SPONSORED BY:

The Guns of November

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Political Pluralism @ 09/30/2009 6:12:32 PM

    Amidst the fiery debate over the new strategy to take place in Afghanistan, Sen. John McCain has proposed a new amendment attached to the defense spending bill. The Requirements that Senator McCain are seeking out is for Gen. McChrystal, and Head of Central Command Gen. Petraeus to testify in front of Congress. This didn't take place without any backlash, Carl Levin; who is on the Senate Armed Services Committee with McCain. Levin feels that there isn't any need at this time for Gen. McChrystal to provide testimony, because President Obama hasn't established a direct plan for Afghanistan at the moment. Despite the damning statements Gen. McChrystal made regarding to President Obama, that he had only spoke to the president once since becoming the lead Afghanistan General. Mr. Obama is set to reestablish a strategy with top officials including Gen. McChrystal. My questions to you all consists of this. Do you think that the war in Afghanistan is capable of winning? If so, will it just be a police state with roughly 50,000 troops present at all times? (politicalpluralism.com)

  • Posted By: Political Pluralism @ 09/30/2009 2:03:36 PM

    Tomorrow the meeting is set to begin in Geneva, Switzerland, the United Nations security council including Germany, Britain, France, United States, Russia, China, and Iran. This is the Obama's Administrations opportunity to persuade Iran to halt its nuclear operations. Iran is still claiming the nuclear productions are solely for civilian purposes. It is obvious there is a hidden agenda behind Iran's uranium enrichment. If it is for civilian energy purposes, then why is it hidden in Qom in the mountains, and heavily guarded? I'm open to your suggests so feel free to comment with your opinion. The United States diplomatic approach is going to work 1 out of 100 times, Iran has shown on many occasions is doesn't have to adhere to any treaty or agreements that are made. Iran had made a public statement a few days again saying that they were not interested in nuclear talks at the meeting. The U.S. is optimistic that the issues at hand can be resolved, but optimism can only breed hope. I don't want hope, I want clear answers as to what the actions are that are going to be taken if Iran doesn't cooperate peacefully. I'm leaving you all with this one last question. If Iran continues to enrich uranium, would you support the United States and allied countries invading to cease the operations of Iran's nuclear program?
    FORUM at (politicalpluralism.com)

  • Posted By: MichaelX @ 09/29/2009 4:45:55 PM

    Well of course, stupid! What else do you think is going to happen? This is a demented little man who thinks himself as the "prince of the east" that Nostradamus wrote of. All middle-eastern sub-species have been slaightering each other for millenia! Pull out our troops, and let them go at it! Getting rid of half of the lame religeo-fanatics would be a plus.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now