Who Was More Important: Lincoln or Darwin?

I think no one was so important ,because they got some the some so in final ,they are 2 best idiots from the history that compare the people with the animals , so from that time to the present the APES made a substantial advance and the one who educated this chimps got to be a retarded mental and a slave to this fuc.. new generation of the modern Gorilla , thanks to this 2 idiots from the history

You're kidding right? How can you even consider a comparison this absurd? Abraham Lincoln Vs. Darwin? The Man who healed a conrty, the greatest president to serve our country, being compared to someone with almost a non-exestent education that taught us to believe that we are all just glorified apes? I don;t care if they were born on the same second, neither of them, deserve this comparison. You are belittling Lincoln and raising up Darwin to stature her certainly does not derserve, considering all the science that has come after him, to refute his claims. However, if evolution as Darwin sees it is true, that most assuredly explains you being a horse's ass!

Lincoln saved this country. Darwin just gave us a theory, not a fact.

???"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down".???
Charles Darwin, 1809-1882
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the Flagellum motor! (fantastic you tube video with Micahel Behe)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NFgjiumiAw&feature=related

I think the idea that Darwin can be compared to our best president in the most difficult time in our history shows a failure of our educational system. The study of evolution has revealed nothing more than microevolution....the slight alteration of existing biological information.

The same problem that plagues naturalists, with the creation of life from non-living materials through random natural processes, plagues evolutionists with the creation of organs in existing living organisms.
For example, I tried to get evolutionists in a newsgroup debate forum to try to explain, or give evidence to, the creation of a new organ in an existing living organism from mutations. The response was revealing as to the actual knowledge of those who believe the evolution of man from a single cell organism. The active debate went silent when requesting an example or explanation. The lone response was so silly that it was embarrassing. An evolutionist tried to explain how the creation of a functional heart probably started with "a mutation resulted in a widening of a central artery, forming a balloon, which would then develop valves and
presto, a heart." How about that! A ballooning artery is a mutation that provides a survival advantage to this evolutionist. Thinking people would probably call it a detrimental birth defect adversely affecting circulation.

The acceptance of evolution as an explanation to the diversity of life has resulted in the rejection of critical thinking. In other words, a new religious faith was born.

Only a homo-phobic, racist american media could compare these two men and expect to be taken seriously. One was instrumental (along wilberforce and others on this side of the pond) in bringing worldwide slavery to an end for the first time in ten thousand years. While the other mans ideals brought on social-darwinism, hitler, columbine. I think in your excitement over the erroneous idea that darwin somehow eliminates god you forget that he hated homosexuals, and stated that superior races should destroy the inferior. Maybe a bit of research before you put pen to paper would be a niffty thought.

Malcon Jones is an absolute buffoon, he asks if a man who put an end to slavery in the united states, preserved hundreds of thousands of lives from the middle passage, and even promoted the passage for the thirteenth ammendment to the constitution was more important to a man who degraded the humans by theorizing that ancestors our ancestors are a bunch of idiotic monkeys who slowly over millions of years adapted to their enviroment. Malcolm why is it callled the "THEORY" of evolution when in fact it is taught as truth in almost every high school in the nation, and malcolm , darwin was a school DROPOUT, do you really beleive a school dropout who was never even there a million years ago? Darwin theorized that an explosion created an intelligent design and lifeform, which violates scientific LAWS like as time goes on things go from orderly to disorderly, does an explosion of the printing press create Websters dictionary? Of course not.
does a tornado in a junkyard creat a boeing b-17 flying fortress? no. Malcolm i sugggest you go back and try to graduate your elementary history class.