Global Warming Is a Cause of This Year’s Extreme Weather

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Ed Yost @ 07/03/2008 3:19:18 PM

    Many phenomena are not investigated yet and be not clear, it is known that being inside what or systems it is very difficult to estimate its(her) abilities, to measure characteristics and to expect an opportunity of succession of events. The theory helps to look at things under different corners of sight, but for that to study the base both technical and conscious is necessary for that to penetrate into essence of the occuring phenomena.

  • Posted By: liquidmental@msn.com @ 07/03/2008 3:17:40 PM

    It is well known that the USA and the USSR concluded an agreement at the end of the 1970's. Pursuant to the agreement, scientific developments in the field of geophysics for military purposes were banned. The projects in this field became classified.

    But de facto such developments, in spite of concluded agreement continued either under the guise of scientific studies, or development of dual purpose technologies, and the content and the purposes of such developments were wrapped in a fog of reservations, scientific speculations and even mysticism.

  • Posted By: Ed Yost @ 07/03/2008 3:05:48 PM

    The matter is that process at which cells in a circuit of a life it (he) not ?????????????? are liberated and any intervention the compassion good feeling but that was then with these africans you have thought, and then they had wars of revolution and famine before to rescue whom or you should think of that that will further instead of to rescue and leave blindly to the mercy of fate as blind children which for famine and what absence or resources each other cut threatens.

  • Posted By: focusonheaven @ 07/03/2008 3:05:26 PM

    An interesting concept that most people want to avoid is the fact that nature responds to God's voice. Whenever God speaks nature responds. Sounds crazy, but for any Bible believer scriptures state that nature responds to God and sure enough waves, winds, and mountains respond to God's voice. God spoke the world into existence and when Christ died and said it is finished, the earth quaked. For a book on what is happening in the heavens please go to focusonheaven dot.com

  • Posted By: Ed Yost @ 07/03/2008 2:57:05 PM

    The matter is that process at which cells in a circuit of a life it(he) not ?????????????? are liberated and any intervention ???????????????? ?????????????????????? good feeling but that was then with these africans you have thought, and then they had wars of revolution and famine before to rescue whom or you should think of that that will further instead of to rescue and leave blindly to the mercy of fate as blind ?????????? which for famine and what absence or resources each other cut.

  • Posted By: mackieml @ 07/03/2008 7:01:03 AM

    How dumb do you have to be to not see the effect we, as humans, have on the Earth? How dumb do you have to be to ignore it? How dumb do you have to be to not see that the politicians who are molding your little minds, are lying to you so they can continue to make obscene amounts of money. Have they lied so much to you that your little brain can't seperate fantasy from truth? And finally, how completely brain-dead stupid do you have to be to think God is on the side of people who start wars to pad their pockets? All of you who voted for George Bush the second time, you should apologize to your children ( they will suffer from your decision) for not paying attention to reality. You, truly, must be all about being evil or dumb. Really, really dumb.

    • Posted By: edkollin @ 07/03/2008 2:56:25 PM

      How dumb do you have to be to think that everybody who disagrees with your point of view does so because they have been manipulated?. How dumb do you have to be to think that everybody who disagrees with you voted for Gorge Bush once never mind twice? I have read many of these discussions some of those that disagree you are Rush Lmibaugh loving George Bust voting for twice types. But many are Libertarians or have libertarian leanings and they despise Bush for a whole host of reasons. Some deny Global Warming exists while others agree it exists but do not think humans caused. Others agree others that humans are at fault not for greenhouse gas emissions but by building on coastlines or because of incompetence. Some other agree that Global warming exists and has been caused by humans and but believe the benefits will outweigh the costs

  • Posted By: Objectivisor @ 07/03/2008 11:07:30 AM

    After living many years outside the American fishbowl, I've seen first hand the degree to which virtually every other country is talking constantly about solutions to a universally accepted impending crisis. For those "inland Americans" who are disconnected from the rest of the world, and who tend to only listen to the propoganda of those like Limbaugh, I have two questions:

    - If this is a conspiracy or hoax, then how can it be a conspiracy in every single country? Are you claiming a worldwide conspiracy?

    - What possible political incentive can come from having to tell people that we must reduce their standard of living to pay for a very expensive problem? One which is not in the best interest of Big Oil?

    • Posted By: ryanclose @ 07/03/2008 11:30:40 AM

      Since the Marxists failed in their original plot to bring about a dialectical socialist global oligarchy, they have changed tactics. I don't know if Big Oil is in on it or their biggest enemy, but I do know that the socialists want to cripple America and redistribute its wealth throughout the world and that this so-called "global warming" is accomplishing exactly that. What they ultimatly want is power and to use the ultimate weapon against the entire world's population: HUNGER. They will systematically destroy traditional farming power all over the globe as the Communists did in Poland and Romania, and as the European and American governments are taking steps to do now through tagging and tracking all legal livestock so they can liquefy (kill) the animals in a time of "crisis."

      • Posted By: Objectivisor @ 07/03/2008 2:48:56 PM

        So then you are claiming that Marxist have somehow corrupted the vast majority of scientists in every single country?

        Isn't this more likely just a simple matter of lack of responsibility? People (mostly Americans) unwilling to foot a very large bill, regardless how how that will affect future generations? Big Oil most of all?

        Are you certain you are not allowing yourself to be duped by Big Oil and their lackies? Are you considering the implications of misappropriating your blame?

        I have. And I've personally experienced the observations of those outside the American fishbowl, uncorrupted by Big Oil propoganda machines like Fox News (sic).

  • Posted By: CEWJ @ 07/03/2008 1:42:13 PM

    Man has always blamed himself for changes in the climate and weather in order to feel in control (if we are to blame, then we can do something about it!). Primitive man blamed himself for not giving enough offerings to his gods, so he made more offerings and atonement. Christian man blamed himself by saying his own sinfulness was being punished by God, so he repented and tried to sin less. So modern man blames his technology for provoking the wrath of nature, and he changes a light bulb or buys a phony carbon offset. The climate and weather on earth have constantly changed over time in both short and long-term cycles (due to the changes in solar output and wobbles in the Earth's rotation - hence alternating ice ages and warming spells). And there were even more drastic climate changes long ago that make today's worries look like child's play. Global warming is nothing new and neither is man's attempt to blame himself for it or any other type of climate change. Instead of wasting our time and effort on trying to change what we don't control (even though many would like to think we do), we should be concentrating on what man has always done in the face of climate change: adapt or die. Use modern technology to be able to survive climate change, not futilely attempt to stop it.

    • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 2:44:47 PM

      You miss a couple of very important points:
      1. There are many more reasons for climate change other than sun output and wobbles in the earth's rotation. Human introduction of stored CO2 into the atmosphere is one of them.
      2. Yes. There have been huge climate changes in the past. Almost all of them were accompanied with mass extinction of the dominant life form.

  • Posted By: MYMONEY1946 @ 06/30/2008 2:39:34 PM

    AL GORE IS PERPETRATING A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY ALONG WITH NEWSWEEK WHICH IS NOW NO MORE THAN THE LIKES OF 'THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER' AL SHOULD BE IN JAIL AND NEWSWEEK USED TO START YOUR GRILL.

    • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 2:37:35 PM

      You obviously don't know what a crime is. Better talk to a lawyer or cop. Really sounds like you just blame liberals for all of your personal issues.

    • Posted By: denmill @ 07/02/2008 11:32:08 AM

      Al Gore is the biggest con artist after Barack Hussein Obama.

      • Posted By: bpellis @ 07/03/2008 7:03:32 AM

        Denmill, you are so "right"! If we elect a gay Muslim from Africa with an Arabic middle name, the earth will warm another 2 degrees as God punishes us--you know, like Falwell and Robertson said He did with 9/11...

    • Posted By: badlogic @ 06/30/2008 11:10:02 PM

      Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Do what intelligent people do. Look at the data, with an open mind and figure it out. It's complex but hopefully easy enough to understand for any high school graduate. There are natural warming and cooling cycles which accur on different timetables than what we are seeing now. How do we know? Years of research. We are artificially raising the level of CO2 at an increasing rate which is raising the temperature. Ignoring it won't make a difference, and being good to the environment and increasing efficiency won't hurt anyone.

  • Posted By: aleph123 @ 06/30/2008 4:56:04 PM

    "Global warming is wishful thinking by all who want begger government, higher taxes, diminution of freedom and less. fun. There are hundreds of tenured climatolist professors who believe that global warming is overplayed and that changes in weather are not the same aschanges in climate. Ten to one that Sharon Begley is not trained in physical science but in political science at liberal academe
    aleph

    • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 2:35:44 PM

      Higher taxes are not the best solution to the real problem of global warming. The best solutions for global warming are market driven solutions. We are currently seeing one such market driven solution. As the price of oil goes up, we are actually seeing gasoline consumption on a downward trend. I also notice that SUV sales are way down, and demand for fuel efficient transportation is way up. I am not aware of any new taxes involved in this trend. It sounds suspiciously like you blame liberals for all of your personal problems.

  • Posted By: DoYourPart @ 07/03/2008 12:31:06 PM

    What totally amazes me about all of the angry folks up in arms against the possibility of global warming is that they offer either a specific example that goes against a broad 'global' trend, cite gods will, bash Gore, or have some conspiracy theory.(Don't even get me started in yokels saying 'Heck I haven't witnessed any global warming.)
    The scientific community, not all, but a majority percent (80%+ ) is looking at data and is saying in general it all points in one direction. The average global temp IS going up, that is fact. Has is been hotter at some point in earths history? I am sure this is true also, does this mean we should not be proactive and do what we think is in the best interest for everyone? Never in the history of the earth have there been 6 billion people with the technology and means to effect the earth like we can today. Just like in the fossil record there have been huge specie die-offs, which we are also experiencing are a higher rate today than any point compared to the best data we have available to us. If I argued with the same logic that I'm seeing in these posts I would say 'Hey we've had specie die-offs before, I see no reason to do anything (i.e. spend money) on saving species today'.
    I just don't understand why there is so much anger and resentment towards the group of people saying 'A lot of data is pointing to warming of the planet maybe we should do something about it'. Can it really be as simple as people are so damn fixed in their lives that the thought of changing current lifestyles is more catastrophic and scary than the potential of what the MAJORITY of scientists are saying is likely happen to the planet? (I do believe that because the MAJORITY of scientists who are knowledgeable in these fields have been pointing to global warming for some 20 years now, and that it is the 'wack-jobs' scientists refuting the scientific community as a whole, not the other way around.)
    Are scientists always right? Of course not. To all the folks who gleefully point out the supposed ice age predicted in the 70???s, are you suggesting we change nothing, just keep on keeping on? Scientists are seeing data trends and they present it and extrapolate what they think the ramifications are. Al Gore has taken the next step by saying we are causing this effect on the planet, AND we better change our ways. Scream at Gore don???t blame the scientists if you are somehow offended or feel guilty that over the last 50 years the US has pumped more C02 into the atmosphere than any other country, even better take some responsibility yourself, which it seems is the whole goal of your arguments. ???Not my fault, can???t change the world, not changing my ways???

    That my friends is utterly selfish.

    • Posted By: electrojoerandom @ 07/03/2008 2:30:49 PM

      No doubt you make good points, however, the article has gone beyond what a MAJORITY of scientists say. So if you support the majority view, then you don;t support what the article is stating. This is the problem with the jump on any boat crowd. They say it is because everyone agrees even if the majority clearly doesnt agree. Don't you see that?

    • Posted By: Turbull @ 07/03/2008 12:58:16 PM

      Excuse me, please, but did you say "majority" of the scientists support this hoax?
      "Less than one in four Americans are loyal. If he calls that half, I'd hate to be his wife and share half his bed!"(William Wilberforce in the movie "Amazing Grace", refuting the claim that half of Americans were loyal to Britain)

    • Posted By: jwmello @ 07/03/2008 12:47:30 PM

      You make some good points, however, keep in mind that this has not been some information presented to the general population stating that there is a possibility that this trend may be problematic. Some have used Global Warming as pushing a political agenda, a scare tactic, as a means of manipulating the general population to donate money towards an agenda, and using fear as a means of controlling others. I agree that we should be aware of our environment and should decrease pollution; however, let???s call a spade a spade. Science has gotten it wrong before and will likely get it wrong again. I am not saying that they are wrong; however, there is so much about climate change that we do not understand. Most legitimate scientist will not say definitively that Global Warming is real or problematic. Most only cite possibilities or probabilities. We should find better ways of encouraging others to pollute less without using fear and propaganda. BTW, Gore???s use of computer generated effects from a movie did nothing to endear him to those who may be a little skeptical.

  • Posted By: CraigA @ 06/30/2008 11:29:53 PM

    Badlogic the reason why is because you will cut the artery which runs the economy. I'm all for alternative fuels for future solutions, but if you need to handle the problems in tandom. If the boat your on is flooding you don't kill the motor and start rowing until you've stopped the flooding.

    • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 2:29:23 PM

      We've already cut the artery. The largest transfer of wealth in the history of mankind is taking place right now: from the USA to Muslim extremists in the form of oil remittances. And I thought they were our enemies in the war on terror.

  • Posted By: joey25@aim.com @ 07/03/2008 12:42:01 PM

    Yes, it's funny how they won't believe in a science that can be simply put. Carbon dioxide clogs atmosphere. Carbon dioxide has no where to go. carbon dioxide causes greenhouse effect.
    What is so hard believing that?
    There's actually a youtube video that proves we should do everything we can to stop global warming. "The most terrifying video you will ever see". It's no science, just logic that everyone can agree with. It's not longand it's very interesting, so I'd suggest taking a look at it.

    • Posted By: nktracker @ 07/03/2008 12:55:47 PM

      If you use YOU TUBE as your confirming resource, you are sorely being misguided. BTW, what do plants do? Can you find that on YOU TUBE?

      • Posted By: electrojoerandom @ 07/03/2008 2:25:47 PM

        Heck if you see it on YouTube it's more than likely wrong.

  • Posted By: BadgerSouth @ 07/02/2008 10:25:54 AM

    I'm old enough to remember how the tobacco industry fought tooth and nail against the medical and scientific community over the causal effect between cigarette smoking and cancer. It's no secret that Big Oil, Big Coal, right wing-nuts like Rush Limbaugh, Libertarians, and others have used the tobacco industry's tactics to cast doubt on the validity of what the scientific community has concluded about the causal effect between climate change and the release of greenhouse gases by mankind. Many Americans died because of Big Tobacco's greed and selfishness. This time around, the stakes are much higher. For the sake of our children and future generations, we need to take action now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate against the climate change consequences that have already been set in motion.

    • Posted By: SoCold02 @ 07/03/2008 9:47:58 AM

      Spoken like a true radical left wing-NUT wacko Michael Moore idolizer. Go scratch some seeds out of your lawn Chicken Little.

      • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 2:24:35 PM

        And you can go on blaming liberals for all of you personal problems, since you are unable to address them yourself. Go listen to Rush Limbaugh or something.

  • Posted By: harlon828 @ 07/03/2008 11:36:23 AM

    Everyone seems to have a slant on whether ot not global warming might be the cause of our weather changes we are experincing around the world.
    It is common knowledge that if you shut up a car in a garage and let it run that you will be suffocated within a short while.
    I think this could be what is happening in the case of global warming. Thousands upon thousands of cars, plants and other means of burning fossil fuesl are continually spewing out this posions into the atmosphere not only in our country but all around lthe world into an atmosphere that is like an egg shell surroundin the world.
    It stands to reason that in time this is going to tend to build up and who knows what resulting affects it will have on the world as we now know it.
    God has given us the answer to what we could do to prevent this polution, but the evil and greed of mankind has refused to persue and develop it and we are now reaping the results and consiquences of that greed.
    Hydrogen can easily be produced to power everything from cars to homes with abaolutely no adverse affects on the world that surrounds us.
    Until man understands these things and does something about it we will continue to suffer the adverse affects of our greedy lifestyles and will be required to live with it.
    Once we loose our bees to polonate our crops by using pestisides and other chemicals to kill everything from earth worms and the like all we will have to look forward to is the on coming faming that will result.
    I know this sounds like far out logic, but just wait and see what is on the horizon............................

    • Posted By: electrojoerandom @ 07/03/2008 2:18:16 PM

      All the people in the world could be mnoved into a land area the size of texas and each have a quarter acre. How in goodness name could something that small have a global impact.

  • Posted By: RevScorpion @ 07/03/2008 8:06:10 AM

    Interesting isnt it.
    Global warming has the whole world polarized either for or against it. There is no middle ground.
    If you dont believe it, you are "evil". If you do, you are a "fool" or a "zealot".
    Simple facts are:
    1: We do NOT have the long term data needed to conclusively PROVE that global warming is real.
    2: We do NOT have the ability to prove one way or another if humans are responsible.
    3: It is infinitely arrogant to believe that, in just a few short years, mankind can affect the earth to this degree.

    It is also interesting to note that as recently as the early 1970's scientists were worried because the earths temp was COOLING and we didnt know what to do about THAT either.

    We need to be good stewards of this planet - its the only home we have - but not get caught up in the political BS when we simply do not have all the answers.
    We dont even really know all the complexities of the question yet.

    • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 2:14:53 PM

      And why is it 'arrogant' to believe that we can affect the climate? Even you say it's possible - we just don't have the facts yet. Fact is that humans are capable of great feats. We have, for example, recreated small versions of the Sun on this planet (nuclear reactions). Sounds suspiciously like you blame liberals for all of your personal issues.

    • Posted By: austinbob @ 07/03/2008 1:06:28 PM

      Good point. What I notice in the posts is that the global warming naysayers often blame liberals for their personal problems. I suspect many of them consider themselves conservative, and probably get most of their facts from Rush Limbaugh. That explains why their arguments are so shallow, and are simply filled with venom.

  • Posted By: iviswan @ 07/03/2008 11:25:49 AM

    Unless you are a meteorolgist, an archeologist, a historian, or an expert on earth evolution, I consider your comments to be baseless, politically motivated,and inflamatory to the real experts that DO know the weather and earth changes patterns through its evolution; so go to school and learn or shut up.

    • Posted By: electrojoerandom @ 07/03/2008 2:09:44 PM

      yes, but the writer of the story says that our "real" scientists are being influenced by the media.

  • Posted By: Ed Yost @ 07/03/2008 1:59:47 PM

    CEWJ
    You are right the theory of Darwin works and survive the strongest and those who is able to adapt,
    But meaningly to saw a branch on which you sit not reasonably.
    Unique minus that the person in loneliness realizes it much faster, than consciousness of group in size in six billions.

  • Posted By: geocajun @ 07/03/2008 1:50:07 PM

    In effect, yes, it has been going on for millions of years. All orgainic matter dies, when it dies it releases C02 and methane as biproduction of decomposion. This is what forms our oil reserves, this is also why a pile of dead grass smells bad, and why dead animals smell bad. Think of all of the matter on earth that is constantly dying and imaging how much that adds up to, a substantial proportion. When volcanoes erupt, they put out massive amounts of CO2, that has been going on for millions of years. Also, the Earth has been much hotter in the past, so to assume that the optimal temperature for the Earth is what we know is foolhardy. Many scientists actually believe that temperature variations LEAD to CO2 (and other) variations. But what do they know, listen to Al Gore.

  • Posted By: Ed Yost @ 07/03/2008 1:43:59 PM

    It is not necessary to search for the reason in what that one, as well as panacea from all troubles.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse