Glow Fading?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: JohnDoug @ 07/12/2008 10:16:47 PM

    So now we're supposed to think Obama is a closet muslim and wants sex ed in kindergarten. Its sad that an election could hinge on garbage like that being perpetuated on the internet. Posters like HolyRoller should be ashamed to be a part of the smear campaign. I'm for Obama (proudly) but I would never want him to win by virtue of people speading lies about John McCain.

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/12/2008 9:41:05 PM

    OBAMA DOES IT AGAIN. Lack of judgment. He uses an old Chicago FRIEND of his, whom he knows well (in this case, Bernie Mac the commedian, to introduce him and to proceed to call him his friend and to later throw him UNDER THE BUS for off colored humor about white women, of all things. THAT AINT THE BERNIE MAC I USED TO KNOW. Unreal:

    Okay, either Obama has the stupidest CAMP of aides/supporters who set up his fundraisers or other events, or Obama is using these functions to subtly throw stuff like this in our faces (white women in this case) using other people ( like his friend Bernie Mac,the comedian ) who he threw under the bus with the rest at a fundraiser last nite. How many times are we to believe he makes associations, engages friendships, hires on advisors, etc. and surprise one of these people says something that he conveniently pushes aside and says he does not condone, represent, etc. those statements. Unreal. Wake up America.

    Bernie Mac Makes 'Inappropriate' Jokes at Obama Fundraiser
    July 12, 2008 10:50 AM


    ABC News' Sunlen Miller reports: Chicago native Bernie Mac may have been a little too loose with the jokes at a Barack Obama fundraiser Friday night, leading some ticket goers to heckle the comedian about his jokes about women at the presidential candidate's event.
    Mac introduced Obama for the $2,300-a-head fundraiser at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Chicago and opened with his typical humor.
    "My little nephew came to me and he said, 'Uncle, what's the difference between a hypothetical question and a realistic question?'" Mac told the crowd, "I said, ???I don't know,??? but I said, 'I'll tell you what you do. Go upstairs and ask your mother if she'd make love to the mailman for $50,000.??????
    The joke continued with the mother saying she'd sleep "with anyone" for $50,000 -- and then continuing to include Mac's daughter hypothetically answering the question in the same way.
    "Hypothetically speaking, we should have $100,000. But realistically speaking we live with two hos,??? Mac said delivering the punch line that solicited a few hecklers in the political crowd.
    "It's not funny. Let's get Barack on," someone shouted from the crowd.
    Mac introduced Obama shortly after, and Obama called him a "great friend."
    Near the end of Obama's remarks, the Illinois Senator included a rebuke of his comedian friend in a regular stump speech riff about divisions that still exist in America.
    "We can't afford to be divided by race. We can't afford to be divided by religion, or by region or class. Or by gender. That means, by the way, Bernie you got to clean up your act. This is a family affair. ??? I'm just messing with you," Obama said.
    The Obama campaign was equally quick to distance themselves from Mac's off-color comments, with Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki saying, "Sen. Obama told Bernie Mac that he doesn't condone these statements and believes what was said was inappropriate.&quo

  • Posted By: Hannah111 @ 07/12/2008 8:58:07 PM

    Saw a link to this article at www.polijam.com Great site for news and commentary. I find parts of the article amusing. The writer is puzzled that McCain doesn't get much coverage. McCain can't get much coverage when the media seems to be in love with Obama. The writer also seeks to undersand why some white people don't seem to like Obama much. Maybe it is because they see Obama for what he is, a shrewed politician without major principles, that will do anything to get elected. Others in the electorate are ready to vote for almost any African-American who seems to be somewhat reasonable, with the hope that with this step, race issues can be put behind us.

  • Posted By: rwethereyet @ 07/12/2008 8:57:07 PM

    Could it be that Newsweek has "opened their eyes" to the fact that their Golden Boy does Not appeal to the Majority of Americans? If ALL of the media could be Fair and Balanced with Both candidates, you would See that this election, at the moment, is "tied". Once the running mates have been selected and we get past the convention in August.... the REAL race begins. The democrats have selected the Wrong candidate at the Wrong time! America is at war and we need a leader that has the knowledge and experience of the military to be the Commander in Chief. McCain will bring our troops home with Honor, Dignity, and Pride.

  • Posted By: carl6352 @ 07/12/2008 8:54:22 PM

    danny: very good you have done some studying on this gas fiasco. as it is all true. you should make a copy and link it to all sites. what you wrote was clear concise and even a public school trained american could understand. my hat is off to you!!!

  • Posted By: Be Neutral @ 07/12/2008 8:48:07 PM

    Who drills the most will win

  • Posted By: carl6352 @ 07/12/2008 8:45:22 PM

    0h my the chosen one is slipping. how dare the american people see what ob is a empty suit. who will do and promise anything. the guy is so far left that he is trying to hide it by saying he will do this and trhat when in reality he has no plans on following thru. the democrats lied there way to win congress by lying to seem like they were moderates while in fact they are lock step behind the leftwing part of the democrats. it was even in the news ron emanuell tild them what to say and how to run. now for all you public school tained people its called a sham. mcain will win because people like divided goverment and ob is way to far left no matter what his lies are.

  • Posted By: jeepwonder @ 07/12/2008 8:42:43 PM

    I'm surprised by this article. It seems the underlying arguement is newsweek is shocked people decide on their own without McCain being the candidate they put in all the headlines. How sad....

  • Posted By: AWeir @ 07/12/2008 8:37:15 PM

    And how's this for a leading question?

    "4c. Some people say that since Barack Obama became the presumed Democratic nominee for president, he has changed his position on key policy issues to try to gain political advantage. Do you agree or disagree?"

    Newsweek absolutely has to comment on the methodology between these two polls. They can't throw out their affiliation models on a whim.

  • Posted By: poynerdelvento @ 07/12/2008 8:36:10 PM

    Maybe instead of asking whether Obama's glow is fading, Newsweek should be asking why their polling numbers are so inconsistent. It's clear from other polling agencies (e.g., Gallup) that Obama has held a 4-6 point edge against McCain nationally ever since Clinton dropped out of the race. I think that this poll was accurate, but something about your polling methodology was off on your last survey.

  • Posted By: poynerdelvento @ 07/12/2008 8:32:12 PM

    Maybe instead of "Is Obama's Glow Fading," maybe the headline should read, "Is Newsweek's polling methodology inconsistent?"

  • Posted By: AWeir @ 07/12/2008 8:27:10 PM

    Good gravy, what did you guys do with the party affiliation numbers on this poll???

    Last month's poll: 26% GOP 38% Dem, 36% Ind
    This new poll: 32% GOP, 32% Dem, 36% Ind

    Unless you can justify for me why this country suddenly became older, whiter, and decidedly more Republican in the last 4 weeks, I call bullsh*t. This is a case of cherrypicking your statistics to justify a more compelling (read: better-selling) storyline.

  • Posted By: Pat S @ 07/12/2008 1:14:18 PM

    Vickie, I agree with you. The Democratic party dumped Hilliary and jumped on the Obama band wagon. Despite being abandoned by your own party she kept fighting. Although I have never been a Hilliary supporter, I admired her tenacity. Sadly, when Obama was unable to "close the deal", the democratic party changed the rules and reduced the number of delegates needed so as to make Obama fit.

    Now, we have a choice. Who do we want for President. As a Florida voter, I will not forget the Democratic parties decision to ignore the Florida voters. I will certainly vote for McCain, not b/c I am angry at the media or angry at the Democratic party, but because I believe he is the most qualified candidate. I do not agree with all of his policies, but at least I know what his policies are. And, looking at McCain's Senatorial history, I am confident he is not putting on a show.
    I can not honestly say the same thing about Obama.

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/12/2008 1:32:49 PM

      Pat S,
      I too agree with you.
      I saw the true colors of the DNP throughout the primaries and how they stripped Florida of 100% of delegates 5 months after our election reform bill became law. No matter which way Senator Nelson tried to fight the DNC, they were bound and determined to leave Florida with zero representation in the nomination process.

      The DNC's actions confirmed all of my other recent research along with witnessing the Democratic lead Senate in action (C-Span 2). This DNP is no longer the party I joined. I no longer have any loyalty to the revised party. I now choose the better candidate - or if all fails, the lesser of the two evils.

      • Posted By: raddave @ 07/12/2008 8:25:56 PM

        Jill, you seem to forget that your state broke the rules set up by both the DNC and the RNC and your state got punished for it. The DNC decided to be harder on Florida than the RNC, but both parties punished Florida, but no one seems to remember the RNC stripped Florida of half its delegates.

    • Posted By: cowen123456 @ 07/12/2008 1:18:36 PM

      Why can't more people on these blogs have good down to earth logic like Pat here........I wish more people can see things as they are like you. Floridians is more indicative of the country as a whole then other states and so I put much weight on how floridian feels and vote. The democratic party disfranchising florida after all that happened in 2000 was the biggest hyprocritical shame I have ever seen.

      • Posted By: Boulder Sue @ 07/12/2008 2:13:43 PM

        Re: disenfranchising Florida voters in the primary: you can blame the Repubs for that. They own the state legislature, which set the date for the primary in a deal to ensure a paper trail in this year's General Election. The Democratic candidates agreed to follow the DNC's ruling on the primary, all of them. I agree, that was pretty sad, but don't bame the candidates alone for it. I truly wish there had been a better solution for that huge mistake, and still have hopes that it will happen at the convention, for Michigan, too. From what I understand it can happen. In any case, a large lesson was learned for the next time araound. Let's just focus on keeping the Supreme Court out of it this time and forever. I f McCain is elected, we' never know what hit us when he starts replacing some of the more reasonable Jusices who are hangin on by the skin of their teeth due to age. Electing a President has very far reaching consequences that extreme die-hards of any stripe generally overlook!

    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 07/12/2008 1:31:22 PM

      As I mentioned to Vickie below, Hillary practiced the nastiest brand of gutter politics I've ever seen from a Democrat in my lifetime, and ran her campaign into double-digit millions of dollars in debt *twice*. I truly can't believe so many people "admire the tenacity" of a woman who honestly suggested that Obama should hand her the nomination because he might be assassinated - no one seems to understand that this kind of political thinking would disenfranchise EVERY MEMBER of a controversial racial or ethnic group and is in conflict with Constitutional principles. And how is her "experience" supposed to help her fix the economy when she couldn't even manage the finances of her own campaign?

      As I've said, it doesn't surprise me that many Hillary supporters are rushing to the McCain camp, because anyone who'd continue to support Hillary despite the ugliness of the attack politics she practiced probably has a preference for more of the same. Besides which, it wasn't the Democratic party that changed the rules in Florida and Michigan - it was Florida and Michigan.

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/12/2008 1:43:06 PM

        Vigil,
        Your blog is filled with misinformation.
        Hillary said anything can happen before the convention - YOU misinterpreted her comment.
        Florida voted to change the primary date to January 29, 2008 as part of the nationally known need for election reform - we require a PAPER TRAIL for every vote cast. This was signed into law early May, 2007. It was not until a full five months later in OCTOBER, 2007, that the Rules Committee of the DNC met and decided that if they didn't impose a severe penalty against Florida, other states would also jump ahead of the Chosen Four. It was THEN that the DNC changed their policy from 50% reduction to 100% reduction. They also forbade any candidate to campaign in Florida, but they were allowed to travel to Florida for fundraising.

        So, yes, it WAS the DNC who changed the rules - Not Florida.

        • Posted By: TheVigil @ 07/12/2008 2:05:35 PM

          Surprise you as it may, I didn't agree with the DNC's decisions at all on the whole primary-date issue. I hate the way the primaries are run now and think that the individual states *should* be able to vote on a unified primary date. However, I also think that the right way to do this is to campaign for change nationally and get the DNC to change nationally as well, not just unilaterally go ahead with whatever the state decides - not in a national election, anyway. If every state did what Florida and Michigan did, the entire Democratic primary process would have turned into a chaotic nightmare. Also, why haven't you mentioned the fact that the reduction was changed back to 50% later in the campaign? I think even Michigan got 50% of their delegates back, despite that Obama was trying to follow the rules and thus wasn't even *on* the ballot in Michigan. So I stand by my statement, though I will concede that you're right that the DNC changed the rules as well to some extent.

          As far as the RFK comment goes, I'll repeat it. "We all remember the great tragedy of Bobby Kennedy being assassinated in June in L.A." was what Hillary actually said. May I ask what you thought it meant instead? If Hillary wanted to say "anything can happen before the convention", why didn't she say "anything can happen before the convention"? Why would she choose to bring up the specter of another controversial, highly liberal candidate who was also seen as a reformer and had close ties to Black America, who was assassinated at an ugly and chaotic time? Why bring up assassination at all if it wasn't on her mind?

    • Posted By: notroubleatall1963 @ 07/12/2008 1:43:55 PM

      And I'm just the opposite. I don't trust McCain because he is such the super-patriot. I think he's all about war and I don' twant any part of it. I disagree with our stance in Iraq, and we never should have gotten involved in the first place. It was all trumped up for the oil.

      McCain is in the pocket of Big Oil now. I'm in the oil biz and I know they all support him because they fear that under Obama, their taxes may be increased.

      Don't swallow the McSame pill and vote away your rights t(womens) for free choice, etc. It's all just more of the same ol' reactionary, backwards and anti-progress conservatism that has thrived under BUsh. Are we REALLY voting for the status quo? That's pathetic. Chicken...

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/12/2008 1:22:29 PM

      Obamacrats will learn that you can support someone without liking all their policies. Tomorrow or next week when Obama has a whole new set of Policy positions they are either going to have to learn or stay home in November.

  • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/12/2008 1:18:52 PM

    notroubleatall:

    Just how is supporting a neoliberal who disguises himself as a liberal Democrat while continuing to support the GLOBALIZATION process of ridding the US of all manufacturing, small business, middle class, etc going to help keep the USA a sovereign strong nation? It isn't.

    I realize that analyzing is not your forte, and you have been educated under the Kennedy system, but somehow, somewhere you have to have some common sense.

    News Flash: The Neocons DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE USA, SMALL BUSINESS, WORKING CLASS
    The Neolibs DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE USA, SMALL BUSINESS, WORKING CLASS

    Both the neocons and the neolibs belong to CFR. Both are working for Globalization. Both are greedy elitists. Obama's advisory teams are LOADED with CFR neolibs.

    ONLY the true Democrats and True Republicans are for the USA and the US citizens.

    • Posted By: notroubleatall1963 @ 07/12/2008 1:55:38 PM

      PS _ Jill, I've been educated in the Catholic School system, and also overseas. I spent my formative high school years living in London and going to school with foiks from all over the world.

      So I really "get" Obama in ways that perhaps not everyone takes him. I like the fact that he had exposure to other cultures less well off than ours, and that he too grew up in underdeveloped countries (I lived in Libya for four years)...

      So I will stand by him, not because of Kennedys - though I certainly admire them - but because of his foreign-ness, his appeal to our fellow human beings overeseas, and the ray of hope he brings to the underclasses and disenfranchised. He's not an elitist - he's got much broader appeal than the narrow minds give him credit for - those who have no inkling or sympatico for people outside their small narrow communities in the US. Those who like to be self-righteious and pompous about their Christian beliefs, who judge everyone else as if they are the self-appoint God of the USA. I cannot stand that IGNORANT, ARROGANT ATTITUDE that sets the USA up as the "BEST, STRONGEST MOST POWERFUL COUNTRY IN THE WORLD." We're only human and in order to lead in the ways that the Kennedy family has, we should elect someone who the rest of the world can respect and admire.

      That would NOT be McCain.

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/12/2008 2:15:48 PM

        My preference leans towards centrist populism. I am not interested in being the best strongest superpower - any more than I am interested in becoming a 3rd world nation - as the neoliberals are guiding us.

        I don't need the government to give me handouts. I don't like that the working class are considered 2nd class citizens by the elitists. I do not need the government to tell me what I can read, what I can drive, what language (Spanish) that my children MUST learn.

        And, Obama is no less ARROGANT than his COUSIN BUSH. OBAMA would be the third term of BUSH, not McCain.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 07/12/2008 8:20:39 PM

          John McCain is not arrogant? Did you not hear his comment when asked about the American cigarrette companies selling the most products to Iran? About how maybe its a good way to kill more Iranians? That sounds pretty *** arrogant to me. You seem globilization as one of the biggest problem to America, but you support McCain who fully supports free trade, while Obama wants to renegotiate NAFTA, I do not understand that.

    • Posted By: Curious in Texas @ 07/12/2008 4:29:32 PM

      Ms. Jill, since you are so loose with your dainty praise of leoliberals ans and neocons. Just what side of the line do you get dowen on? Only the good dems and repubs cab rught things, according to you. Hust who are you refering to? Is John McEmpty one of them?

    • Posted By: notroubleatall1963 @ 07/12/2008 1:40:15 PM

      Alright, Jill!! I now understand. I wasn't sure where you were comin from...

      I am really beginning to think that we're all on the same side, and whoever wins will just have the mess the last leader allowed to unfold.

      So no matter who we vote for, it's all the same old same old... oh well. Sigh.

      No, I'm not good at analysis. I'm creative so please forgive my rants. I am having a little fun, that s all. ;-)

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/12/2008 1:52:16 PM

        And, it's the Congress that has to be cleaned of the neos. For the first time, John Kerry is fighting for the Democratic nomination. That would be 1 down and 10 more neos to go in this year's Senate reelections. Allard, R-CO, Baucus D- MT, Biden D-DE, Cochran R- MS, Durbin D - IL, Harkin D - IA, McConnell R - KY, Pryor D - AR, Roberts R -KS and Smith R - OR.

  • Posted By: dmpastick @ 07/12/2008 8:08:03 PM

    One thing is for sure.....you folks at Newsweek just can't stand it that McCain has pulled even with Obama. It's clear you are scratching your elitist heads in wonder trying to explain how this could be. It must be that people just don't undterstand the real Obama.....yeah, right!!! No, the issue is that more and more people are paying increased attention.

  • Posted By: dmpastick @ 07/12/2008 8:04:36 PM

    One thing is for sure....you folks at Newsweek obviously just can't stand it that McCain has made huge gains against Obama. I can see you scratching your heads, wondering how you could have been so wrong!!

  • Posted By: cowen123456 @ 07/12/2008 1:25:00 PM

    Its no surprise that the Obama's experiencing a poll shrinkage. The bigger the staged show gets the more transparent how hollow and artificial it is. Voters may come in many colors and classes but they're not stupid....they know a well scripted show when they see one.

    While the pundits mock Mccain for every little human flaw and gaffe, I do not believe they realized how normal that is to us folks watching from out here. The thing is...when a man is not on a script, he will come across like the guy next door..who will make funny and not so funny jokes sometimes sprinkle with a few slip ups. Its called being people....we all do it. I'll take 100 of Mccain's gaffe and plain humor over 1 well pressed, well scripted and well orchestrated image of Obama anyday.

    Voting is about gauging the person who will select as president. So if who you're selling is a manufactured image based on marketing groups and opinion polls then how the world will voter ever know who you are. There is a reason why voters do know who Obama is.......and that's because he's been portraiting an image rather then who he really is. On top of this, his words has proved to have very little value.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/12/2008 1:36:07 PM

      Wait till his staged show in Denver. I will come off very much, resembling a Hitler Nazi Rally. I also, think there will be considerible violence, at the Convention. Hussein has rallied all of America's lunatics to his side. Put a bunch of kooks in one place, and America will get a clear view, of what a Hussein as POTUS, would be like. The SuperDelegates are sweating. If Clinton can force a real rollcall, the results my be shocking. Like a group of Hussein supporters are already shouting....ReCreate '68 Baby!!!

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: notroubleatall1963 @ 07/12/2008 1:46:20 PM

        This is funny - how can you make the comparison of a bunch of Liberals to a bunch of Nazis? It's the Conservatives who are more like Nazis.

        The Liberals would be more like Maoists, perhaps.

        Unholy Roller, you are the one person on this blog who consistently makes a fool of yourself in favor of the wrong (Right) party. It's so funny my sides are splitting!

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/12/2008 3:12:40 PM

          His acceptance speech, in the stadium, with 75,000 kooks inside, will VERY MUCH, resemble a Hitler, Nazi Party Rally. Remember, when it happens, HolyRoller told you so, first.

          NOBAMA!!!

          • Posted By: raddave @ 07/12/2008 8:03:19 PM

            Why do you have to compare it to a Nazi rally, why not to a Rolling Stones concert or something like that? Oh because a Rolling Stones concert doesn't seem as sinister and evil as a Nazi rally

        • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/12/2008 2:00:41 PM

          Actually you could say that our neoliberal Democrats and neoconservative Republicans are fashioning our liberties under the former USSR KGB. The KGB monitored all activity within their borders, very similar to the internet monitoring since the mid 90's under Clinton, and the warrantless wiretapping under GW - the one that Obama voted to give the Bush administration complete immunity by not allowing ANY court action.

          Conservative court in WI has recently reclassified an AR-15 as a fully automatic rifle and now a banned firearm.

          And the list goes on and on.

    • Posted By: notroubleatall1963 @ 07/12/2008 1:58:10 PM

      We've been electing Mediocrity since Bush Sr, when we all voted for the candidate who wasn't "perfect" - whose flaws in speaking and expressing himself made him seem "HUMAN"

      Don't fall for this again - it has not helped our country in the least - and has in fact damaged our image overseas and across all the thinking world.

      Please elect someone who conveys that he has a brain, who can speak well, and who represents the TOP INTELLECT and INTELLIGENCE in the country, not the most common, low-brow factor in the mix.

      That would be McCain't.

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/12/2008 2:07:03 PM

        Actually since Nixon, we have had a CROOK, a CLUTZ, a PEANUT FARMER, an ACTOR, a FAULTY MEMORY, a WOMANIZER, and a PUPPET.

        We really shouldn't settle for another Puppet.

        • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/12/2008 3:06:50 PM

          Puppet? I would say more like a DICTATOR.

  • Posted By: Danny Eller @ 07/12/2008 7:48:55 PM


    FACT: In January of 1995 when in the first time in 40 years the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress the average gas price in the US was $1.06 a gallon. (Note: there was just a few months in 2002-2003 that Jumpin Jim caused a brief switch in the US Senate to the Democrats)

    FACT: In January of 2007 when the DEMOCRATs took back control of both houses of Congress the average price of Gasoline in the US was $2.28 a gallon.

    FACT: In "TWELVE" again, in 12 years of Republican Control of Congress gas prices rose 215% with no adjustment for inflation.

    FACT: Right now under a DEMOCRAT led Congress gasoline prices in the US average $4.16 a gallon.

    FACT: Since the DEMOCRATs took over both houses in Congress in January 2007 just "EIGHTEEN" again, just 18 months ago, gasoline has sky rocketed 182.46%!!!!! Even with an adjustment for inflation that still qualifies as skyrocketing!!! That is ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO PERCENT INCREASE IN AVERAGE GAS PRICES IN ONLY 18 MONTHS!!!

    FACT: In 12 years of a Republican controlled Congress gas prices rose and average of 17.91% per year or 01.49% per month.

    FACT: In 18 MONTHs of a DEMOCRAT controlled Congress gas prices rose and average of "121.64%" per year or 10.13% per MONTH!!!!

    ???THAT IS SIX POINT EIGHT TIMES ((6.8 TIMES)) GREATER
    INCREASE IN GASOLINE PRICES UNDER A DEMOCRAT CONGRESS!!???

    FACT: During the Carter years a DEMOCRAT Congress put off limits 98% of all US public lands to oil exploration.

    FACT: A DEMOCRAT Congress put off limits BILLIONs of barrels of "KNOWN" oil deposits in a small 2000 acre coastal plain part of ANWR which is 19,000,000 acres in size.

    FACT: A DEMOCRAT Congress put off limits the coastal shelf, an area with KNOWN oil deposits of BILLIONs of barrels of oil and TRILLIONs of cubic feet of natural gas.

    FACT: A DEMOCRAT Congress put off limits KNOWN oil shale deposits located in The largest deposits in the world are found in the United States in the Green River basin, which covers portions of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming; about 70% of this resource is located on federally owned or managed land. Deposits in the United States constitute 62% of world resources which is in shale oil roughly three times the oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.

    Question, how did this world energy crisis become President Bushes fault?

  • Posted By: RomekN17 @ 07/12/2008 7:34:34 PM

    I loved the guy. But when he began sucking up to H. Clinton I began to lose that loving feeling. I had great hopes for him, but now I'm beginning to wonder if he is the same old politics as usual.

    • Posted By: Pansycritter @ 07/12/2008 7:44:23 PM

      He must suck up to HRC and he must suck up to Bill. He has no choice. He has no experience, they do.

  • Posted By: Pansycritter @ 07/12/2008 7:42:36 PM

    Polls can only find those with land lines. We all can vote.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse