The earths' environmental issues are the most important topic the world is facing today, and as a vast non-renewable resource consumer, the U.S. government must be more pro-active (economically assisting or less regulatory) to promote citizens to create and implement new energy sources both public and private. I have faith that the day will come when the majority of americans will start seeing past their selfish financial endeavors and focus pro-actively on solving a major global problem while accepting the related economic windfall that impolitely attaches itself to responsible philanthropic change. Start writing letters and hope our representatives are truly representative.
- 1
- 2
Power Failures
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
SPONSORED BY
But they would be the first to point out that, even though American research labs are rising to the challenge, government action remains vital. The idea that government should "stay out" is meaningless. It is in knee-deep already; energy is a highly regulated industry. In fact, it's notable that we have low productivity and runaway inflation in two crucial areas these days—food and fuel. Both have been nationalized, protected or subsidized by governments around the world for decades. A host of regulatory and legal barriers make renewable and small-scale energy production less attractive, profitable and manageable than it could be. But Krupp and Horn focus on the central policy change that the United States needs to make—enacting a cap on carbon. America is the only developed country that does not put a price on carbon.
Imagine if President Bush were to announce at the G-8 summit that the United States would institute a cap on emissions. We would instantly have the world's largest carbon market and it would, instantly, change the price of clean energy. It would unleash a tsunami of economic activity in renewables that could, over time, give American productivity the next big boost it needs. It would, of course, also quickly send a signal to the market about future demand for oil, which would in turn affect the price.
But somehow I don't think that's what Bush is going to say in Hokkaido this week.
© 2008
- 1
- 2
Discuss