SPONSORED BY:
HEALTH CARE

Patient Protection

The most common medical mistakes and what you can do to avoid them.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The Institute for Healthcare Improvement estimates there are 15 million instances of medical harm in America every year, and more than 238,000 hospital deaths among Medicare patients between 2004 and 2006 were due to medical mistakes that might have been prevented, according to a recently released study of patient safety in American hospitals by the healthcare rating organization HealthGrades. In California alone, more than 100 incidents of preventable medical harm occur every month, according to the state department of public health. Patient-advocacy groups and regulatory agencies agree that by assuming a more active role in their healthcare, patients can help doctors and other healthcare providers avoid unnecessary errors.
Here are the four most common ways medical care goes awry, and some risk-reducing suggestions.

1. Medication Errors: Four out of every five U.S. adults use over-the-counter drugs, prescription medications or dietary supplements in a given week, and medication errors injure 1.5 million people a year, according to the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. The causes range from messy handwriting to confusion over similar drug names. The Institute of Medicine recommends that patients maintain complete lists of the medications and vitamins they take and have the lists reviewed regularly by medical practitioners. Ask physicians to explain prescribed medications and their side effects, and have physicians write down dosage information, purpose and how often to take all prescribed drugs.

2. Poor Doctor-Patient Communication:Susan Sheridan co-founded Consumers Advancing Patient Safety in 2003 after her family experienced two medical errors that left her son with cerebral palsy and her husband dead from a malignant tumor that wasn't properly reported to his doctor. Sheridan, who is also a lead member of the World Health Organization's World Alliance for Patient Safety, says that after the mass was removed from her husband's head, it was diagnosed as malignant, but the information never made it back to her husband's doctor, who assumed it was benign. Her son's cerebral palsy stemmed from jaundice, says says, a common condition among newborns but one for which he was not treated.

The Institute of Medicine estimates that patients receive only half the tests and procedures recommended for their conditions. Sheridan emphasizes following up on tests with your doctor and requesting extra copies of lab reports, test results and prescriptions. Electronic record-keeping systems can help patients and doctors better aggregate information and keep personal files. "I collect all my documents and my children's documents and keep their whole history together," she says.

3. Hospital Errors: Bed sores, falls, hospital-acquired infections and failure to aid patients in distress make up the bulk of avoidable errors that occur in hospitals. These errors are often related to an inability on the healthcare provider's part to recognize the patient's need for medical attention. Sheridan recommends that a family member or friend act as an advocate to look out for the patient's best interests. Patient advocates can stay alert for everything from medication errors to patient falls, and in some hospitals, they can also utilize what's known as "Condition H" to alert a quick-response team to the patients' deteriorating condition. The protocol allows patients and their family members to call for immediate help if they feel their condition is not being addressed quickly enough.

4. Surgical Errors: Surgical complications range from known risks to avoidable mistakes, such as transfusing the wrong blood type or administering an incorrect amount of anesthesia. More horrifying, though more rare, are the administrative mistakes: The National Center for Patient Safety reports that 36 percent of mistaken surgeries were performed on the incorrect patient, and up to 2,700 wrong-site surgeries—where doctors bypass the wrong artery or operate on the left ear instead of the right—are performed in America each year, according to the Archives of Surgery. The Joint Commission, an independent healthcare accrediting organization, recommends that patients discuss the operation in detail with their doctors and ask to have the surgical site marked with a permanent marker.

As for healthcare providers themselves, the Joint Commission has issued National Patient Safety Goals that recommend that providers identify and regularly review lookalike and sound-alike drugs and make every effort to distinguish them from each other, identify patients in at least two ways to help prevent mix-ups, and require read-backs of telephone orders and telephone reporting of critical test results.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 07/07/2008 12:15:23 PM

    Wright - your conclusions about the cause of hospital medical errors are incorrect.

    The majority of medical errors in hospitals - falls, bed sores, failure to recognize patient distress - have nothing to do with doctors. These are problems directly related to the number of nurses on a given unit, or more specifically, lack of nursing staff.

    Hospitals are not run by physicians, although the lay public and most doctors think they are. Hospitals are run by nurses. A doctor may see a patient for 10 minutes, spend another 20 reviewing the medical record. The nurse is directly responsible for a patient's care for the full 8 or 12 hours of the nurse's shift.

    Physicians depend on the nurse to communicate changes in a patient's condition. And it is exclusively the responsibility of the nursing staff to turn patient frequently, get them out of bed, and insure their safety. When nurse-to-patient ratios go down - when there are fewer nurses for more patients - study after study has shown that patient morbidity and mortality goes up.

    While there is no question that 24-36 hour shifts for medical residents are ridiculous, not all hospitals, in fact, only big teaching hospitals, have residents, but all hospitals have nurses. However, the amount of hospitals that now have mandatory overtime for nurses is rising, and one can only speculate on how many errors are made during forced 16 or 24 hour nursing shifts.

    Medical errors that happen outside of hospitals are due to many factors - too many prescriptions, poor written records, difficulty maneuvering a complex and over-stretched health care system - but blaming hospital medical errors on lack of phyisican oversight is inaccurate.

    In most instances of hospital medical errors, the phsyician is irrelevant.

    C.MacLean, RN, MS

  • Posted By: Nins @ 07/06/2008 11:39:38 PM

    Did you know that if McCain is elected you will have to pay income tax on the value of the medical insurance that your employer gives you? Worse still, he is offering a tax break for people who pay their own insurance, BUT only $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families.

    Let's say you have a family of four. Your insurance policy costs would be at least $1,500-2,500 per month under a self-pay plan, which cost more than employer group plans. So, you pay $18,000 -$30,000 per year for insurance, and you get to deduct only $5,000 of that. If you paid $25,000 for you insurance, you would be out of pocket $20,000 per year. This is FAR WORSE than the current system, where if you are self employed you can deduct 100% of you medical insurance costs.

    So, if you're not self employed, you would stick with your Employer's plan. Employer plans for a family of four have a value of $900-$1,500 per month totaling 10,800-$18,000 per year. Surprise! On April 15th, you owe tax on all of that as INCOME to you. Say your bracket is 25%, and the value of your Employer medical plan is $14,000. You will OWE THE IRS an additional $3,500, and that's ON TOP of whatever monthly premium you already pay to your employer for your insurance.

    Many analysts say that McCain's new rules would encourage employers to stop offering health benefits. If that happened, then far fewer Americans would be insured than are insured today, because what family of four can afford $18,000-$30,000 out of pocket per year for self-pay health insurance?

    Furthermore, McCain's plan does not require insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions of people who self-pay their insurance. People under employer group plans have all of their pre-existing conditions covered. This is a hugely unfair aspect of the current system. Insurance companies can afford to cover the pre-existing conditions of the much larger pool of people with group insurance, but they refuse to pay the pre-existing conditions on the smaller pool of self-pay customers. They have been allowed to price gouge the self-pay customers, which is a form of market manipulation that should be illegal.

    So let's say one of your kids had diabetes and you have high blood pressure, then your employer stops offering insurance. You now have to buy your own, but you and your child are INELIGIBLE due to pre-existing conditions. Oh, yeah, they will let you buy the insurance, but you can't use it for any pre-existing condition until you have paid on time every month for two years. And you know what happens at one year and 11 months? You get a letter saying your policy has been cancelled. I have many patients this has happened to.

    McCain's plan SUCKS.

    It does nothing to help middle class working Americans afford or obtain medical insurance. In fact, it makes the current system WORSE.

  • Posted By: wright @ 07/06/2008 5:53:19 PM

    The principal reason for the high level of medical errors is, in my opinion, that the medical establishment suffers little or no cost for them. The suffering public is not protected by the lobby-bound government, where the AMA is all powerful. For example, a major factor in medical errors is, I believe, the high rate of doctor failure to function under the stress of the work environment. Doctors are not only being pushed to more and more intense levels of service, but also keep hours that are manifestly unsafe and would be judged unacceptable in any other life critical profession, from airplane pilot to fireman to policeman. For archaic traditional reasons, or perhaps greed, inertia, or a psychology similar to that of hazing rituals in fraternities and gangs, interns, resideants and practicing doctors are routinely forced to endure 24 - 36 hours shifts with either no sleep, or with constant interruptions. Life threatening errors result from their all too human inability to function properly without sleep, resulting errors such as discuswsed in the article. The medical profession, the NIH and the other weak regulators that supposedly watch out for the public interest have a moral obligation to manage themselves responsibly, first by acknowledging that their long hours are not just the doctors' province to regulate, but should be done to provide best care for the patients, and second, by reviewing how airlines, the military and the police have already handled these issues responsibly for many years. New procedures should be tested and evaluated rapidl;y, and existing regulations should be enforced vigourously and promptly to protect the public. Also, the information technology exists today for each patient to carry the equivalent of a memory stick storing a medical "passport" that amply records all his history, medications and conditions, a set of pictures, etc. Also obvious is requiring that each presciption be typed and signed by a doctor, instead of the current artistic handwritten way it is done today.
    All these changes, and others, will happen, I believe, only as government universal insurance and other programs that cannot tolerate the current scandalous level of errors will be implemented, and thus will bring medicine into the 21st century in areas of job safety and communications, since the medical establishment has demonstrated its inertia and recalcitrance.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now