CULTURE | TRUE OR FALSE

The Hottest New York Art Exhibit is So Big, It Won’t Fit in a Museum

 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

The buzz on "The New York City Waterfalls" was loud enough that a boatload of reporters chugged out into New York Harbor one recent steamy morning with the installation's artist, Olafur Eliasson, and Mayor Michael Bloomberg for a first, up-close look at the project: four cascades, ranging in height from 90 to 120 feet, installed at sites along the East River. The falls work by an elaborate system that pumps water up from the river, then lets it tumble down a tower of scaffolding. Not that you need to get on a boat to see them. There are good vantage spots along the river—and that's the point, says the 41-year-old Danish Icelandic artist. He wants New Yorkers to explore the waterfront that most of them have turned their backs on, to see their city in a new way. The day the project opened, the tumbling curtains of water reflected the gray skies: they looked remarkable but not quite as spectacular as you might have thought, coming up against the powerful cityscape around them. But the falls will change in every sort of weather and time of day—and when lit at night, they have an ethereal beauty. Their success doesn't depend only on the four almost surrealistic walls of water, or the artist who made them. As Eliasson put it, "It's not about me. It really belongs to the people of the city."

"The New York City Waterfalls" is the latest contemporary work to expand our notion of public art—an idea that goes back to ancient times, in the form of memorials and religious or civic monuments. Think of the pyramids, or the Bamiyan Buddhas of Afghanistan destroyed by the Taliban in 2001—or consider Constantine's foot, which, along with his colossal head and hand, is all that remains of a 30-foot statue of the emperor in the basilica in the Roman Forum. In America, public art once tended to be heroic, too, with bronze generals on horseback leading the charge across the quiet green of city parks. Modernism injected a new kind of heroism into the civic realm. Enormous abstract sculptures, landed like spacecraft in front of courthouses or shopping malls, have tended to be—with the exception of, say, a Calder stabile—as still as a tomb and as eternal. But now, contemporary artists like Christo, who wrapped the Reichstag in Berlin, or Cai Guo-Qiang, with his carefully choreographed gunpowder explosions, are up to something different. Their art is epic in scale but dynamic and ephemeral—they don't create an object so much as an experience.

Eliasson, too, is into what he calls "experimental setups"—interventions in the public realm that engage people in new ways of seeing their surroundings. He has dyed rivers green, but his most famous piece is "the weather project," in which he filled the immense Turbine Hall of the Tate Modern in London with mist and a gigantic "sun" made of 200 yellow sodium lamps. "The New York City Waterfalls" is his most ambitious project to date, and the biggest in New York since Christo's "The Gates," which filled Central Park with billowing banners of orange in 2005. "The Gates" generated $250 million in tourist revenue. Bloomberg estimates that Eliasson's project will pump about $55 million into the city's economy. The cost of the $15.5 million project, initiated by the Public Art Fund, was raised mostly from private donations.

Eliasson spent his childhood summers in Iceland—an island of great waterfalls, where he clearly found his inspiration. Nature is at the heart of much of his work. An Eliasson retrospective, "Take Your Time," is concluding a run at the Museum of Modern Art in New York and will travel to the Dallas Museum of Art in November. In it, you can see his ideas at play on a smaller scale: his materials include smoke and mirrors, but not presented with sleight of hand. He shows you how he produces his effects, the mechanics juxtaposed with such ephemeral elements as light, mist, color. In one piece, strobe lights flicker on a mini-waterfall in a darkened room so that individual drops are magically illuminated.

Judging art in the rarefied precincts of a museum isn't the same as judging public art like Christo's or Eliasson's. Not everyone thought those orange metal gates and fabric were lovely, but no one could deny how wonderfully the park was transformed—and the people who moved through it. By the same token, "the city is not a pedestal on which I put a sculpture," explains Eliasson. "I wanted to do something that is not monumental but temporal, that creates a trajectory of experience." He wanted four waterfalls, not one, in four different sites, so people would be on the move—on foot, on bikes, even on boats—to see them, until they are dismantled forever in October. For Eliasson, the "public" is as essential as the art itself—as if he's riffing on the classic riddle. If waterfalls fall in the city and there's no one to hear them, do they make a splash?

Answer: True

© 2008

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: loberant @ 07/02/2008 1:11:01 PM

    I often wonder if people who just skim articles should comment.
    They noted that the 15.5 million dollar investment will generate 55 million in additional tourist dollars pouring into NYC. That's nearly 40 million in "profit" going to hotels, hot dog vendors, restuarants, stores, and tour operators. They'll pay taxes on those profits, as well as pay their employees for the additional hours they worked and the money will again be "respent" in NYC by those people who earn it.

    Even though I have to go to NYC for a family trip in late October I plan on going in July b/c of the waterfalls.. I'll go to the museusms, eat at a nice restaurant and maybe catch a show... None of which I would have done if it had not been for the draw of the waterfalls.

  • Posted By: mitra_k @ 06/29/2008 7:04:56 PM

    How much energy does the pump consume to get all that water up?? is it based on a self sustainable system? is it based on hydroelectric installations? i have nothing against an architectural installation, as long as it is seamlessly woven into the landscape, and does not cause any ill effects on the environment ... rather compliments it!

  • Posted By: mitra_k @ 06/29/2008 6:49:32 PM

    frankly, the first glance of the video felt like an over-flowing water tank. it appealed to me as "HAZARDOUS"!

    How much energy does the pump consume to get all that water up?? is it based on a self sustainable system? is it based on hydroelectric installations? i have nothing against an architectural installation, as long as it is seamlessly woven into the landscape, and does not cause any ill effects on the environment ... rather compliments it!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg