WORLD VIEW
Fareed Zakaria
Power Failures
U.S. energy policy is seriously behind the rest of the industrial world. What President Bush should do to catch up.
Whether it's Barack Obama or John McCain who enters the White House in January, the new president could well find his approval ratings sliding fast. The increasingly grim economic news is likely to overshadow all else. Britain's prime minister, Gordon Brown, is already experiencing this reality. While most of the British media would argue (vigorously) that Brown's low poll ratings relate to his charisma, or lack thereof, he is also clearly suffering the political effects of economic malaise.
Like the United States, Britain is going through a credit crunch, a financial crisis and a housing collapse all at the same time. Brown, however, argues that the central problem is skyrocketing food and fuel prices—"that's what hurts the average family most," he said in a conversation last Tuesday. Brown said he hoped that the Group of Eight countries would take them on at its summit in Hokkaido, Japan, this week. "The great challenge for the G-8 is, can we coordinate policies to prevent crises. In the 1980s, we had currency coordination. But with finance globalized, that's not the challenge of the present," he said. "The new problem, worldwide, is energy. We need to coordinate our energy policies."
Brown argues that even in the short- and medium-term, the G-8 countries could do something. "The market assumes that demand will always increase, and in a circumstance of constrained supply, that means prices rise. But we can send a signal that demand is going to moderate, that we are serious about efficiency and alternative energy sources. But it would have to be a clear signal sent by all the major consuming countries."
Last month, Britain laid out plans to generate 35 percent of its electricity needs from renewables by 2020—up from 5 percent now. The country is already the world's largest generator of wind power (with mostly off-shore turbines) and plans to generate 60 times current levels in 12 years. It has also cleared regulations to increase nuclear energy. "You cannot get to a new energy mix without a substantial rise in nuclear power," Brown said.
The contrast with Washington is blinding. George Bush still has not made a serious speech, announced a serious plan or presented Congress with a serious set of laws to move the country toward new energy sources. With oil prices at their highest levels since the discovery of oil (even in inflation-adjusted dollars), and with their rise threatening to push the country and the world toward 1970s-style stagflation—he hasn't brought himself do it. And while we stand pat, the rest of the world is moving. In a recent ranking of countries for environmental performance, jointly produced by Yale and Columbia universities, the United States came in 39th, well behind every other advanced industrial country. (Germany ranked 13,
Britain 14 and Japan 21.)
Washington's inaction also stands in contrast to intense activity in the private sector, fascinatingly described in Fred Krupp and Miriam Horn's new book, "Earth: The Sequel." Krupp heads the Environmental Defense Fund, but this is not a gloomy global warming tirade. It's an optimistic account of the progress being made by American industry in renewable energy. The
authors explore every new technology, from solar to wind to geothermal, and introduce the men and women who are inventing the future.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: Ecocentric05 @ 07/31/2008 1:02:38 AM
Comment: The earths' environmental issues are the most important topic the world is facing today, and as a vast non-renewable resource consumer, the U.S. government must be more pro-active (economically assisting or less regulatory) to promote citizens to create and implement new energy sources both public and private. I have faith that the day will come when the majority of americans will start seeing past their selfish financial endeavors and focus pro-actively on solving a major global problem while accepting the related economic windfall that impolitely attaches itself to responsible philanthropic change. Start writing letters and hope our representatives are truly representative.
Posted By: light speed @ 07/18/2008 9:28:41 AM
Comment: I have no faith in anything Bush can or should do, I do feel the congress could help lower some of the cost of gas at the pump by getting control of the oil speculators. NO, this will not solve our problems but one part of the problem is greed. We all know, greed is what makes the world go around in the oil industry.
Posted By: Gessho @ 07/11/2008 12:33:29 PM
Comment: I'll take George Bush over that dolt Gordon Brown any day.