Global Warming Is a Cause of This Year’s Extreme Weather

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: JoyceCuevas @ 07/03/2008 11:43:53 AM

    Yes, the weather conditions have been going on for centuries, but you have to look at the facts as well, before all this started. The weather is not the same as before. It has gotten worse within the last 100-200 years. Global Warming IS the main problem. And if we don't start becoming more aware of that and admitting that we are the cause and try to be the solution, are children are not gong to have a place to live in the future or to bulid there futures. If you look at the world before and you look at it now, there is a major difference. People have gotten so use to having everything handed to them and driving just a few blocks, when they could walk or ride a bike, that we have all gotten lazy. Yes including myself. The Earth has given us so much in return, why is it that we can not do the same. If everyone could do alittle, it could add up to alot. We are destroying are home and our futures, and the next generations to come. We only have one chance in this lifetime. Wouldn't you like to say you had a part in making it better. To say there world is better place because of me. I know I sure do. I know that I want my kids to be able to run around and be able to witness life of nature. Just to see how beautiful the Earth really is. Please OPEN YOUR EYES!! before it is too late.

    • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 6:20:12 PM

      You're so silly. Haw, haw, haw. Please understand you want to perpetuate the human race, and you're not at all interested in "saving the Earth." If you were actually interested in the latter, then you'd be advocating the extermination of the bulk of the human population in order to completely eradicate modern infrastructure and civilization in order to completely put an end to anthropogenic climate change.

  • Posted By: focusonheaven @ 07/03/2008 3:04:43 PM

    An interesting concept that most people want to avoid is the fact that nature responds to God's voice. Whenever God speaks nature responds. Sounds crazy, but for any Bible believer scriptures state that nature responds to God and sure enough waves, winds, and mountains respond to God's voice. God spoke the world into existence and when Christ died and said it is finished, the earth quaked. For a book on what is happening in the heavens please go to focusonheaven dot.com

    • Posted By: couchbomb @ 07/03/2008 6:09:37 PM

      Where is the evidence to support that?

  • Posted By: jenc23 @ 07/03/2008 11:09:40 AM

    Whoever you are, you really need to do your research because you sound stupid and mis-informed. As for the frequency of these terrible storms, you need to get your facts right from the start. As stated in the article, "The frequency of downpours and heat waves, as well as the power of hurricanes, has increased so dramatically that "100-year storms" are striking some areas once every 15 years," this is not correct. If Ms. Sharon Begley actually researched what a 100-year storm was, she would know that a 100-year storm event is NOT a storm that occurs once in every 100 years. This term means that a storm of this magnitude has a 1 in 100 chance of occuring EVERY YEAR!! It's called statistics and probability. You obviously need to go back to school and study Civil Engineering, especially Hydrology, because you would have known that your facts are not correct. You people need to stop scaring the hell out of the country with these bogus facts. THESE TYPES OF STORMS HAPPEN!! DEAL WITH IT!! When we start getting 10 100-year and 500-year storms in 12 calendar months, then you should start worrying. For now, stop making people panick.

    • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 6:07:57 PM

      Why would you entrust the masses with the task of understanding their own plight? Read through 80% of the posts on this board and you'll realize most of the people on either side of the argument have no understanding of the side that opposes them and don't even really know why they hold their respective beliefs.

    • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 12:34:22 PM

      The author did use a probabilist argument. You obviously didn't understand the article. At least you blame the liberals for all the world's problems though. Good job.

  • Posted By: liquidmental@msn.com @ 07/03/2008 4:25:27 PM

    did any one here ever fill a glass full of ice.. and then fill it to the brim with water... then wait for the ice to melt? did your glass over flow? no? why not and if not how will melting ice caps rase the oceans water lever? ..... for all the physics majors out there yes i know the real answer but i dont think many of these people do... well in the aspect of melting ice being the cause of raising sea levels..

    • Posted By: couchbomb @ 07/03/2008 6:06:58 PM

      Antarctica is land covered in ice.

    • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 07/03/2008 5:31:11 PM

      The ice that is in the ocean is not a concern. However, the ice on top of the glaciers miles thick is the problem. If this ice were to melt and release into the ocean it could raise ocean levels considerably.

    • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 5:17:30 PM

      The earth is not a glass of water

  • Posted By: bpellis @ 07/03/2008 6:36:31 AM

    Robertg222--

    If you think the earth has been cooling since 1998, you're clearly living in a (very cool) cave. The average temperature has been steadily rising over the past 40 years, with 2006 as the hottest year on record. The biggest temperature changes have been at the poles, but the smaller changes everywhere else are clearly having disastrous results on the weather.

    • Posted By: valhalla phil @ 07/03/2008 6:04:51 PM

      Not true! Even the global warmers afree on that. The proaganda used to say 'this is the warmest year in history' then they started saying 'this decade was the warmest in history' now they are saying the last decade is the warmest in history. Of course they never say the earth is cooling but if you read between the propaganda lines it's there.

    • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 4:57:24 PM

      Sources son, sources. It's all hearsay until you can play by the rules.

  • Posted By: edjunk47 @ 07/03/2008 6:03:25 PM

    so how can more water in the atmosphere cause more droughts? and how can a monkey move to the Missippi valley at a time when the tempeture was raising at the same rate as now be if it is just us people causing it? And how did swizterland get to be so green when it has been discribed as haveing been very dry in the past if this is all new? It is all Scare and control tactics. Too many scientific studies contradict this but those are ingored.

  • Posted By: synergyearth @ 07/03/2008 8:58:27 AM

    Wake up people...do some research. The cutting down of 80% of the forests contribute. The trees are major part of balancing the weather, filtering the air, cold and heat moderation. The pollution the industry is causing on our earth is toxic to the air, water, soil. The soil being drilled, moved, mined, polluted all have something to do. Everything exists in a cycle. We have consumed too much without putting enough back and now the earth is responding to the abuse. There are so many factors that work together in destroying our system. If more of us become more aware of these things and look beyond the 4 corners we live in we can do something about it. There are programs such as zerowaste, using solar power--thats one fuel thats available to all of us and can save on the electric bill. Think about our generations after us. check out these sites. www.storyofstuff.com discusses the pollution, consumption, Bill Mollison (permaculturalist) is also a great resource, check out some of his videos. It goes beyond just Global Warming. These scientists that study this do it for a living. They keep letting the world know whats going on. The solution lies within all of us. Synergy Earth

    • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 5:51:28 PM

      Tell me, do some people just enjoy telling other people to "wake up"? Is it THAT fun to say?

  • Posted By: edjunk47 @ 07/03/2008 5:41:17 PM

    I like how the environmentist are seltive in their information they use. how can this be anthing but natural when scientist say tah a certine monkey move to the Missippi valley in a time when the earth was warming at the same rate and had similar temps as it does today. Or how could Switzerland have been a desert and today a paridise. how does more water in the air translate into more droughts. this is nothing but scare and control tactics. and we fall for it!!!

  • Posted By: Dkryskowski @ 07/03/2008 8:09:28 AM

    Its not global warming--More and more catastrophes are to happen as we get closer and closer to the polar shift of our planet on December 21, 2012-What is predicted to wipe out much of the world.

    • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 5:25:10 PM

      LOOK! LOOK renfinity! LOOK! Didn't I tell you the world was going to end on 2012?! See?! SEE?!

      This is exactly what I mean.

  • Posted By: a180714 @ 07/03/2008 8:09:16 AM

    I'm not 100% sure about global warming. Everyone has their agenda. I tend to be skeptical. Here are some difficult-to-answer questions:
    1) if GW is caused by carbon dioxide, why did we have a warming cycle in the 11th century?
    2) if GW will destroy the planet, why didn't the 11th century warming destroy the planet?
    3) why do we think today's temperature is the one to defend regardless of cost? Maybe a planet 5 degrees warmer than what we currently will make us better off, all things considered.
    4) why are other planets in our solar system getting warmer? Don't think it's SUV exhaust fumes.

    • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 5:23:20 PM

      What... are you even talking about...

      You make the argument against you that much easier for those who would argue against you.

  • Posted By: ghandi @ 07/03/2008 8:06:57 AM

    Dear Sharon,

    Your Journalism School should rescind your diploma. What a load of steaming crap! Weather has always been unpredictable and always will be. If you check out the real experts, a lack of current sunspot activity is pointing toward Global Cooling for the next 30 years at least. Better buy a parka.

    • Posted By: jath123 @ 07/03/2008 8:14:18 AM

      The global cooling you predict will occur, but as the result of short term global warming. What most deniers don't understand about the prevailing scientific theory is that short term global warming will trigger massive polar cap ice melt (already happening), which will cool the oceans a few degrees and interrupt the world-wide ocean current pattern. Once there is no longer such a thing as the Gulf Stream to warm the East Coast in the winter, things will indeed get chilly. Hence, the correct term is Global Climate Change, not Global Warming. But the theory is correct so far. Short term global warming will lead to unstable weather patterns and possibly long-term cooling.

      • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 5:21:51 PM

        I'm sorry for interjecting, but I find it funny that you said "will lead to unstable weather patterns" as if Earth's atmosphere has ever been stable or predictable. Furthermore, yes, when something isn't warming up anymore (and it isn't staying the same) then it will be *cooling*.

      • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 1:01:37 PM

        Not to mention rising sea levels, which could easily destroy all US coastal cities - including NYC.

  • Posted By: billvlahos @ 07/03/2008 7:34:50 AM

    What is also disgusting : our government suggesting increased fossil fuel production on our own soil to help alleviate our current energy woes. Sure, keep the greedy oil companies happy while conveniently ignoring the repercussions. ANSWER: we need to get OFF the oil!!! Add all fossil fuels for that matter. We need to champion electric / battery powered vehicles faster than we currently are, and poise ourselves to sell the technology globally as well. HELLO, GM at less than $10 / share??? I'm buying! Solar power - YES, Hydro / Wind, YES, Nuclear, YES! Getting OFF the fossil fuels will not only help solve our energy dependency issues, but also cease the irreparable damage we've done to earth's atmosphere.

    • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 5:15:26 PM

      "Nuclear, YES!" is maybe the most intelligent thing I've seen on this joke of a board.

  • Posted By: wakeupyoufools @ 07/03/2008 5:02:31 AM

    Absolute TOSH, all those that agree with man made global warming hold your breath right now because you destroying the planet, you exhale carbon right? Once all factories and carbon emitting things have been wiped off the planet, what will be left to explain the continuing trend of crazy weather? Humans breathing precious oxygen and exhaling carbon,WAKE UP YOU IDIOTS! YOU'VE BEEN BRAINWASHED TO YOUR DEATH!

    • Posted By: rock this world @ 07/03/2008 11:04:29 AM

      This is one of the most stupid alswers and ways to think.. get you head to work!!!!
      Yes, humans to exhale carbon but do you think that the amount of carbon we exhale from out bodies can be compared to the amount that comes out of factories?? And we are not only talkin about factories here. There are over 16000 ariplanes in the air every second 24/7. And the cars? The trains? Busses? Carbon exists naturaly on earth but humans have over done it!!! Way over the limit!!!!!!!!!! If you think that humans have cut down 80% of the earths trees, and trees clear up the air, they take the carbon in and give out oxygen. This is something you must have learned at school at the age on 12. And that is only the start. Cutting down trees!!!!!! What do expect? where do you think the all the carbon goes? Into the atmosphere causing global warming. Like I wrote, that was only the start. We have been poluting earth for many years in many different ways... Try drinking soft drink for a month.. Your body is a living organism. It will eventualy collaps.
      Like earth.. Feed it with crap, and it will die!!! Try blocking your nose and mouth and then breath!!!! Thats what cutting down trees did!! Drink petrol!! Can you? You will die!! Thats what happens with all the polution in the seas, rivers e.t.c So, think again when you say silly things about the carbon humans exhale.. It has nothing to do with it!! So get your head to think and do some research before you even try to play smart!!!

      • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 4:54:58 PM

        Oh what the hell... let me reiterate:

        Stop talking about chemistry like you know something. Every time you used the word "carbon" it was blasphemy. Get *your* facts straight. Nothing "exhales carbon" and trees don't "take carbon in." Your hypocrisy subverts your own cause.

  • Posted By: mr1126 @ 07/03/2008 4:24:37 AM

    ANSWER: FALSE Get you head out of the TV. They want you to believe its global warming is a man made problem . So now they can Tax us for breathing. Over 100 scientist have said . There is NO proff its caused by humans. What about the 4 scientist Al Gore that quit your study.Then have received death threats? Because they did not believe what you were trying to sell.. Builderburg is up to no good. It is a shame the polar bear is going bye bye. But to say its caused by man . That is BULL. Mother earth will do its cleaning as it feels neccasary . I have read many reports on this subject. The ones I've read didn't come from Al Gore or Main stream media.

    • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 4:53:45 PM

      You provide your opponents the means by which they can deride you. Take your ignorance and your politics elsewhere, or learn to debate in an intellectual manner and be taken seriously. It's your call.

  • Posted By: wakeupyoufools @ 07/03/2008 3:59:07 AM

    Absolute TOSH, all those that agree with man made global warming hold your breath right now because you destroying the planet, you exhale carbon right? Once all factories and carbon emitting things have been wiped off the planet, what will be left to explain the continuing trend of crazy weather? Humans breathing precious oxygen and exhaling carbon,WAKE UP YOU IDIOTS! YOU'VE BEEN BRAINWASHED TO YOUR DEATH!

    • Posted By: rock this world @ 07/03/2008 11:05:35 AM

      This is one of the most stupid alswers and ways to think.. get you head to work!!!!
      Yes, humans to exhale carbon but do you think that the amount of carbon we exhale from out bodies can be compared to the amount that comes out of factories?? And we are not only talkin about factories here. There are over 16000 ariplanes in the air every second 24/7. And the cars? The trains? Busses? Carbon exists naturaly on earth but humans have over done it!!! Way over the limit!!!!!!!!!! If you think that humans have cut down 80% of the earths trees, and trees clear up the air, they take the carbon in and give out oxygen. This is something you must have learned at school at the age on 12. And that is only the start. Cutting down trees!!!!!! What do expect? where do you think the all the carbon goes? Into the atmosphere causing global warming. Like I wrote, that was only the start. We have been poluting earth for many years in many different ways... Try drinking soft drink for a month.. Your body is a living organism. It will eventualy collaps.
      Like earth.. Feed it with crap, and it will die!!! Try blocking your nose and mouth and then breath!!!! Thats what cutting down trees did!! Drink petrol!! Can you? You will die!! Thats what happens with all the polution in the seas, rivers e.t.c So, think again when you say silly things about the carbon humans exhale.. It has nothing to do with it!! So get your head to think and do some research before you even try to play smart!!!

      • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 4:51:01 PM

        Stop talking about chemistry like you know something. Every time you used the word "carbon" it was blasphemy. Get *your* facts straight. Nothing "exhales carbon" and trees don't "take carbon in." Your hypocrisy subverts your own cause.

  • Posted By: Open Minded @ 07/02/2008 1:20:28 AM

    When the earth is one black soggy burned up ash.....people can stop debating this. Meanwhile
    only the dull witted will ignore the obvious trends. Maybe you have to live longer to see it....but
    my 60 years can confirm it with confidence. Global Warming is entirely and completely engulfing us.

    • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 4:36:39 PM

      You've been a climatologist for 60 YEARS?! That must make you like 80+ years old. If you had any idea what climate change proponents are arguing, you'd know that Earth will be flooded and water-logged and then frozen over, not burned up ash. Please take *your* ignorance elsewhere.

  • Posted By: burbank @ 07/01/2008 3:35:02 AM

    To believe that we (humans) are the sole cause of all the ills that have befallen the earth because of our use of oil is like believing in the tooth fairy. Nice story, no substance. In point of fact, most of the climate change we see here on earth is a direct result of sunspot activity or the lack thereof. The more sunspot activity we see warmer it gets here on earth. And because sun spot activity is now virtually non existent as we head into the 25th solar cycle, coupled with a decrease in the activity of the sun's plasma fields look for temps to start to cool here on earth. Some scientists have even started to predict the return of the Dalton Minimum, a global cooling event that lasted from about 1790 to 1830 and was directly related to a decrease in solar activity. While we cannot treat our environment with contempt, we must also realize that running about like a bunch of environmental chicken littles screaming the the sky is falling is just as ludicrous. There is more than enough scientific evidence that refutes the global warming myth but not enough is being reported about it. So, in answer to the question posed by this article's headline, "Is Global WarmingCause Of This Year's Extreme Weather? The answer is no. And all you need to do is a bit of research to find out just how much of a canard global warming really is.

    • Posted By: Isis Skye @ 07/03/2008 3:29:01 AM

      Got some links to that "evidence" refuting climate change there, buddy? I am not an astronomer (my partner is an astro-physicist, but he is out of town right now so I'll have to wait to inquire), but I thought that sunspot activity flared up in short bursts? --as in days, not decades. Cycles of sunspot activity occur over years, 11 year cycles if I recall correctly---rrrg never mind. From all I have read, it is a tiny tiny percentage of scientists who dispute human-created climate change. My understanding is the debate comes in as they try to determine the severity and speed of the change, when the tipping point will occur, etc. I live in CA, and our governor Arnie is, yes, a Republican. And he gets behind environmental initiatives in many circumstances because CA has A LOT to lose from climate change. Fire problems, water shortages, low crop yields, and flooded coasts are all potential scenarios for us. These all have HUGE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES as well as public health consequences. It's not just a "granola" issue in 2008.

      Where do all these under-rock dwellers on this post COME FROM???? Are they paid by the coal industry to seek out climate change postings and spread nonsense?

      • Posted By: Chinadian @ 07/03/2008 4:19:15 PM

        Sunspot cycles occur over a 22-year period. 11 years of "waxing" and 11 years of "waning." There are also many, many other extra-planetary factors that influence terrestrial weather, and there are many geological factors that have an impact on our atmosphere including, but not limited to, plate tectonics and the ocean currents.

        If you're interested, this is a good, basic scientific "quiz" about global warming. It has pretty pictures and large font for those with short attention spans: http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/start.html

        I'm also going to take it upon myself to reassert that one should not prematurely dismiss the merits of any one side of any academic argument and warn you about the dangers of intellectual extremism.

  • Posted By: Liquidity @ 07/03/2008 3:46:35 PM

    For those ignorant of geology and climate (seemingly most of those that rant and rave about global warming), Long Island is the terminal moraine scoured out and pushed up at its present location most recently during the last ice age. The North American glacial sheet associated with this ice age (the Wisconsinian Glacier) began its advance about 85,000 years ago and commenced its melt-driven retreat (leaving behind among other visible features, Long Island) about 21,000 years ago. A mere blink in the past, modern Homo Sapiens was laying the groundwork for the first "advanced" eurasian cultures still visible today. And sea level was 300' (THATS 300 FEET!!!!!) lower than today. About this same point in time, ancestors of the American Indian WALKED from Asia to North America across a landscape most closely traversed today only by submarine.

    So it is certainly a fact that global warming has occured which has melted glaciers, caused the sea to rise, land to be inundated, climate to change, and, in the process, pushed around human life for the better and the worse while extincting many less adapable species. The "myth" of Atlantis and flood of Noah are most certainly derivative of "real" cultural memory. Now, if we want to tie global warming and melting glaciers to post industrial man, it should be noted that Plymouth Rock is still sticking out of the water and that at most post industrial rise in sea level is a matter of a couple of inches. For those that may be "alarmed" by the idea that man is causing all of this , I suggest you divide 300 feet (3600 inches) by 21,000 years. Anyone that does so might reasonably conclude that buying beach front property a couple of feet above present day high tide is an unlikely legacy for generations.

    But it is presently getting warmer and, as he has for the past 40,000 + years, man is going to have to adapt.

    Now, if you believe man is the cause of global warming and this is a problem to be solved rather than adapted to, I suggest you will find a most effective solution being eliminating a significant percentage of man, not per capita green house emissions. We already know how to do this and have the necessary technology. As Spock might say, any other approach is illogical. If we were to follow such a path, I would suggest that we also have some understanding of evolution and use this as an opportunity to improve the species while reducing it to sustainable levels. Here, it should be apparent that rationality and intelligence are those species attributes that would be of greatest future benefit in adapting to a changing world. Perhaps "self-defense' is why those that have us freeze in winter, roast in summer, be once again geographically restricted by Shank's mare, advocate such solutions.

  • Posted By: opethslayer01 @ 07/03/2008 11:31:23 AM

    Jeanne32: Ride your bike if you want, walk backwards to work for all I care, but when this bogus crap leads to the hypocritical liberal, lying politicians making rules that affect the way I live - that's abuse.

    • Posted By: jeanne32 @ 07/03/2008 12:00:42 PM

      you have obviously grown up with everything handed to you on a silver platter....other countries live by walking and taking mass transportation to work. It is not politics that are changing our lifestyles, or my lifestyle, I am changing it because of social responsibility. I dont care what Al Gore has to say, or most people arguing on here....it is incredible, becuase it sounds like most people have a good amount of knowledge, yet sitting on their asses doing nothing, as opposed to doing something about their lives. People need to stop expecting politics to do everything for us. That is not the purpose of politics!!!! look at other countries, such as mexico. They pay taxes, yet there water only runs for a couple hours a day. Why becuase we live in the desert, there isnt an abundant amount of water, anything happens to the colorado river we are screwed to say the least. Those taxes in mexico go to the politicians pockets. do you think the people are still sitting around bitching online, no they have are trying to come here to the land of oppurtuntity....yet todays generation cant even get their *** together. THis generation is full of consumers, that was the only way they were raised, not with a care in mind of their surroundings or environment. It is not about politics why I say this, or Al Gore, or religion.....it is becuase we should have respect for the earth. We should care for where we live, do you not care for things you own, the house you live in? Then have the same respect for the shelter that is around you that allows you to enjoy life. We have become so disconnected from mother nature it is ridiculous to hear people speak like this.

      • Posted By: midnightblue4221 @ 07/03/2008 12:29:02 PM

        Thank you for what you said here! I hope it gets through to people!

        • Posted By: enviro-offender @ 07/03/2008 3:24:00 PM

          So what you are saying is that people are so stupid that they need the government to force them to be environmentally friendly. You want America to be like Mexico only not where you live. You get to have everything the same just "the people who need to get their sh!t together". Here is a thought, nobody is hurting the environment because everything on the earth is of the earth therefore how can the environment hurt itself?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse