AFRICA

Mugabe's Endgame

Zimbabwe's dictator wants to die in office, and is apparently more than willing to let opponents perish in the fulfillment of that wish. A report from inside a menacing capital.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: pnoty96 @ 06/26/2008 7:25:15 AM

    bohdansz??..Perfect example of ignorance...I am sure European COLONIALISM was great for all involved, Native Americans, African-Americans, Africans...were all treated so greatly by their masters. Doesnt it occur to you that America's stability in this time is the result of our torrid past? and the ability to grow as a society (gradually) into stability? The interruption in this growth presented by your colonialism is exactly what prevented these cultures from growing as a people out of complete poverty and religious / cultural differences. Lack of understanding of these cultures is so central to American arrogance that it results in us continuously entering conflicts we cannot win (Iraq, Vietnam, Iran ???) because the points of contention are not solved. I dont know what your educational background is, but I will tell you true education comes not in school..but by reading ALL sides of the story. PNOTY96

    • Posted By: gvaust @ 06/26/2008 7:51:24 AM

      I can understand the logic behind your thinking, that African colonialism suppressed local populations from growing a middle class and when the colonial powers left - there wasn't a middle class to sustain a governement. What about Asian countries that were faced with same situation but seem to have more stable governments?

      • Posted By: delerium73 @ 06/26/2008 8:47:26 AM

        The problem is deeply rooted in the tribal mentality of the people. It has been such a part of their culture for so long, that it has become virtually impossible to create any sort of stability.

        • Posted By: R Lawrence @ 06/26/2008 11:29:34 AM

          Reply to delerium73: I agree, if you look closely at any part of the world and assess political and economic degradation in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, you will find the ugly root of tribalism and also in most cases - extreme versions of religion and ignorance. Tribalism and governance by religion based dogma is outdated, never really was an effective form of governing people. Humanity, if it is to survive and progress, must evolve into another form of thinking; one that primarily treats each and every human being with respect and equality. Tribalism and religions never will achieve this because this form of governance is rooted in power based egos and is emplemented by force.

          • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 1:14:40 AM

            The colonialism you mention in other responses as a viable solution hardly does away with ego, force, *or* tribalism.

            I think Europe in some ways was lucky to have developed nationalism so early - which I'm not sure was a product of any one individual. Ugly as it can be at times, nationalism is a powerful unifier, and it helped do away with the tribalism that was present in Europe well into the Middle Ages and beyond. (As a matter of fact, more or less all human roots are tribal.)

            Africa would most likely be lucky to get some sort of continent-wide ideology that helps them overcome the problems of poverty and violence there. But it is their poverty and violence, not ours, and as a consequence it is not necessarily ours to judge.

            • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 12:57:43 PM

              Correct....colonialism did not extirpate tribalism. Historically speaking, however, it did ruthlessly supress some of the more unsavory tribal practices. For example, the suttee (India) and human sacrifice as practiced in meso-America. More recently, Soviet (Russian to be precise) force kept the Caucases from erupting into fullscale inter-tribal conflict...not so peaceful in the post-Soviet era.

              • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 2:36:58 PM

                Yes, I agree. I might note though that colonialism is generally seen as a *hindrance* to the development of self-determining nationalism. Usually, the colonizer draws the borders, which generally don't have anything to do with proto-national sentiments or boundaries that exist in the area, throwing antagonistic tribes together under a dubious national boundary, and promoting tribal violence. A lot of the problems in Africa still have to do with European-drawn borders that are like this...and it still contributes to problems in the Middle East as well.

                • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 5:00:23 PM

                  Yes, I'm not referring to the true nation-state. There is no question that nation-state development (or even simple national identity) is suppressed by the colonial power. I'm speaking more narrowly here of the ethnic/tribal practices which the colonizers found to be abhorrent. In my last sentence I was simply pointing out that Colonizers sometimes act as a lid on long standing ethnic rivalries. I concur with your statement regarding the British cartographic calamity of the early 20th century.

    • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/26/2008 9:34:36 AM

      Looks like somebody served up a big steaming platter of non sequitur and banality. Way to obfuscate the subject matter and get in a little America bashing too buddy. The Poster is simply positing that Afrficans were better off, financially, politically and emotionally under colonial rule as opposed to the Marxist hegemony we now find so in sub-Saharan Africa. Please put down the multicultural Kool-aid my friend. Others countries have "suffered" from Colonialism and are doing quite well thank you...can you say India , Vietnam, Malaysia?

      • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 1:21:40 AM

        India kicked the British right out before achieving world or nuclear power and their foremost and most revered leader was the leader of that movement.

        Vietnam suffered horrendously with thousands and thousands of fatalities as a result of a military "intervention" there by an interloping former power whose name I doubt I have to repeat on this board.

        Malaysia only became a contending economic force *after* its independence was granted and the Malays established that no preference would be given to the ethnic Chinese in their country.

        You condescend to every single post you reply to in some way and you don't provide any justification for controversial statements. I'm quite happy to debate the colonialist legacy with you as long as we stick to facts, and not ad hominem attacks - you familiar with the concept?

        You might want to start by explaining why, if colonialism is so good for all involved, all three of the countries you mentioned kicked their "colonizers" right out of the country before achieving real economic power or any level of prosperity.

        • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 9:29:35 AM

          I'm delighted you agreed with me my friend regarding the three countries I listed. A country can suffer under the bondages of colonialism, expel their oppressors and still prosper economically, culturally etc...all AFTER the fact. Did I at any point say anything differently? Please follow the context of my comments and to whom I am responding and the nuance I employ. You might want to read their comments.
          With regards to ad hominems- I'm respectful to those who are polite in their comments to others. If I sense snideness then I let loose my sarcastic arrows. BTW...re: your condescension comment, I'm reminded of the old saying (I'll let you fill in the blank): "The pot calling the kettle...??

          • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 2:18:16 PM

            Touche.

            As you mentioned, I'm having trouble seeing the nuance. And I have read the thread of the comments you're posting on. I'll admit to making assumptions about your argument, but perhaps it's not a failure on my part to not understand it, as your position is not terribly clearly explained...

            • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 4:52:10 PM

              To get the nuance we'd have to make a diagram. I can't rehash everything said and the ebb and flow of the comments and counter-comments....bohdansz made a comment that pnoty96 responded to...that I commented on that you commented on that I then retorted. ...catch my drfit? I'll let you sort through it all. If I have been unclear with my arguments then let me summarize is as simplistic a fashion as possible. European Colonialism had many unsavor, abhorrent facets. The three nations were colornized, threw out the colonizers and are prospering to one degree or the other. Colonialism is not the death nail for free nations and it should not be the sole reason why Zim. if failing. (Remember I'm responding to a blanket statement by an earlier poster). I felt the nuance was unnecessary at this juncture...my bad. It is my opinion, however, that with regard to Zim. in particular the people might very well choose Ian Smith - or whatever Rhodesian leader you can think of- over what they now have. That bar is pretty low and it is strictly my opinion.

    • Posted By: bruce1921M1 @ 06/26/2008 1:45:22 PM

      Yea I can see how well the blacks govern themselves when they don't have the white master guiding them! NOT!!! Look at any large city eg. Detroit. It looks like a war zone. I'm sorry but all of the sterotypes of blacks are true.

  • Posted By: bruce1921M1 @ 06/26/2008 1:16:09 PM

    Screw those negroes! It's a black thing! After watching the news again last night, I don't care anymore! Two black girls just got away with murdering a white girl in her early twenties, found not guilty by a black jury in Detroit Mich. They walked, dragged into the woods at "Belle Isle" a park in detroit, and robbed her of her jewelry, then pushed her face in the mud until she stopped breathing. This was not disputed by either black girl. The only thing that was disputed was who was responsible for her death. They both blamed the other. So neither one goes to prison for Murder? Found not guilty by a black jury. This is justice?

    • Posted By: revbuggie @ 06/26/2008 1:46:24 PM

      Screw those negroes? Are you kidding me! You're upset because a white girl was killed for no reason by two black girls? You should be upset, but don't come off as if you are all of a sudden concerned with justice. Where was your rage when Emmitt Teal was savagely beaten and burned for looking in the direction of a white woman? Where was you rage when blacks were routinely hung for being black? Where was your rage when Rodney King was beaten unmercifully by rouge cops ? Pleae spare me your rage now.

      • Posted By: bruce1921M1 @ 06/26/2008 3:06:50 PM

        When was emmett teal killed? This girl is just another in a series. What about the two white college girls just recently killed, (in two seperate states) less than a day apart! Also the white college girl killed last year (just recently solved) at Michigan state university. In her dorm room. I haven't heard of any blacks hung by whites since when? On the contrary Society says it is OK for white girls to become "my baby's momma" It is even a saying amoungst the blacks "she fell for the Okey doke" It is also accepted society to go from "don't ask don't tell" to homosexuality and lesbianism to be accepted as a preferable lifestyle. You can't have a manger on a courthouse lawn or have the ten commandments In the courthouse. but america isn't headed for ruin with our new morals. Why don't blacks accept white morals? why is it OK for white kids to be taught that its ok for them to dum down there morals. Call women Ho's and *** is OK. Its ART, not vile or filthy" Oh by the way it wasn't some hip new way to say Whore, It is hard for them to pronounce Whore, so it comes out Hoe. eg. clo9se the doh, the water ends at the show, not shore!

        • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 12:51:31 AM

          What about the intense legacy of poverty and discrimination that African-Americans have suffered - usually at the hands of Caucasians - that increase the desperation and tendencies of those in the ghetto to want to escape the pain, hatred, and suffering by any means? What about lynchings, black men burned alive? What about the still-extant legacy of slavery? What about the noose that was hung in Jena last year? What about the discrimination that's still perpetuated every day by major media personalities like Bill O' Reilly who claimed that he "ate in a very nice restaurant that was very clean even though it was run by Blacks"?

          And no, you can't have the Ten Commandments in a courthouse. The First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an institution of religion." This was not an accident. In America, the Constitution supersedes your church, on purpose, no matter how much you might rail against it. Though it doesn't seem you've absorbed any of its messages of tolerance anyway.

          • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 10:07:15 AM

            You've fallen into a rhetorical cul-de-sac my friend. Every time you mention a white on black hate crime someone else can fire back about a black on white crime. It's a logical dead end that's self defeating. What's your point? As for O'Reilly...I'm not a fan but you need to do your research and read the context of his comment http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2007-09-25-oreilly-restaurant_N.htm Were his words poorly chosen? ...yes. Is he "perpetuating discrimination"..no.
            You left out the clause following "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". Namely..."or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". What does this mean?? Intelligent people can argue but please quote passages fully and in context. This is no "slam dunk". Finally, the ten commandments are on display at the Supreme Court...however in a secular context.
            http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/capital.asp

            • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 2:32:22 PM

              If you've caught any of my responses to other news story threads, you'll be well aware that I've quoted the Establishment clause in its entirety on at least two occasions. I apologize for leaving out part of it here, and I apologize for paraphrasing in general - the truer response would have been "While the Ten Commandments may be physically present in a courthouse or may appear as evidence in a trial, they may not become an influencing factor a priori to the specifics of the case, nor can any other religious belief or dogma become a factor in judging a case other than as it may relate to specifics of the case being discussed."

              As far as Bill O' Reilly goes, I'm well aware of the context of his comments, and to me it doesn't seem that it makes them any less racist or discriminatory. His remarks in and of themselves contained an implication that most restaurants run by African-Americans would not be clean or well-run, and I believe that if you're arguing that this is a rational point of view, *you're* attempting to bring in a larger context that this is true that I'd demand you justify.

              Finally, I see a wide road stretching ahead rather than your hypothetical cul-de-sac. Pull up some statistics on black-on-white crime if you want to convince me that it's all equivalent. There's more black-on-BLACK crime than there is black-on-white crime, at least last time I checked. And at least in this country, there's one group that was enslaved, and one that wasn't. Pulling up a few black-on-white violent crimes hardly changes that.

              • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 4:23:06 PM

                Religion/Ten Commandments - thanks for recognizing the Establishment Clause in its entirety. Again my point was people like Judge Moore got into trouble for presenting the Ten Commandments as a religious display and not in the secular context we see at the US Supreme Court.
                O'Reilly - let me state this once again. I am know O'Reilly fan. To ascribe some sinister racial motive to his words is your right. Please take note that I am not arguing whether his spoken words were rational. I said his words were extremely poorly chosen. Please read my post. What you BELIEVE, INFER, IMAGINE or CONJECTURE is your perogative. You can "demand" whatever you want and no answer will come from me. Why??..we're arguing a subjective - not objective - topic. There are not absolute right or wrong answers here. You argue your opinion respectively and cogently and I'll do the same. After our mutual sarcasm party we can hopefully agree to disagree.
                Black/White White/Black crime - I agree that Black/black crime is much more prevelant than black/white or white/black crime. I wasn't aware I was arguing that point...if I were, please highlight and I'll retract. I stand by original statement. I agree that Blacks have been mistreated and abused in the good ol' US of A. By entering into the argument in this manner (i.e., the litany of injustices suffered by Blacks at white hands) , however, you allow people like Bruce to hit back with their own retorts of black on white mistreatment. Please read Bruce's thread and then read your response. It seems a game of one-upmanship that is endless. I'm not saying your point of view is invalid.

                • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 4:28:11 PM

                  Sorry about the typo...I am NO O'Reilly fan... not ..I am KNOW O'Reilly fan.

    • Posted By: revbuggie @ 06/26/2008 1:39:40 PM

      Screw those negroes? Are you kidding me! You're upset because a white girl was killed for no reason by two black girls? You should be upset, but don't come off as if you are all of a sudden concerned with justice. Where was your rage when Emmitt Teal was savagely beaten and burned for looking in the direction of a white woman? Where was you rage when blacks were routinely hung for being black? Where was your rage when Rodney King was beaten unmercifully by rouge cops ? Pleae spare me your rage now.

      • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/26/2008 1:57:51 PM

        We got your point after the first three comments. No need to cut and paste anymore ...changing a word or phrase here and there. He's just yanking your chain trying to get you agitated. Please ....and it's ROGUE cops not rouge cops....their fellow officers would have called them sissies. Alas, I would have hoped we as a society would have gotten over this 'You did it to me so I'm going to do it to you philosophy'.

        • Posted By: bruce1921M1 @ 06/26/2008 2:47:51 PM

          I am not the one repeating myself! That is the people that are replying or the comment page layout, the way it was programmed.

          • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/26/2008 2:55:04 PM

            I understand. I was referring to revbuggie above...not you.

    • Posted By: revbuggie @ 06/26/2008 1:46:12 PM

      Screw those negroes? Are you kidding me? You're upset because a white girl was killed? You should be, but don't come off as if you're all of sudden concerned about justice. Where was your rage when Emmit Teal was beaten and burned by white men? Where was your rage when black men were taken from their families and hung? Where was your rage when Rodney King was beaten by rouge cops? Now you're concened aobut justice? Please! Your rage is unacceptable.

      • Posted By: bruce1921M1 @ 06/26/2008 2:45:25 PM

        This is 2008 not the 1950's This the United states of america (where you can be anything you want to be, if you go to school or even try) slavery is over, blacks have the same oppurtunity as anyone else (if not more) When are people going to hold everyone to the same standards? I don't think someone who was born in the usa should not learn the language. Ebonics? You don't have to learn and speak a recocnizable language. We'll just call it ebonics (monkey english) You can graduate highschool and not even learn the language. Also both of those girls that walked her into the woods were guilty BOTH! I know how I sounded COLD I feel for those people being murdered but I don't thinki the usa needs to get into another conflict. We are still in Iraq for over 7 years now. Fix america first.

    • Posted By: revbuggie @ 06/26/2008 1:43:48 PM

      Screw those negroes? Are you kidding me! You're upset because a white girl was killed. Please spare me with your sudden concern for justice. Where was your rage when Emmit Teal was savagely beaten and burned by white men? Where was your rage when black men were routinely snatched from their families and hung? Where was your rage then? So don't allow your rage to spew from you as if you feel justice was not served because two black girls got off. White people have always gotten off when they commit crimes against blacks. Your rage is unacceptable.

  • Posted By: paulte @ 06/26/2008 10:14:36 AM

    It certainly seems to be his game plan. Let's all just hope it comes soon for the welfare of that nation! This also shows what a waste of time the UN is. A UN expeditionary force should simply go in there and remove Mugabe.

    The worst rule in the world is black rule! Does anyone remember Idi Amin of Uganda? The only really stable country in sub Saharran Africa is Botswana. The one thing that keeps South Africa afloat is its substantial white minority of around 4-5 million people.

    • Posted By: northtothefuture @ 06/26/2008 10:24:05 AM

      I think if you took some time reading these comments, you'd see that Americans actually do care quite a bit -- it's the administration that chooses to look the other way. White people just don't care about Africa. It's not just Americans, either. Take a look at what companies like Shell are doing in Africa.......Europeans are no better. It's not an American thing, it's a Western thing. I don't see any members of the EU or UN rushing in, either, so don't be so quick to point the finger.

      • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/26/2008 10:54:22 AM

        Actually Bush has sent (wasted IMO) millions in taxpayer money to Africa. It's a financial black hole but it's paid off. Bush is probably more popular in sub-Saharan African than any other region of the world. I'm no Bushie but he's probably more concerned w/ Africa as a whole than Joe Q six pack. Perhaps he thinks this will pay off w/ the AA's in this country?? Hell, even Geldof praised him.

        • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 1:40:52 AM

          Yes, of all the recent U.S. gov't. expedentures, that's definitely what's been wasted over the last eight years.

          (*Coughs and tries hard not to say "$600 billion" or to point at a sandbox.*)

          • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 9:12:21 AM

            Yes mi amigo..one of the many things Bush and our feckless Congress has wasted money on...thanks for agreeing with me..you rock!

            • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 11:06:13 AM

              What's a measly $600,000,000? Let's print up a few trillion dollar bills and drop them over Africa. I mean there's no need to back up our neat paper money ( I just adore the new colors) with commensurate tangible assets... right? The govt. tells us this stuff is worth something and it's all good...yep that's the ticket. Genius, pure metaphysical genius.

              • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 2:22:30 PM

                My point was rather that the $2B or thereabouts annual aid to Subsaharan Africa does not represent a terribly significant portion of U.S. federal government revenue or the foreign aid budget. The Iraq War does. That was all.

                And no, you can't just "print money" and spread it around, I'm at least as well aware of this as you are. As a matter of fact, I'll leave it to you to explain how paper money that isn't backed by real assets tends to produce inflation. I will also leave it to you to also explain how the Subsaharan African aid total is a drop in the bucket compared to the Iraq War costs, completely irrespective of any kind of inflation.

                • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 3:50:39 PM

                  Hurray! Something we can agree on. The whole Iraq war is an abject political and financial disaster... I heartily concur. I would also condemn our overseas commitments- commitments that have seen US troops stationed in Europe for the last 60 + years. ...another huge and unnecessary financial burden in the post-Cold War era. I also agree that $2B (I'll trust your figure) is a drop in the proverbial bucket. It's still $2B that would seem to have been inefficiently allocated. Money did trickle down to the common man but a substantial portion was siphoned off by despotic regimes. You're arguing a point that was not germane to the original comment ...a point, I might add, I agree with.

      • Posted By: northtothefuture @ 06/26/2008 10:25:24 AM

        Hm that comment was supposed to go to Chitta Nirmel. My bad.

    • Posted By: underdog @ 06/26/2008 10:46:40 AM

      I believe every race has a few bad characters. Stalin, white, killed millions of his own people. Hitler, killed millions. Mao, let millions starve to death, and had forced labor camps like Stalin. Pol Pot killed millions in Cambodia. Musollini, killed innocents in Ethiopia. The war in the former Yukoslavia was about the extermination of the Muslims, caused the deaths of hundred of thousands. Mass killing on an inhuman scale for petty reasons is done by every race. Thank you mankind.

  • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 2:45:18 PM

    Pbpace.......You are right.... that was clear postulation, because at the time all Uganda had was tobacco... i apologize for that guys

  • Posted By: R Lawrence @ 06/25/2008 7:38:45 PM

    Africa has always been a real basket case. It is sad to say but the only time that any part of Africa has been at peace and well managed was during colonial times. Africans are incapable of self governance. Look at what has happened in South Africa once the local population was allowed to be in power. Today there is widespread lawlessness and curruption, and violence. Not a single African country is safe any more. I say get the colonists back and let the good times roll.

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 06/25/2008 11:23:41 PM

      Try to find those willing to colonize Africa again.

      • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/26/2008 9:39:01 AM

        Good point. This is an interesting article along the same lines.

        http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2008/02/come_back_colon.php

        • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 2:06:21 AM

          I saw that article when it first appeared in Time. The question it left me with is the same one I posed to you above - namely, if colonialism is so great, why does it inevitably provoke a resistance movement in the colony?

          You don't have any right to claim that countries like Zimbabwe ought to be colonized again just because there's no industry there, not unless you're willing to dispense with the "our proud colonial masters" propaganda and actually go plant a flag of conquest. It's not our land to appropriate. The inhabitants may choose to prosper, or not, but it is their own nation and own self-determination with which to do so. Your thinking that a Western way of life is inherently superior is a very Eurocentric point of view - "civilize the savages" - and in its own way it's just as unable to get out of its own box as the Congolese have remained resistant to modern industrial practices.

          Besides which, our vaunted Western industrial practices are going to have some very serious repercussions over the next twenty to thirty years that may make a tribal village life seem enviable. For all that you might want to say about the Congolese, it's America that's leading the way towards severe enough environmental damage that we may see a mass extinction event of nine-tenths of the species on Earth as a result.

          • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 9:03:52 AM

            At least you're consistent my friend. You have an uncanny ability to answer questions which were not asked. My thesis is not that colonialism is great per se. Leopold II's iron-fisted rule in the Congo proved this. My thesis is that many (not all) of the inhabitants of sub-Saharan Africa would choose this form of governance over their current. I am speaking particularly of Zim. here. This is of course theoretical my friend...it's called 20/20 hindsight. I'm not advocating we (the West) recolonize anything. Where did I say such a thing? Follow the thread and context of the conversation. Please read and pay careful attention before posting. If you wish to disagree with my thesis then so be it. Trying to obfuscate the subject will not advance your argument.

            • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 2:01:38 PM

              I'm not trying to obfuscate anything on purpose, and if I have ascribed re-colonialist seniment to you in error, I apologize.

              However, I'm not sure I'd agree that sub-Saharan Africans would willingly go back to colonialism. They might prefer the economic benefits of foreign investment, capital, and knowledge, but it seems to me that whenever a country's right to self-determination is abrogated, one inevitably ends up with a resistance movement of some kind. Getting back on topic, part of Zimbabwe's current troubles have been caused by Mugabe's insane overreaction to a colonialist legacy.

    • Posted By: southernboy @ 06/26/2008 12:26:05 PM

      Lawrence,
      Fully agree with you.
      To those who may thinck otherwise, please name one single african country, ON SINGLE that has accompished anything on anything?
      Do not blame colonialism on the weongs in Africa, blame it on yourselves africans.

      • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 9:50:11 AM

        Do you really want to name african countries that have made a difference without too much western influence? Please do a little traveling and you will see what you are missing. if we want to talk about the organized structure of these countries, then your point is valid. Thanks

      • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 06/26/2008 3:44:53 PM

        I mean, if you want to start at the beginning, there iare blades 250,000 years ago, barbed points 100,000 years ago, mining 90,000 years ago.
        Here is a fairly extensive list of African contributions (more recent ones) on this website. I didn't have to look very hard to find it on google http://www.africancontributions.net . Africa and Europe have had political, economic, and social ties for over 2000 years. They have each contributed to the other's society.

        Colonialism has had quite an effect on Africa because the national boundaries as they exist today did not exist 500 years ago. Ethnic tribes that normally had no contact or were even rivals were cobbled together within colonial boundaries by the dutch, the portuguise, the spanish, and of course the brits. When the colonists abandoned their colonies, they often left no effective government in their place, leaving the ethnic tribes to compete for power where the colonists were successful because of their guns.

        It's amazing what you can learn in a couple college history classes.

        • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/26/2008 5:42:31 PM

          With all due respect, the URL you listed contains many inaccuracies (i.e., Garrett Morgan inventing the first traffic light). I feel it's important not to propogate historical inaccuracies.

        • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 06/26/2008 3:52:45 PM

          Oh, and i guess I can't leave out Egypt, where their hieroglyphs may well represent humankind's earliest attempt to write. The ancient Egyptians developed the use of writing on papyrus, the product of a native plant of the same name that they processed. Many of their documents were used for teaching purposes, and they produced manuals with model letters for apprentice scribes.The ancient Greeks credited the Egyptians with many early discoveries in the fields of philosophy, art, and science. It is clear also that the Greeks benefited from and were influenced by the achievements of the Egyptians in sculpture and architecture. The ancient Egyptians were masters of the arts of stoneworking and metalworking and the production of faience and glass. Their products were used throughout the ancient world. Their understanding of astronomy was very advanced, and this knowledge was passed on to the generations that followed. Based on their observations of the Sun and the stars they developed a calendar.

    • Posted By: bruce1921M1 @ 06/26/2008 1:52:52 PM

      It's a black thing. They don't have the mentality for a civilized society. They would still be digging up roots for water if not for the white man. They are a few rungs down the evolutionary ladder to act civilized. a flying cochroach is not a bird.

      • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 1:07:28 AM

        ...whereas the rest of us were talking about people.

        I have Black friends a damn sight smarter and more civilized than you are.

      • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 06/26/2008 2:23:40 PM

        What's really sad to say is that racists like you two influence non-white (African, Asian, Hispanic) opinioins of the way white people feel about the rest of the world. We are all human beings. Black people are no more inept at governance than any other race. The problem lies with the political history of the continent and the fact that dictators take power by force and brutality...the majority of the people (the good, moral people) don't have the stomach to pick up machetes, organize, and butcher back the evil people indiscriminately. Therefore, the more brutal organization retains power.
        Until a superior force defeats the dedicated dictator, he will remain in power. period. This isn't a race thing. If you think it is, then consider the other European and Asian dictators in history, their atrocities, and then maybe you won't be so ignorant.

  • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 8:49:14 AM

    I noticed that some of the people here can't see beyond their noses. They just jump on the bandwagon with a biased individual and cook up evidence of their experiences with other races.... GET A LIFE!!!
    Robert Mugabe is one of many african leaders that has wronged his people; maimed, murdered, starved and violated their rights.. there was a dictator in a country named Nigeria years ago that did not work too well with the United States(name:Sani Abacha). note that nigeria is an oil rich country... Anyway, he died mysteriously in his sleep. After his death, the U.S and nigeria had a great relationship.....
    There was another dictator by the name Idi Amin who had a problem with the West as a whole..... Guess what? the U.S and GBR played a major role in making sure that he went into exile..... point.
    There is one thing these two countries have in common.... They have oil..........
    Truth: If African leaders intervene, Mugabe will be dethroned ASAP. it is not the U.S' responsibility to overthrow any government, so all of you making noise should relax and shut up!... We have no reason to go to Zimbabwe.... they have no oil for us, and they have no gold for us.... in short, it will be a bad investment. lol
    the Racists and Clowns on here should take a cue and learn from Barney....

    • Posted By: Mzalendo @ 06/27/2008 11:57:57 AM

      Sorry but Uganda (Idi Amin) has no oil.

      Can't for sure who/what killed Abacha, I'm sure there were plenty of Nigerians capable of getting rid of him as well as the US or UK.

      • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 12:28:54 PM

        Yes they do.
        www.afrol.com/articles/21834 - 23k

        • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/27/2008 1:47:16 PM

          Correct...but from everything I've read Amin fled several years before the initial Ugandan discoveries. Are you postulating the West had a 'Heads up' about the country's oil prospects prior to his departure?

  • Posted By: harris2208 @ 06/26/2008 5:04:43 PM

    ...I am honestly amazed at how quickly this entire strand of comments moved from Zimbabwe's crisis to a heated debate over racism. Race has nothing to do with the terrible crimes that are being committed in Zimbabwe, and I'm a little disheartened that someone would try to make trailor parks and murders in Michigan be some kind of justification for letting a "LEADER" of a country kill everyone who tries to campaign against him! I'm from the south, many of my family members live in TN ( big cotton state for those who may not know). WE have black people here who cause trouble, we have ALOT of mexicans here who steal and stare at every woman to the point you feel like you are being undressed. But we also have alot of white people here who cause trouble, or steal, or stare at women.Yes, I do have a problem with black people who act like everyone owes them something or those who gang up and try to intimidate everyone, and I do have a problem with Spanish speaking immigrants who in no way try to learn english, but expect english speaking people to know exactly what they want at all times! BUT.... despite all of that I know that..THE PROBLEM IN ZIMBABWE IS NOT RACIAL! IT IS ONE EVIL MAN TRYING TO RULE A SCARED AND OBVIOUSLY ABANDONDED PEOPLE.

    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 12:45:30 AM

      Lot of judgement on this thread. I'm finding it happens a lot in American political discussions.

      We all think we have the right to judge, not just describe...

      • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 8:31:13 AM

        Total contradiction in your comment.....you started off alright, but deviated later...... you are not even worth responding to

        • Posted By: harris2208 @ 06/27/2008 9:29:43 AM

          Then why did you respong?

          • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 10:01:08 AM

            i just let you know what i thought about what you said.... if you made any sense at all, then i would have contributed a paragraph or so... nonetheless, i think you are an obtuse individual, and have a really low intelligence quotient, and you should refrain from contributing to forums and discussions when you know fully well that your brain is incapable... short bus rider. lol

            • Posted By: harris2208 @ 06/27/2008 10:22:16 AM

              Does it make you feel more intelligent to try and put down other individuals? Personally, I respected what you said in many of your comments, however, now I find you vein and offensive. I believe that you are a narcissistic ass hole.

              • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 11:11:44 AM

                Harris2208.... since you want to talk about Zimbabwean politics, lets talk... I was pissed when you made the comment about Race. with that said, i will proceed to say that it might not be as bad as the news is portraying it. i concede the fact the Mugabe is a bad leader, however, he is not untouchable. all it takes is intervention by the African continent as a whole. They have a whole lot of billionaires in africa, but i guess they have not seen a profitable reason to go to war with Mugabe and effect change in Zimbabwe.

                • Posted By: harris2208 @ 06/27/2008 11:56:32 AM

                  I was not trying to be racial in any way, I was trying to get throught to bruce that YES there are racial issues here in America, but you have to look past America and look at other countries, the events taking place in Zimbabwe are not racial. I will say I don't know alot about Zimbabwe, or any other parts of Africa. What I do know is that this is not a fight the U.S. needs to get involved in. We have enough going on. I agree, this is up to Africa, and I also agree that the news could very well be over exagorating the entire situation.
                  Now, was it so hard to be mature about the situation, instead of using insults and demeaning language?

                  • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 12:31:04 PM

                    lol.. you actually had me smiling at the last line(your question) and the answer is no.... so i apologize for my unscrupulous behavior.

                    • Posted By: harris2208 @ 06/27/2008 12:36:24 PM

                      lol It's okay, I'm sorry if I offended you in any way with my post.
                      by the way...my mom is happily married..I really don't suggest you go for her...I don't think she would like manhattan anyway. ; )

      • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 10:18:32 AM

        by the way you idiot... not every Hispanic person is Mexican.... Now we know you are a Racist... you bastard
        You will encounter a good person one day, and God will make you an advocate of good deeds. you dummy

        • Posted By: harris2208 @ 06/27/2008 10:24:28 AM

          The immigrants we have here are Mexican, so until you have lived here go *** yourself!

          • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 10:41:33 AM

            Tn huh? lol You can never see me in that state my brova... i will be here making money off the crude oil while you pay full retail ($4.10) with your 20 dollar and hour job.... and i have enough money to invite your mom for dinner in my manhattan condo... and me go *** myself? no way.. i will do your mom instead

            • Posted By: harris2208 @ 06/27/2008 10:46:55 AM

              haha way to pay attention I said that many of my family members live in TN..that doesn't include me and I don't pay $4.10 for gas. And judging by your personality on here...you are probably the only person you get to ***! My mother is 60 years old..so ah..if you want to try and get with her go ahead..have fun.

              • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 10:48:53 AM

                I will. thanks for your consent.

                • Posted By: harris2208 @ 06/27/2008 10:57:00 AM

                  Any time hun, anytime!

                  • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/27/2008 11:45:39 AM

                    Comment: Harris2208.... since you want to talk about Zimbabwean politics, lets talk... I was pissed when you made the comment about Race. with that said, i will proceed to say that it might not be as bad as the news is portraying it. i concede the fact the Mugabe is a bad leader, however, he is not untouchable. all it takes is intervention by the African continent as a whole. They have a whole lot of billionaires in africa, but i guess they have not seen a profitable reason to go to war with Mugabe and effect change in Zimbabwe.

  • Posted By: dakotahkidd@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 2:56:12 PM

    Totugga55....

    Sorry, but I didn't take anything from anyone and I suspect neither did you. Yes white people here in America did own slaves, most black but not exclusively. Many white people were also "owned" as indentured slaves. Further blacks have been enslaving blacks in Africa for as long as there have been people there. Just as most of mankind has since the beginning of time.

    As for the culture, influence, etc. Most rap artists are black, they exploit the situation of the less fortunate neighborhoods where most of them grew up to get rich, but then do nothing to help change the situation. Yet you would blame me as a white person for this

    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 06/27/2008 1:36:45 AM

      A lot of rap artists go back to their hometowns and spread a lot more money around than you think. The forces underlying the poverty in those areas are deeper and far more rooted than rap music is. As The Game put it, "I can show n***** my fortunes but can't get them to think rich."

      There are plenty of celebrities of all races that do charity work, and plenty that are self-obsessed snobs. Your attachment of race to it holds absolutely no water.

    • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 3:14:30 PM

      Dakotahkidd.... the word you are looking for is called Capitalism.......... look it up

    • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 3:11:33 PM

      no one is blaming you.... and as far as Rap music goes, studies have shown that the target market of Rap music is caucasian kids in the suburbs. your sarcasm is unnecessary because i listen to other genres of music. the only reason why i attacked you was because of your Superior word.. there is no superior race.... why? because a Man is a Man regardless of race, and a woman is a woman(same applies).. we make mistakes alike, and we prosper alike... the only difference is environment... have a great day

  • Posted By: claimer @ 06/26/2008 6:32:44 PM

    i appreciate your refernce to the ndebele massacre and nkomo; politics hardly excuse mugabe's genocide which resulted in his political rival with power going into exile and the demise of zapu and the creation of a one party system; and he is a hero? it worked then, why not now with a helping from south africa? this is also a blot on the south african government!

    • Posted By: RiversideWarrior @ 06/26/2008 8:13:11 PM

      Thabo Mbeki is unquestionably a willing accomplice and enabler of some of Mugabe's darkest deeds. The irony is that the worse it gets the more refugees from Zimbabwe will seek safety in an already heavily-burdened South Africa. The traitor Mbeki must be punished for his duplicity and overall complicity in the Zimbabwe crisis.

  • Posted By: Barneystamps@msn.com @ 06/26/2008 4:05:37 PM

    Normally, I do not respond in these type of forums. But the comment posted by bruce1921Mi intrigues me. In as much as I find his comment immensely offensive, and one of great ignorance, I can not help but also at the same time take great comfort in knowing that many of the very luxuries and inventions that he, as well as the rest of us that make up modern civilization, enjoy and take for granted was created by members of the black race. So I would simply exhort and challenge Mr. Bruce to reconsider his take of the evolutionary ladder the next time he stops at a traffic light. Or the next time he hear of someone needing heart surgeory...or the next time he wears a cotton shirt... that he owes a debt of gratitiude to the very race that he has so dengrated today. In reference to our diversity and contributions to society, let us learn to celebrate one another, rather than tolerate each other. Life would be a whole lot sweeter.....

    • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/26/2008 5:06:47 PM

      Although your motives are pure I must respectively disagree with many of your invention assertions. It does not detract from your heartfelt sentiments. I feet it's important, however, not to propagate historical inaccuracies. Garrett Morgan's traffic light was not among the first fifty patented traffic signals. It was not "automatic" as is sometimes claimed, nor did it play any part in the evolution of the modern traffic light. Nevertheless, a clever invention that earned him a patent.
      As for the heart surgery claim, Dr. Daniel Williams, repaired the sac around the heart and not the actual muscle. He was not the first physician to do this particular procedure. The first successful operation on the muscle itself ws performed 3 years subsequent in 1896 by a German physician. Again, a fine physician by all historical accounts. Your comment that we would not be enjoying these things without AA contributions is incorrect.

    • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 4:49:16 PM

      barney, dont even worry about Bruce..... he is probably a kid... lol everyone have a nice one

  • Posted By: Barneystamps@msn.com @ 06/26/2008 5:01:36 PM

    Thank You luga982. It is a powerful thing when great minds from various backgrounds and circumstances can come together and share in truth. I celebrate you Sir! May we all continue the "Good Fight" for Right & Fairness....

  • Posted By: dakotahkidd@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 3:47:39 PM

    luga982..

    Capitalism has nothing to do with it. This is a much deeper rooted problem. It's about a certain section of society wishing to force another section of society to take the blame for their failures. No one forces a neighborhood to collectively turn it's head as drugs, gangs, etc. start to inflitrate. No one forces that group of citizens that live in said neigherhood to do nothing and then complain about it.. Nor does the fact that some white guy owned slaves 150 years ago have anything to do with the ills of modern american society. Just as Egypt is not to blame for Isreals problems just because they enslaved the Isrealites at one point it time.

    If we wish to change our society we must start with ourselves. That starts with each person acknowledging that they themselves are soley responsible for what they make of their lives. Stay in school, study hard, get a college education and get a good job. And don't tell me it can't be done. My step father was black and he did it just fine even though he came from a dirt poor family in the projects. I dropped out of college worked my tail off at dead end jobs and finally got smart, got student loans and finished college. So it can be done. Also why do we have to refer to people as blank-American? If a person doesn't hold dual citizenship then they are not blank-american. Only american. If all races are to be truly equal then all races need to work together to eliminate race as a consideration. There is nothing wrong with knowing, understanding and being proud of your heritage. But if you are going to call your self an, lets say African-American, then you put yourself in a situation that forces race to become an issue. If you only call yourself an american then race is no longer an issue. If we can achieve this then we can eliminate many of the race issues. But of course that calls for an open mind and willingness to change. Something I notice that most people don't have or want. It's much easier to blame the whites who owned slaves, or Capitalism, or the system, or whaterver....

    As the blues singer Anothny Gomes noted in a song. The irony truly is strange that your the only one you can change.

    • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 4:48:35 PM

      Dude, Today, You have gained my Respect..... I respect you man... Hopefully we will work together to educate some people in our lifetime. have a good one brother... i dont know where you are from, but i am sure that you get a lot of respect for fairness..... keep it up.

  • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 2:18:21 PM

    Mrs Thompson, i applaud you for your sincere unbiased views as expressed below... Bruce is obviously a kid who does not understand the basic foundation behind the violation of human rights...... I strongly believe that anyone that dares to take lives should be punished; period. on the other hand, if anyone gets on the internet hiding behing the four walls of their house fails to respect other peoples race by making idiotic comments(big bruce the big idiot), you should also be punished.
    Point: Mugabe is a corrupt leader, a coward and evidently a cold blooded murderer. the ideal thing to do will be to send troops from Nigeria and South Africa to solve Zimbabwe's problems.. Those troops are deadly, and will devour Mugabe in a heartbeat... all they want to hear is "GO". we have seen them do it during the Ecomog war, so we know that they can do it again and bring peace to the innocent and poor in Mugabe.
    evidently, Mugabe has violated human rights in the worst way, and should be handed over to the high court in Zimbabwe after being captured.... all it takes is for the African Gods... South Africa and Nigeria to invervene.
    back to Mr idiot. If you cannot learn to curb your emotions as a man, then you should not post comments

    • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/26/2008 2:40:30 PM

      South Africa is an important ally of Mugabe. Both regimes possess a Marxist/anti-Western ruling class. Hence, there isn't a snowball's chance in hell they'd send troops on behalf of the MDC or Zimbabwean citizenry. In fact, many, not all, South Africans are preying upon the defenseless Zimbabwean as they pour over the border. As for the ECOMOG forces, they're nonstanding and poorly equiped http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/country_profiles/2364029.stm.
      Regarding Bruce, I agree that his 'N' word insult was childish and uncalled for. The First Amendment makes no distinction, however, between stupid speech and normal speech...that's something a lot of Liberals AND Conservatives fail to comprehend.

      • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 3:37:32 PM

        YOU ARE A GOOD MAN.....

  • Posted By: illiad27 @ 06/26/2008 8:12:57 AM

    Something needs to be done about this, the powers that be, ie Europe & US should remove Robert Mugabe and his thugs by force before he butchers anymore of his citizens, but once again we have shown great indifference to suffering and injustice because that country is of no importance to us, quite frankly it makes me sick , but ist it funny how the U.S goverment goes after one brutal dictator who just happens to rule an oil rich country and leaves the rest of them to their devices. Amazing !

    • Posted By: REALITY CHECK @ 06/26/2008 10:18:46 AM

      IT'S INTERESTING HOW SOME OPPOSE INTERVENTION IN ONE CASE BUT FULLY SUPPORT IT IN ANOTHER. AT LEAST BE CONSISTENT. SADDAM HUSSEIN ALSO MURDERED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT IRAQIS.

      • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 06/26/2008 2:15:46 PM

        Furthermore, Sadaam was in violation of UN sanctions (oil for food, no fly zones, etc.) and he publicly funded palestinian suicide bombers' families with $25k each...how many lives does that put at risk. if Israel gets agrivated enough, how many lives would a large scale war between Israel and it's neighboring countries take?

        As far as Ameica's intervention, we are the largest contributor of food and financial aid for Africa, we push for democracy across the globe...are we supposed to topple every regime that won't adopt our political system.

        The blame America first nonsense is beyond rediculous...it's simply retarded if you believe America is to blame for everything. You don't think America pushes for action at the UN? including Darfur? As soon as we do something, suddenly we are acting unilaterally as occupiers and empirialsts.

        Last time I checked, a heck of a lot more people are trying to get into America than escape from it.

        • Posted By: Chachii @ 06/26/2008 2:30:19 PM

          Blame America? If it weren't for the americans I fear we would all be speaking German right now, and besides, the americans do things that other nations are to spineless to do, just remember December 7/1941, the lesson there is do it before its done to you. SUPPORT THE TROOPS.

          • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 06/26/2008 3:01:52 PM

            Besides, if America was to make it policy to topple every dictatorship, don't you think the dictators would unite and there'd be another world war on our hands? Dictators across the world would be trying to pre-emptively attack the democracies of the world. Which side would China be on? Russia? Middle East energy suppliers? Sounds like a lot of loss of life to me.

            Definitely:
            SUPPORT OUR TROOPS
            SUPPORT THE MISSION
            Do the job right the first time so we dont' have to go back.

  • Posted By: tortuga55 @ 06/26/2008 2:26:24 PM

    bruce1921M1

    That is because by american law two people can not be charged for one crime, and as long there is any doubt as to which one delt the killing blow they can not be found guilty. That is why an identical twin will not be found guilty of a crime, because even DNA tests can't prove which of the two is guilty. So therefor they will never know for sure which twin is responsible.

    Just because someone is a different colour doesn't make them more violent, smarter, or any other racist steriotype. Yes, different cultures instills different values in people but skin tone doesn't. You have no idea what the people of Africa go through every day. You probaly have never gone days without food, and lived in constant fear. You might think you have but the worst life in the US is better than their best. My best friend was born in Hati, was adopted into Canada, and she has more class then most white girls. She is one of the most recognized people in my town, you say her name and everyone has something nice to say about her. You should think about how different your life would be if from the time you were a child society told you you were useless, stupid, ect. You would be no different, you are complaining about something you helped create. Instead of being a jack ass, you should do something to help. Children are like fish, they will grow as big as their tank will allow. If kept in an enviroment of hate, and abuse their minds won't grow very big, but if surrounded by love and equality they too could/can change the world. You need to put your nasty words aside and help show "how better you are" by making a difference. For a race that is "superior" you would think we would be able to control ourselfs better, be able to help instead of creating more problems. Name a problem that the African American community has, guess what we got that too! Murder, drugs, abuse, gangs, all also afflict white people. Even in area's where we are the majority. Yes it's not as prevalent but then in general our living conditions are better. You might think "they" passed that to us, but if we are so much better why would we fall for that. Maybe its because we are as weak and messed up as everyone else. We clawed and beat our way to the top and now some of us feel it appropreat to point and laugh at those we devalued in the process. We pushed them down and now we need to prove our humanity and help them reclaim what we stole from them.

    • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 2:52:49 PM

      Shut up Tortuga55, you are an old hag..... get the hell out of here and go eat some faeces... by the way, the comment below was meant for you.

    • Posted By: luga982@yahoo.com @ 06/26/2008 2:45:50 PM

      Dude, what did you steal from Africa? i dont think you have ever been there. i have been to Africa a bunch of times, and i love it... amidst all the poverty there is wealth, amidst all the negative portrayal of africa, there is development, and amidst every dummy like you, there is a highly intellectual person...
      You should start your expression by learning how to spell this word.... take a cue it is S T E R E O T Y P E!
      and when you intend to say etcetera, ensure that you write down "ETC" as opposed to ect you f**ing idiot.

      To the reasonable people on here, if you can name one black,white,asian,hispanic friend out of all your friends from other etnic groups, then you may be either anti-social or ultimately prejudice... mind you i refrained from the "R" word....
      Finally, if Mr Idiot here understood history, then you will know that the 70's is what brought about the imbalance in the U.S as far as broken homes and such..... drugs drugs drugs! back in the 70's after war vets came back from vietnam, they were still in shock and turned to drugs; black and white alike...
      Now tell me Mr Idiot(big bruce) are you God to judge all these people collectively? or are you just a F**ing broke punk who has nothing but time on his hands? be fair with your statements, and life will be fair to you...
      You sound like a classic example of a kid who saw his mom on drugs and blame it on the blacks...
      F **ing IDIOT

  • Posted By: MrsThompsonII @ 06/26/2008 1:43:55 PM

    I guess ignorance really is bliss hunh bruce1921M1. Let's not even get started on the countless injustices committed by white people against black people. Sean Bell, killed in a hail of unjustified gunfire, all ACQUITTED. Oh, and war zones you say? I have you visited your local trailer park my dear? If you really want to get into a debate about what blacks and whites are capable of and aren't, do your homework first. Ghettos don't know color lines, nor does poverty, injustice, crime or anything else that ails us as human beings. I can easily say the folks going into work shooting up the place, blowing up buildings in the name of the USA, or men who kill their wives and infant children IS A WHITE THING, but I won't because history has given us plenty of examples where such ignorant, inflammatory and narrow minded comments have no bearing.

    • Posted By: bruce1921M1 @ 06/26/2008 2:27:30 PM

      To mrs. thompsonII I don't know what world you live in. I hope you get to experience the real world soon but not as devastatinly as so many other good people have had to experience since the bleeding hearts like yourself eg. a flying cochroach is not a bird just because it can assimilate fliight. I wasn't always rascist, this is more like conditioning. It took 56 years of life to realize there is a major difference between the races. I agree there are exceptions to the rule. The majority are decent people but like I said it is more than just a few incidences. The majority of crines considering there minority status is overwhelming. I wish it wasn't so but it is. There excepted culture is very different. Also The white kids today are dumming down, becoming more open to black influence. eg. the filthy rap that gets called art. Give me a break.

    • Posted By: bruce1921M1 @ 06/26/2008 2:14:12 PM

      Yea I forgot the trailer parks. They the blacks are ruining the trailer parks too!! In warren Mich. there were nice trailer parks, with law abidding citizens, senior citizens and young people that found it cheaper than trying to afford a big mortgage etc. not anymore, now you have a influx of blacks moving to the suburbs. yes there are trailer parks in the suburbs. But yes there are crimes that seem to be more white oriented. They are bad, horrendous, but they aren't the lifestyle of most whites. Can you honestly say when you watch the news at night you aren't going to see the majority of crimes commited by Blacks?? Car chases, murders, robberies etc.

  • Posted By: REALITY CHECK @ 06/26/2008 10:35:38 AM

    EVERYONE SEEMS TO BE CLAMORING FOR (US) TO INTERVENE. SOUNDS SIMILAR TO PRE-IRAQ TO ME. WITH THE WONDERFUL LESSONS WE LEARNED IN IRAQ, AND THE BLAME WE HEAP ON BUSH FOR INTERVENING THERE AFTER SADDAM HUSSEIN BUTCHERED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF IRAQIS, CAN WE REALISTICALLY EXPECT ANY ACTION IN AFRICA? WITH THE HAND WRINGING AND COMPLAINING ABOUT IRAQ, WE'VE EFFECTIVELY TIED OUR OWN HANDS WHEN CONFRONTED BY THESE SITUATIONS. IT'S CURRENTLY PREVENTING ACTION IN DARFUR, AND WILL IN ZIMBABWE AS WELL. THE CHICKENS HAVE COME HOME TO ROOST.

    • Posted By: Chachii @ 06/26/2008 2:10:37 PM

      Amen, If all you people would have backed the war in Iraq instead of turning on your own country maybe then the great U.S.of A would consider doing something about it, but not after the gong show the american people have made of this war. I as a Canadien support our friends to the south in all their noble acts.

  • Posted By: Chitta Nirmel @ 06/26/2008 10:18:41 AM

    Resident Dumbush's final justification for our invasion of Iraq was that Saddam hussein was so bad to his own people that we had to remove him. Robert Mugabe comes from the same gene pool as Saddam, and he is very very obviously bad for his people. Yet the U.S. is not doing anything except mouthing platitudes about the poor Zimbabweans.

    Why is there such a difference in the attitude of the U.S. government in these two cases? Is it because the real reason was not that we give a damn about the suffering of the Iraqi people under Saddam but just the oil under their land? Or is it that we don't really care about the suffering of blacks in Africa? Remember Ruanda and the millions raped and hacked to death in the war between the Hutus and Tsutsis.?

    Of course you don't recall. You are an American! You have a God-given right to kill hundreds of thousands just to ensure that you have lots of crude oil. You deserve respect as the only superpower with cruise missiles that can bomb innocents from hundreds of miles away, but you have no obligations to help the poor people of Zimbabwe get rid of a shitty dictator. God Bless America.

    • Posted By: harris2208 @ 06/26/2008 10:33:27 AM

      If you will think about all of the *** being said already about the US going into other countries then you may understand one of the reasons we have not done anything. I am an American I am saddened by the fact that no one is doing anything, but you also have to look at things from someone elses view..not just your own. And as for the crued oil being why we are still in the middle east, try again. As soon as we leave that place things are going to be a thousand times worse then they already are. Oh, and if you want to bash America..you might want to include the other countries that are doing NOTHING for Zimbabwe as well...what was your excuse for them??

      • Posted By: RiversideWarrior @ 06/26/2008 1:49:30 PM

        I think Chitta must be a great admirer of China, maybe he should ask his Chinese friends to intervene? Oh thats right, China supports Mugabe (and for that matter Sudan too).

    • Posted By: pbpace @ 06/26/2008 10:44:56 AM

      Yes the reason we're not intervening in Zim. is two-fold: first, it's of no strategic value to us. I think we learned our lesson in Somalia. Secondly, if we did invade you, and like-minded people, would be the first ones to cry racism, colonialism and imperialism. ...remember - damned if you do and damned it you don't. BTW, please get some therapy for your anti-American hatred. Game-set-match. Next question please.

  • Posted By: REALITY CHECK @ 06/26/2008 10:11:29 AM

    THE REALITY OF DICTATORS IS STUNNINGLY DEPICTED BY THE AUTHOR. THE SHAME MUST BE SHARED BY THE LEADER OF SOUTH AFRICA, WHO REFUSES TO CONFRONT A BRUTAL DICTATOR BECAUSE OF FRIENDSHIP (NO LEADER WORTHY OF THE TITLE). THE ONLY COMFORT IS THAT HISTORY WILL JUDGE MUGABE, AS WELL AS MBEKI.

    • Posted By: RiversideWarrior @ 06/26/2008 1:44:55 PM

      Don't expect anything from the idiotic cretin Mbeki, this is the man in denial about the existence of AIDS/HIV.

  • Posted By: northtothefuture @ 06/26/2008 8:42:48 AM

    It is absolutely unbelievable to me that instead of doing something, the West is just watching. We're more than happy to intervene when people are playing with nuclear reactors or natural resources we need, but we have sure let the world down, first in Darfur, then in Tibet, and now in Zimbabwe. We sit in our nice houses and offices and watch these people beaten to death and thrown into mass graves because we have nothing at stake. The West stopped caring for Africa long ago -- we only care for their oil. This story, this situation and the lack of intervention by the West makes me ashamed to be a Westerner.

    • Posted By: RiversideWarrior @ 06/26/2008 1:42:44 PM

      What part of "It is not our business" do you not understand? We cannot go everywhere and be the world's policeman, we will go bankrupt by the cost in our own blood and treasure. We need to choose our battles wisely, drawing the line at where national interests are at stake (Kuwait 1990, Afghanistan, nuclear issues, etc.) and when they are not (Iraq 2003, Vietnam 1965). We have had a mixed record of sucess/failure on more humanitarian efforts (Bosnia, Somalia and Kosovo) with Somalia certainly being the worst. It is high time that nations in the neighborhood take responsibility for their own area, if they wanted to Zimbabwe could be crushed in days. All surrounding countries could close thier borders, South Africa could stop sending electricity, the armies of Angola, South Africa, Mozambique and Tanzania could invade - it would be over in a matter of days. If they don't do it, its on them.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse