The Politics of Heroism

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: ndrock @ 07/04/2008 2:52:32 PM

    God I hope you people ain't old enough to vote. What kind of stupid childish remarks are you trying to make?

    Obama lies, has no experience in real life situation, and you make fun of someone who was a prisoner of war! Is that what you do, sit around and judge all our P.O.W. and make light of what they went through. You make the judgement of how much they should have suffered. Unless you have been in their shoes, you have know right to judge the person. At least McCain is going to know what are solders are going to go through when they get home. You are very petty little people. If by some unGodly act in the universe Obama wins, you will get what you deserve. He will bite you in the ass and spit it out back in your faces.

    • Posted By: PleaseSaveAmerica @ 07/04/2008 3:01:30 PM

      Who is making fun of a prisoner of war? Certainly not me. From your comments, it sounds like you are acting a tad bit childish.

      My point is that P.O.W does not equal Presidential credentials. Period. That is absolutely, undeniably true. It may or may not help, but it is not sufficient.

      Now, if the Presidency was only about running a military, it is possible that McCain wins that argument. Very possible. But the Presidency is so much more than just the "Commander-in-chief" label. So much more. For the love of humanity, even you have to admit that the current administration is proof of that.

      Since the Presidency is a far-reaching post, you can surround yourself with the proper people to help you in your deficient areas. That is the key to a good President; who does he put around him to make good decisions.

      • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 3:12:25 PM

        Does smokin' crack rock and gettin BJ's from a man, in the back of a limo, give a better qualification? That is Hussein's record. Getting ready THIS week to become a mainstream story.

        NOBAMA!!!

        • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 07/05/2008 9:25:22 AM

          Umm, I believe Senator Obama is ready for the lies. Thats why he had the good sense to refuse public support. You get ready and watch a genius at work.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 07/04/2008 3:36:01 PM

          There is a precedent for drug use as a qualification for president, GW had a cocaine addiction.

          • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 3:42:54 PM

            Unfounded accusations...if true, however, it might explain some of his decisions. Hussein ADMITS his in his own books. When will a real reporter ask him this simple question....Sen. Obama, When was the last time you used illegal drugs? The question is coming....What will be Hussein's response? Who MAY have evidence? Guess we will wait and see.

            NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 07/05/2008 9:23:17 AM

      Oh, McCain knows what they went through? Then how come he's not trying to give them the benefits THEY deserve?

    • Posted By: PleaseSaveAmerica @ 07/04/2008 3:04:29 PM

      Oh, and by the way, I am old enough to vote. And, I actually think that is a good thing. I actually take the time to understand the issues, past records, the people -- all the things that should be required before being able to vote.

  • Posted By: PleaseSaveAmerica @ 07/04/2008 3:41:19 PM

    The sad part about people like HolyRoller (and yes I am going against my moratorium for a second here) is that people will actually start to believe statements they say, given the power of internet and the general laziness of people to fact check.

    No one but Obama and Larry Sinclair know the actual truth. So it is really a person's word vs another person's word. But I do know that Sinclair did *fail* a polygraph test. The greatest thing in the world for me would be for Obama to take a polygraph test and pass. Then all the HolyRoller's of the world would have to eat crow, shut their ignorant and hateful mouths, and find some other way to make a troll living.

    Another sad part about all this is that people will actually believe these ads without doing due diligence, and those are the people that really shouldn't be able to vote. Sound bite politics -- isn't it grand?

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 3:57:17 PM

      Thank you for responding. Remember, your "messiah" believes people can talk out their differences. Negotiate. Use diplomacy. I don't know if the story is true or false. I do know this...It is NOT going away. Sinclair is fighting tremendous odds. He is sticking to his story. The media is picking it up. The arrest at the NPC has given it credibility. Sinclair, may very well have, legal remedies to his harassment. Joe Biden, and his son Beau(Del. Attn. Gen) were responsible, and broke several federal laws in doing so. Sinclair is fast acquiring powerful backers. This story has gained tremendous momentum, because of the arrest. It makes people wonder...?????WHY????

      As for the lie detector. It has been proven to be a scam. Whitehouse.com used a fake Ph.D, to read the results. PROVEN. They assured access to the test afterwards. They refuse now. They scheduled a press conference to refute these allegations. They canceled. The computer score, showed Sinclair to be truthful. That was withheld.

      The biggest question is this. Does Sinclair, truly have PROOF, of being contacted, by the executed gay choir director, of Trinity??? If so, the Hussein machine is most likely involved in the mans MURDER. POWERFUL opponents to a Hussein POTUS are getting involved. Thanks, Barry. Larry needed some help.

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: PleaseSaveAmerica @ 07/04/2008 4:23:21 PM

        As I am a person of integrity, I don't associate myself with heresy and propaganda. And this story is just that; irrefutable. You yourself just admitted you don't know this is true. So the only reason these ads are airing is to smear somebody, without proof. I don't know why Sinclair is doing this. Maybe he is being paid; maybe he just really hates Obama and will do anything to smear him; maybe he is jealous; maybe the story it is true. Like I said, this is all heresy.

        Is that what elections have come to nowadays? The best smear campaign wins. If that is the case, we have a bigger problem in this country than I initially thought. What happened to who has the best policies and people to move us forward type of politics?

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 4:32:16 PM

          Most of the obamamohammed crowd, wants to accuse McCain of war crimes. Talk about a smear. Barry IS NOT untouchable. The story deserves investigation. There are phone records. There are other witnesses. LIMO DRIVER??? The man IS NOT going away. There are laws against defamation and slander. Why can't Hussein/Axlerod shut him up??? Donald Young WAS whacked, in his home, gangland style, in Dec. These are very serious claims. You wish they would vanish. Probably would have UNTIL the NPC conference and arrest. Ya'll gave it strength. Now the truth will be found out.

          NOBAMA!!!

          • Posted By: PleaseSaveAmerica @ 07/04/2008 4:35:53 PM

            You have proven my point that no matter how hard anyone tries, you cannot engage in a civil, intelligent conversation where we talk facts, policies, etc. I am sorry to see that.

            • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 5:43:03 PM

              Facts are facts Hussein changes his positions on a daily basis. It truly comes down to very simple decisions. Is McCain a stronger leader? Does he have more real experience? Is he able to cross the aisle, effectively? Is his position on Iraq correct? Do we need more domestic oil production, as McCain supports and Hussein rejects? Do tax increases designed for redistribution of wealth, really work, as Hussein accepts, and McCain rejects? Should high achievers be penalized? Should we negotiate with rogue leaders? It goes on and on. Biggest issue in HolyRollers mind is this.....WHO IS THE REAL HUSSEIN OBAMA???? Neither you, or I, or any other voter knows. That is a very dangerous truth, about mohammedvilles messiah.

              • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 07/05/2008 9:13:53 AM

                Who is the real John McCain? Do you really know? Im sick and tired of you talking about SENATOR OBAMA. His name is Barack Obama, say it with me now, Barack Obama. The reason you use all those other names is because you want to discredit him by any means necessary. Use the damn oil you already have nitwit.

  • Posted By: bluesgutter @ 07/04/2008 4:04:49 PM

    This is journalism at its silliest. Clark merely stated what most people believe- that is being shot down in a plane and being a POW does not qualify anyone to be President of the United States. John McCain (like Bob Dole) is selling this as a reason he should be President. In fact, in John McCain's case, considering the torture he suffered at the hands of the Vietnamese, it should be of no surprise to anyone that he may have psychological issues that run deep. That would certainly explain some of his erratic behavior.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 4:15:35 PM

      It's better than Barry's reasoning. HOPE and CHANGE. He certainly has illustrated his preference, to the CHANGE part. He flip-flops on every position of importance. Oh, I guess his PRESENT and OOPs votes should get credit for leadership, also. And, his group of scum associations, in Chicago. Anyone ever hear, of Tony the Syrian??? If not, you will soon. Hussein Obama is a crook and a fraud.

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 07/05/2008 9:00:26 AM

        Hmmm holy roller seems to have some inside information from the McCain camp. Dont tell me McCains staff is out posting on posting boards??????

  • Posted By: dr doug @ 07/04/2008 8:58:37 PM

    Making the statement that it's about "character and integrity" and that Mc Cain has them and Obama apparently doesn't clearly illustrates the problem with politics today. This brought on by Conservative Republicans and the likes of "Moneybags" Limbaugh, the Devil's spawn Sean Hannity and the shrew of the world Ann Coulter. There thesis is this: if you are for the war - you have integrity. If you are against the war you have no integrity. That's nauseous! People can love their country, wear lapel pins, and all that stuff and still have differing opinions as to what course our country should take. That's probably a 5th grade principle that has somehow been lost by the right wing crowd and the result is that, even though they have a microphone they are small, small people.

    • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 07/05/2008 8:37:58 AM

      You Go Doug! Yeah that boy shole know how to say it right! (smile)

  • Posted By: dr doug @ 07/04/2008 9:21:07 PM

    In response to Rush Limbaugh Jr. (Holy Roller) again: Mr. Roller states that Mr. Obama is "inexperienced, elitist, left-wing loon". Then a few sentences later he states that Mr. Obama is an "unknown". Well, which is it, Mr. Roller? Is he those things you mentioned or is he an uknown? You can't have it both ways. If I play your game I call Mc Cain a senile, liar, in bed with lobbyists and a former member of the Keating 5. Is that the way were going to play this election too? I thought Rove was off shilling for Fox News ("Fair and Balanced"). By the way, the only thing McCain can run on is his war record - because he wrong everything else: the war: oil - but not the economy since he's already confessed he knows nothing about economics and has to be "taught".

    • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 07/05/2008 8:34:07 AM

      Hey Doug, I've finally found someone who can say the things I cant. I'll be watching you. Thanks by the way.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 10:11:17 PM

      The UNKNOWN part of Barack Hussein is huge. I am not talking about his stances on political views. I'm talking mainly about his relationships and questions about his character. With convicted felons, admitted terrorists, black seperatists, jihadists, past drug use, his questionable birth certificate, his Islamic upbringing, his wifes attitude toward America, his associations with scum who DESPISE America. These are UNKNOWNS. Not much longer though. The vetting has begun.

      NOBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: dr doug @ 07/04/2008 9:21:49 PM

    That's enough for me - on to bigger things. I have to go see if Britney wore panties today.

    • Posted By: Lovly2008 @ 07/05/2008 8:31:46 AM

      LOL, what a simple soul you are. Wish I could join you in your simplicity. Have fun!

  • Posted By: chitom @ 07/05/2008 8:15:56 AM

    Ms. Clift seems a bit confused. Bob Schieffer was the one that claimed that being shot down somehow constituted a presidential qualification for John McCain. When Clark disagreed with that, he was in fact agreeing with the good Senator, whom Clift quotes as also denying that being shot down is a qualification. How is this a mistake by Clark? Unless of course one is not permitted to contradict the press, I guess.




    aaapparent hero

  • Posted By: junkmail6 @ 07/04/2008 11:51:06 PM

    As a former Naval Aviator, my training included classroom sessions with former POW's in Hanoi, where they shared their experiences in full. What John McCain endured was horrific, and his endurance through five years of pure hell is a tribute to his patriotism and commitment to duty. He is a true hero.

    As much as I respect that, his experience in Vietnam has no bearing on his ability to be President. The way he has handled himself in the Senate, his stances, past and present, on various issues, and how he handles himself during the campaign are what is important. Personally, I think the Iraq mess is bankrupting our country and ruining our military, and wanting to stay there is stupid.

    As far as Obama, the one thing I can say for sure is this: He is a magnet for ignorant bigots. That's not his fault at all; it's just that his ethnicity and his father's religion seem to act like a light for moths.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 9:56:09 PM

    ALL OBAMAMOHAMMED'S....want a sneak preview of the "larry sinclair ads" coming out this week??? You can hear for yourself.

    ..................... http://www.americashopefoundation.com .....................................

    WARNING...WARNING....WARNING.....Does not mix well with Kool-Aide.

    NOBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: dr doug @ 07/04/2008 8:27:37 PM

    I understand and agree with Mc Cain's syayus as a war hero. However, I have sometimes wondered if being a prisoner might in some way give someone (I don't know how to put this) a "different" view of war. Might the past prisoner make decisions based upon his past experience? For example, negotiating for prsioners out of proportion so that some boys don't go through what he went through or, on the other hand, going overboard to find our prisoners. For example, perhaps threatening to "level a city" if 2 of our men aren't returned... It's difficult to say what I mean. But, no matter who the candidate, I have wondered if having been a prisoner isn't the good thing we all make it out to be.

    • Posted By: misterharban @ 07/04/2008 9:09:03 PM

      Yes, being a prisoner of war might give someone a "different" view of war. So would having your own flesh and blood in combat (as did Sen. McCain) at the same time you are making decisions which can effect the war. You and everyone else will have to be the judge of that. Personally, I think generations of Americans have found comfort in the presidents and generals who have had to make terrible choices which might kill their own children.

  • Posted By: dr doug @ 07/04/2008 8:30:04 PM

    To Holy Roller: By your insistence on calling Mr. Obama "HUssein" (a name he does noy go by), one can question your character. How many years have you served in public office? Second, I'll call Mr. McCain "Grandpa" from now one. (By the way - I have laways been a staunch independent. But I AM SO FED UP

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 8:36:01 PM

      I'll take a grandpa over a Hussein any day.

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: dr doug @ 07/04/2008 8:44:17 PM

        The problem with the McCain candidacy is that there's a good chance he'll be senile before the end of his term - just like Reagan's 2nd term.

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 8:56:41 PM

          I'll take a senile, old, invalid American Hero, who would use whatever means necessary to protect this nation and our values...over...an inexperienced, elitist, left-wing loon, who has very real and sincere relationships, with scum, who DESPISE this country we all call home. He is an unknown. In his own words...a blank slate. There are way, way too many questions about his character, values, and beliefs. The Jr. Senator from Illinois, is in the Chicago corrupt political scene, up to his neck. Former good buddy, Tony "the Syrian" Rezko, who is negotiating his sentencing right now, will quite possibly get Hussein indicted. The list of questions is almost endless. A Change I can Believe In??? Don't think so.

          NOBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: bill1369 @ 07/04/2008 2:02:57 PM

    I don???t buy this McCain ???war hero??? stuff for a second ??? and never did during Operation Homecoming when all these ???heroes??? were released. What???d they do ??? sat in a cell and got beat for 4, 5, 6 yrs. This qualifies as war hero status? (Are Gitmo POWs heroes?)

    According to Veterans Affairs stats, 725 Americans were captured and interned. 64 of those POWs died (9%) ??? since 37 of those deaths were USMC & Army ??? ground (helicopter) troops who were held in the South in far worse conditions than the North ??? the pilot-POW death rate over, say, 5-yrs was about 1 POW every 2-months. Now, I wouldn???t want to be one of those guys who cashed in but with, about 1,000 ground-troopers dying a month in Vietnam combat operations during the same period, getting a good beating and a diet of bugs & broth may not have been so bad ??? and even that improved once you signed the statement acknowledging US criminal aggression. Which McCain signed (and I eventually would have also, no doubt).

    Bottom line ??? I???m not buying this war hero stuff. + they got their big parade without enduring daily humps in the bush with landmines, snipers, ambushes and frequent pitched battles with a formidable enemy.

    • Posted By: Galasso @ 07/04/2008 8:47:06 PM

      That's obscene. It was much easier in the bush than I can even imagine in a POW compound.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 2:09:25 PM

      you are one sick puppy

      NOBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/04/2008 2:33:55 PM

    If John Kerry was a POW or MIA, that would be something different. Life as a POW under the Vietnamese was NOT comfy. Kerry only served what a total of 5 months in Vietnam? Kerry could never have survived 5 hours of torture, much less than 5 years. Unless you were there, you absolutely have NO comprehension of what a POW went through just to live another day or hour.

    In WWII, the Germans went by the Geneva Convention. The Vietnamese did not. There was no Red Cross, no care packages, no "sanctioned" interrogation tactics.

    • Posted By: phyl48 @ 07/04/2008 2:48:56 PM

      Oh, I see. Your military service to your country only counts if you get captured or your a republican. I guess that makes us civilians unpatriotic as well.

      • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 07/04/2008 3:01:25 PM

        you just hit the GOP nail on the head. Cold War Veterans again will lose all the benifits. cause McCain does not concider us Veterans. or Patriotic. and it scares the snot out of us all.

        • Posted By: phyl48 @ 07/04/2008 3:11:29 PM

          I noticed that Obama supported the new GI bill sponcered by Jim Webb. McCain was against it.

          • Posted By: Galasso @ 07/04/2008 8:33:10 PM

            Obama wouldn't know a GI Bill from a hedge fund. He's all over it now because it's poltically expedient. McCain was against the GI Bill in its original form. He wanted increases graduated to years of service - the more you serve - the more you are eligible for. It makes sense because the way its crafted now - one can enlist and be discharged in three years at max benefits. Why stay in? This will seriously affect the midgrade NCO ranks and boots on the ground leadership as well as the 01-03 officer ranks.

          • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 07/04/2008 3:16:16 PM

            scarry ain't it

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 3:08:22 PM

          Who could argue with someone who shook hands with Bin Laden, as a 17 yr old, in Afghanistan. You are a loonie.

          NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: sparky716 @ 07/04/2008 2:59:39 PM

      How do you know how long John Kerry could surrived as a POW?...were you there Jill? were you a POW?If the Germans went by the Geneva Convention then why don't we?...You got nothing but right wing republican Hate and Fear !!!! to bad Americans will not buy it this year..

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/04/2008 3:29:13 PM

        I have problems with all neos - liberal and conservative. Both are chipping away at our constitutional rights.

        The Geneva Convention should be followed by the US. While Pelosi and Reid, refuse to impeach Bush and Cheney, the world should try them for WAR CRIMES.

        Neo-liberals want to take away the right to bear arms, while the neo-conservatives are reclassifying "automatic" weapons.
        Both are restricting our right of privacy - FISA immunity, internet trolling (started under Clinton), National IDs.

        Personally, I think both candidates are not qualified nor will they have our country's best interests in mind. We have to consider which is the lesser of the two evils. And, Obama is NOT the lesser evil.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 07/04/2008 2:50:29 PM

      Thank you for proving Kerry correct as to what he stated to Congress,no rules breeds warped methods, nessary, but warped, just to stay in the game and staying alive! Warped is a mild term, for a much more morbid actions.

      • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 3:08:52 PM

        Who could argue with someone who shook hands with Bin Laden, as a 17 yr old, in Afghanistan. You are a loonie.

        NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: PleaseSaveAmerica @ 07/04/2008 2:38:59 PM

      I don't think anyone questions the incomprehensible matter that is being a POW. No one who hasn't gone through the process should even try to comment on what it is like because you cannot know. So I don't even try.

      That said, what Clark was trying to say, and it could have been said better, was that being a POW, being in the military, being shot down, whatever does not give you an automatic pass into the White House. That is absolutely true. It is absolutely correct. There is no refuting that. It takes a lot of different skills to be a good President; that should be evident from the current administration.

  • Posted By: 15R8 @ 07/04/2008 4:45:35 PM

    Well eleanor really that is its really hard to force myself to finish one of your writings.
    With gas over $4/gal the last thing I think about is what your writing about . Most of us don't give a rats *** about your dadah article. Your just don't get it do you in the fashion of a true Bushie. Rember he was a piolet too wasn't he. Right now he is steering this country to ruin. old sameold republican tricks from you your party can not defend its record.
    So on the 4th of july you do our veterans along with the rest of the citizens this disservice and this kkind of journalism is a disservice to everybody. Write about solutions to problems. Or maybe just don't write at all

  • Posted By: lawdogxxx @ 07/04/2008 4:39:22 PM

    Eleanor, you're cool. I like you but you're wrong about this one.
    McCain didn't have to claim that getting shot down in a plane was a qualification for being president because Bob Schaeffer claimed it for him. He said "Obama never had his plane shot down..." as evidence that McCain was more experienced and equipped to be Commander in Chief.
    Also, Clark was not trying to diminish the indignity and suffering McCain experienced as a POW or claim that executive experience is more honorable. But executive experience is more RELEVANT to the job of president, however noble enduring hardships as a POW may be.

  • Posted By: lawdogxxx @ 07/04/2008 4:38:29 PM

    Eleanor, you're cool. I like you but you're wrong about this one.
    McCain didn't have to claim that getting shot down in a plane was a qualification for being president because Bob Schaeffer claimed it for him. He said "Obama never had his plane shot down..." as evidence that McCain was more experienced and equipped to be Commander in Chief.
    Also, Clark was not trying to diminish the indignity and suffering McCain experienced as a POW or claim that executive experience is more honorable. But executive experience is more RELEVANT to the job of president, however noble enduring hardships as a POW may be.

  • Posted By: noelmjr @ 07/04/2008 4:32:20 PM

    Elanor,

    The thing that "journalists" either miss or give Wes Clark a pass on is this: Wesley is arrogant because he was the NATO Commander. He was a bill clinton kiss ass and that is why he got the job. Ever since then Wes has looked in the mirror and seen a God looking back at him. The other thing the media either doesn't see or gives Clark a passon is: He will say or do anything to get to the top. The electorate rejected his bid for the Presidency. He knows that it is Obama's turn now but that doesn't mean that Clark wouldn't just love to be the Vice President, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of State or something equally "Mr. Big". Clark is dangerous because his arrogance is exceeded only by his ambition. He also doesn't seem to grasp the thought that the American electorate don't see him as the God he knows he is. Marty.

  • Posted By: reunionpi @ 07/04/2008 7:36:18 AM

    Obama's mother's original Social Security Number Application

    http://webofdeception.com/obamamother'sssapplication.html

    • Posted By: j.n @ 07/04/2008 4:12:50 PM

      Enter Your Comment What the hell does his mothers SS # have to do with this election

  • Posted By: gwinegarden @ 07/04/2008 2:59:33 PM

    "...At least McCain is going to know what are solders are going to go through when they get home"

    How does going home to his rich, well connected family show him what some poor kid is going to go thru when he goes back to the South Bronx?

    • Posted By: Galasso @ 07/04/2008 4:00:40 PM

      The answer to that is - he will know exactly what he's going through.

  • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/04/2008 2:18:49 PM

    Nelson Mandela stated that the one incident that caused the Islamic Movement of 1979 was US's determination to reinstate the Shah of Iran, which was done under Jimmy Carter. The mastermind behind that is Zbigniew Brzezinski (Carter's National Security Adviser). Brzezinski was one of the CFR's to encourage Obama to run and is his main adviser on Foreign Affairs.

    So if Brzezinski's actions gave birth to the Taliban and al Aqueda, doesn't that make HIM the Father of Terrorists? And, since Obama is following Brzenzinski's directions, doesn't that make HIM the BROTHER of Terrorists?

    • Posted By: raddave @ 07/04/2008 2:50:08 PM

      The Shah of Iran was reinstated in 1953, after a coup that was sponsored by the CIA. That would have been under Eishenhower's administration, not Carter's. the revolution in Iran in 1979 overthrew the Shah. Get your facts straight, otherwise it makes it look like you are talking out of your ass.

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/04/2008 3:10:26 PM

        In the mid 70's, under country-wide discontent over the Shah, the Carter administration's policies were to keep him in office - as our ally. This discontent led by Ayatollah Khomeini was targeted to the Western Power that was ensuring the Shah's reign - The United States of America. Thus, the takeover of our Embassy in 1979.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 07/04/2008 3:48:15 PM

          The takeover of the Embassy in 1979 was in response to the US allowing the Shah to enter the country.

    • Posted By: j.n @ 07/04/2008 3:17:02 PM

      Jillfrom Florida:

      I am no way a smart person,but you should do more reading and less typing,get your facts together you are making your self look stupid.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 07/04/2008 2:43:55 PM

      what then does the whole clandestine operation from 1979-1989 with Bush Sr. and Reagan??? It was Bush SR who was warned by Bhutto that we were creating a Frankenstein and funded with money in the billions, total, and weapons to boot! Not by or under Carter but Reagan and Bush Sr.! Not Carter remember Reagan traded weapons for hostages, and forgot, as did Oliver North from FOX! Does the Iran/Contra scandal sound familier, if not read more! We traind over 100,000 rebels between the CIA,SAS,IMI,and USMC, they learned quickly and very well as we see today!

      • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/04/2008 3:07:49 PM

        Who could argue with someone who shook hands with Bin Laden, as a 17 yr old, in Afghanistan. You are a loonie.

        NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: phyl48 @ 07/04/2008 2:57:47 PM

        Thank You pinkpanther.

    • Posted By: phyl48 @ 07/04/2008 2:43:18 PM

      Gee, I always thought it was because Osama wanted us to remove our bases from his country.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse