‘The Wild Horse Is Us’
An advocate of the American West's mustangs blasts a proposed government policy to cull the herds.
PHOTOS
No Longer Home on the Range
Kill them, corral them, or let them run free—what's to be done with America's wild mustangs?
After surviving the ice age, the industrial revolution and the slaughterhouse, America's wild horse population is facing a new threat: the U.S. government. The Bureau of Land Management announced this week that it is considering euthanizing wild horses to curb the population on the range and in federal holding facilities. There are an estimated 33,000 wild horses living in 10 Western states, and another 30,000 living in government corrals. The BLM is billing euthanasia as a way to cope with looming budget cuts, while still maintaining the mustang as a living symbol of the American West. But critics say that the herds have already been thinned to the edge of extinction with periodic roundups and auctions. A century ago, there were around 2 million wild horses roaming the West; now the BLM wants to cut that population to 27,000. In "Mustang," her new history of the wild horse in North America, Deanne Stillman explores why America is destroying the horse it rode in on. She spoke about the government's new proposal with NEWSWEEK's Tony Dokoupil. Excerpts:
NEWSWEEK: How surprised are you by this proposed alteration of federal policy?
Deanne Stillman:
It's shocking. Then again, there's been a move to dismantle the Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act, which enshrines mustangs as a protected symbol of freedom, since it passed in 1971. And the move is reaching its peak under the Bush administration. For the past eight years, the president has wrapped himself in the flag and now, three days before the Fourth of July, his administration announces plans to exterminate our greatest icon—the very horse we rode in on.
What are the biggest threats to the wild horse population?
I think it comes down to mismanagement. Study after government study, dating back to the Teddy Roosevelt administration, shows that it's livestock grazing that does the most damage to the range, not wild horses. You can't say that 20-something-thousand horses are doing more damage to the land than 4 million cows. Yet the Bureau of Land Management claims that wild horses are overrunning the West and that there is an "overpopulation" problem. It's simply not true. The only place there is an overpopulation problem is in government corrals—because the horses shouldn't have been removed from their home turf in such great numbers to begin with.
Then what's spurring the BLM to cut herd sizes?
There are a number of factors. The livestock lobby regards mustangs as pests, animals that steal food from cows, and since members of the lobby lease federal land for ranching, they pressure the BLM to curb the wild mustang population. There are also a lot of other things happening on public lands these days: increased oil and gas drilling, mineral leases, development. The BLM is supposed to determine how many wild horses as well as cows and sheep the range can support with range studies, but these are not always up to date. What this all comes back to is mismanagement: The fox is guarding the henhouse.
Historically, how has the BLM managed the mustang population?
Federal management of our wild horses has been plagued from the start. Over the years, there have been various disasters. The first one that I know of was in 1977, when about 200 wild horses in a government holding facility in Nevada died because agency personnel failed to clean out their corrals after a series of storms and the muck froze and the animals couldn't move. The horses were buried in mass graves and it was only when photos surfaced in newspapers that the story became known. There have been others since then. To be fair, many horses have been successfully placed through the government's adopt-a-horse program, making their way into partnerships with the right people. But now there are more horses in BLM pipelines than on the range, and they ought to be returned to their home turf, where they belong, rather than a trip to the gallows. Does this mean I am saying there should be no management of wild horse herds? No.
Where does the public stand on this issue?
People across the board—right wing, left wing—aren't happy about our stripping away the wild horse population and the American heritage that goes with it. We're a country that was born in the hoof sparks of Paul Revere's famous ride on a horse. The horse is our great icon of freedom and the open road, and that's why our greatest road-trip car is the Mustang, with the galloping pony on the grille, and that's why we drape horses with flags on July 4th and ride them down Main Street.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: mmstortini @ 08/21/2008 9:20:51 PM
Comment: geee blackandwhitehorses...ya think your horse prejudice or what, these animals are americas history, as a horse owner of 10 years, what is going on bs. There is no reason for the Federal Government needs to step in, IT IS POLITICS not the benefit of the animals that consume there thoughts or processes. These animals survived without us for many years it was by the hands of humans that they are in this position, maybe even ranchers. DId you read the article, I doesn't take a genious to know that the government is leasing land to keep the food consumption going in the US and every damn place else. This is ridiculous, no reason to euthanize these animals, 33K horses is not a lot considering and nature will take care of it themselves we don't need to be involved. Don't ranchers have confined spaces for animals at times. Come on people how much more are we going to stand for in life, how much more can we compromise!!!!
Posted By: tevanko @ 08/03/2008 7:06:56 PM
Comment: it is pathetic that wild animals on public grazing land are being killed (or want to be) for the benefit of cattlers. Does anyone know that overgrazing by for profit cattlers caused plenty of wildlife die off for generations? It was in the 1800s and 1900s that these ranchers would kill one another over grazing land which is why we have public land and grazing rules...now they are going to buldoze that freedome also. What is wrong w/ the morals of this country. We complain about china hunting whales to extinction, but are happy to do that to horses for profit?? What makes us better?
Posted By: blacknwhitehorses @ 07/16/2008 12:09:52 AM
Comment: Send the excess population of mustangs to the anti horse slaughter proponents like Bo Derek and Willie Nelson.. Why don't all the "rescue groups" like Best Friends Animals Sanctuary take what's left over. City slickers and bleeding heart animal advocates have done more to destroy the quality of life for the mustangs by insisting there be NO culling just forced containment in holding pens for years on end. To spay and geld to prevent continued population increases is yet another form of torture. I speak from experience after having my own UTERUS ripped out from surgery. Unfortunately for me it was necessary to cure a serious medical condition. Frankly I don't understand anyone wanting to adopt a WILD horse and condemn it to a life of confinement when it has run FREE since birth. How is that a quality of life for a WILD horse? Culling is necessary especially in the wild herds. Let them die with dignity instead of being couped up in a 12X12 pen the rest of their lives. That is NOT life that is prison. BTW for those of you who think cattle destroy the range....newsflash horses are the ones that damage to rangeland. They can crop the grass down to roots as they eat with two sets of teeth....cattle wrap their tongues around the grasses instead. Horses large hooves cause far more damage to the ground than the cattle's split hoof. Also horses will peel and eat the bark off the trees, cattle do not. In short horses are far more destructive to rangeland than cattle.