Fannie, Freddie, Folly

Why the two mortgage giants can't be allowed to fail.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/15/2008 1:44:51 PM

    Bill Clinton points to liberal Congressional Democrats' protection of Fannie and Freddie from scrutiny as a primary cause of the current economic meltdown.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsynspIqAoE

    To prove Bill Clinton's point, this is a link to a C-SPAN video clip of the Congressional hearings at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix fannie and freddie.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

    "Video Unearthed Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam that caused our Economic Crisis"

    The link below describes how some of those Democrats in Congress tried to use the original version of the bailout bill to divert money eventually recovered to groups like ACORN. See: Wall Street Journal

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122247015469280723.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

    And here is Lou Dobbs reporting on ACORN corruption and ties to Obama, including Obama Campaign paying ACORN $800,000 for voter registration activities, and Obama representing them when he was a practicing attorney.

    http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/10/09/ldt.tucker.acorn.under.fire.cnn

  • Posted By: DiamondJim @ 07/13/2008 10:11:36 AM

    Posted By: cutter37 @ 07/12/2008 7:54:01 PM
    Comment: If the Gov't. had never gotten into the social engineering business (promoting and pushing for everyone to own a home, many of whom should be apartment dwellers-not the end of the world you know) we might well of not had this "subprime" (read: poor risk) fiasco. Now the imbeciles in Congress conduct hearings to deflect blame from their own incompetence.

    I can't believe you so grossly misunderstand the "sub prime" lease fraud.
    "Sub Prime" mortgages existed not because of social engineering (some call it the "American Dream" and the maintenace of a healthy middle class that is the basis of our democracy) but due to greed, fraud and lack of adequate regulation. This is a product of a centerpiece of neo-conservatism, i.e., "DEREGULATION".
    This mess will now be dumped on the American people, not just in the loss of the "American dream" but by the assumed bailout og Ginnie May and Freddie Mac, adding ane estimated $5 trillion dollars to the national debt, which embarassingly was brought about during the 20 + year tenure of Republican "fiscal conservatives".
    Your "knee jerk" "blame the government"response shows that you have been properly brainwashed bt the "neo-cons"
    The "imbiciles in Congress were led by largely neo-con extremists.
    You are shooting youself in the foot.
    The answer is not so east as "blame the government" "That's just scapegoating".

  • Posted By: Nins @ 07/13/2008 1:29:22 AM

    Know why McCain wants to distance himself from former Senator Phil Gramm? It's not because of Gramm's obnoxious remarks calling Americans "a nation of whiners" who are in "a mental recession." Those remarks were so ascerbic that they may've been made just to give McCain an excuse to distance himself from Gramm. This issue is a lot deeper than it looks on the surface.

    When Gramm was a Senator he was Chairman of the Banking Committee. He pushed through the legislation known as the "Enron Loophole." This loophole allowed US investment banks to bypass Federal regulations governing futures trading, and is the reason why investment banks were able to falsely inflate the prices of oil, wheat, corn and other commodities through massive futures trading, causing your costs of gas, heating oil and food to go through the roof.

    Gramm also created the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act, which got rid of the laws that seperate banking, insurance and brokerage activities in America. The Gramm Act was touted as a new way to protect consumer privacy, but the real meat on the Act's bones was banking deregulation. Essentially, this Act did away with laws written after the Great Depression to protect us from another Wall Street/Banking Industry collapse. That's right, Gramm stripped the system of it's safe guards nine years ago, and guess what? The value of the dollar has nose-dived, four major economic institutions have failed, Wall Street is unstable, and we are in a worsening recession.

    Notably, the US investment banks that gained the most from the Enron Loophole and from the Gramm Act contributed more than a million dollars to Gramm's campaign.

    Currently Gramm is Vice Chairman of UBS, the Swiss Bank that came up with the idea of "death bonds." Worse, though, UBS is involved in a scam where they sold auction rate securities to American customers. Auction rate securities are supposed to be as safe as cash, but the way UBS did it, the fees garnished by their in-house investment bankers were intentionally higher than the return on the securities, ripping off their American customers. The Massachusetts Attorney General has already filed charges against UBS, and private brokers world-wide have dropped UBS stock. UBS is forecasted to lose 82.91% of it's value in 2008. We are talking about the corporate bank where Gramm is Vice Chairman. Looking at his track record there and at the havoc he has wrought on the US economy through the Senate Banking Committee, it's clear that Gramm is a either criminal or grossly incompetent.

    Now McCain wants nothing to do with Gramm, wants us to forget Gramm has been a key player on McCain's team. Gramm was McCain's campaign CO-CHAIR and LEADING ECONOMIC ADVISOR. Previously, McCain had said that he planned to appoint Gramm as SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.

    With Gramm as McCain's leading economic advisor, now you know why economists and analysts say that McCain's economic policy plans are untenable.

  • Posted By: Judith Evers @ 07/12/2008 7:38:24 PM

    Why does it not occur to anyone that people who are losing their homes to foreclosure are the ones who need the help? Many of them would willingly pay to keep their homes if the lenders would adjust terms to more affordable payments. Lenders won't adjust mortgages to make them affordable. This is where the government needs to step in. The government policies should be directed to helping people stay in their homes. Judith Evers, New Smyrna Beach, Florida

    • Posted By: Nins @ 07/13/2008 1:28:51 AM

      Dear Judith, I really agree with you. If the Fed had bailed out the homeowners, there would have been no need to bail out the banks.

      Just a word to the wise: you probably shouldn't use your full name and town on a public blog. There are some real nuts on this website.

  • Posted By: cutter37 @ 07/12/2008 7:54:01 PM

    If the Gov't. had never gotten into the social engineering business (promoting and pushing for everyone to own a home, many of whom should be apartment dwellers-not the end of the world you know) we might well of not had this "subprime" (read: poor risk) fiasco. Now the imbeciles in Congress conduct hearings to deflect blame from their own incompetence.

  • Posted By: Judith Evers @ 07/12/2008 7:36:07 PM

    I don't suppose it has occurred to anyone that the people who are losing their homes to forclosure would like to be offered better mortgage terms so they can keep the houses and keep paying for them! But the banks won't do that. This is where government needs to step in.
    Judith Evers, New Smyrna Beach, Florida

  • Posted By: DiamondJim @ 07/12/2008 6:36:28 PM

    So neocons "belly up to the bar", pay your tab and stop your babblings and
    excuses. You've had since the COWBOY to straighten things out.....YOU FAILED

  • Posted By: DiamondJim @ 07/12/2008 6:32:11 PM

    Just as a footnote the (unregulated ) "free market" that the neocons worshipped (see: Adam Smith), brought the billions of dollars of fraudulent mortgages and is now self-destructing. By buying out Fannie and Freddie (loaded with "sub-prime" mortgages) and bailing out the failing Investment Banks (also unregulated) they are dumping the losses on the American public....losses generated by greed.

    So this is your Utopia ?
    BTW I mentioned Adam s Smith who acknowledged that his "free market" could be distorted by other (non-economic) tendencies like gredd and possible social distortions caused by the concentration of wealth. The neocons forgot to tell us about that....and guess what we got !
    If you read the neocon literature, like "the contract with America", you can easilly catch the intent to maintain US power in the Middle East....hence 9.11 fit conveniently in their intenttions.. Military invasion. The plans to invade Iraq were drawn up well before 9.11.
    All we had to do was falsify a little intelligence, like WMDs a nuclear threat, and a haven for fanatics. Hussein was very much afraid about those very same fanatics.....see-Iran / Iraq war.

  • Posted By: DiamondJim @ 07/12/2008 6:15:23 PM

    jBLACKwell and techres:
    You think only in linear terms. Black or white, rich or poor, Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal.
    Guess what thanks to your neocons it's not just the liberals who don't have a dime. The increasing concentration of wealth in the top 10% is shifting wealth, and living standards, not just from the poor but also the declining middle class that is the basis of our democracy.
    Given your allegiance to the greed of the neocon capitalism you would even sacrifice your country, making it an elitist countryclub.
    Remember when Marie Antoinette said "let them eat cake". Typical of your thinking.
    The "government inaction' is just the use of an old scapegoat. Reagon and the Republican right wing that followed are to cause of inaction because they DIDN"T WANT REGULATION. They made the government fail. It's part of their philosophy.
    To Thomas:
    Can you imagine our financial position if the neocons, advocating fiscal responsibility while running constants deficits resulting in a $9 trillion dollar debt, had only practiced what they preached..
    Foreigners , especially China , own us.
    The Social Security System and Medicaid system "real money" was tapped off to the Federal Budget, and replaced by IOU's (Fed securities).
    If the neocons were true conservatives that method of "budgeting"would be out of the question. And both system would have "real assets". It's like you tapping into your savings plan and inserting an IOU to yourself. Then you spenfd the cash.

    Conservatives sured preached a good sermon, but their actions betry them.

  • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 07/12/2008 5:38:34 PM

    The funny thing is, if there weren't conservatives, the left wouldn't have a friggin DIME. Who would a nation full of Democrats tax, themselves? I'd vote to disband the USA if we could separate everyone.

  • Posted By: gozo @ 07/12/2008 1:16:16 PM

    We have a problem. FREDDIE and FANNIE started the fire.....Paulson outed another bunny......The subprime debaucle started with the governments influence on the so-called corporations that lost US backing and tricled down to the so called banks (hedgefunds (another fraudulant system that over leveraged).....and now they are left holding 42.3 % of worthless paper......Well its worse than that.....So now the government is going to back corrupted corporations so they can save the pensions and grace with the foreign soverign governments who thought they were investing in a sure thing....... Senator Dodd tells investors and the tax payers they can't lose because there really is value in the real estate.....well, will be value after we drag ourselves out of financial collapse......our government destroyed our financial system along with the insiders who were allowed to suck billions out of our market and government. It's all on your back.....and it was all about paying the high cost of war and corruption.........how sad......

    • Posted By: THE DUCK @ 07/12/2008 4:15:39 PM

      i got more but this thing only goes to 3000 so got to figure how send it milkman19462003@yahoo.comjust ask for the DUCK

      • Posted By: THE DUCK @ 07/12/2008 5:37:04 PM

        as far as gramm goes folks did you notice when you get to the bottom of the pack of gramms its always crumbs its great that were worried about an you know just like the last 2 idiots who ran the stock market think they would make great checker players in jail with the last four leader we had running this country get it gramm cracker not worth takin about crumbs as usual

      • Posted By: THE DUCK @ 07/12/2008 5:15:28 PM

        no working maybe this gov get the picture we have had enough of thier crap. lets get bthe right people in jail the ones running it and as far as the ones on the ballot get real we need a president thats not afraid to turn the jail door keys we neeed to get out of other peoples business as we dont belong overseas we dont take care of our business right for gods sake dont tell others how to run their country our whole sociaol network out of synic fix our s first and stop feediing those over thier they ll comaround thire low life people run by low life people they dont know anything else kill kill kill let them grow their own food then they wont have time to kill as far as thoise puc of gangs over thier osama bin dorky and his social degenerates and others lets get to cleanin g house war is war start by letting our troops do thiewr job kill the vermin and get out no food they will get hungry fast . we the people better start thinking about our selves and our kids and grasnd kids we were sold out to these foringers lets get off our butts and take back our great country and no more oil profits light up them things over there and dont send help then theyll find out were not a weak nation and deserve respect its sad your right its just we got lazy people gettin fat here and the gov knows it

    • Posted By: THE DUCK @ 07/12/2008 4:12:51 PM

      i agree whole heartedly as you say you just need to say it the way it is the goverment of the u s a sold our country to forigen countires then stole social security then generously help themselves to the oil profits by allowing gas to go thur the roof and bleed the rest of our lively hood fron the american people . this is what we get for sending our troops in to help 5 or 6 world countrys who got nothing better to done then kill each other i ll start this you can add the rest iran iraq afganistan etc. what are we doing over there in the first place oh teaching these low lifes how to kill our people who came there to help them there were some honest ones just ask the soilders who died already american tears on foriegn soil again we still havnt learned there a barbaric system people who just cant see there leaders are murders killers distorers of there own children . the sad part is we the people here ( constitution readit ) tell our gov. what to do as we pay them there all no good and its time to clean house . lets get out of there problems and let them do what they do best be the low life they are as they have showed they are incapable of being proper people . this country should collect all debts owed it then maybe the dollar will get back to where it belongs on top the shame falls on this government for allowing our dollar to be come worthless and our foods unsafe to it our water filthy gees this sounds like our government dont it .BUSH PUT THE freeze on all outside companies and our included untill all prices reset to before the recession the depression the disgrace we have now get the rich oil companies to while your at it PROFETEERING AT THE COST OF THE NATION IS AGAINST THE LAW FOR SHORT LOCKUP ALL EXXON ALL STOCK MARKET PEOPLE WHO HELP ANY ONE OR COMPANY GET RICH AT OUR EXPENSIVE . my only sugestion is simply FREEZE ECONOMY NO SHIPPING ANY FOOD AS OF NOW TO ANY PLACE OTHER THEN THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY UNTIL OUR DOLLAR IS BACK ON TOP ANY ALL OTHER MONY IS WELL WORTHLESS AS IT SHOULD BE AND GO FIND A REAL PERSON TO GET US BACK ON TOP THE ONES WEVE HAD FOR THE LAST 14 YRS ARE LIARS THEIVES PERVERTS HAVE WE AS A COUNTRY FOUNDED ON TRUTH INTEGRETY AND HONESTY AND LEADERSHIP TO SET GOOD ENTHICS FOR OTHERS GOT AS LOW AS THE THE COUNTRIES WE DEFEND GENOCY MURDER KILLING DISTROYING ALL THE CHILDERN NAMES BRAZIL PAKASTAN AFGANISTAN IRAN YOU KNOW THE REST HOW ABOUT OUR COUNTRY KIDS STARVING OLD PEOPLE STARVING NO HOMES NO LIFE IS THIS IS ALL THANKS TO THIS GREAT GOVERNMENT OF OURS LETS NOT BY ANYMORE GAS OR FUEL IN THIS COUNTRY SAY ON 1ST OF AUG 08 AND 10TH 08 AND SHUT THIS CROOKED SYSTEM DOWN NO WORK NO MONEY WO

      • Posted By: THE DUCK @ 07/12/2008 5:25:48 PM

        were a great country just pick loosey leaders llets worry about us get our troops home to you know where with the rest of this crap lets fix us 1st our kids no school or in bad schools with bad kids our kids not getting enough food i know i just drove thur the lower states bad housing animal food to eat not enough money to run a homne right we got all that oil in the ground in barrels gov. get it on the refiners winters commin give it free to all americans now dont worry about war the dead cant fight get it we got a sick gov and time to get them all a laxative and jail cell we did it for saddam why oh forgot he got the rope dont we have rope here weell god bless america and its people and all you folks that arnt afraid to tell it like it is so far i seen enough people for the senate now need more for congress keepup the good work and again thanks gozo good job well done the duck

  • Posted By: techresmgt @ 07/12/2008 5:24:08 PM

    All of the economic disasters have not occurred in isolation. Government policies, government inaction on energy policy, government malfeasance, government bungling just about everything they touch has brought us to this point. To say otherwise is fallacy. Today Bush is bashing and accusing Congress of inaction regarding opening oil field exploration. Hello, if our President had any imagination, vision, and real leadership, we would have been working hard on alternative energy sources in the year 2000. Blaming Congress is helping no one. This is the most frustrating and irritating Administrations in recent memory.

    • Posted By: ThomasAtwood @ 07/12/2008 5:30:55 PM

      Can you imagine if all the money spent in Iraq ($500 billion or more) was used instead to provide subsidies for solar conversion, plug-in hybrid vehicles, building windmills, etc. Can you just imagine where we would be as a country?

  • Posted By: ThomasAtwood @ 07/12/2008 2:56:15 PM

    Thank you Nins for your concise explanation of the role Senator Phil Gramm played in deregulating the investment banking industry. The current state of economical affairs in the United States is not about Democrats and Republicans -- we all know there are some on both sides who are culpable. It is about individuals like Gramm, the head of the Senate Banking Committee who wield too much power and are way too susceptible to corruption. What I do not understand is -- why does this country only have 100 Senators? That is 100 people who have their fingers on $3 trillion of the people's money every year! It is simply too much power in too few hands. The Senate should be expanded to 1,000 and the House to 10,000. Then let's see how easy the lobbyists can control that many people.

    • Posted By: Scott4444 @ 07/12/2008 4:11:00 PM

      Where did you get the idea to expand the numbers in the House and Senate to lower the influence of special interest groups? This seems like a good idea, but is there any data supporting this and where did you come up with the exact numbers?

      • Posted By: ThomasAtwood @ 07/12/2008 4:51:50 PM

        I wish I could provide you with some quantitative analysis, Scott, but I do not have any. The yearly budget figure of $3 trillion is accurate, but I just picked the numbers regarding expansion of Congress out of the air. I recently had a discussion with a friend who is a historian. He mentioned Lincoln's famous words, "government of the people, by the people, for the people. . ." and how far removed the present government is from the people. It was Lord Acton who originally wrote "power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." And that is what we have in Washington -- absolute power. The only way that I can see to disperse the power is to expand the Congress. But you can bet that Congress itself would never propose such a course of action. This would have to come from the people, by way of Constitutional Amendment. Term limits would be a good addition to such an amendment.

        • Posted By: ThomasAtwood @ 07/12/2008 5:06:07 PM

          Let me just add an example of absolute power. Saddam Hussein or Mugabe in Zimbabwe -- these are two examples of absolute power, a very small group of individuals controlling everything. Well, given that Iraq or Zimbabwe are a fraction of the size of the USA, you can see how 100 Senators who control $3 trillion far exceeds the absolute power of these other regimes. That's $30 billion per Senator each and every year! It is obvious that is too much control over too much money, too easily influenced.

          • Posted By: ThomasAtwood @ 07/12/2008 5:22:56 PM

            After further consideration, perhaps I am looking at this in the wrong way. Instead of expanding the numbers in Congress, it might be better to create subdivisions within the states that each Congressman must answer to. Think of a tree diagram. Each Senator and Representative must follow the majority lead of ten elected subordinates who must in turn each follow the direction of ten subordinates below them, etc. until you get to a level where the subordinates are always accessible to the general public. This would certainly decentralize the power base and return the power to the people.

    • Posted By: Nins @ 07/12/2008 3:17:31 PM

      Thanks, Thomas. I agree with you that both Democrats and Republicans are to blame. I am a Republican myself, therefore I feel justified in going after the GOP to take responsibility for their actions. I am beyond dissapointed that the Republican nominee is John McCain, and man who is "in bed" with Phil Gramm, the author of our financial woes. If McCain is elected, how can America expect to resolve this dire economic situation? Therefore, I am voting for Obama. I do not agree with everything Obama has to say, but I have read both candidates' economic platforms and Obama's is far superior.

      People get obsessed with the moral issues of religion, abortion rights, gay rights, etc. These are important issues and we definitely need to collectively address them. However, to make your Presidential choice based on these moral issues RIGHT NOW when our BANKS ARE FAILING is idiotic. We have to face our economic problems head on, today. McCain, by aligning himself with Gramm, has shown that he is part of the problem, not a man with solutions.

  • Posted By: Bettina77 @ 07/12/2008 3:45:17 PM

    I put myself through Real Estate school one year ago. I can recall our instructors telling us that, many of the major government- backed mortgage companies/products are "sacred cows." They tried to reassure us that "whatever" happened with the economy, would not touch two hallowed institutions: Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae! We were told to steer our prospective clients to these institutions, if they were not good candidates for conventional loans. In 2007, we were taught that the present lending cap was between $400,000 - $500,000 per loan. Now, one year later, I read that the government in its' infinate wisdom, has allowed the cap to rise to OVER $717,000. What were they thinking? My household allowance hasn't doubled in one year: how about yours? By, the way, I have yet to sit for my broker's licensing exam. The Real Estate industry has become, "too speculative." In the present economic climate, our family NEEDS to count on "X" amount of money coming in each month. Yes, the American people should be calling for the impeachment of George Bush. I'm not a political scientist/historian, but the last time I checked the American Constitution, our presidents are REQUIRED to consult Congress and receive their blessing BEFORE declaring war. Mr. Bush didn't bother with that "informality," back in 2003 when he invaded Bhagdad. A greater EVIL is that American taxpayers are being FORCED to finance an unjust war, when many of them do not believe in the "mission"! (I count myself among them). Hmm, let's reason this one out: not only do the american people pay for the war; many of them are struggling to survive: ie. feed their families; put gas in their cars; keep their homes. . . . If we are critical of third world dictators who systematically starve their citizens for their own political/personal gain ~ then we should be OUTRAGED with Mr. Bush. Hasn't his economic/foreign policy decisions amounted to our inability to keep up with inflation. Oh, and can someone kindly inform our president that Saudi Arabia IS NOT OUR FRIEND? The billions they take from us in oil profits, are THEN shared with various terroist organizations that they harbor, allowing them to train Al Quaida forces, who in turn, would attack us again given the opportunity. Instead, Mr. Bush travels to Saudi Arabia to kiss the royal family's rings! The Saudi's are no more our friends ~ than Iran is a friend to Israel. It would seem Mr. Bush never played Stratego as a kid; nor did he read the "Spy versus Spy" cartoon in "Mad" Magazine! Having done so, he would surely be able to better recognize our enemies. Thank you for posting my diatribe. And thank you, Mr. Gross, for telling it like it is.

    Kim Garcia. Albuquerque, New Mexico.

    • Posted By: DiamondJim @ 07/12/2008 4:43:50 PM

      Bush can only read at lower elementary level. That's why he chose to read to them on 9.11

      • Posted By: ipup124 @ 07/12/2008 5:03:53 PM

        The idea of having congress declare war went away after WWII Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Desert Storm, Afganistan, Iraq. None are "Wars" The constitution was flushed down the toilet in the 1930's. All national programs - Medicare, Social Security, Income Tax, etc. all unconstitutional. Wha's different now?

  • Posted By: Nins @ 07/12/2008 4:58:22 PM

    Know why McCain wants to distance himself from former Senator Phil Gramm? It 's not because of Gramm's obnoxious remarks calling Americans "a nation of whiners" who are in "a mental recession." Those remarks were so ascerbic that they may have been made just to give McCain an excuse for distancing himself from Gramm. This issue is a lot deeper than it looks on the surface.

    When Gramm was a Senator he was Chairman of the Banking Committee. He pushed through the legislation now known as the "Enron Loophole." This loophole allowed US investment banks to bypass Federal regulations governing futures trading, and is the reason why the investment banks were able to falsely inflate the prices of oil, wheat, corn and other commodities through massive futures trading, causing your costs of gas, heating oil and food to go through the roof.

    Gramm also created the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act, which got rid of the laws that seperate banking, insurance and brokerage activities in America. Essentially, this Act did away with the laws written after the Great Depression to protect us from another Wall Street/Banking Industry collapse. That's right, Gramm stripped the system of it's safe guards nine years ago, and guess what? The value of the dollar has nose-dived, four major American economic institutions have failed, Wall Street is unstable, and we are in a worsening recession.

    Now you could say that this isn't Gramm's fault, how could he know the outcome of his actions? However, it turns out the investment banks that benefited from the Enron loophole and the Gramm Act gave more than a million dollars to Gramm's campaign.

    Currently Gramm is Vice Chairman of UBS, the Swiss Bank that came up with the idea of "death bonds." Worse, though, UBS is involved in a scam in which they sold auction rate securities to American customers. Auction rate securities are supposed to be as safe as cash, but the way UBS did it, the fees garnished by their in-house investment bankers were intentionally higher than the return on the securities, ripping off their American customers. The Attorney General of the State of Massachusetts has already filed charges against UBS, and private brokers world-wide have dropped UBS stock. UBS is forecasted to lose 82.91% of it's value in 2008. We are talking about the corporate bank where Gramm is Vice Chairman. Looking at his track record there and on the havoc he has wrought on the US economy through the Senate Banking Committee, it is clear that either Gramm is a criminal, or grossly incompetent.

    Now McCain wants nothing to do with Gramm, wants us to forget Gramm has been a key player on McCain's team. Gramm was McCain's campaign CO-CHAIR and LEADING ECONOMIC ADVISER. Previously, McCain had said that he planned to appoint Gramm as SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.

    With Gramm as McCain's leading economic adviser, now you know why economists and analysts say that McCain's economic policy plans are untenable.

  • Posted By: Nins @ 07/12/2008 4:55:18 PM

    Know why McCain wants to distance himself from former Senator Phil Gramm? It 's not because of Gramm's obnoxious remarks calling Americans "a nation of whiners" who are in "a mental recession." Those remarks were so ascerbic that they may have been made just to give McCain an excuse for distancing himself from Gramm. This issue is a lot deeper than it looks on the surface.

    When Gramm was a Senator he was Chairman of the Banking Committee. He pushed through the legislation now known as the "Enron Loophole." This loophole allowed US investment banks to bypass Federal regulations governing futures trading, and is the reason why the investment banks were able to falsely inflate the prices of oil, wheat, corn and other commodities through massive futures trading, causing your costs of gas, heating oil and food to go through the roof.

    Gramm also created the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act, which got rid of the laws that seperate banking, insurance and brokerage activities in America. Essentially, this Act did away with the laws written after the Great Depression to protect us from another Wall Street/Banking Industry collapse. That's right, Gramm stripped the system of it's safe guards nine years ago, and guess what? The value of the dollar has nose-dived, four major American economic institutions have failed, Wall Street is unstable, and we are in a worsening recession.

    Now you could say that this isn't Gramm's fault, how could he know the outcome of his actions? However, it turns out the investment banks that benefited from the Enron loophole and the Gramm Act gave more than a million dollars to Gramm's campaign.

    Currently Gramm is Vice Chairman of UBS, the Swiss Bank that came up with the idea of "death bonds." Worse, though, UBS is involved in a scam in which they sold auction rate securities to American customers. Auction rate securities are supposed to be as safe as cash, but the way UBS did it, the fees garnished by their in-house investment bankers were intentionally higher than the return on the securities, ripping off their American customers. The Attorney General of the State of Massachusetts has already filed charges against UBS, and private brokers world-wide have dropped UBS stock. UBS is forecasted to lose 82.91% of it's value in 2008. We are talking about the corporate bank where Gramm is Vice Chairman. Looking at his track record there and on the havoc he has wrought on the US economy through the Senate Banking Committee, it is clear that either Gramm is a criminal, or grossly incompetent.

    Now McCain wants nothing to do with Gramm, wants us to forget Gramm has been a key player on McCain's team. Gramm was McCain's campaign CO-CHAIR and LEADING ECONOMIC ADVISER. Previously, McCain had said that he planned to appoint Gramm as SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.

    With Gramm as McCain's leading economic adviser, now you know why economists and analysts are saying that McCain's economic policy plans are unt

  • Posted By: DiamondJim @ 07/12/2008 4:39:43 PM

    Why is anyone surprised at the Bush neo-cons' continuing to try to privitize govermental agencies ?
    The faulty REaganomics is still in place despite the massive increase in our national debt (RR said "deficits didn't matter") Spend away.
    As for the privitation schemes it has been pushed in Social Security, Medicare, medicaid, a privitized "national health plan.
    Continued "deregulation", which failed to recognize that capitalists were not only driven by "profits" but also by greed, excessive wealth, and the accompanying "excessive" power. Lobbyists and "fund raising committees" are just the prostitutes that infest the nation's and state capitols.
    The recent sale of fraudulent mortgage backed securities indicate the absence of adequate regulation. The SEC and the Fed are agents of corporate business.
    Re: the perverse buy-out/bail out of private sectop Invesment banks at the cost and risk to the public, an unprecedented move by the FED which only insured commercial bankks under Fed regulations.
    So why not sell Fannt and Freddie and let the taxpayer foot the loss.

  • Posted By: DiamondJim @ 07/12/2008 4:39:08 PM

    Why is anyone surprised at the Bush neo-cons' continuing to try to privitize govermental agencies ?
    The faulty REaganomics is still in place despite the massive increase in our national debt (RR said "deficits didn't matter") Spend away.
    As for the privitation schemes it has been pushed in Social Security, Medicare, medicaid, a privitized "national health plan.
    Continued "deregulation", which failed to recognize that capitalists were not only driven by "profits" but also by greed, excessive wealth, and the accompanying "excessive" power. Lobbyists and "fund raising committees" are just the prostitutes that infest the nation's and state capitols.
    The recent sale of fraudulent mortgage backed securities indicate the absence of adequate regulation. The SEC and the Fed are agents of corporate business.
    Re: the perverse buy-out/bail out of private sectop Invesment banks at the cost and risk to the public, an unprecedented move by the FED which only insured commercial bankks under Fed regulations.
    So why not sell Fannt and Freddie and let the taxpayer foot the loss.

  • Posted By: gozo @ 07/12/2008 4:12:58 PM

    And if you choose to commit fraud or break the law.......you should be held accountable and pay your debt to society.......IT'S THE LAW......you play you pay!!!!!!!!!Stop making the innocent people in this country pay for your crimes and misdomeaners..........Congress is so rapped up in this that they refuse to inforce the Constitution.........It is unbelievable!!!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: Silverfox @ 07/12/2008 4:09:52 PM

    Well, folks....where does it all end? Probably not until out esteemed politicians sell America out completely down to the bare bones. Then they will follow the money they stole and invested in foreign countries so they can rob and pillage those countries as well. I have lived from the 1940's on up and have seen it all. No one can save us from ourselves. The new ritual is "get mine" and to hell with everything and everyone else. It
    makes no difference who is elected come November....the landslide has already begun and the young people of today are too busy struggling to "get mine" than try and save the place from which they think they will get it. There needs to be some sort of peaceful revolution and our government needs to be radically changed. We need to take our Country back. But I'll never see it. Doubt anyone else will either.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse