Since when has neo-religious fervor become the basis of journalism?
"Attribution" studis based on computer models which: cannot reliably predict next month's weather with any greater reliability than a random number generator; cannot run backwards through time even though the programmers know the "correct" answer for each period; start with the questionable assumption that man-made emmisions are a material factor in any weather trends (hubris much?); cannot explain any of the myriad warming and cooling trends of history; start from the silly assumption that "normal" global temperatures just happen to coincide with the beginning of the reliable data (a little more hubris with your new gospel?); and are promoted by bureacrats with massive budgets to grow and protect!?!
Not since the early days of Mr Pulitzer has such weak Yellow tea been so prevalent in American "journalism".









Discuss