The President has a great deal of power to deal with the economy. What we have is a straight line economy the money goes to the top 2 % and stays there.
Companies such as Hewlett Packard see themselves as the supplier in a supply side economy. they are not the supplier, the manufacturer is, and the manufacturer is China and India, the true supplier clearly benefits, this short sided view so many of this countries corporations have excludes the majority of America from the economic process, I have no idea if the next president can recover or develop new products that would put the labor force in play once again, Obama says he will, Personally I believe him.
But Infrastructure has always been a key element in creating jobs and getting the economy moving again a good example of bottom up economics, most memorable Presidents used it well.
Taxes are a good way of economic stimulus, Bush's tax cuts certainly have not helped, an example is Obama???s proposal to give seniors a tax break, Those making less than $50,000 would pay no tax or even have a requirement to file. This tax break would put 12 to 14 billion annually into the economy, again from the bottom up.
The opportunity seems to be in the green technologies both in some manufacturing again developed in this country, and in infrastructure, Can you imagine what the infrastructure of this country would be if the trillion plus spent on removing Saddam had been spent in this country?
We would have looked like what we should look like in the 21st century and certainly would have no concern fixing bridges that actually go somewhere, but there are so many examples of missed opportunities by this administration they are hard to count.
An interesting side note speaking of missed opportunities is McCains view the missed opportunity was the failure of the government to entice people to community service, while most of us feel the missed opportunity was losing world support on fighting terrorists and most likely ending the war in Afghanistan when we could.









Discuss