Shoukat Aziz when got him sacked as Chief Justice unlawfully Aitizaz Ahsan fought his case. Though the Chief Justice was restored by the Supreme Court decision but few months after the Chief Justice and 60 other justice were dismissed because they had refused to accept Musharraf dictates against the Constitution of Pakistan.

    Mr Zardari, against whom cases were terminated because of (NRO), is now leader of the majority party in the government. He does not want independent judges. Zardari like any other dictator needs tamed judiciary. Bush administration also does not want independent judiciary in Pakistan because independent Judges will be asking for production of the untraceable citizens, clandestinely handed over by Musharraf.

    If the independent Judges are restored Musharraf is very likely to be tried for various crimes including mutiny breaking of the Constitution of Pakistan.
    Present US Government is strongly backing General Musharraf. The NRO was enacted by General Musharraf under the dictates of Bush administration. Now Zardari intends to pay back his favour to General Musharraf by not restoring the independent judges who could be problem for Musharraf and American administration.

    Zardari does not like Aitizaz Ahsan though he is member of Pakistan Peoples Party and he was Interior Minister in Benazir???s last Government. Our present leadership and specifically the role of Barrister Aitizaz for independence of judiciary will be remembered for ever in Pakistan.

    M. Saleem Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan
    Islamabad - Rawalpindi

  • Posted By: atiqc @ 06/22/2008 2:21:34 PM

    Civilized nations stand today on bodies of people who had been daring and always stood firm to make their point against the dictators. Although, they were perished but are remembered as national heros in the history of any nation. Dictators like Hitlar are hated not only in their on country but all over the world.

    Political and civil society movements change the course of a nation. The Long March of Lawyers and civil society of Pakistan might be perceived as a failure by few short sighted fellows but it would have very deep rooted impact on the future of Pakistan.

    Lawyers movement has already brought a change in the perception of a common man. An example of that is quoted by Mr. Aitzaz in his article. Mr. Khurram is a gem of a boy and God knows how many gems like him have already been educated and awakened by this movement.

    This movement has already touched hearts and souls of millions of Pakistanis and they stand united behind the CJ and all other deposed Judges. Although, Pakistani rulers are using delay tactics but they are neglecting that people are watching all their actions and they would pay the price if not today then tomorrow.

    We are quick to comment on persons and start doubting their motives and forget the long term achievements and benefits the nations is going to have. Lets stand behind the cause not individuals.

    Dictators like Musharaf are supported by non other than American regime which proclaims that they are biggest supports of democracy. Their claim probably ends outside the territory of the United States. Musharaf, the dictator, is key ally of America. These movements would impose pressure on America to stop support of such dictators and tell America that Pakistan needs real democracy not a dictatorial democracy.

  • Posted By: Houlbelat @ 06/22/2008 9:44:59 AM

    Judiciary by definition is required to have no room for sentiments, should be blind to anything against principles of humanity, should have no ears for listening anything out of context or speak its mind on any issue having remotest possibility of being referred to as precedence or quoted to prejudice its normal course of proceedings. Can we expect the embroiled Chief Judge to have no sentiments, no eyes and be deaf and dumb?

    Another point is about the competence of Pakistani legislators. Can those semi-illiterate legislators make laws capable of solving highly intricate legal riddles by decoding and simplyfying legal jargon's devised and propagated by the evil genius minds for negative reasons? Can the empty seats in the legislative assemblies of elected representatives entrusted the task of setting the course and sailing the ship of Pakistan's destiny, lead it out of turmoiling rough seas ? Is it not a design of those, who do not want capable and intelligent minds deliberate and legislate on issues for welfare of the nation, always holding the forts? Is it not the greatest conspiracy against a common man, to manipulate return of nodding dumb heads in the legislative assemblies to make laws and regulations for enrichment of a few selfish at the expense of milling millions? And most importantly, is it possible to have a genuinely humane legislative assembly and independent, unbiased judiciary in Pakistan under current street agitating brand of holligan lawyers, which should have no consideration other than pure merit to make, decide and execute laws, without fear or favour.

    Presently, those who are fighting to resist reinstatement of genuine judiciary and installation of a rubber-stamp legislators, obviously have their selfish agenda. Otherwise, who on earth would resist knowledgeable and dynamic lawmakers and maintain stagnation against development?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now