Global Warming Is a Cause of This Year’s Extreme Weather

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: billbider @ 07/03/2008 8:51:48 AM

    This idea that mankind's production of CO2 has caused the extreme weather events of this spring and summer is nonsense. You obviously have failed to look into the history books to see that the most extreme rain and flooding ever to strike the midwest came many years earlier. Major flooding of rivers in my home state of Kansas occurred back in the earlier 1900s, the 1950s, and even the mid-1970s. Your lack of historical knowledge coupled with your preconceived opinions regarding the global warming phenomena being caused by mankind yield this kind of thinking and hysteria. Unfortunately, the general public and most elected officals have accepted these unsupported theories leading to poor public policy, scared children, and it is pushing our society toward an unnecessary loss in our quality of life.

  • Posted By: VFW6986 @ 07/03/2008 8:48:04 AM

    Well you have the bully pulpit. You probably are able to convince a lot of people through sheer emotion. If there is anyone out there that can still think for themselves please consider these facts. Midieval Europe enjoyed a warmer climate than today and people prospered because of it. Grapes grew in England, not today. Sea levels were higher as evidenced by castles and port docks of the era. The earth cooled and water was locked up in polar ice. It has warmed again and some say is starting a cool down cycle, evidenced by coldest winter on record in China 2007-2008. Would you agree there have been ice ages where so much ice was locked up at the poles there appeared a land bridge across the Bearing Strait. Then for the love of Pete use your head, we are just dust in the wind compared with the power of nature. Don't let a politically driven, prpagandist news media lead your thinking for someones (Gores) political gain. Remember he is the one who claimed sharks were still patroling the slave ship routes waiting for more to be thrown overboard. Remember Y2K? Please wake up.
    bvincent

  • Posted By: Engelwood197 @ 07/03/2008 8:43:34 AM

    The sky is falling!!!! Buy this magazine to find out how the world will end!!!! We must slaughter all of the conservatives in order to save mankind!!! We must wipe our *** with leaves!!!

  • Posted By: CrunchTime @ 07/03/2008 8:26:01 AM

    As Lester Brown, of the Earth Policy Institue, suggests in his "wake-up-America" book "Plan B 3.0 Mobilizing to Save Civilization", we need to move at war-time speed just as we did after Japan attacked us and not only get cars like the plug-in hybrid Volt rolling off the production line but convert former factories of the SUV RIPs so they can produce wind turbines to provide clean electricity to power those vehicles. THAT would allow all those workers sent packing with pink slips to regain their production line jobs, get off unemployment, build cars that people actually want, clean up the air, and rid ourselves of our dependence on foreign oil. We ARE being attacked again, and the threat is MUCH larger than it was in the late 30s and early 40s. However this time, the enemy is stealth-like. That doesn't mean it's any less threatening. It's time to mobilize at wartime speed.

    • Posted By: a180714 @ 07/03/2008 8:38:45 AM

      That's a bit over the top. The global warming threat is greater than the Nazi and Japanese threat of the 30's and 40's??? By the way, I'm all for electric cars, but the electricity has to be generated somehow. I am reasonably sure that wind turbines are not capable of providing enough electricity to power ALL our vehicles. We should do what we can, but don't think it is a complete solution.

  • Posted By: deroyer @ 07/03/2008 8:16:05 AM

    Listen here is the deal. You would be niave to think that the planet is not on a warming trend and regardless of where you stand politically this is undeniable. But to definitively say that humans are the cause is a real stretch. To put it into perspective I cannot remember there ever being an SUV big enough for the dinosaurs to fit into or any historical proof of their reliance on fossil fuels, but yet they died of what science can only speculate as to a global climate change. Throughout it's several billion year existence the earth has a long history of heating up and cooling down and since we only average about 70 years i think I have the solution. "I'd like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony. I'd like to buy the world a Coke" Seriously let's choose a battle we can actually win and get over this already.

    Just because Al Gore said it, doesn't mean it's true, it just means that he said it, and nothing more, nothing less...

    • Posted By: mmotyka31 @ 07/03/2008 8:37:25 AM

      I just read your comment after I posted mine. I have to say thank you at least I'm not the only one that thinks the same way you do. Again thank you

  • Posted By: mmotyka31 @ 07/03/2008 8:33:52 AM

    I do not believe that it is global warming as you may all think. Look back threw history the weather and seasons have always changed. I think as a society we are quick to try to find a reason that we can so call prove and make it a fact. Years and years ago we had an ice age and after that the world be came hot and warm again. If you look at the seasons they all start about a month soon or later every year. I don't think you should believe in global warm just because some people went to school way to long and tell you that???s what you should believe. We are only on this earth for maybe the time you are born till about 90 years old. We are going to see a lot of things change. I hate hearing or everything being blamed on global warming by these people who need to justify a pay check usually based on government grants. Have a mind of your own and believe what you want. Maybe I???m wrong but prove it.

  • Posted By: mmotyka31 @ 07/03/2008 8:33:28 AM

    I do not believe that it is global warming as you may all think. Look back threw history the weather and seasons have always changed. I think as a society we are quick to try to find a reason that we can so call prove and make it a fact. Years and years ago we had an ice age and after that the world be came hot and warm again. If you look at the seasons they all start about a month soon or later every year. I don't think you should believe in global warm just because some people went to school way to long and tell you that???s what you should believe. We are only on this earth for maybe the time you are born till about 90 years old. We are going to see a lot of things change. I hate hearing or everything being blamed on global warming by these people who need to justify a pay check usually based on government grants. Have a mind of your own and believe what you want. Maybe I???m wrong but prove it.

  • Posted By: HedHunter01 @ 07/03/2008 8:30:42 AM

    jath123...my point exactly. Heavily draped sarcasm is difficult to express in type. But you're right. cows are an insignificant contributor o methane production. Just as SUV's are an insignificant contributor to CO2 emmissions. Bottom line...global warming and cooling pattern are cyclical. It blows my mind that PEOPLE are being blamed for the floods in the midwest. I live in Iowa. We have a very low population density compared to the rest of the country, meaning lower carbon emmissions. Our famers have gone to no-till farming for several years, crop rotation and erosion control are huge in the agricultural community. Why did we flood? Because a weather pattern stalled out over the midwest and dumped huge amounts of rain. The only contribution man played is that the Army Corp of Engineers didn't release water from the resevoirs until it was too late.

  • Posted By: eccharbonnet @ 07/03/2008 8:30:40 AM

    More powerful Hurricanes? What fantasy world is this writer living in? The past 2 seasons have been complete duds despite GW alarmist???s predictions to the contrary. And even going back to Katrina ??? if SE La had maintained its levee systems Katrina would be a mild footnote in history. As for the massive Midwest floods, once again these are worst than in the past not because the storms or worse but because we have channeled our runoffs into smaller channels. You cannot measure the power of the storm based off the amount of damage it does if we have been foolish enough to allow our infrastructures to decay.

  • Posted By: eccharbonnet @ 07/03/2008 8:29:57 AM

    More powerful Hurricanes? What fantasy world is this writer living in? The past 2 seasons have been complete duds despite GW alarmist???s predictions to the contrary. And even going back to Katrina ??? if SE La had maintained its levee systems Katrina would be a mild footnote in history. As for the massive Midwest floods, once again these are worst than in the past not because the storms or worse but because we have channeled our runoffs into smaller channels. You cannot measure the power of the storm based off the amount of damage it does if we have been foolish enough to allow our infrastructures to decay.

  • Posted By: rickmick @ 07/03/2008 8:29:39 AM

    It is cooler in Arkansas now, than it has been in the past years. Our government has admitted publicly that they tamper with the weather by weather modification, h.a.a.r.p. Global warming is a fraud! This is another scare tatic to try and control the sheeple!

  • Posted By: geofluid @ 07/03/2008 8:19:09 AM

    If computer models can simulate the past climate with consider amount of accuracy, why shouldn't it not able to do so for the future climate? Global warming does not mean there will not be a cooling period of one or two years within the broader spectrum. There still can be an interannual variability but the longer trend is that earth has been warming steadily and the increase has spiked over the last century or so. If you read Newsweek before you should know that the other side oppinion came out oil/coal/energy industry to undermine the honest scientists.

    • Posted By: a180714 @ 07/03/2008 8:28:48 AM

      So, only scientists who agree that we have man-caused global warming are "honest?" Come on. There is money flowing on both sides, not just from Big Oil.

  • Posted By: snoopaloop23 @ 07/03/2008 8:20:51 AM

    I am surprised to see a Newsweek article with a complete misunderstanding of 100-year and 500-year weather events. It's simply a layperson's explanation of probability rather than a prediction of the time frame in between occurrences. Even then, the historical data used to create the probabilities are limited in accuracy and scope due to our relatively short scientific recordings of atmospheric weather patterns. And while I agree humans are to blame for the recent floods in the Midwest - improper agricultural and community development planning - I have little faith in the carbon dioxide, global warming "theories" everyone loves to cite. Nice attempt for an office discussion, but don't print this stuff...

  • Posted By: HedHunter01 @ 07/03/2008 8:10:18 AM

    The global warming alarmists are providing me with a great chuckle this morning, and I thank them for that. But get real. We've been keeping stats for maybe 70 years tops. That's a short period of time. And during that time, we've seen the advent of the EPA which has resulted in clean burning plants, industry, manufacturing, etc. Back in the 70's (way before many of you were born, I'm sure...) there was mass hysteria regarding global COOLING. I have an idea! If your serious about this, why are you doing nothing about the number 1 greenhouse gas? Methane. The number 1 producer of methane? Cows. 4 liters of the stuff per day per cow. YIKES! The cows are trying to kills us! Same us Green People...Save us!!

    • Posted By: jath123 @ 07/03/2008 8:20:19 AM

      The largest sources of atmospheric methane are (in order), the fossil fuel industry, landfills, and sewage. The cow thing is significant, but its predominance is urban (or is it rural?) legend.

  • Posted By: jath123 @ 07/03/2008 8:00:03 AM

    Anatomy of a Staged Retreat (aka "The Repubican Game Plan"):
    1.) First, deny that gloabl warming is even taking place.
    2.) Once the evidence is irrefutable, agree that global warming is occurring, but isn't caused by humans.
    3.) Once its irrefutable that it is caused by humans, claim that it's ok because it may actually be beneficial (Don't you remember from grade school that CO2 is good for plants?)
    4.) Once it's clear that it's NOT beneficial, throw up your hands and say it's too late to do anything.
    5.) Collect your money from the oil companies and utility lobby, and chuckle at all the common rubes you fooled into parroting you lies.
    6.) Move on to debunking other "crackpot" theories like evolution and gravity.

    Happy July 4th folks. It's time to declare your independence from stupidity.

    • Posted By: a180714 @ 07/03/2008 8:19:39 AM

      Hey jath123, there are plenty of bright people out there, including climatologists, who don't accept that global warming is caused by man or that it is necessarily all bad. Accepting things on faith without sufficient facts is not called science, it's called religion. There is not a clear concensus on GW and it's cause or solutions, but questioning concensus is part of the scientific process. We once thought the world was flat and Earth was the center of the universe. Belittling others shows how small-minded you are, not them.

    • Posted By: jath123 @ 07/03/2008 8:08:18 AM

      PS - Life is too short to spell-check, so hold the wise cracks. It wouldn't be a chat room without typos. Cheers.

  • Posted By: HedHunter01 @ 07/03/2008 8:17:07 AM

    HA! They really ARE starting to go after the cows! This should be good. The next war will be between the "Greens" and the PETA people!

    Methane vs. Carbon Dioxide
    by the GSI Staffposted September 14th, 2007
    NPR released an article this week giving caution to the much overlooked greenhouse gas, methane. Professionals in the field of climate change are particularly concerned with global warming because it can be a catalyst for methane emissions. As temperatures rise, melting permafrost and ice create lakes which, in turn, are home to many forms of bacteria that feed off of the once frozen carbon deposits. The byproduct is then ???burped??? out as methane. Methane emissions are at the forefront of concern because ???methane is a greenhouse gas that is 23 times more powerful than carbon dioxide, which means it is much more efficient at trapping heat ??? As a result, methane feeds into a loop of global warming.???

  • Posted By: ghandi @ 07/03/2008 8:09:19 AM

    Dear Sharon,

    Your Journalism School should rescind your diploma! What a steaming pile of crap! Weather has always been unpredictable and it always will be. In fact, the true weather experts now point to a lack of sunspot activity as a harbinger of GLOBAL COOLING for the next 30 years or so. Better buy a parka.

  • Posted By: MeLizzard2 @ 07/03/2008 7:56:03 AM

    ALso, the ice caps on Mars are melting. I'll bet humans are to blame for that, too. I'll bet solar activity has nothing to do with it. Alarmist, hysterical junk science and other propoganda such as this article are the reason my husband and I canceled our Newsweek subscription. There are plenty of actual news sources out there, go find some. Global Lietacy? Yeah, right.

    • Posted By: MeLizzard2 @ 07/03/2008 7:58:37 AM

      Sorry, "literacy".

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse