andrea della robbia broken angel met
Metropolitan Museum of Art
The Della Robbia, Intact: Even angels have accidents
CULTURE

Fallen Angel

Broken artwork and the challenge of protecting masterpieces.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Sometime in the late 15th century, the Italian sculptor Andrea della Robbia created a terra-cotta relief sculpture of Saint Michael the Archangel. Since 1996, this sublimely beautiful, 62-inch-wide framed piece has been resting in metal mounts above the entrance to the Metropolitan Museum of Art's galleries for European and decorative art. But last week, in the middle of the night, Saint Michael the Archangel fell from the sky--breaking into pieces on the marble floor below.

The cracked archangel may not be a sign of apocalypse, but it's definitely a cause for alarm at the Met, which is scrambling to confirm the "structural integrity" of the pedestals and wall mounts that keep some of the world's finest artifacts intact. "The charge of a museum is to protects these materials," says Eryl Wentworth, the executive director for the American Institute of Conservation. "The last thing you want to have to do is deal with breaking an artifact."

In fact, museums have to deal with broken art fairly frequently. In 2005, the Institute of Museum and Library Services surveyed more than 3,000 collecting institutions, both large and small, and released their first-ever Heritage Health Index Report. This study found that more than half of all institutions have experienced some damage to their collection due to handling, and 58 percent of those surveyed also said damage has occurred as a result of improper storage or enclosure.

When something like a della Robbia falls from its mounts, museum conservators are responsible for figuring out why the accident occurred and, quite literally, putting the pieces back together. (The Met says the piece was not "irrevocably harmed" and expects it to return to display.) The American Institute of Conservation comprises more than 3,500 professionals who work in museums or as freelancers; nearly all have a master's degree from one of the seven institutions that offer degrees in the field. Needed? A knowledge of science, hand skills and a bachelor's degree in disciplines as varied as art history or chemistry. "There's only one formula I go by," says Jerry Podany, the senior conservator for antiquities at the Getty Museum, as well as the director of the International Institute of Conservation. "Acceptable risk equals acceptable damage. If you want the latter part of that formula to go away, you have to reduce risk by providing resources like staff, budgets, security and disaster prevention."

When the Heritage report was released, it found that 80 percent of collecting institutions did not have a paid staff dedicated to collections care, and that 71 percent needed additional training and expertise for the staff that deals with their collections. "Accidents probably happen more often than we know, and staff who aren't appropriately trained or a lack of staff can cause those accidents to be more likely," Podany says. And while major museums like the Met and Getty have scores of employees--curators, preparators, conservators and registrars (who keep records)--history shows they're not immune, especially given the size and scope of their collections.

Two summers ago, the Centre Pompidou museum in Paris had to pay nearly $90,000 to separate institutions when it broke two works that were on loan. One was a resin sculpture by Peter Alexander that fell when staff members didn't give glue time to dry; the other, a Plexiglas relief by Craig Kauffman that fell from the wall for still-unknown reasons. Two months ago at the same museum, a 30-pound Plexiglas sculpture by Corey McKorkle splintered into three pieces when it fell from a mount meant to hold 350 pounds. Specialists had approved the device, so the Pompidou is still investigating why it fell.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Mz. Understood @ 07/11/2008 2:03:53 PM

    Comment: Curry - your comment really is off topic as this is about preserving OLD Art. The artist's of the 15th Century were NOT creating modern art as that mode of art is contemporary to this Century. Your ideas on modern art are very closed. I am sure because of the diversity in this genre there is at least one artist or one piece that you may actually enjoy --

  • Posted By: Mz. Understood @ 07/11/2008 2:03:24 PM

    Comment: Curry - your comment really is off topic as this is about preserving OLD Art. The artist's of the 15th Century were NOT creating modern art as that mode of art is contemporary to this Century. Your ideas on modern art are very closed. I am sure because of the diversity in this genre there is at least one artist or one piece that you may actually enjoy --

  • Posted By: bbbs53 @ 07/11/2008 5:03:47 AM

    Comment: Whether or not you care for a certain type of media is really not the point here. The point is that for the sake of a few dollars and not hiring the best techs they can get, they have accepted an unacceptable amount of risk especially when it pertains to irreplaceable pieces. Last I heard this was a free country and curryjim is entitled to his opinion, just as you are yours. Comparing the terra cotta piece to most of the modern school is a really stupid path to start down. Besides anyone that avoids museums really does not appreciate the effort that goes into one anyway. It would be better to confine your comments to the subject at hand, not your particular taste or lack there of for art, modern or otherwise. It all needs to be better protected and the exhibition of any piece must take into consideration all aspects of the pieces safety.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Luxury stadiums are on the rise. A top seat can cost $150,000. Beer costs extra.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu