Why don't we move them to someplace where they can be used ? Seems a real waste that they just sit there.
An advocate of the American West's mustangs blasts a proposed government policy to cull the herds.
Why don't we move them to someplace where they can be used ? Seems a real waste that they just sit there.
The wild horse is the one picture of freedom that we have left. The way the wild horse roams without a care in the world and runs forever showing whar real freedom is. America can not kill the one picture of freedom that we have. Killing the wild horse would kill so many hearts. I can not imagine an America without the wild horse. The way they helped America get to where we are today, there is no way killing them off is the answer to the problem. Horses are meant to be free and running wild not in some holding place where they will die anyway. Even the Indians knew the power of the wild horse and how the spirit of the horse was as powerful as any spirit. The wild horse reflects what so many hearts and spiriits hold inside and to kill that would be to take away a part of the spirit of the people. We need to stand together as Americans and say No to killing these animals. Their spirit and freedom will live in forever inside of us all as they remain free and running wild!! Wake up America!! Thier is more than just jobs to worry about; how about putting some passion back into what we really feel and the wild horse is a symbol to be highly reveared!! We must save them before it is too late!!!
killing these animals would be wrong beyond all reasion. these horses have been here longer than any humans and we were imposing onto their land! Taking away their homes for our "needs." Not seeing wild mustangs running free across the barren plains of the west is as un-American as not playing base ball or not saying the Pledeg of Alegiance. As Americans say, "No" to the slaughtering of these amazing and beautiful wild horses.
So we're concerned about polar bears in the arctic, but we don't give a damn about our own ecosystems. Those animals have been here long before we were. They deserve a little respect. How would you feel if someone wanted to euthanize you if you were considered a pest? Jeez, these people are a-holes.
To whom it may concern,
We need to stop killing all these poor defenceless animals and start thinking about their existance.
People of the BLM need to *** off and get a new hobbie. One that doesn't involve killing or torchuring animals. Animals are just as fragile and meaningful as human beings and they need to stay out in the open as wild mustangs not human cutting posts! We need to take a stand and stand up for what is right! These acts of violence may lead to worse things maybe child endangerment! Or other animals! Who wants to see these beautiful creature get slaughtered! I mean if we don't stand up for them, who will?
SAVE THE HORSES ......................
they should not be treated this way................
say NO! to this bad thing that the BLM want todo to these amazing animals that we have on our earth......
RISK TO LOSE ONE OF THE GREAT ANIMALS....................
we need to come together and fite it .............SAY NO!!!!!!!!!
geee blackandwhitehorses...ya think your horse prejudice or what, these animals are americas history, as a horse owner of 10 years, what is going on bs. There is no reason for the Federal Government needs to step in, IT IS POLITICS not the benefit of the animals that consume there thoughts or processes. These animals survived without us for many years it was by the hands of humans that they are in this position, maybe even ranchers. DId you read the article, I doesn't take a genious to know that the government is leasing land to keep the food consumption going in the US and every damn place else. This is ridiculous, no reason to euthanize these animals, 33K horses is not a lot considering and nature will take care of it themselves we don't need to be involved. Don't ranchers have confined spaces for animals at times. Come on people how much more are we going to stand for in life, how much more can we compromise!!!!
it is pathetic that wild animals on public grazing land are being killed (or want to be) for the benefit of cattlers. Does anyone know that overgrazing by for profit cattlers caused plenty of wildlife die off for generations? It was in the 1800s and 1900s that these ranchers would kill one another over grazing land which is why we have public land and grazing rules...now they are going to buldoze that freedome also. What is wrong w/ the morals of this country. We complain about china hunting whales to extinction, but are happy to do that to horses for profit?? What makes us better?
Send the excess population of mustangs to the anti horse slaughter proponents like Bo Derek and Willie Nelson.. Why don't all the "rescue groups" like Best Friends Animals Sanctuary take what's left over. City slickers and bleeding heart animal advocates have done more to destroy the quality of life for the mustangs by insisting there be NO culling just forced containment in holding pens for years on end. To spay and geld to prevent continued population increases is yet another form of torture. I speak from experience after having my own UTERUS ripped out from surgery. Unfortunately for me it was necessary to cure a serious medical condition. Frankly I don't understand anyone wanting to adopt a WILD horse and condemn it to a life of confinement when it has run FREE since birth. How is that a quality of life for a WILD horse? Culling is necessary especially in the wild herds. Let them die with dignity instead of being couped up in a 12X12 pen the rest of their lives. That is NOT life that is prison. BTW for those of you who think cattle destroy the range....newsflash horses are the ones that damage to rangeland. They can crop the grass down to roots as they eat with two sets of teeth....cattle wrap their tongues around the grasses instead. Horses large hooves cause far more damage to the ground than the cattle's split hoof. Also horses will peel and eat the bark off the trees, cattle do not. In short horses are far more destructive to rangeland than cattle.
Sidetopic- I know!
Oh yeah lets just let the wolves run free! You obviously don't live anywhere near an area where they reintroduced wolves (yup RE-introduced) because it was the natural thing to do. And what exactly do you have to do to provoke a wolf to attack you- oh yeah, just stand there and wait for it! We have wolves right down in our backyard (and yes we live in town) and I am not going to wait for a wolf pack running through my back yard to kill my dog, cat or kids. I am going to get my gun and shoot it. And they do NOT reimburse our cattle ranchers here. They only reimburse you if you did not shoot or try to get the wolf to leave your property. And you have to prove that it was killed by a wolf, which can be hard if other scavengers have already gotten to the carcass.
Wolves are scary.. They will actually stalk you to kill you. Even if you are in a group of people. They are almost fearless of people. And yes I have experience with being stalked. And sometimes even killing one with a gun won't get rid of them all. They are beautiful I will admit- but they do not mix with people.
Just remember, Ranchers and the American Public have entered into the Wolves' domain. Only Rabid wolves will attack at will. They are afraid of Human contact. If you hunt them, they will possibly attack as their protection. You need to do more research before stating inaccuracies. And by the way, I do live where they re-introduced wolves to society, and there have been rare occassion where the rancher's stock where killed. Which by the way, was on federal land, where the wolves have the right to be. Rancher's fault here.
where'd your research come from? The Sierra Club monthly newsletter? Maybe you should put your dog or your child in closer with the wolves and see what happens. Read the newspapers and explain away all of the wolf attacks on wildlife, pets, and yes, people. Just because you wish it to be true, doesn't make it so. I guess I must live a little closer to them than you think you do.
The wild horse act removes protection from horses that have been adopted for one year. Those horses get titled to the adopter and can be sold, traded or given away at that time just as any other horses. The protection is for those who are in the wild. Horses that have been in holding pens for years, some for a decade, can no longer be considered wild.
Something has to be done, the country is in an econmic situation and budgets are being cut everywhere. The wild horse program has operated in the red almost from the beginning.
Things must be changed and not all changes are going to please everyone. The policy discussed has been in the original law since the beginning 31 years ago. I have sent suggestions to the BLM for years, such as what I suggested below.
The time for finger pointing and blame game has long passed. Drastic times calls for drastic measures and what needs to be done, get done now. It is time for people to step and take responsibility as Americans for America's symbol of wild horses.
Go out and adopt one or two.
Write a college or University, ask about sterilization programs and taking in a group of horses as a study group to humanely develope feasible sterilzation methods that would work on the wild herds.
Ask your state or national parks in your area to set up, a sanctuary and take in sterile, un-bred mares and castarted males to live the rest of their lives in the open rather than a feed lot.
Ask those Animal Rights groups and Wild Horse Advocates like Deanna Stillman, to cough up some of that tax-free donations, purchase some land and take in some of these horses. They receive Millions of tax free donations every year, and can cerrtainly buy some land for the purpose they are promoting and asking donations for.
They can sell syndicate papers to people who donate, designating certain horses as being the donors, complete with photographs of the horse, like the feed the children campaign.
there are plenty of ways people can do something rather than demonizing other citizens who have actually stepped up and done more for the horses athn other people want you to believe.
Just sit back and brain storm ideas and do it!
How about going through the holding pens, all of them, and select the horses with good size, conformation and a popular/ high demand color.(Appaloosa, Pinto, Roans, Buckskins, Palomino's, Curlies, etc.) Then set those horses aside to place into select management areas at the time of roundups.
That would provide new genetic balance into a herd, build up and improve the quality of future adoptable horses. More people would be willing to pay more for a good sized, decent conformed horse with the color that people like to see. I have seen horses with those qualities go for a $1,000. vs horses that are stunted, solid colored and less desirable conformation, not even selling as a buddy horse for $25.00.
Ask about turning loose a mammoth Jack into a couple of the larger ranges to take over a herd or two? It would provide a sterile crop of colorful mules that are very popular. It would also keep the herd size to a reasonable rate as the offspring will be sterile and the mares would throw a few more sterile offspring, without adding more fertile fillies or colts to the range. Then (before people start screaming about genetic diveristy) at the time of the roundup, remove the mule offspring, remove the Jack and stick one the previously selected studs, with size, color and conformation in with the ones for release.
Offer some of the older horses to the Indian Nations. Offer some to sanctuaries at no cost. They just come and get them, rather than BLM taking them there. Take some small, sterile groups and establish sanctuary areas in various National / State parks east of the Mississippi. With them being sterile, it will be an area where more can be placed as the original ones pass on from natural causes, as none will be born there.
Offer a higher incentive to Ranchers and other interested groups to provide private land to take in some herds. The requirement must be that the horses be sterile, or unbred mares and castrated males. That way no one is going into the "private Mustang breeding business", the sanctuaries remain available for more in the future when the older ones die off from old age/natural causes.
Contact some of the colleges and universities and give them field practise for spaying, castration, donations to BLM. They get practise under supervison of the Veterinarian School and the BLM gets free services. Donate some to Veterinary colleges and Universities as a study herd to perfect sterilization methods to use on some wild herds.
The rest of the unadoptable, for what ever reason, euthanize humanely and dispose of them. It has been in the BLM policy to humanely destroy the unadoptables from the beginning of the Mustang program. It is the sitting back and waiting and Wild Horse Advocate lawsuits, that has allowed the program to get in the sorry shape it has become.
Ranchers already own their land..
Cows were brought over the same time as the horses. Check out Spanish expeditions.
Take back our nations land! Let the ranchers go and buy their own piece of property. Get your cows off of my land. If you are interested in bringing animals onto my land to put money into your pocket, try bison. At least they were there before you or your ancestors were (until they killed them off as well). I fully trust our governments assessments on everything (especially the environment or wmd's)! hahaha
Like most mammals that went through the earth???s cooling down some would cross the Bering Strait land bridge connecting the North America to Asia and the yet others would travel south some staying in southern area of North America while others would head to South America. Each group evolving (i.e.: Plesippus, Hippidion) some dying out. Equus stenonis crossed back into North America along with similar forms Equus Scotti and Giganteus(which both exceeded the modern horse in size). All horses in North America would ultimately become extinct approximately 11 thousand years ago, what caused their extinction along with a variety of other megafauna is still a matter of debate especially the suddenness of the event.
It wouldn???t be until millions of years later when explorers to the new world would bring horses back to North America. The wild horses of today are not ???domesticated??? horses recently left in the wild on their own to fend for themselves. The wild horse is the descendants of horses that took part in American history. Some of these horses are the ancestors of horses that carried troops in to battle during the Revolutionary War, War of Mexico, Civil War, Indian War, the discovery of the American West and some of these horses ancestors we???re ridden by some of the West most famous outlaws. Billy the Kid, Jesse James, the Dalton gang.
For anyone to call them nothing more than feral animal is plain wrong. They are a living and breathing history and to euthanize them should be considered a criminal act. There is a saying that is very fitting and true not just about America but history in general ???History was written on the back of the horse.??? To euthanize them should be looked at as if you decided to take a demolition ball to Independence Hall or tossing The Declaration of Independence into a fire because we have it scanned on the computer and no longer need the paper (parchment) taking up space. After all Independence Hall is just another building and The Declaration of Independence is just an old piece of paper (calfskin).
Wild horses are our responsibility to care for just like any animal wild or domestic. As for the Ranchers who want them gone so they can raise even more cattle need to step back and be thankful to the horses who ancestors made their lives easier.
Maybe the government should look at the ranchers and ask them what measures they are going to take to care for the wild horses. They want grazing land to lease then the price has gone up and if there is a wild herd nearby then they will be required to look after the herd or pay for someone to do it. If they are the cause of any death or injury to the herd they will be held liable and charged with a felony and face prison time.
Ranchers don't want them gone. That is hype posted by advocate groups that say only what they want you to hear.
Ranchers don't get bigger or more grazing. The permit sizes are the same since they were laid out in 1934 and those areas are often within their own property boundaries. So to say they should take care of the herds? They already do! Horses don't know the difference between public and private land. They cross over to private land, eat the forage grown by the rancher, to support his herd through the winter. They break down fences, mingle with the ranchers own stock, etc. Ranchers have to repair those areas that were destroyed by the BLM horses at their won expense. Ranchers just want the horses managed the way BLM stated it would and is responsible for doing so. If there are 400 horses in an area allotted to support 175.. than do the math.. it is past carrying capacity for year round grazing of horses.
this is rediculious. half of the people on here live in the city and know nothing about what they're arguing. they have no hands on expirence with the topic and are being nieve about the situation.
To kwhorseluver - RE:
Posted By: kwhorseluver @ 07/02/2008 8:32:14 PM
Comment: this is rediculious. half of the people on here live in the city and know nothing about what they're arguing. they have no hands on expirence with the topic and are being nieve about the situation.
Kiwani Response to kw:
First of all, it is NOT RIDICULOUS to have an opinion, just because it opposes yours! Second, Just because some people live in the city and have no hands-on/direct EXPERIENCE, does NOT mean they are being NAIVE when they have a differing or opposing opinion from your position/opinion.
I may not have direct/hands-on experience handling/breeding/stabling horses, BUT I DO HAVE COMMON SENSE (& COMPASSION & EMPATHY) enough to know that there may be MANY, MANY other OPTIONS for the government to apply RATHER THAN TO KILL THE HORSES!!!! I want to know---
1. Did they EVEN EXPLORE ANY OTHER OPTIONS?? It does not appear they did, or if so, not very many, or they dismissed them out of hand because it did not fit with their LAND-GRABBER/ROBBER BARON HIDDEN AGENDA!!!
2. Some other posters mentioned several GOOD ideas/options the gov't could employ-- I bet they did not even explore any...relax adoption criteria/expand adoption program to other areas as it is little known outside the West/contact Native American tribes to see if they would take the horses to graze on reservation land (hey-maybe they could PAY the tribes a fee =/to (or even <)the cost to feed them in gov't corrals OR just give them to the tribes & maybe the tribes could use the horses to start some kind of enterprise to alleviate some of the ABJECT POVERTY CONDITIONS THAT EXIST ON MOST RESERVATIONS!!!!)
OR HEAVEN FORBID--- maybe they could JUST LET THEM LOOSE!!! then they would not have to pay to feed & MANAGE them... let mother nature take over... I'm sure she's very capable & has the EXPERIENCE as she has handled situations such as this for MILLIONS OF YEARS!!! How about relocating them to some other areas where they could graze freely & maybe HELP control some of the TALL GRASSES THAT ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM WITH ALL THE WILDFIRES around the whole of the west, HMMMMMM?????
I'm sure there are many other options that could be employed (or a variety of combined options) but I think the Hidden Agenda is overriding all COMMON SENSE & DECENCY-- if we put a man on the moon & on Mars-- what is SO HARD ABOUT SOLVING THIS LITTLE PROBLEM??? NOTHING. If one is so inclined as to think & to try!! Although, this might be TOO TAXING for the officials manning BUSH'S administration!!!!!!!
THANK GOD HE'S GONNA BE GONE--- SOON!!!! (but not as soon as this country needs!)
I think January 19, 2009 should be declared a NATIONAL THANK GOD HE'S GONE-FREEDOM HOLIDAY!! (National TGHGF-Day!!!) :):):)
I am glad you admitted you have no experience with horses at all, and the most I have seen is quotes by other Native Americans. I truly hope you did some research on this matter instead of operating on emotional opinions.
IF you did some research, you will find that the BLM has tried many, many options regarding managing the population of Mustangs. Many.
Including incentive programs to ANYONE who wanted to give older, unadoptable horses a permanent home. A couple thousand have been placed. Guess who stepped up and took most of them in? RANCHERS.. You know the very people who are getting demonized by ignorant statements. Some even went to a few tribes who asked.
Ranchers who share grazing areas in or near wild horse areas like seeing the horses, however they want the horses managed the way they are supposed to be, by the same law that gave them protection for commercial roundups. The Ranchers keep and maintain the cattle numbers within the limits alloted to them. It is only fair that BLM keep to its policy and maintain the numbers of horses in the same way. That has not been happening. Ranchers have more knowlege, education, experience and understanding of carrying capacity, eco-system, riparian areas etc, than anyone here. They know when there is more horses on the range year round the range does suffer, horses are destructive and no matter what romantizing you want to do, the evidence is still there.
The BLM and policy for removal, and even destruction of excess, unadoptable horses has been in the law since 1971-1973 and 1978. So all your Bush hating can't lay this one at his his door. Its been there since Pres. Nixon.
1. Maybe the mustangs already are loose and that is the problem.
2. It wont do any good to expand the adoption programs besause they are having a hard enough problem getting rid of the ones that are in captivity.
3. if you give them to the indians they will just end up slaughtering the horses themselves.
4. horses were introduced into this country by man and now through mismanagement they have become feral animals, much like the dogs and cats that are EUTHANIZED every day for roaming the streets.
5. if you just turn them loose and let mother nature take its course, you will see results of inbreeding, overgrazing, delicate springs and water holes will be overrun and stomped out.
So why dont you take your romanticized western books back to the library and stick to the concrete jungle in which you reside, and let the ranchers and BLM handle the problems on the land they care for.
Well at least us city folk have enough decency to pay attention to our spell check. You sir are abusing the privilege. Are you using a laptop while riding a horse ?
way to waste everyone's time reading your comments. Shows your loss for logical argument when confronted with facts.
Not only did I waste YOUR time,but you also took the time to quote me and respond.....way to waste your own time.
I must have missed those "facts". Id also like to see the scientific survey he took to determine that "half" the posters here are from the city.Im just having some fun.
Ironic how some one so educated doesn't know proper spelling and grammer desertdonkey. You want to play the education card- it is Hypocrites, NOT hypocrits- accuse ME not knowing what words mean- that's pathetic. You're not worth my time. Exactly what does your welfare tirade have to do with not wanting thousands of animals needlessly slaughtered? Should that many be loose- no. I agree with that. But there are other alternatives. I simply want to see them explored by an organization that doesn't waste funds. I wouldn't accuse others of being emotional over an issue you obviously have a lot of feeling over. If you weren't...why are you still responding? Your degree means crap. My grandfather runs the conservation department in my area, I've lived this stuff. So go back to your library, your books, and your bitter lonely word. Oh yeah...you haven't said...what is it again that you are doing to help the situation besides yell at those with a conscience?
Wow.
You contradicted yourself several times in there... and it's the Internet.. spelling means nothing and pedants like yourself appear to fulfilling your banal desires when you point out misspelled w3rds.
Wow.
Regarding a previous comment, anyone who states with apparent certainty that wild horses totally disappeared from North America during the ice ages simply is buying into a never proven piece of propaganda from The Corporate State's controlled government and news media, for which there has been enough fossil evidence, much of it neatly or sometimes clumsily covered up by both U.S. and Canadian authorities, which points to a conclusion that some horses DID survive here, beyond that point, while others migrated to Eurasia via the Bering land bridge. An even more outrageous government lie is the premise that wild horses are overpopulating and damaging public range lands. The fact of the matter is that consistent mismanagement of natural wildlife habitats by the Bureau of Land Management's preoccupation with corrupt land brokerage deals, consistently has squeezed these horses into smaller and smaller habitats, often in the most inhospitable terrain areas, in direct violation of the l971 Wild Horse and Burro protection law. It's as if, on the old Andy Griffith TV, the writers were to squeeze all of the residents of Mayberry into a single one block square area, eliminating all other real estate which would include Aunt Bea's house and Goober;s garage - and you would have to agree that the remaining town was overpopulated and non-sustainable. Our government's decimation of natural predators in the wild horse range areas further has contributed to this trumped up, so called overpopulation of wild horses. If anyone in the BLM and the entire Department of Interior had even the slightest regard for true preservation of natural wilderness areas, which are our planet's only effective producers of actually clean and uncontaminated air and water, they would recognize the vital importance of preserving both natural predators and the wild horses, who self regulate their own populations and co-exist in a healthy, mutually supportive way, when left alone in adequately sized natural habitats that are free from bureaucratic ineptness and corruption driven inteference.
Maybe you should nactually read the Wild Horse and Burro Act of 1971? You'll see that the ranges the horses they were on at that time were set up be the wild horse ranges. You will also see that the policy which set up the humane destruction of unadoptable excess horses was set up AT THE SAME TIME!
This is not in violation of the Law, it is in the Law! The horses ranges haven't been reduced. The only times horses have been removed entirely from a range is when the water holes dried up, fire damage, or severe drought was starving them. They get returned and have been returned when the conditions improve, that has happened.
I was appalled when I read this article; I can hardly believe the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is considering euthanizing the Mustang population out west. The BLM gives several reasons; their budget is to low and the Mustangs are destroying grazing land, etc. If they want to control population, why don???t they geld the stallions, I guess that implies a little common sense and God forbid the US Government should utilize common sense when trying to reach the best possible resolution.
The Mustang is America???s symbol of freedom and slowly but surely we are destroying what helped to make our nation great. The horse is the epitome of what America has stood for since before Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492 and now the horse is an inconvenience the United States doesn???t want or need, they have served their purpose so that are literally put out to pasture.
The BLM can utilize what ever argument that suits them best but I believe they are 100% wrong and the horses need to remain free without fear of being ???thinned out??? by our government. Haven???t we learned anything from our past mistakes concerning endangered species? Do we really want to see the Mustang on the endangered species list? Two decades ago, the Mustang population was 2 million, and now it???s roughly 27,000. I truly hope the US government utilizes good judgment with regards to the Mustang population.
On a more cynical note, I wonder what government official is getting rich off this outlandish pr
Mustangs are not an endangered species and never will be. 219,000 have been adopted since 1978. 20,000 in holding pens across the country. 30,000 on ranges meant to support only 27,000 in excellent conditions. There has been a drought going on out west for several years.
The horses of the west are feral horses that very few can trace back to spanish genetics. Many exhibit draft breeding from all the work horses turned loose in the 20's, 30's and 40's. Others have a little better quality thanks to the Calvary re-mount program which turned loose Arabian and Thourghbred stallions. Others are escaped ranch stock.
I have seen horses at adoptions that barely push 12 hands high ( a hand is 4"). Severly stunted, backs so long they look like a horse version of a dachshund, crooked legs, large heads, ewe necks. Then I have seen some that resemble short draft horses and finally a few individuals that because of selective breeding a good influx of modern breeds, are really quality animals.
No body is getting rich in this business. It costs millions per year to run the adoption program and at $125.00 a head for an adoption fee, they aren't going to even pay back a fraction of that cost. Throw in 20,000 that for one reason or another are not adopted, it still costs to feed and care for them.
If you haven't noticed the economy is bad and budgets are being cut everywhere.
Even gelded stallions eat. It is only one stallion per herd that does the breeding anyway. The other stallions run in "bachlor bunches" waiting for a chance to challenge a stallion and take over its herd. The problem is that there is not enough forage on the wild horse ranges to support a year round population of horses that is anywhere from 2X to 4x over the amount evaluated as a healthy population.
There was not 2 million mustangs on the range two decades ago. There may have been two million horses back in the 1850's, but I doubt anyone was out there counting them. In 1971-1973 there were 9,700 mustangs on the range. The Wild Horse and Burro Act of 1971 established those areas as Wild Horse Management areas. They are to maintained at a population level of 27,000 horses, and to managed as a "Symbol".. not to be returned to someone's idea of a historic population. If you hadn't noticed, there is alot more cities, roads, highways, ski resorts, towns, homes and people ( not just Ranches) out west than there was in 1850.
The policy that required removal of horses in excess of each ranges carrying capacity, to include placement in the adoption program, and humanely destroying the unadoptable horses was set up at the same time as the law giving them protection (from commercial roundup), was in 1973. They have always had the authority to do this and all of you demonizing a population of citizen's of this country, who also vote, pay taxes, and do more for the enviroment than any of the arm chair enviromentalists here, are completely operating on emotions rather than fact.
The advocate who brought about this article is using twisted statements and opinions as fact, which they are not. Basically she is committing slander and should be held accountable.
In fact why doesn't her group buy any land, set up a sanctuary purchase some un-adoptable Mustangs at the low cost of $125.00 each. yeah that is all it costs to adopt one of these horses. I know because I adopted 3 and NO it doesn't take years to get them trained. I was riding mine in just a couple months and still have one at 19 years old.
Give the horses away, I am sure that many Americans would love to have them. What has become
ot the Government of the United States being so cruel.
The adoption fee is $125.00 per head. You can adopt a second Mustang for $25.00.. Go get you one.
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss