SPECIAL REPORT

Not In Our Park, Mister

When the Swiss protect land, they mean it.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Switzerland ranks No. 1 in the green index, scoring near-perfect marks.

For a glimpse of primeval Europe, head for the high mountains of eastern Switzerland. In the wild scenery of the Swiss National Park, the authorities have sought to re-create the conditions that prevailed 5,000 years ago. No trees are felled, no meadows mown and no animals hunted. The ibex and the bearded vulture, once driven to near extinction, now flourish again after their reintroduction in the last century. Wolves have returned to the region, and so has the occasional bear.

A rare gesture to nature conservation from a nation famously devoted to commerce? Not so. When it comes to environmental protection, the Swiss can point to tradition. As far back as 1914, the nation created the oldest national park in the Alps or anywhere in Central Europe. And the tradition persists with a heap of legislation that establishes more than 20 new national parks. Small wonder that the country took first place in Yale and Columbia's Environmental Performance Index with a set of near-perfect marks.

It's an achievement that few would challenge. More than half the forests that cover 30 percent of the country have gotten Forest Stewardship Council certification, the international hallmark of good practice. In the EPI, Switzerland scored 65 in the effectiveness of its conservation measures, compared with an average of 25 for its neighbors and 51 for others of similar wealth. This is all the more impressive considering its population density—176 people per square kilometer, more than twice the figure for Greece, largely concentrated in the valleys and lowlands. The country has managed to juggle the needs of people with the needs of its wildlife, earning it more than double the average European score for biodiversity. "You can swim in any of our lakes, and turn on any tap and drink the water with pleasure," says Hans-Peter Fricker, head of the Swiss office of the World Wide Fund for Nature.

Why such dedication? One explanation begins with history and the importance of the Alpine landscape in the national psyche. The four original cantons that came together to form the nucleus of the Swiss nation in the 13th century encompass spectacular mountain landscapes. "The Alps are part of the whole Swiss mythology," says Reto Soler, Swiss representative of the International Commission for the Protection of the Alps. "It is where Switzerland was born."

Environmentalists have taken advantage of Swiss direct democracy, which allows citizens to demand a referendum on the issues of their choosing. The current construction of the world's longest and deepest rail tunnel beneath the St. Gotthard massif in the Alps—to divert heavy freight traffic off the roads—follows a national vote. So, too, did moves to ban heavy foreign trucks.

More than 40 years ago Parliament passed laws to protect wetlands, meadows and Alpine streams and glaciers. Care for the environment is now written into the Constitution. An article added in 1996 explicitly obliges the government to promote sustainable farming and the upkeep of the rural landscape. New parks, seen as a boost for tourism and conservation, will be scattered across the country.

On the environment, this nation isn't standing still.

© 2008

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: sachsephilip @ 07/10/2008 11:36:27 AM

    Comment: I do not agree with this article due to the fact that most of the industrialized countries produce their pollution outside their own borders. most of them should not merit to be placed as the greenest countries on any ranking! in a globalized world where transnationals ignore borders, such an EPI (Environmental Performance Index jointly produced by Yale's Center for Law & Environmental Policy and Columbia's Center for International Earth Science Information Network) ranking may turn out to be even dangerously misleading, since most of the environmental damage is directly or indirectly tied to consume. due to this fact, it is actually countries like guatemala or cuba or costa rica that should rank as the most ecological countries, instead of switzerland who is actually as all the other rich industrialized countries a resources sink or in other world a consume paradise!!
    ecological devastation and CO2 emissions have to be calculated different! this EPI point of view of the world is very old and to my opinion completely wrong. the only merit this study has, is the valuable information that was gathered and analyzed so as to perform these rankings! jet these numbers should be viewed per capita! if these nice numbers were to be computed similar as ???individual CO2 footprints??? and multiplied by the inhabitants of any country of the world, Switzerland inhabitants would find themself very low on a similar ranking, probably not so far from the Usa and other industrialized countries which actually indirectly pollute the world per capita much more than other countries like china etc.. imagine the Usa had as many inhabitants as china! many worlds would be needed to satisfy its needs! industrialized countries have to admit their responsibility in deforestation and pollution of the world, instead of changing the facts intelligently and pretend they are green!

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu