Mr. Obama’s Washington

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Nins @ 06/24/2008 11:11:39 PM

    Some of you who read my posts about investment banks driving up the price of oil through commodities futures trading did not believe me that this was a real issue, despite the fact that the Senate is investigating it. Well, it really is an issue and an important one, so important that the Department of Justice is going to investigate.

    Senator Obama announced a plan to crack down on excessive energy speculation and fully close the loophole in the CFTC regulations that I referred to in my blog. This loophole is also called the "Enron Loophole" because it was created by McCain campaign co-chair Phil Gramm at the behest of Enron lobbyists, and exempts most trading on energy commodities from regulation. As a result, the CFTC is unable to oversee the oil futures market or investigate cases where excessive speculation is driving up oil prices. Just last month, John Hofmesiter, President of Shell Oil Company, says that the proper, uninflated production price of a barrel of crude oil is no more than $65.

    http://www.financialpost.com/reports/oil-watch/story.html?id=532747

    Clarence Cazalot, CEO of Marathon Oil, stated in November of 2007 that "$100 oil just isn't justified by the physical demand on the market - it is speculation on the futures market that is driving this."

    http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/12/markets/oil_hundred/index.htm?postversion=2007111216

    Larry Chom, Chief Economist of Platt's, states in a recent Businessweek article that speculation is adding at least $50 to the price of every barrel of oil. You can read this article in the May 13, 2008 edition of Businessweek, but it is no longer available on their website unless you are a member.

    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2008/

    To see what Senator Obama is doing to correct this serious problem and lower the price of gas and oil, go to his website:

    http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stateupdates/gG5Rzb

    Now THAT is my kind of President! Sees the problem, and moves to fix it, while Bush and McCain are sitting on their hands.

    • Posted By: jath123 @ 06/25/2008 3:05:46 PM

      Another worthless, cut-and-paste, driveby robo-post. Am I the only one who is sick of these?

      • Posted By: loriw @ 06/26/2008 12:27:22 AM

        jath123, You are not the only one who is tired of cut and pastes to every article. Usually they are totally unrelated to the article's content. Wastes our time when trying to find meaningful content.

        • Posted By: Nins @ 06/26/2008 1:39:57 AM

          Lori, YOU are looking for meaningful content? Anyone who reads your posts would be surprised to hear this.

          Personally I don't care if my blogs are not commentaries on the subject of article that I append them to. My goal is to get out the word about the economy, energy policy and the voting records of the candidates. I append only to political articles, where presumably people come to read political blogs. I post political blogs on political articles.

          And what do you do, Lori? I have yet to see you post one single factually substantial blog. All you do is harp on people, complain and moan.

          • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/26/2008 11:55:57 PM

            Amen, Nims! Our political views may differ, but I do fully agree with this comment! Sometimes the original article isn't even worth the debate....

      • Posted By: sharenews @ 06/26/2008 2:02:53 AM

        I have not objection to cut and pastes as long as they are providing supporting information for voters to share with others about either their candidate or their opponents as long as they are not mean spirited reposts that are cut and pasted (and there are some of those that get reposted) and that they help add to the dialogue of the conversations going on in various blogs on the Newsweek site. Plus you need to consider that there are always new bloggers coming onto the site each day that may never see some of the original posts cuz you dont expect them to dig back 5 days worth for those blogs that stay up that long in support of a few meaty articles. Well, that is my stance anyways. : )

    • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/26/2008 11:54:36 PM

      Nins, I respect everyone's right to decide for his/her self what they feel is best. And yes, investments do drive up or down whatever stock is out there. Both candidates have good and bad viewpoints. Both are probably the worst of the possibilities we once had, but here we are.

      My concern isn't cracking down on people making money as you mention here about Obama. My concern is the idea of someone wanting to take away yours and my choice. Our options of deciding for ourself=ves what is best for us. This id a path to dictatorship. Everything I hear from Obama reaks of this philosophy. If he really wants to gain respect, why doesn't he crack down on our public officials making obscene salaries, having obscene benefits, etc.... These politicians really contribute nothing to society. At least businessmen contribute. Vehicles were not created by the government - a private citizen did that. Same with oil and everything else we have. Then politicians came in and figured they need to regulate and control things. Every time a politician gets his/her hands into something, it goes to crap. Hell even the senate which decided to run their own cafeteria lost money and decided it was best to privatize it again... Yet they feel they should get involved. It is our elected officials who (with the pushing of minority special interest groups) have held our society back. If they would stick to ensuring the voice of the people were heard and national security was upheld then leave the rest to the people, we would be in so much better shape. We do not need government handouts and ogranizations to take care of us. When left to our own, the American peoiple throughout our entire existence have been the most generous in the world. Without government getting involved and taking our money, charity would be greater. We have a right to life liberty and the persuit of happiness. Any time someone steps in and tramples on this by demanding that we do this or that, only serves to take away this blessing. Obama would "require" and "Demand" we follow what he wants... Now I don't recall anywhere in our history where the American people have even tolerated this type of attitude until now.

      Small things here and there from both sides are good and bad. But the big picture is where I am more concerned. Who is more likely to support and defend the constitution of the United states agains ALL ENEMIES, foreign and DOMESTIC? I just don't see this from Obama. Perfect example is the second ammendment issue. We had judges "Interpreting" whether this applied to individuals or not. This is the first time in our existence. Why? The entie Bill of rights was designed for the individual. Fortunately it was upheld. But when one of these bill of rights is taken away, the floodgates are open for the rest to be "interpreted"

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/26/2008 10:17:16 PM



    MONDAY, MARCH 31, 2008
    NY Daily News revealed that some of the 66 lobbyists driving the Double Talk Express have made close to a million dollars lobbying for a notorious predatory lender, Ameriquest, which lured people into unsustainable mortgages. McCain doesn't blame Ameriquest or his lobbyist pals-- one his chief liaison to Congress (John Green) and the other is his national finance co-chairman (Wayne Berman). Instead he blames the victims, calling them irresponsible and trying to paint them as somehow morally deficient and undeserving of society's help as they lose their homes. Of course, McCain himself has voted for every single piece of legislation that has wrecked a regulatory system that could have and should have prevented the business practices that led to this-- and those votes are paying off big time as scores of lobbyists he has helped flock to his campaign.
    When Sen. John McCain addressed the nation's burgeoning mortgage mess last week, he insisted it was time for a little "straight talk."

    "I will not play election-year politics with the housing crisis," the GOP presidential hopeful insisted while unveiling his plan, which many have since described as friendlier to the mortgage industry than the Democrats' proposals.

    What McCain did not say-- which some believe smacks of politics-- is that two of his top advisers were recently lobbyists for a notorious lender in the mortgage meltdown.

    McCain's lobbyist brigade were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars before Ameriquest went belly-up-- but not before thousands and thousands of their victims lost their homes. The company was forced to settle suits in 49 states and pay $325 million in liabilities. "They would be defined as the most blatant and aggressive predatory lenders out of everybody," said Bruce Marks, head of the nonprofit Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America.

    McCain claims he kept Green and Berman out of the process when he decided to come down on the side of the predatory lenders and against the consumers and, in truth, that's the way his voting record shows he's always been. One of his p.r hacks, Tucker Bonds, blatantly lied to a press ever eager to believe every word: "Sen. McCain has never done anything that would violate the public trust and he has never done favors for special interests or lobbyists." I guess no one remembers McCain's close relationship with crooked Arizona banker Charles Keating, who admits he got what he expected from McCain for showering him with tens of thousands of dollars in expensive gifts and services-- while ripping off millions of dollars for Savings and Loans depositors.


    • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/26/2008 11:36:27 PM

      Wagon driver you never cease to amaze me with your bullshit and warped twisting of the truth. You support a candidate who has clearly expressed a socialist/marxist/facist point of vie in all of his politics. He wants large government to make decisions and control the masses. Everything he stands for reaks of communism. yet here you are again, making a feable attempt to use "fear" to persuade others to come around and willingly vote away their freedoms. Please get off the crazy pills and stop gulping the koolaid.

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/26/2008 10:18:54 PM



    "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." - Sinclair Lewis

    The Repugnant Party has arrived and it is wrapped in the flag and it is carrying the cross

    And It Is A Cross I Do Not Wish To Bear And I Wish For Them To Quit Desecrating My Beloved Flag And Country

    1.) Powerful and Continuing Nationalism: Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

    2.) Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights: Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

    3.) Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause: The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals: communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

    4.) Supremacy of the Military: Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

    5.) Rampant Sexism: The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.

    6.) Controlled Mass Media: Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

    7.) Obsession with National Security: Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses

    8.) Religion and Government are Intertwined: Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.

    Continued Below:



  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/26/2008 10:18:02 PM



    Continued from above:

    9.) Corporate Power is Protected: The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

    10.) Labor Power is Suppressed: Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.

    11.) Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts: Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.

    12.) Obsession with Crime and Punishment: Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations

    13.) Rampant Cronyism and Corruption: Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

    14.) Fraudulent Elections: Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.


  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/24/2008 10:08:32 AM

    Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God." James 4:4

    Senator Obama has been very up front during the campaign about his Christian faith. Only God can judge his heart if indeed he has accepted Jesus Christ as his personal Lord and Savior, but based on his public statements about his faith as well as his actions, it is critical to explore what he believes and see if this man really is a Christian as he claims. What does Senator Obama believe regarding the basic tenets of the Christian faith? What does he believe about salvation?

    Senator Obama is part of this new and emerging group of Christians I have called the "religious left." The "religious left" is made up of people who identify themselves as Christians and hold strong religious beliefs as well as sharing left-wing ideals. Obviously, this group has risen up in opposition to those who have been tagged the "religious right" or the "Christian right." Those in the "religious left" oppose God on issues like abortion and gay marriage, but are heavily involved in the ecumenical movement, environmental issues, opposing war for any reason, world hunger, and social issues like healthcare, welfare, and education. Sound familiar?

    I am sending a formal invitation to Senator Obama to sit down with me on camera and deal with these serious questions regarding what he believes about his Christian faith. He has been eager to talk about his faith to the media and has appeared in many televised programs specifically about what he believes. Sadly, those who have interviewed him and moderated these special programs on faith, have either not had the understanding or desire to ask Senator Obama the critical questions to determine what this man really believes regarding the foundational beliefs of Christianity.

    A Christian, according to the Bible, is a person who has made the conscious choice to accept Jesus Christ as their Savior by faith and follow Him. You CANNOT be a true follower of Jesus Christ and deny the Truth of the Bible. It is inconsistent to say, " I am a Christian," yet live in rebellion to the Bible. It is apparent as you listen to Senator Obama speak about his faith, that he does NOT hold the Bible to be the inspired, inerrant Word of God, representing Absolute Truth and our final authority in all matters. Jesus said, "If you love me you will obey me," and that means His Word!

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/24/2008 10:09:53 AM

      So what are Senator Obama's beliefs about the most important issue of all, how to be saved? He claims his mother rejected Christ, yet he knows she is in Heaven. He stated in a recent interview, "I believe that there are many paths to the same place." This is the damnable universalistic lie leading millions of souls to hell that there are many roads leading to God. He also said that "he doesn't know if he is going to Heaven, nor does he believe he or anyone will go to Hell." How can you claim to be a Christian, yet not believe in Heaven and Hell?

      JESUS SAID," I AM THE WAY AND THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE. NO ONE COME TO THE FATHER EXCEPT THROUGH ME." JESUS TAUGHT THAT THERE WAS ONLY ONE WAY TO BE SAVED, AND THAT IS THROUGH FAITH IN HIM, AND THAT THOSE WHO "BELIEVED IN HIM" WOULD BE FOREVER WITH HIM IN HEAVEN, AND THOSE WHO REJECTED HIM WOULD BE CAST INTO HELL FOR ALL ETERNITY. HOW CAN YOU CLAIM TO BE A CHRISTIAN YET DENY GOD'S PLAN OF SALVATION THAT SUPPOSEDLY SAVED YOUR SOUL???

      The fact Senator Obama denies Jesus is the only way to be saved, that there is no Heaven or Hell, that the Bible is not the only Truth, calls into question whether he believes Jesus was immaculately conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of a virgin as the Bible claims, or that Jesus literally rose from the dead as we are told in Scripture. Faith in Christ is not a political game, but a life changing experience that determines where your soul will spend eternity. It is time for Senator Obama to be held accountable for what he says he believes to examine if he really is a Christian!

      Also calling his faith into question is his position on three key spiritual issues that transcend into the political arena.

      • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/24/2008 10:11:03 AM

        ON ALL THREE SENATOR OBAMA IS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF GOD! First is his position on abortion. His entire political career he has not just voted to uphold the slaughter of innocent babies, but he has been a defender of those rights. He has been such a staunch defender of this practice of legalized infanticide that he was endorsed by NARAL, one of the world's leading baby killing organizations. GOD CALLS ABORTION MURDER AND NO CHRISTIAN IN CONSCIENCE CAN DEFEND OR SUPPORT MURDERING INNOCENT BABIES!

        Second, is his position on the sin of homosexuality. Again, his entire political career Senator Obama has been a staunch ally and supporter of the homosexual community. He is in favor of redefining God's Holy Institution of Marriage to include men marrying men and women marrying women, he is in favor of redefining God's plan for the family to include adoption by same sex couples, and he is in favor of special rights for people who choose to engage in deviant sexual relationships. GOD CALLS HOMOSEXUALITY AN ABOMINATION AND THE BIBLE DEFINES THIS ACT AS A SIN FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT THROUGH THE NEW TESTAMENT.

        Third, is his position on Israel. Senator Obama is in favor of giving away part of the land that God Himself gave to the children of Israel to their enemies, whose stated goal and desire is to kill every Jew and wipe them off the face of the earth. God's promise to Abraham found in Genesis 12:3 is still in effect. It reads, " I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you." NO MAN HAS THE RIGHT TO GIVE AWAY THE LAND GOD HIMSELF GAVE TO ISRAEL!

        If Senator Obama wants to support slaughtering babies, the homosexual agenda, giving away Israel's land to their enemies, and promote New Age lies about salvation, that is fine. However, don't do these things and call yourself a Christian. I never have or ever will endorse any candidate, tell people who to or not to vote for. I want to warn all Christians that you can't separate your faith in Christ from who you elect to influence the spiritual issues of our day. You are not voting for a pastor, but should be voting for someone who will uphold your faith and values. When you vote, you are voting your conscience.

        • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 06/25/2008 4:50:42 PM

          I just have a question on your first point. Where exactly in the bibile and which version is abortion mentioned. I would really like to know.

          • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/26/2008 7:43:06 AM

            Exodus 20: Ten Commandments - Thou shalt not kill. Now please tell me where in the Bible it states that it is ok to kill the unborn child. Bottom line, it is a child. The arguement that is is still developing is rediculouse. (Example: a 1 or 2 yr old child is also still developing but you don't see anyone arguing that it is ok to kill the child simply because the mother choses she doesn't want it). A Life is a life. Any arguement that a child in the womb shouldn't have the right ti love is a slap in the face on all principles. Ask any pregnant woman if she can't feel the "life" in her move, kick, etc.... So please, since you want to bring the Bible as an example, please show me somewhere where it states that this practice is OK.

            • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 06/26/2008 4:40:28 PM

              Who are you replying to? willnotvote stated that Obama was on the opposite side of God on the Abortion issue. I asked him where in the bible and what version is abortion mentioned.

              Regarding your reply "Thou shalt not kill" are you serious? people are murdered legally in this country everyday. Although I am personally against partial birth abortions, except under extreme circumstances, my personal opinion is that what I do with my body is my business not the government. I really do not care what type of laws are passed to ban legal abortions. If I were to decide that this procedure was the right decision for myself or a daughter of mine, I would just do what rich folk have been doing for decades, I would just take a trip to a more progressive country to have the procedure done.

              • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/26/2008 5:47:26 PM

                I was replying to you. You wanted a verse where it talked about abortions. I brought forth the "thou shalt not kill" Exodus 21:22 says: ???If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman???s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.??? So there is your answer on where in the bible it specifically discussed the issue.

                For the rest, even in the Bible there were death penalties for offenses. This is not considered "Legal Murder" as you would seem to put it. I personally believe that there are cases where the death penalty is justified. I like you have a daughter (a couple of them actually). I would be willing to be a criminal in the eyes of the law by taking the life of any jackass who decided to kidnap, rape and kill one of them. To hell with the justice system in that case - but that is a personal choice. Just as you and I have a personal choice in anything we do. If you support abortion - great that is your choice, if not - great that is also your choice. And yes I personally think there is even a time when an abortion would be ok - for example if it is something that greatly puts the woman in jeapardy of her life. These are all choices. The partial birth abortions I do not believe are justified because you waited too long before making a decision and had already chosen. I wasn't argueing for or against your comment. I was simply answering your inquiry

        • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/24/2008 2:12:43 PM



          Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He

          Man this has got to be one of the funniest post I have ever read no wait it is the funniest post I have ever read

          Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He

          Extend our Pain with Your vote for Your Saint McCain

          Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He HeHa Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He Ha Ha Ha Ho HO HO HE He He

          • Posted By: Concerned Ctzn @ 06/24/2008 8:38:44 PM

            Hi-Ho, Hi-Ho, it's off to BO I go

            I smoke some crack

            My baby's got back

            Hi-Ho, Hi-Ho ...

            Light one up and sing with me Driver! Come join the Hippy Bus and the Magical Mystery Tour!

            • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/25/2008 11:07:47 AM



              You are not really that fuched up are you? I mean you make light of almost everything one would have to start wondering a little maybe a lot. Nah why bother carry on

            • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 06/24/2008 10:30:56 PM

              ROTFLMAO...Mark

        • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/24/2008 10:12:29 AM

          I will be praying for Senator Obama and his family. Praying that he has a real encounter with the Lord Jesus Christ. His campaign slogan is CHANGE. I pray that Senator Barack Obama will CHANGE from being an enemy of God who lies to people that there are many roads that lead to God to being a man of God who will boldly and without shame tell people the ONLY way to be saved is through faith in Jesus Christ. I pray that Senator Barack Obama will CHANGE from being an enemy of God who supports the legal slaughter of babies to being a man of God who seeks to overturn Roe vs. Wade and take the Federal Government out of the business of legally slaughtering babies.

          I pray that Senator Barack Obama will CHANGE from being an enemy of God who supports gay marriage, gay adoptions, special rights for gays, to being a man of God who will condemn this sin and try to help those in bondage to homosexuality find freedom. I pray that Senator Barack Obama will CHANGE from being an enemy of God who seeks to give away the land God gave to Israel to being a man of God who will be a friend to and defender of the Jewish people.

          The Christian faith is not a buffet where you can pick and choose what you want to believe. We don't get to determine what Truth is, God has already done that and given it to us in the Bible. The public statements Senator Obama has made about being a Christian and his position on key spiritual issues are totally inconsistent with someone who has a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. His chief campaign slogan is CHANGE. I pray that Senator Barack Obama will CHANGE from being an enemy of God to a friend of God!

          • Posted By: Concerned Ctzn @ 06/24/2008 10:50:32 AM

            Wow! You really did your homework didn't ya?! I guess ONE WORD will sum things up:

            NOBAMA!

            Goooo HR! CC and Willnotvoteobama are whicha!!!!

            • Posted By: AmeriKhan Lobo @ 06/25/2008 1:06:14 AM

              No "homework" was done. Just more hate filled anti Obama posts from someone who needs to pray that God will clear their racist, redneck vision. If the best you can do is spout crap you heard/read from a 3rd party anti Obama website or a cuckoo right wing nut "christian" extremist source/website, then you are pathetic. You won't change the minds of people with real intelligence and wisdom but you might convince mindless sheep like yourselves.

  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/26/2008 3:26:35 PM

    Obama-the Flip Flopper
    What is amazing about Obama is that he will flip flop over the course of consecutive days--as he did with the "without preconditions" argument. Or whether or not Iran is a threat. One day, it was a "small" threat. The very next day, Obama said that he had always recognized Iran as a "grave" threat.


    Then his campaign will tell us what Obama really meant, which usually involves a lot of doublespeak, and vocabularly manipulation. Who knew that preconditions and preparations, for instance, mean entirely different things, but neither Obama nor his campaign can actually pinpoint the difference?


    And then there's the old standby that Obama was speaking "metaphorically."


    Next, the campaign will scrub the Obama website of any reference to Obama's "old" stance.


    But my favorite recent Obama flip flop has to be when he said that two men heading a VP search committee for Obama did not "work for (Obama)".


    But then at least one resigned the very next day. He had to resign from something--perhaps his job with the Obama campaign?

  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/26/2008 3:17:01 PM

    What kind of change?
    All the Obamabots that flood these comment posts, I hope you go to vote in Nov. And please be civilized if your candidate loses.


    This is an opinion piece, not news. If you don't agree with it, offer your argument to the contrary. No need to call something you disagree with garbage, such term, with its "useless" connotation, might be better applied to describe Obama's false promises and empty, boastful rhetoric.


    As for change, McCain has been the REAL FIGHTER FOR CHANGE all his public life... at least, for the last 25 yrs. THe record is there. He has bucked the political establishment on most of the most important and controversial issues of our time. What has Obama done, beside "SACRIFICING" one year of his youth life as a street organizer in Chicago? ALthough that was smartly planned out and he has long reaped the fruits of such an investment.


    Obama = Radical Change to the extreme left.


    IT AINT GONNA HAPPEN.

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/26/2008 1:49:59 PM



    Johnnie Midnight is at it again

    Several of Congress' most prominent Jewish members are set to go after John McCain on an issue of perceived strength: his proclaimed "toughness" in dealing with Iran.

    On Thursday, Sens. Frank Lautenberg and Ben Cardin, alongside more than half-a-dozen members of the House of Representatives and the National Jewish Democratic Council, will host a press conference highlighting a vote McCain made that helped corporations like Halliburton continue doing business with sanctioned countries like Iran.

    The vote, McCain's critics argue, demonstrates a strand of political hypocrisy -- on the campaign trail, the Senator has repeatedly called for divestment from Iran -- and pokes holes in his attacks on Barack Obama.

    "John McCain has been arguing that he is Mr. Tough Guy on Iran," said Ira Forman, Executive Director of the NJDC. "At the AIPAC conference he talked about how he would introduce stronger sanctions and boycott measures. He's also saying Obama is naïve and can't be trusted to deal with the Iranians. But when it came to deciding to be tough on Iran or supporting Halliburton, he stuck with Halliburton. It is easy to talk the talk but it is not so easy to walk the walk."

    In July 2005, Sen. Lautenberg introduced an amendment to the Defense Authorization bill that would have closed a loophole allowing U.S. corporations to do business with terrorist-sponsoring nations by setting up foreign shell companies. The measure had broad support as it became evident that several major companies, including Halliburton, had taken advantage of the system. Frank Gaffney, the neoconservative columnist, opined that the situation was an "affront to the letter and spirit of the law."

    But when the provision came to the floor, the vote split almost entirely down party line. Only two GOP Senators supported the amendment and neither had the last name McCain.

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/26/2008 1:24:08 PM



    Senator Obama just took another giant step toward winning the presidency. Actually, someone who considers himself a sworn enemy of Senator Obama took the step for him. Dr. Dobson of the Focus On the Family radio program (and evangelical media empire) has aired a program in which he attacks Senator Obama, the Senator's theology and his credentials as a Christian. With enemies like this Senator Obama doesn't need friends.

    No, I'm not talking about Dobson energizing liberal Democrats. I'm talking about Dobson energizing his fellow evangelicals to vote for Senator Obama.
    If you're one of many Americans who thinks that the war in Iraq was a mistake or believe that the Republicans have run the economy into the ground or think that perhaps the chaos George Bush unleashed in our foreign affairs has something to do with the price of gas at the pump... then you have Dr. Dobson to thank -- personally. No one worked harder to get Bush elected then reelected. Dobson delivered his millions of dupes. But now many of them see through him and like most Americans, are appalled by Bush.

    The new generation of evangelicals is sick of being labeled as backward rednecks because of their association with fossils like Dobson. There are many evangelicals like Cizik too who are not all about homophobia, nationalism, war-without-end and American exceptionalism or the Republican Party. Like Cizik they believe that the America has a responsibility to do something about global warming, poverty, AIDS, human trafficking and other issues. They see through Dobson and the other so-called pro-life leaders, who have actually done nothing to reduce abortion. In fact Dobson has increased abortions because of his "abstinence only" crusade.

    As a result of his power grabs and bullying of other evangelicals, not to mention his telling people how to vote and pointing them to the failed W, Dobson & Co. have zero credibility with a growing number of otherwise conservative evangelicals who happen--this year--to be looking favorably at Senator Obama's holistic Christian-based world view. Unlike Dobson they like Obama's theology just fine.

    All that was missing to put the frosting on the Obama cake was for Dobson to attack him. For Obama to win all he needs to do is peel off a chunk of heretofore solid evangelical Republican votes. Dobson just handed Obama those votes.


  • Posted By: Kboogie @ 06/26/2008 12:40:22 PM

    NOW, THIS IS INTERESTING....................

    According to RealClearPolitics, Obama is leading by 7pts in the National Poll, 70pts in the Electoral College, and leading in 5 out of the 7 "battleground" states".

    RasmussenPoll is holding steady w/ Obama leading by 5pts. The Rasmussen Reports Balance of Power Calculator shows Obama leading in states with 200 Electoral College votes while McCain leads in states with 174 votes. When leaners are included, it's Obama 284, McCain 240.

    The Gallup Poll is showing a national tie. But what's interesting is that Obama is no longer showing weakness w/ Catholics, Jews, or Hispanics:

    "Among major U.S. religious groups, Catholic voters are most closely divided in their presidential voting preferences, with Barack Obama holding a narrow 47% to 43% advantage over John McCain. McCain leads Obama among Protestants (48% to 41%) and Mormons (70% to 23%) while Obama holds the upper hand among Jewish voters (62% to 29%) and those with no religious affiliation (65% to 25%)."

    "Catholics have traditionally been a key swing-voter group, and the 2008 election is proving to be no exception. Obama's appeal to minority voters -- including Hispanics -- helps to push him ahead of McCain among Catholics. In these data, roughly one in seven Catholic registered voters report being of Hispanic ethnicity, and they prefer Obama by a 66% to 25% margin."

    Whether you count the Newsweek, LA TIMES, or Bloomburg Polls, (or not), the end result remains the same - If the election were today, McCain would be TOAST!!!!!

    Actually, Obama has been the front-runner since he defeated HRC, officially.

    Almost forgot.............OH HAPPY DAYS!!!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 06/26/2008 11:04:33 AM

    Obama supporters, please refresh my memory as to why I would want to vote for Obama. Thanks.
    McCain supporters, no interfering in this, thanks.

  • Posted By: Bass Pro @ 06/24/2008 3:40:14 PM

    And when i think of abfabinri, i think of a person who is willing to vote for a man who is dedicated to sending our young women and men to their deaths in Iraq. John McCain is willing to just that to obtain the votes of the mouth-breathing right Wing of his and your party so he can realize his ambition. You out of touch 23%ers have no problem with killing our troops to achieve the White House.

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/24/2008 11:30:21 PM

      obama sends more babies to thier death by supporting late term abortion than any war ever has !!!!

      • Posted By: AmeriKhan Lobo @ 06/25/2008 12:58:07 AM

        No. People send babies to their death, Obama doesn't make them do anything.
        Do you want to blame the gunmakers for all the shoting deaths? They give you the option to buy their firearm. How you use it is up to you and other gun buyers. 99% of your postsarguments are weak at best. NEXT!

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 06/26/2008 11:02:08 AM

          Ditto!

        • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/25/2008 8:48:52 AM

          True, it isn't the gun manufacturers, knife manufacturers, baseball bat manufacturers, etc who cause the deaths. It is the people using these instruments. Hell a telephone can be used to crack a skull.... But in his arguement, it is the politician who pushes these laws that allow "legalized murder" to occur all in the name of "choice". You had a choice when you did the deed. Problem is no one in todays society wants to accept the "RESPONSIBILITY" for their actions. Obama himself displayed this attitude in his comment that he wouldn't want his daughter "PUNISHED"

          • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/25/2008 4:06:47 PM



            If guns, knives and baseball bats don't kill people don't take them along when you go to War!

            • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/25/2008 10:44:47 PM

              Sorry but that simply was one of the stupidest comments I have seen yet from you. Guns don't kill people. People kill people. To even argue the point is ignorance. How many guns have killed someone on their own? How many knives have just jumped up and stabbed someone? How many baseball bats have simply had enough and started swinging wildly on their own? These are nothing more than tools - inanimate objects. They are tools that by themselves are harmless. Wake up and smell the kool aid before drinking it.

          • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/25/2008 9:02:07 AM

            continued (spastic finger caused submission)... He didn't want his daugher punished with a CHILD because she chose to have sex. This kind of attitude may not be forcing anyone to do anything, but it is just as ENABLING as giving a drunk a drink.

    • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/25/2008 9:29:14 AM

      I really don't k like "defending" McCain because a great deal of his philosophies I do disagree with, but this here is blatant "fear mongering". How can you honestly sit there and put out this BS about him wanting to send our troops to their deaths? I suppose you would have us do away with the military all together so none of them ever have to go off to fight a war.... Boy we sure would have a free nation for a long time then wouldn't we. The men and women who enter the military do so for various reasons, but they do so freely and willingly and take an oath to support and defend the constitution agains all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. Bottom line is everyone who joins the military knows that if called upon they do have a responsibility and requirement to fight. I know that is extremely hard for some weak minded left winger to understand but that's how it is. Additionaly, Congress has to approve a war and sending our troops so your sorry attempt to push this on one man is beyond pathetic. If you want to post for your candidate, by all means do so - it is your right and priviledge granted to you from the blood sweat and tears of OTHERS. But for crying out loud, post something that is for your candidate not made up trash against another...

  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/26/2008 10:52:54 AM

    to all obama supporters answer this what and how will he change the way the u.s is being run please be specific !!!

  • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/25/2008 10:12:56 AM

    Id like to see a candidate address and try to fix this:

    How many zeros in a billion? This is too true to be funny.

    The next time you hear a politician use the word 'billion' in a casual manner, think about whether you want the 'politicians' spending YOUR tax money.

    A billion is a difficult number to comprehend, but one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective in one of it's releases.

    A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

    A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

    A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age.

    A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.

    A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes, at the rate our government is spending it.

    While this thought is still fresh in our brain... let's take a look at New Orleans .. It's amazing what you can learn with some simple division.

    Louisiana Senator, Mary Landrieu (D) is presently asking Congress for 250 BILLION DOLLARS to rebuild New Orleans . Interesting number... what does it mean?

    Well... if you are one of the 484,674 residents of New Orleans (every man, woman, and child) you each get $516,528.

    Or... if you have one of the 188,251 homes in New Orleans , your home gets $1,329,787.

    Or... if you are a family of four... your family gets $2,066,012.

    Washington, D. C???. HELLO! Are all your calculators broken??

    Accounts Receivable Tax, Building Permit Tax, CDL License Tax, Cigarette Tax, Corporate Income Tax, Dog License Tax, Federal Income Tax, Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA), Fishing License Tax, Food License Tax, Fuel Permit Tax, Gasoline Tax, Hunting License Tax, Inheritance Tax, Inventory Tax, IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax), IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax), Liquor Tax, Luxury Tax, Marriage License Tax, Medicare Tax, Property Tax, Real Estate Tax, Service charge taxes, Social Security Tax, Road Usage Tax (Truckers), Sales Taxes, Recreational Vehicle Tax, School Tax, State Income Tax, State Unemployment Tax (SUTA), Telephone Federal Excise Tax, Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax, Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Tax, Telephone Minimum Usage, Surcharge Tax, Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax, Telephone State and Local Tax, Telephone Usage Charge Tax, Utility Tax, Vehicle License Registration Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Watercraft Registration Tax, Well Permit Tax., Workers Compensation Tax

    STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

    Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago...and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.

    We had absolutely no national debt... We had the largest middle class in the world... and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

    What happened? Can you spell 'POLITICIANS!'

    And I still have to press '1' for English.

    What the heck happened?????

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/25/2008 12:45:28 PM

      OK I'LL TRY BACK IN THE 60'S THEY HAD THIS THING CALLED WOODSTOCK AND SOME HIPPIES RAN OUT MONEY TO BUY DOPE AS THEY WERE TRAVELING ALL OVER PROPTEATING THE VIET NAM WARTHEN THEY SEEN SOME FOLKS THAT WERE MAKING A LIFE HERE IN THE GOOD OLE U.S.A. WELL THEY WERE NOT WILLING TO WORK FOR MONEY SO THEY CAME UP WITH A PLAN TO GET FREE MONEY AND A LIBERAL WAS BORN AFTER THAT WELL THEY THOUGHT UP MORE PLANS TO GET MORE FREE STUFF AND WENT TO THE GOVERMENT AND SAID WERE HUNGRY WERE POOR AND SO SOME WIMP CONGRESSMAN THOUGHT UP ABILL THAT WOULD PROVIDE THE POOR WITH GOVERMENT MONEY BUT THAT WAS NOT ENOUGH WHEN THE CONGRESS MAN THAT HELPED THEM WAS NO LONGER WILLING THEY CAME UP WITH A PLAN TO GET ONE OF THIER OWN IN OFFICE AND IT WORKED SOON THERE WERE HAND OUTS EVERYWHERE AND MORE AND MORE KEPT COMMING SOON IT WOULD TAKE BOTH PARENTS THAT HAD FAMILIES TO WORK TO PROVIDE THE TAXES FOR THE POOR AND FROM THERE KIDS WERE LEFT ALONE IN THE HOUSE AND GREW UP WITHOUT ANY PARENTS TO GUIDE THEM TO BE GOOD CITIZENS AND NOW THERE ALL OLD ENOUGH TO VOTE AND HAVE ADOPTED THE LIBERALS WAY OF THINKING THEY ARE SCARD LITTLE WHINNING BRATS THAT DON'T HAVE THE NERVE TO FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY AND WANT TO HAND IT OVER TO SOMEONE THAT BLOWS SMOKE UP THIER ASSES JUST SO THEY WON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE REAL PROBLEMS THAT THIS COUNTRY AND THE WORLD HAS SO MY FELLOW MARINE I HOPE THIS KINDOF SUMS IT UP AS TO WHAT HAPPENEDTO THE GGOD OLE U.S.A. HANG ON TO YOUR BOOTS BECAUSE ITS NOT OVER YET !!!! SEMPER FI !!!

      • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/25/2008 10:35:46 PM

        Believe me I know what happened and it is getting worse every day. Just thought that was too good not to share! We are in a gimme gimme society. Everyone wants a quick fix but seem to be too stupid to lok at the big picture. We will spend ourselves into oblivion with these hand outs. Anyone think it can't happen? look at history. (recent history to point a fact ... former Soviet Union for example).

        Plus we have congressmen not wanting to allow drilling for oil because... "it won't provide an immediate fix to the oil cost". So rather than do something about it, they'd rather sit and let it continue. Maybe things aren't immediate, but hell it would be a start towards a better life. If we sit on our hands because things aren't immediate... nothing will ever get done. I am sure glad these kooks weren't in office when we used to manufacture products, build dams, etc... Do you think todays elected officials would have approved the Hoover dam? Very doubtful because we would be desturbing wildlife. We have a microwave society that can not see past the here and now.

        • Posted By: Concerned Ctzn @ 06/26/2008 9:52:35 AM

          Two Thumbs Up Willnot and RetiredMarine!!

          Difference between JM and BO's schools of thought regarding our current Energy Crisis:

          John Mc = We may not save the world tomorrow, but damn it, let's put our heads together now and get the ball rollin' ASAP!

          BO = Nah, bad I idea, might inadvertently kill a TREE or an INNOCENT RAT (No not Rev. Wrong -- stop that people!) with that huge, evil drill bit.

      • Posted By: jath123 @ 06/25/2008 3:03:49 PM

        Hint, nobody reads any post that it typed all in caps. It is hard on the eyes and tis probably just a rant.

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/25/2008 12:50:35 PM

      SORRY ABOUT THE SPELLING THIS SITE WON'T LET YOU EDIT BEFORE OR AFTER POSTING !!

  • Posted By: Nins @ 06/21/2008 6:49:24 PM

    Readers, be informed, and beware! Sam Bodman, US Energy Secretary, is a Bush appointed Yes-man. Bodman states that insufficient production is making oil prices soar. Bush wants you to think that the OPEC countries are responsible for high oil prices, but the truth is, OPEC has been significantly increasing production over the past several months. Where is all that oil going? It's being stockpiled by US investment banks, who are creating a fake shortage to drive up the price. Congress has already started to investigate this criminal practice. Bush, who has deregulated the banking industry, tries to blame it on OPEC. By now you should be familiar with Bush's MO: he says you should be very afraid of Muslims. But who you should really be afraid of are investment bankers at Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and Lehman Brothers. Check this out:

    Michael Masters of Master Capital Management (a global investment manager) testified before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Government Affairs a couple of weeks ago. Quotes from his testimony:

    "Today, Index Speculators are pouring billions of dollars into the commodities futures markets, speculating that commodity prices will increase. In the popular press the explanation given for rising oil prices is the increased demand from China. According to the DOE, China's demand for petroleum has increased in the last five years from 1.88 billion barrels to 2.8 billion barrels, an increase of 920 billion barrels. Over the same five year period, Index Speculators' demand for petroleum futures has increased by 848 million barrels. THE INCREASE IN DEMAND FROM INDEX SPECULATORS IS ALMOST EQUAL TO THE INCREASE IN DEMAND FROM CHINA. Index Speculators have now stockpiled, via the futures market, the equivalent of 1.1 billion barrels of petroleum, effectively adding EIGHT TIMES as much oil to their own stockpile as the US Government has added to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve over the last five years."

    "The Senate has asked the question "Are Institutional Investors contributing to food and energy price inflation?" And my unequivocal answer is "YES." In this testimony I will explain that investment banks are one of, if not the primary, factors affecting commodities prices today. Clearly, there are many factors that contribute to price determination in the commodities markets; I am here to expose a fast-growing yet virtually unnoticed factor, and one that presents a problem that can be expediently corrected through legislative policy action..."

    The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission is ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL. They're supposed to be protecting us from these kinds of abuses, but Bush allowed loopholes in the CFTC regulations that you can drive a truck through. An oil truck, that is.

    Links to Masters' Senate testimony, and 2 articles:
    http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/052008Masters.pdf
    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20011.htm
    http://globalresearch.ca

    • Posted By: summer1216 @ 06/21/2008 9:45:18 PM

      If oil production increases, prices will not go down. This is one area where supply and demand don't work the way we hope it does elsewhere. Don't be fooled by Sam Bodman.

      • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/26/2008 7:33:35 AM

        Yet doing absolutely NOTHING sure isn't going to help the US not be at the mercy of these oil countries now is it. Would rather our money go towards energy here than overseas so our enemies can build up their arsenal on our dime! Also, if you have ever been to one of these oil producing countries you would quickly notice that the cost of fule is drastically lower than what the rest of the world spends. So your arguement about prices going down really has no merit. You honestly don't think that if we produced our own fuel, it wouldn't be at a lower cost? Please stop drinking that rainbow colored koolaid

  • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 06/23/2008 7:07:08 PM

    You silly white asses. Is this the paper that dogged the clintons awhile back and have now been paid not to do it again? I wondered why there were so many negative comments about Obma on here, now I see why. Anybody who is for Obama, you keep them from posting. Doesnt matter you idiots, oh and by the way, this is not for the post, this is for the person who reads then deletes. This is my fourth post today and Im dont think even one got posted. Yeah I said it, IF GOD BE FOR YOU, WHO CAN BE AGAINST YOU?

    • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/24/2008 9:12:44 AM

      since you want to bring religion into it, God also said there would be a time when people will call evil good and good evil..... We are falling for, and worshipping, the trojan horse almost as quickly as they did centuries before.... History truely does repeat itself..

      • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/24/2008 5:36:31 PM



        We already have that inside the gate. The enemy that is and their names are Jr and the Devil translation Bush & Cheney

        You are right History does repeat itself

        Ha Ha Ha Ho Ho Ho He He He

        • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 06/25/2008 10:57:45 PM

          If that be the case, I would go on record as saying Obama must be the son of Lucifer then. He spouts of rhetoric and lies and everyone falls for it since it sounds so good.

  • Posted By: TruthForward @ 06/25/2008 7:37:27 PM

    Obama is not jaded like McCain.

  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/24/2008 10:00:36 AM

    obama's arrogant ass thinks he can change the president seal to say obama of america unstead of the united states of america he should be drawn and quatered !!!!

    • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 06/25/2008 4:56:36 PM

      Wow I see that you are one of those who is able judge and spout condemnation others and then just throw that whole Saved Christian coat in the closet when you choose. So you seem to only be a saved Christian when it suits you?

      Nice. I don't think I like YOUR god very much, kind of judgemental and ignorant like you.

  • Posted By: Kboogie @ 06/25/2008 1:48:02 PM

    Oh Happy Days!!!!!!!!!!

    Obama leading in ALL polls, including Electoral College Map...............Gallup, Rasmussen, AP, Newsweek, LA Times........

    Oh, nevermind..............you get the point...... LMAO!!!!!

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/25/2008 7:24:17 AM



    How dare Obama inspire 1.5 million donors, giving an average of $197 apiece, to help him raise more money than McCain?

    "This is a big deal," said McCain of Obama's decision. "It's a big deal. He has completely reversed himself and gone back not on his word to me, but the commitment that he made to the American people. That's disturbing."

    The fact that McCain has "completely reversed himself" on public financing -- and is currently breaking the law on a daily basis, making a mockery out of a campaign finance system he helped create?

    In the fall of 2007, McCain opted into the public financing system for the GOP primaries, which meant he'd later receive just over $5 million in public funds in exchange for agreeing to a fundraising limit of around $54 million for the entire primary process, which ends when he accepts the nomination at the Republican National Convention in September.

    By late November, his campaign was practically broke, so McCain took out a pair of $1 million loans, using the public funds he would receive as collateral.

    Cut to Super Tuesday, when McCain had the Republican nomination all but wrapped up. Suddenly, he didn't want to be bound by that $54 million limit, so his campaign did a 180 and opted back out of the public financing system.

    But as David Mason, the Republican-appointed chair of the FEC, has pointed out, you can't just unilaterally opt out -- especially after securing a loan based on having opted in. The response of the McCain campaign is quite simply to ignore Mason. And because the FEC currently lacks a quorum (thanks to stalling tactics by that human roadblock to reform, Mitch McConnell) that's where things stand, pending a ruling on a lawsuit filed by the DNC.


    CNN's John Roberts. When McCain surrogate Nancy Pfotenhauer tried to contrast Obama opting out of public financing and McCain's steadfast resolve in the face of torture at the Hanoi Hilton, Roberts, as noted, firmly raised the question of whether McCain cheated the campaign financing system.

    Looking back on the journey McCain has taken, from tireless champion of campaign finance reform to presidential nominee abusing every campaign finance loophole possible, Graham's words are actually a fitting epitaph for the loss of the Old John McCain of 2000. It is "just really sad for the country" that the man who once vowed "to have blood all over the floor of the Senate until we accede to the demands of the people" for meaningful reform has been replaced by the John McCain of 2008.

    Francis Wilkinson who, writing in the New York Times, deemed it "probably the most obvious and inevitable decision he'll make all year -- justified both politically and ethically.'

    What's more, because of the revolutionary way his campaign has used the Internet, Obama, unlike candidates of the past, no longer needs to spend 2/3 of his time in fundraising dinners with fat cat donors. And wasn't that goal of

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 06/25/2008 12:43:39 PM

      OK I'LL TRY BACK IN THE 60'S THEY HAD THIS THING CALLED WOODSTOCK AND SOME HIPPIES RAN OUT MONEY TO BUY DOPE AS THEY WERE TRAVELING ALL OVER PROPTEATING THE VIET NAM WARTHEN THEY SEEN SOME FOLKS THAT WERE MAKING A LIFE HERE IN THE GOOD OLE U.S.A. WELL THEY WERE NOT WILLING TO WORK FOR MONEY SO THEY CAME UP WITH A PLAN TO GET FREE MONEY AND A LIBERAL WAS BORN AFTER THAT WELL THEY THOUGHT UP MORE PLANS TO GET MORE FREE STUFF AND WENT TO THE GOVERMENT AND SAID WERE HUNGRY WERE POOR AND SO SOME WIMP CONGRESSMAN THOUGHT UP ABILL THAT WOULD PROVIDE THE POOR WITH GOVERMENT MONEY BUT THAT WAS NOT ENOUGH WHEN THE CONGRESS MAN THAT HELPED THEM WAS NO LONGER WILLING THEY CAME UP WITH A PLAN TO GET ONE OF THIER OWN IN OFFICE AND IT WORKED SOON THERE WERE HAND OUTS EVERYWHERE AND MORE AND MORE KEPT COMMING SOON IT WOULD TAKE BOTH PARENTS THAT HAD FAMILIES TO WORK TO PROVIDE THE TAXES FOR THE POOR AND FROM THERE KIDS WERE LEFT ALONE IN THE HOUSE AND GREW UP WITHOUT ANY PARENTS TO GUIDE THEM TO BE GOOD CITIZENS AND NOW THERE ALL OLD ENOUGH TO VOTE AND HAVE ADOPTED THE LIBERALS WAY OF THINKING THEY ARE SCARD LITTLE WHINNING BRATS THAT DON'T HAVE THE NERVE TO FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY AND WANT TO HAND IT OVER TO SOMEONE THAT BLOWS SMOKE UP THIER ASSES JUST SO THEY WON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE REAL PROBLEMS THAT THIS COUNTRY AND THE WORLD HAS SO MY FELLOW MARINE I HOPE THIS KINDOF SUMS IT UP AS TO WHAT HAPPENEDTO THE GGOD OLE U.S.A. HANG ON TO YOUR BOOTS BECAUSE ITS NOT OVER YET !!!! SEMPER FI !!!

      • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 06/25/2008 12:53:32 PM



        You really have no idea at all.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse