The Politics of Heroism

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Plus15 @ 07/06/2008 6:55:14 PM

    The question marks in the earlier version were courtesy of Newsweek. Maybe this time it will be posted as writte, Thanks.

    I certainly honor John McCains service as a prisoner of war. He was a hero to me and to hundreds of thousands and millions of others as pilot and as a prisoner of war. However,
    Eleanor it is unfortunate that you often take the opportunity as a member of the main stream media to defend and protect John McCain under any circumstance. For the past 26 years no mention is made - good, bad or indifferent - of John McCain without the writer or speaker reciting some version of the phrase ..."I certainly honor his service as a prisoner of war. He was a hero to me and to hundreds of thousands and millions of others". You, the media and the Republican Party enforce the repetitions. God forbid anyone say McCains name without the accompanying phrase. Over that 26 years a version of that statement has been recited more frequently then the Pledge of Allegiance (except for school children). That plus McCain's daily feigning of innocence (that he never mentions it) before alluding to his service and then its subsequent recitation by anyone who precedes McCain to the microphone is actually a constant announcement that his military service in a POW camp for five years is the perfect experience to be President and the further implication that he deserves it as a reward for the five years as a POW, renders your columns focus bogus.

    • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 07/06/2008 8:46:18 PM

      I completely agree. The extolling of McCain's service by the media becomes a mantra that all must repeat.

      Ironically, it is totally OK for the right to discredit a Democrat's service as was done to Kerry and Gore.Especially when running against Bush who did everything possible NOT to serve when duty called and is now a "war time president" sending kids to the same type of war he refused to serve in. Somehow we must believe the military records when it comes to Bush, when it comes to Kerry, phrases like "flesh wound", "questionable service" and "threw away his medals" are totally OK. I am glad, very glad, Clark didn't take it back. Unlike John Kerry he isn't caving to political pressure and is questioning the fake outrage of the right. If any, absolutly any of those people really gave a damn about service, including McCain, they'd have stood unquestionably on the side of Kerry when his record was vilified.

      But since McCain is down in the polls and lagging hopelessly behind in fund-raising it's OK for him to be completely outraged about this non-issue.

  • Posted By: Mike S @ 07/06/2008 7:02:59 PM

    "He never has, and as someone steeped in military tradition, he's all too aware that a flyer who gets shot down is disparaged by his peers, not lionized, hence the joke."
    _______________________

    Eleanor, you couldn't be more wrong. A pilot who is shot down in not disparaged. On the contrary, we do everything in our power to save him or her, knowing it could very well have happened to us. We all know that when the stuff hits the fan, it sometimes happens that your skill level doesn't matter, the aircraft is going down. What pilot McCain said about his mishap was in keeping with the pilot tradition of downplaying the "pucker factor."

    When something goes wrong in the air, the possibilities of what can happen are limited to you overcoming the situation or (usually) dying. Pilots often downplay their heroics and their fear, making light of things that would frighten others into immobility. They put a premium on staying cool under pressure, hence, a serious emergency - or enemy action - is referred to as "a problem" and, when in a lighter mood, a catastrophe averted is simply another example of their own stupidity overcome.

  • Posted By: Plus15 @ 07/06/2008 6:47:21 PM


    I certainly honor John McCain???s service as a prisoner of war. He was a hero to me and to hundreds of thousands and millions of others as pilot and as a prisoner of war. However,
    Eleanor it is unfortunate that you often take the opportunity as a member of the main stream media to defend and protect John McCain under any circumstance. For the past 26 years no mention is made - good, bad or indifferent - of John McCain without the writer or speaker reciting some version of the phrase ..."I certainly honor his service as a prisoner of war. He was a hero to me and to hundreds of thousands and millions of others". You, the media and the Republican Party enforce the repetitions. God forbid anyone say McCain???s name without the accompanying phrase. Over that 26 years a version of that statement has been recited more frequently then the Pledge of Allegiance ??? (except for school children). That plus McCain's daily feigning of innocence (that he never mentions it) before alluding to his service and then it???s subsequent recitation by anyone who precedes McCain to the microphone is actually a constant announcement that his military service in a POW camp for five years is the perfect experience to be President and the further implication that he deserves it as a reward for the five years as a POW, renders your columns focus bogus.

  • Posted By: sparky716 @ 07/04/2008 4:13:35 PM

    When ever I have a look at newsweeks discuss comments theres is ole HollyRoller spewing his hate and fear...he's always saying the same think HATE FEAR and nothing else...this person has no life he's always making a rifgt wing nut comment...first he needs mental help and then he or she needs to get a life...but we only have a few more months to read his hate a fear message then we will have Predident Obama a democrat house and senate and he can crawl back in his hole.....him and the other 28 % that think America is headed in the right direction...

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 4:22:29 PM

      SURGE (McCain's position all along) is WORKING. Makes you mad doesn't it. What about DRILL NOW, DRILL HERE, LOWER PRICES??? ~70% of America agrees. Hussein does not. YET. Makes you mad doesn't it. LARRY SINCLAIR...not going away. Makes you mad doesn't it??? Get used to it. Hussein's vetting has begun. There is also that BIG question about his Birth Certificate. Granny in Kenya say's he was born there. Larry Johnson (former C.I.A. operative) says released copy is tampered with. Wouldn't that be something? Oh yeah...."whitey" tape is just around the corner. Makes you mad, doesn't it???

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: djheru @ 07/05/2008 9:41:52 AM

        You are a one deluded individual. The surge has worked spectacularly...if the goal was to allow the Taliban and al Qaeda to regroup. Meanwhile, the "surge" is going to have to last forever, because there is no politicial solution that the Republicans are smart enough to figure out. There are already millions of acres of land leases here that the oil companies are not even exploring. If we start drilling now, the oil won't reach the market for at least 10 years. People like you never explain what motive the oil companies would have to decrease the price of their product. You'd have to be stupid to think that any company has an interest in reducing the price of their product when they are earning record profits. The Birth Certificate smear is B.S. His mother is American, he automatically is a citizen.

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/06/2008 5:25:47 PM

          POTUS requires natural born status. If his birth was in Africa, he is not eligible. The entire thing is suspect. We will wait and see.

          NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: sparky716 @ 07/04/2008 4:46:45 PM

      like I said Holyroller your sick and need help...please get it...nope dont make me mad knowing its coming from a person who's sick in the head...can't you read almost every one in these post think your crazy execpt a few right wing nuts like you....what you going to do after the election is over go back to the John burch society meetings? Presidend Obama sounds good to me...

      • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 07/05/2008 8:56:00 AM

        Go sparky! I hadnt read your comments about holyroller because I was too busy writing my own. I was just commenting that the man requires either a psychiatrist or an exorcist. Hold your ground, youre not alone.

  • Posted By: PleaseSaveAmerica @ 07/04/2008 4:31:26 PM

    For the folks on this board who love smear campaign politics, just remember this: For every smear to one candidate, there will be a smear to another. And, in the end, where does it leave us? Nowhere, that's where. The bottom line is that, to me, elections are about my children. The election of current government representatives are those that are going to enact policies that will affect my children when they are adults. That's all I care about; period! I only want to know which candidate stands for policies that allow my children to have a better future than me. That's it! That's all!

    FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) gets us nowhere --- and just shows the ignorance of America to the rest of the world.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 4:36:57 PM

      What does Hussein stand for??? He was waffled on every major policy stance discussed, in the last two weeks. He has no stance. He is willing to adopt ANY position, on anything, at any time, if his handlers think, it will garner him votes.

      He is a crook and a fraud. Is that what you want for your kids???

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: PleaseSaveAmerica @ 07/04/2008 4:39:26 PM

        The funny thing is, HolyRoller, you don't know who I am voting for. I have never stated. It could be Obama, it could be McCain, it could be Barr, it could be Paul, it could be Nader. I have only tried to convince folks here to have intelligent conversations.

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 5:25:39 PM

          well, based on your sign in name, and your comments, I assume you are passionate about, saving America for your children. A vote for Nader, may as well be a vote for McCain. A vote for Barr is essentially a vote for Hussein. Neither one saves anything. It is a protest only. Nothing more. That leads me to the only logical conclusion. You are an obamamohammed. If not, then you sure fooled me.

          Remember this, however. There is no more important qualification, for POTUS, than this. Character and integrity. McCain, has an abundance of both. Hussein has neither.

          NOBAMA!!!

          • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 07/05/2008 8:52:47 AM

            My Lord! I think anyone who thinks McCain has an abundance of Character and integrity should have his head checked or check into a church or something. Are you serious? Now Im really afraid, knowing that someone like this is allowed to vote. Just say you want McCain, but dont, for God's sake say the man has integrity or character. At most he is just a talking dummy. Im still looking for his strings.

            • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/06/2008 5:20:05 PM

              You want to see strings??? Look into Hussein's mouth. George Soros has a hook and line in one corner, and the Chicago Mafia politicians have another in the other corner. His only real accomplishment in life, is getting accepted by the crooks and thugs who run Illinois.

              NOBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 07/06/2008 3:51:08 PM

    Radical Centrism, Centrism, Triangulation. Anyone who wants to be President has to understand these concepts. We will pull out of Iraq when OBAMA takes the Presidency. However, every President has to listen to those "in charge" of the war before any Military decisions are made. THOSE IN CHARGE OF THE WAR HAve already started to build A HUNDRED YEAR FOUNDATION in IRAQ. McCAIN INTENDS TO FINISH THE JOB.

    THOSE IN CHARGE OF THE WAR HAVE ECONOMIC INTERESTS IN IRAQ. THEY WILL MAKE IT VERY DIFFICULT FOR THE NEXT PRESIDENT TO PULL OUR TROOPS OUT.

    OBAMA IS ALREADY ACTING LIKE AN EXPERIENCED PRESIDENT.

    People need to understand a UNIVERSAL LAW

    NOTHING IS CONSTANT

    THINGS ARE ALWAYS CHANGING. IT IS PART OF HUMAN EVOLUTION.

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/05/2008 10:07:03 AM

    What does Mc Cain the war hero intend to do about medical care in this country. It presently resides in a cesspool.

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 07/05/2008 1:28:41 PM

      i know one damn thing he don't want to give free health care to 15 million illeagles and make us wait in line behind them and thier anchor babies!!

      • Posted By: raddave @ 07/06/2008 1:43:51 AM

        Obama doesn't want to give free health care to illeagal immigrants. Where do you people come up with this B.S.?

        • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 07/06/2008 2:39:09 PM

          hell he's already voted for it twice and will give more free health care once he becomes president

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 07/05/2008 1:26:02 PM

      well i'm not sure how he would do it but i read on his web site that he wants to put caps on lawsuits that run the good doctors off.. hell in this country we've got the get rich quick crowd that sues anyone with insurance .so if he can limit that and give the good doctors and hospitals a incentive maybe they would be okay with comming out of the selective private sector and start treating the general public like you and i ?

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/06/2008 2:29:58 PM

    Guess you are right about the money that has been coined in Iraq, notroubleatall, Lots of money in those democracy crusades. And as far as Bush's religious fervor is concerned, I give it no more credit than a way for him to get off of the juice, sober up, and run for Moron of the U.S.A. It's a crutch to take the place of the alcohol crutch. Fakery for sure.

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/06/2008 10:51:48 AM

    Bush's earlier referral to our entry into Iraq as a "Crusade". He was correct but he was quickly advised to quit using that term. The Crusades, if you recall, consisted of Christians from Britain and Western Europe going to the mideast and "killing the infidels", because they worshipped Mohammed and substituting Christianity in the place of Islam. It failed, of course. The slight adjustment that Bush made was to go there with the ruse of depriving Iraq of atomic weapons, with the ultimate purpose of depriving them of their government based on Mohammed and substituting an American style democracy. Just about as close to the Crusades as you can get. It is historically embarrassing. It is all fueled by the zeal for American Heroism and is fed by a false heroism equal to the heroism of the Knights of Britain who slew all of the heathens that they could find. We have made no more of a dent than the Knights did, and will finally ride home dragging our swords and lances, forlorn and glad to finally return to our peaceful countryside.

    • Posted By: notroubleatall1963 @ 07/06/2008 1:01:33 PM

      Dude, this was a "crusade for Oil" basically - and for profit for Bush's friends and supporters throughout the military-industrial complex. There was nothing remotely religious about it. bush's cynical approach to starting a war with Iraq was strictly motivated by MONEY. Oil Profits. Nothing to do with a religious crusade, though perhaps many who believed in Bush saw it that way - how convenient, how cynical. What a fine "Chistian" specimen.

  • Posted By: notroubleatall1963 @ 07/06/2008 12:55:16 PM

    I haven't really been following this flap, but it sounds largely like a media trap more than anything really substantive. McCain is down by 6 points vs. Obama in the CNN poll of polls so I don't think any of this helped him much.

    We have had 8 years with a moron in office, who essentially evaded serving in the military and who swiftboated McCain - McCain should have been our president these last eight years instead of the idiot we "elected" - now it's too late, I suspect. He is honorable and unimaginably courageous - his strength of character and heroism bring tears to my eyes if I pause to really even try to think of what he must have suffered during captivity.

    But it seems that Obama will prevail in the election - he will surround himself with great advisors and for the most part, he'll be covered for any perceived "weakness' -- but it will be such a relief to have someone back in the White House with a brain again.

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/06/2008 10:59:20 AM

    The saddest part of it all is the ignorance of our president. He claims that he will be considered great in years to come for all the good that he has done us in the Mideast. He also has tried to inject religion into our public arena by funding religious entities in substitution for previously governmental functions. What causes it to be so sad is his ignorance of any religion other than his narrow view of it, and his abysmal failure to understand how governments relate on the international scene through carefully designed diplomacy. He needed the narrow religious view to combat his alcoholism and somehow managed to graduate from Yale without studying history and government. Might add the subject of English grammar to that list.

  • Posted By: asiseeitnow@aol.com @ 07/05/2008 12:25:53 PM

    Clark is a warrior of another era. He looked at the massive Soviet Army as the enemy and say Bosnia et al as sideshows. The Soviets are gone. Failed states and global terror are the new battlefronts. Clark's views on the new battlefield are irrelevant. He is yesterdays warrior with yesterday's news. McCain has been in the Senate and dealing with the new problems. Wes has been a wannabe president.

    • Posted By: Jacob Freeze @ 07/05/2008 2:02:44 PM

      General Clark prevented genocide in Serbia, and it had nothing to do with the Soviets. He tells the truth, without the usual hundred layers of bullshit, and scribblers like Eleanor Clift natter about what a mistake he made. This is the Washington mentality that respects bullshit above all things, and I'm sick of it.

      • Posted By: Galasso @ 07/05/2008 6:28:45 PM

        Wesley Clark did some good things in Bosnia and then he made an egregious error in Pristina - something a clear thinking, politically astute, internationally competent 4 star General officer would never do. And he was relieved for it and sent home.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 07/06/2008 1:40:27 AM

          Wesley Clark was not relieved of his command because of anything that happened in Kosovo, he served his three years as the SACEUR and then retired because there were no commands available for him to take.

          • Posted By: Galasso @ 07/06/2008 8:45:52 AM

            He left his command two months early and there is no wonder why there were no future assignments for him after his hotheaded actions in June 1999 concerning Pristina.The press accounts at the time and the word within the Army was that he was relieved of command. Generals Schwarzkopf and Shelton stated publicly that Clark had "integrity and character" problems. For two four star general officers to say that about another one is almost unprecedented. SECDEF Cohen ordered him to get his (expletive deleted) face off the television. The point is - Obama is going to need some heavy duty military advisors if he is elected because of his lack of expertise and experience in that area. Those of us who have served just hope it isn't Clark.

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 07/05/2008 2:00:49 PM

      CHECK ON THE REAL WESLEY CLARK HE'S NOTHING MORE THAN A PUPPET THAT DID NOT EVEN WORK FOR HIS STARS ON HIS SHOULDERS !!! http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles8/DVNS_Wesley-Clark.htm http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles8/DVNS_Wesley-Clark.htm CHECK THESE WEB SITES FOR SOME TRUTH IN THE MATTER !!

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/05/2008 11:53:01 PM

    FROM THE GALLUP POLLING:

    80% OF AMERICANS SEE MCCAIN AS CAPABLE OF HANDLING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMMANDER IN CHIEF:


    July 3, 2008
    Nearly All Americans Consider Military Service PATRIOTIC

    Symbolic gestures valued more highly by older Americans and the less educated

    by Lymari Morales

    WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Nearly two-thirds of Americans (62%) say serving in the U.S. military reveals "a great deal" about one's patriotism, ranking it second only to voting in elections among six items rated in a recent USA Today/Gallup poll. More than half of Americans (53%) say the same about reciting the pledge of allegiance, and far fewer about wearing an American flag pin.

    Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama spent much of this Independence Day week trying to assure voters of his patriotism, having been faulted during the Democratic primary season for at times not wearing an American flag pin, and for not placing his hand over his heart during the national anthem on at least one occasion. Obama's speech on Monday, entitled "The America We Love," included praise for Republican rival John McCain's service to his country in Vietnam, in response to retired Gen. Wesley Clark's statement that McCain's experience as a Navy pilot and prisoner of war does not necessarily qualify him to be commander in chief.

    McCain's service in Vietnam is generally considered an advantage in this wartime election against Obama, who has never served in the military, and a key reason why:

    80% OF AMERICANS SEE MCCAIN AS CAPABLE OF HANDLING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMMANDER IN CHIEF:

    The Gallup data reveal that Americans do in fact consider military service in general to be a sign of patriotism. While Republicans are among the most likely of all groups to say serving in the military reveals a great deal about one's patriotism, more than half of both Democrats and independents agree. Republicans also tend to place more value on saying the pledge of allegiance and wearing an American flag pin, while independents align more closely with Democrats, who are generally less likely to place a high value on each action.

    source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/108646/Nearly-All-Americans-Consider-Military-Service-Patriotic.aspx

  • Posted By: PacificGatePost @ 07/05/2008 10:18:13 PM

    JULY 4TH. ??? A COMMEMORATION OF ENLIGHTENMENT

    http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/07/july-4th-celebration-of-great-minds.html

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Posted By: Galasso @ 07/05/2008 8:18:12 PM

    Well said - misterharban. As I recall, John McCain refused to jump on the Swift Boat that went after John Kerry. He said something to the effect that John Kerry's service in Vietnam was off limits and that he honored that service as he did the others who went to SE Asia. I have voted in 11 elections - the vitriol and gutter language that has erupted in this one is largely due to the anonimity provided one in the computer age and the fact that the news media is fueling it. Just watch Countdown with keith olbermann if you want to see the benchmark for nasty news. On this website - there are people who sit at home in drunken stupors and write things they would likely never say if it was tagged with their name, address, and phone number. But it is an indicator of the current thinking and sadly - the level of intelligence, character, and obsession with entitlements instead of service. It also - as you so eloquently stated - does not bode well for uniting the country to a common purpose.

    • Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 07/05/2008 8:57:57 PM

      I am reminded of the days of Citizens Band radio and the political calender. At least ones' sobriety could be gauged by the slurring!

  • Posted By: misterharban @ 07/05/2008 6:46:00 PM

    What is most remarkable about most of the anti-McCain comments in this column is how incredibly unnecessary the whole discussion is. Anybody who is looking for a reason to not vote for Sen. McCain certainly does not have to look back to his experience as a POW to find adequate justification. A statement does not have to be false to be stupid, arrogant or disrespectful. Gen. Clark made a statement which, whether it was true or not, was stupid, arrogant and disrespectful. (His cloying reference to McCain as a hero in the statements, placed in the context of the rest of his statement was as sincere as telling your lover that if she weren???t so ugly, she would be beautiful.) And it would appear that the supporters of his point of view are so arrogant and disrespectful of others that they cannot consider the possibility that they do not need to destroy every single quality in the people with whom they disagree. Certainly Sen. McCain made his views unequivocably clear on efforts by the Swiftboaters to similarly denigrate Sen. Kerry???s war experience. Denying the possibility that anything of value could have come out of Sen. McCain???s experience is more a reflection of the stupidity of presidential politics (no matter your affiliation) than it is a reflection of anything resembling a search for the truth.

    I have seen 14 presidential elections. And I have seen the worst of discourse between the candidates. But in this new age of gotcha politics and the internet I have seen partisans on both sides who are no longer satisfied with a simple, dignified victory. Both sides seem to crave victories which leave the vanquished without a shred of dignity. The winners, whoever they may be, will not be satisfied until they have denigrated everything the losers hold dear. It really does not matter if Obama is a uniter. Neither his followers nor his opponents will stand for being united after this is all over. Certainly there is nothing in discussions like this to suggest that any of the partisans have any reason to seek unity with their opponents.

  • Posted By: anamorphicart @ 07/05/2008 2:55:45 PM

    I wondered why everyone calls McCain a hero...........I thought a hero saved people's lives, not just their own! Does it mean every POW has the smarts to be president...what are McCain's qualifications?

    • Posted By: misterharban @ 07/05/2008 6:16:39 PM

      Maybe you should lose some of your ignorance and make an effort to find out what he did for his fellow POW's while in captivity. He, in fact did save the lives of some of his fellow soldiers -- but I would guess from your comment that you are one of many in this country who do not consider soldiers to be people. It is really an interesting story -- if you can read. Somebody once said that people may think you are ignorant if you don't say anything -- but they will know you are ignorant once you open your mouth. Your comment is an outstanding example of this principle.

  • Posted By: rsamx @ 07/05/2008 11:35:56 AM

    Clift's 3 Mistakes
    Clift Mistake Number One: Clark never said McCain Claimed POW status is a qualification for POTUS. Rather, negated the notion that it is a qualification using Schieffer's words, saying, "I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president", and rebutting the oft implied Hero/Qualification status repeated so often by media surrogates for McCain.
    Clift Mistake Number Two: Claiming Clark erred in "Elevating executive responsibility, which sounds like a desk job, over the experience of enduring torture and deprivation." The two (executive responsibility and torture) are Apples and Oranges. Clift continues the McCain surrogate conflation of Executive Experience with Torture, both of which are unrelated and entirely different things, neither of which has bearing upon the other.
    Clift Mistake Number Three: By perpetuating the Rovian implication of wrongdoing by Clark in her indictment of Clark when she assesses fault to Clark for "Refusing to back down", Clift again plays Rovian Surrogate by implying that there was any untruth or maligning of McCain's well known heroics in Clark's very clear and truthful statement that he doesn't "think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president." Clearly that act alone is not a qualification for POTUS!
    Is it Ms. Clift?
    Clark's statement is simple and direct and one which which practically any reasoning individual would be able to agree with -- minus the emotional and misleading conflation of Heroism with something totally unrelated, Executive Competence.
    The real question of malfeasance here is in the willful and continued distortion of the facts by questionably responsible and objective members of mainstream media, without which the smearing of an individual in the Press or SwiftBoating, as it has now come to be known, could not exist.
    Could it now, Ms.Clift?

    • Posted By: loriw @ 07/05/2008 4:42:38 PM

      While I don't agree with some of your post I will state that I really dislike Ms Clark's stories.
      She is far from unbiased and I think if she is going to continue to write on politics she should make this fact clear at the beginning of her articles so all readers will understand her bias and will read her articles with that fact in mind.

  • Posted By: Marquette70 @ 07/05/2008 12:09:26 PM

    Words matter. If a national leader can't get people who like him to understand what he means, how can the people who don't like the United States know what he means. That goes for General Clark and the guys running for President.

    • Posted By: Jacob Freeze @ 07/05/2008 2:00:03 PM

      General Clark told the truth, as always, and if you think there's something better than the truth out there, maybe you should explain exactly what that "something" is.

      • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 07/05/2008 2:01:54 PM

        CHECK ON THE REAL WESLEY CLARK HE'S NOTHING MORE THAN A PUPPET THAT DID NOT EVEN WORK FOR HIS STARS ON HIS SHOULDERS !!! http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles8/DVNS_Wesley-Clark.htm http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles8/DVNS_Wesley-Clark.htm CHECK THESE WEB SITES FOR SOME TRUTH IN THE MATTER !!

        • Posted By: Jacob Freeze @ 07/05/2008 2:09:05 PM

          I watched General Clark negotiate with twenty different NATO delegations to save tens of thousands of Bosnians from rape and murder, and he sacrificed his career to get it done. The UN ran away, Clinton wanted to run away, the NATO allies wanted to run away, but General Clark saved tens of thousands of lives by playing the double game of war and diplomacy better than any of them. Ridiculous smears by nobodies on the internet don't change the truth, and neither does Ms. Clift's preference for bullshit instead of just telling it like it kis.

          • Posted By: loriw @ 07/05/2008 4:37:06 PM

            So if Gen. Clark is so wonderful why doesn't he run for POTUS?

  • Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 07/05/2008 4:33:23 PM

    Howard Metzenbaum...founder of The National Lawyers guild, quietly spitting at the US military for all these years.
    general clark: wants to hang around influencial Liberals and will spit on a fellow service member to improve his chances!
    John kerry....joined the discrimination Campaign against military experts and profesionals ..to become and influencial Liberal!
    These are society's ten percent who are sick people.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse