SPONSORED BY:

Save The Planet, Lose The Guilt

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Watch Those Labels
Green marketing comes in waves. The last big one in the United States hit in 1992, when "recycling" and "biodegradable" first became buzzwords and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission issued its first green guide, clarifying how terms like "recyclable" could be used. That wave faded as the price of oil fell in the late 1990s. "Now there's a new wave," says James A. Kohm, the director of the enforcement division at the consumer-protection arm of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. "It's really more of a tsunami."

It sure is. Kohn says he knew the tsunami was coming when he saw ads for the first "carbon-neutral Super Bowl," "carbon-neutral NASCAR race" and "NBC's Green Week." New claims are visible in the aisles of any supermarket or hardware store. The flood of promotions prompted the FTC to bump up its scheduled review of environmental-marketing claims to last April, a year earlier than planned. The European Commission recently toughened voluntary guidelines on ecolabeling, and now audits green claims. The U.S. rules are not voluntary, and could lead to prosecutions, says Kohm. "We try to get the worst offenders and make them an example."

There shouldn't be much trouble finding candidates. Scot Case, vice president of TerraChoice, an environmental-watchdog group in Ottawa, Canada, says that while few brands used to tie themselves to "global issues," now it seems "everyone is making these claims," often "using these terms knowing that they haven't been defined." Last year TerraChoice sent researchers into big-box stores in North America to evaluate the green claims of 1,018 consumer products, and found that 1,017 were illegitimate, including beauty products that promised a "totally organic experience" but included "zero evidence that the product contained any organic ingredients," says Case. (TerraChoice won't identify the retailers for fear of libel.) "We saw absolutely ridiculous claims," Case says. "And vague, too. What the heck does 'earth-friendly' mean?"

Most claims were not false so much as misleading. Some garbage bags, for instance, are promoted as "compostable," implying that you can throw them into the compost bin and by spring they'll be fertilizer. Plastic bags, of course, take thousands of years to break down, unless they are sent to an institutional composting facility that stirs waste with huge tractors to create heat and speed decomposition. Most consumers don't do that. They throw the bags away, thinking they will magically dematerialize into dirt on their own.

Many beauty products marketed as "organic" or "natural" actually contain fossil fuels. True, petroleum is the product of decayed plants and animals, but that's not what customers have in mind when they pay a premium for organic. And because petrochemicals are mixed with so many nonorganic chemicals, it's even a stretch to call them "natural." In April Dr. Bronner's, a line of beauty products, filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court against 13 personal-care brands, including Avalon, Jason, Kiss My Face and Estée Lauder, for deceptive and false advertising. Among the claims were that Kiss My Face's "Obsessively Organic" cleansers contained olefin sulfonate, a petrochemical, and that Avalon "Organics" contain the petrochemical Amdiopropyl Betaine. The defendants say that the use of processed oil derivatives does not undermine their "all natural" labels, and call for a clearer legal definition of what constitutes "eco-friendly."

Another firm is also trying to lend credibility to the industry by creating a "Greenwashing Index" Web site, where consumers can rate green ad campaigns for accuracy of the claims. The site, established by Austin, Texas-based environmental-marketing firm EnviroMedia, in collaboration with the University of Oregon, aims to help consumers understand authentic and inauthentic green advertising, and since launching in January, some 113 ads from six countries have been posted and reviewed. Among the Web site's most egregious "greenwashers": the energy and automotive industries, with bottled water close behind. Consumer electronics and renewable energy are faring better.

So far it seems that few green consumer products are aptly designated. The only claim that TerraChoice considered legitimate came from a brand of paper towels, which made independently certified claims and specified how much of the total content was recycled.

Lesson: Watchdog agencies should have the power to prosecute false claims; clearer definitions required.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Ed Dunn @ 08/15/2008 6:44:39 PM

    I have had an issue with the US Green Building Council. They have created a checklist (LEED) for building "Green". I have seen many people use the list as a guideline to design and build with. Problem is, most people, including architects are just not understanding the concept of simplicity and the use of natural elements such as the sun, earth and water. LEED, gives points for using green methods or materials. Trouble is, some people try to incorporate too much just to so that they can score high. Many times, buildings that have scored high on the LEED perform poorly in reality. LEED does not include passive solar design at all. Passive solar is an incredible way to get free energy from the sun to both heat and cool a building. Very few architects or designers understand how it works. Many would prefer to avoid it altogether as LEED gives more points for using HVAC systems that are energy efficient.

    I have built structures, here in Flagstaff, AZ that use very little energy over the year to heat and cool because it is using the sun for this! They are very simple, and the funny thing is, they score very low on the LEED! The LEED instrument was designed by people in the industry, and that may be the problem. HVAC people may have discounted solar because if properly designed there would be little or no need for HVAC systems. This, to me, would be a perfect example of greenwashing.

    Ed Dunn
    Solar Design & Construction
    Flagstaff, AZ
    solar.ed@gmail.com

  • Posted By: ralphmcm @ 07/14/2008 7:57:22 PM

    I would like to know the guidelines for being labled GREEN. I would also would like to know if a company that makes a great energy efficent product in a less than perfect green factory in China that is imported in the USA and save energy over all competion, can it be labled green or is it origin a problem?

    Is commercial laundry equipment capable of having a green label?

  • Posted By: accrew4 @ 07/11/2008 9:03:26 AM

    The whole idea of carbon footprint is missleading and IMO was suspossed to be that way. Why not use the method that the commercial industry uses to justify a manufacturing process. "The total energy and material cost of producing a product and getting it to the consummer." If it cost more to produce than the customer is willing to pay, then do not produce it. A prime example is bio-diesel, it still cost more to produce then the oil based diesel, when you remove all the tax breaks. We are not even going to mention the hugh cost of corn based gasoline additives.

    For years the oil companies burned natural gas at the wellhead. Because it was going to cost to much to get to the customer and at the time there was little demand for natural gas. The same as LNG is today, the transportation cost to markets is just too high. Plus the lack of sea ports to unload the ships transporting LNG, caused by the NIMBY people and the huge safety issues associated.

    The whole concept of just in time deliveries of products to stores and manufactoring plants, worked great when the transportation cost to the stores was low. Now with rising cost of diesel and the damaged caused by using longer and heaver trucks on our road systems. Trains are looking better and better, especially the new ones that can run on 70% LNG and 30% diesel fuel. IMO long haul trucking is going to join the wagon trains of 19th century.

    As the rising cost of transporting products filters down to the cosumer. You will see more and more local produce stands open. The best example I know of is setting in front of me now. A bottle of all natural Dole sliced peaches. The peaches were grown in the USA and they were packaged in Thailand for sale in the USA. Also I have a bag of fresh peaches that were grown 5 miles from my house, that I have just bought at a road side market one mile away. Ha Ha

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now