Baby 101

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: RmeBraatt @ 07/15/2008 10:56:41 AM

    I think its awful that you make having a baby at a young age glamerous....I know its not.....you left out the part where you have to stay home when all your friends go out...how many guys dont want to date you because you have a child.....childcare issues....healthcare issues, and all sorts of other things.....You are trying to make it look cool, when in reality for most "normal" people like myself and others...its actually VERY hard and you sacrafice a lot.

  • Posted By: seagull#2 @ 07/15/2008 10:55:49 AM

    That whole family is nothing but the latest trend in hollywood trash to cash marketing. Give me a break 1 million dollars for pictures of her illegitimate child? and people pay it? It's an American embarrassment!
    These so called celebrities are too rich to be responsible for them selves and this just brings down our American values even more! and yet we allow our young people to look up to these morally challenged children!childre

  • Posted By: teriw77 @ 07/15/2008 10:54:58 AM

    Teenagers are getting pregnant everyday and because Jamie Lynn is a star everyone wants to blame her for other teen mistakes because most parents don't want to look at themselves and believe they are part of the problem of thier own tweens or teens. Teens have been having babies for decades and society use to hide it because it was so immoral. Now that we as a society are able to talk about teens having babies lets do something about it to prevent it and help the teens instead of criticizing them. Most teens and tweens parents think there kids are perfect and never talk to them about sex and what can happen when you engage in sex because you are so blind to think that my kid can't be doing that. Well I have to let you know more tweens and teens are having sex now than ever not just because of what they see on TV it's also peer pressue from their friends, boyfriends are just want to be cool. Majority of the females do it because they think it's the only way to make that guy like them when in reality it's not but no one has never sat down to tell her that you do not have to give your body to make a boy like you. Please let's start educating our tweens and teens about sex and the responability that follows such as unexpected pregnancy, STD's and even AIDS.

  • Posted By: serenity45 @ 07/15/2008 10:54:58 AM

    Ok let's have this conversation in 5 or so years when she is pulling a Britney. This DOES glamourize teen pregnancy, she IS going to have people following her and her baby, she IS going to be under a microscope, and she will eventually crack. Being a teen mom isn't fun. And the only reason it is "OK" (no pun intended) is because of her name. No one cares about if you can pay your bill or not. Every woman is optimistic is about raising a child but it isn't easy A NO AGE!! And when the reality of it all sets in...you will see!!

  • Posted By: Starla143 @ 07/15/2008 10:54:50 AM

    Whether it is Jamie Lynn or any other teen pregnancy. It isn;t glamourous by all means nor cute. Having a baby is alot of responsbility and worse when you have to do it alone. The difference here is money (Jamie Lynn's) baby will not have to suffer the hardships of most (teen mothers). For those out there that think that Welfare will take care of you. (think again). It doesn't pay enough for rent, food and other basic needs. Why bring a baby into the WORLD to suffer. Your baby can't live on "LOVE" alone. And to those DEADBEAT dads out there (you made your children and while you were having fun) you failed to remember your BABY. It is your resposibility just as much as the girls. Don't walk away (you say your a MAN, be a MAN when it counts).
    Get a job and SUPPORT your kids; like a REAL MAN! You talk the talk; but are you ready to be REAL.

  • Posted By: Dire @ 07/15/2008 10:54:18 AM

    I agree with most of what driven1010 said: I think that she should give up her Nickolodeon contract. She's a mother now; Zoey 101 is a child's role and she is no longer a child anymore, and needs to accept the reality that that position. I disagree with driven in that she bemoans the liberal world aspect of it - I would be considered a liberal, and I certainly think that it is inappropriate the amount of starstruck baby attention that has been given this young lady. I don't think it should be like the 40's/50's, where pregnant girls were sent away to have babies, forced to give them up, and then quietly brought back to the household in shame. But she stupidly got knocked up, and luckily she lives in a magical world where she doesn't have to worry about her parents kicking her out, doesn't have to worry about money, doesn't really have to worry about who's taking care of the baby - that's NOT a good example for our kids, and THAT is exactly what they will see: pregnancy without consequences. A lot of young girls already live under the delusion that someday they'll be rich or famous - the delusion that they can have babies and everything will be romantic and fabulous is even worst. However, if parents are doing what they're supposed to be doing, this would be an excellent chance to discuss the difference between reality, fiction and priviledge and how it relates to teen pregnancy.

  • Posted By: Nicolepatrice @ 07/15/2008 10:53:36 AM

    And another thing,,,,who gave anyone the right to put down this child,,,calling her a slut,,,,she is exactly what they say a CHILD ! someone should have been paying more attention MOTHER DEAREST!

  • Posted By: RmeBraatt @ 07/15/2008 10:53:34 AM

    I think its awful that you make having a baby at a young age glamerous....I know its not.....you left out the part where you have to stay home when all your friends go out...how many guys dont want to date you because you have a child.....childcare issues....healthcare issues, and all sorts of other things.....You are trying to make it look cool, when in reality for most "normal" people like myself and others...its actually VERY hard and you sacrafice a lot.

  • Posted By: sexycrz@yahoo.com @ 07/15/2008 10:47:31 AM

    The only thing i can do is wish her luck. This is just the beginning of a long journey for her. Hopefully she doesn't follow her sisters foot steps. As myself I was a young mother not at 16. And unfortunetly it put my whole life on hold. About her setting a good example for our kids of course not but who are we to judge her?
    This is where our job as a parent comes in. So lets stop blamming celebs for what happens outside.

    • Posted By: arzola3 @ 07/15/2008 10:53:27 AM

      nobody is judging Jaime Lynn here, its the magazine that is being judged...they are glamourizing something that shouldnt be...they are not taking responsibility for there part in society...the media has a big impact on our society and time and time again they DO NOT take responsibility for that and now they are hurting our CHILDREN because of it....wake up and smell the coffee!!!

  • Posted By: babygr1L @ 07/15/2008 10:53:26 AM

    I had my son 2 days before my 18th birthday. There is a big differance between a teen like Jamie Lynn and other teen moms. I didn't have nannies to get up in the middle of the night to take care of a screaming baby or someone to hande him over to so I could take a 10 minute shower. I think she needs to realize it's alot harder to be a teen mom in normal circumstances. When teens look at her they see a "storybook ending." I was lucky enough to have a supporting boyfriend who is now my husband and the father of my 3 children but not all teens end up so lucky. I have friends who ended up working at a job for $8 an hour and barely able to feed their children. I think OK magazine has the right to do a story on anything they find intresting but they should have made sure they were responsible enough to do a story on a teen mom who wasn't fed off a silver spoon her whole lifeso other teens can see the whole picture.

  • Posted By: suzeeque @ 07/15/2008 10:53:05 AM

    The article mentions how, in contrast to Britney, Jamie Lynn made "smart choices"..Hmmm, how is putting one's self in the situation of becoming pregnant at 16 a "smart choice"? And, aside from incest or rape, teen pregnancy is
    a choice - it becomes one once the participants choose to have sex. This is
    not the 1950's - it is not longer plausable to claim that one did not know that
    part A plus part B equals Baby C. It's no longer a taboo subject.

    Jamie Lynn may be fortunate in that she has the financial means to raise her child, but money is not the full picture. She is only 17 and presumeably the
    child's father is young, as well. Money does not buy maturity (in fact, don't we
    usually see the opposite in most celebs. with money!), but I suppose it will buy
    responsible nannys and lots of 'things' so the magazines can take their unstaged photos. Perhaps they could come back and shoot some footage of the day after Jamie spends several nights up with a colicky baby, laundry undone, dishes by the sink and circles under her un-made up eyes.

    For that matter, maybe we could see some of JLo or Angelina that have not been so staged. Enquiring minds want to know, as the old mag states.

  • Posted By: doug11111 @ 07/15/2008 10:52:46 AM

    Great, so now celebs are having babies for the ???it??? factor. What happens when ???it??? becomes a child, a teen, an adult? In more cases than not ???it??? becomes part a poster family for despair, destruction, and derailment; money, media and madness. . Too bad the ???it??? factor isn???t a cat. Anyway what???s done is done, hope this does not happen to this ???happy for now??? family and in 5,10,20,50 years they are still going strong.

  • Posted By: rajkay @ 07/15/2008 10:52:38 AM

    Nothing is wrong about Jamie glamourizing her being a teenage mom cause that what she's doing. She is not, at the point in time, thinking about the effects of teenage pregnancy and that should be easy for some of us moms to understand that. She is more overjoyed now at the fact that she could produce something or someone rather, so precious and adorable. It is up to the teens who are fans of Jamie spears to protect themselves considering their individual situations in comparison to Jamie's. Jamie is not promoting teenage pregnancy but in my opinion, promoting the joy of being a mother.

  • Posted By: judgejudy @ 07/15/2008 9:15:39 AM

    This is media at its worst. When the next "pregnancy pact" comes up in some middle or high school, I think OK Magazine might do well to kick in for child support.

    • Posted By: LawyerDad @ 07/15/2008 10:52:32 AM

      Right on, JudgeJudy. Keep up the good work.

      LawyerDad

    • Posted By: Stunner @ 07/15/2008 9:40:15 AM

      hahaha That is awesome!!!

  • Posted By: AngelicKR @ 07/15/2008 10:52:23 AM

    Regardless of what OK! says, this is glamorizing teen pregnancy just by having this bright smiling little girl on the cover with her baby. It sends a very confusing message to girls that this is ok...life can be happy and normal again with a baby in the picture. And that is simply not true. I'm 27 years old with no children, so it didn't dawn on me how bad this cover really is until someone else mentioned it and said they wouldn't want their daughter to get the wrong idea. I thought, wow, if I was a mom with a young daughter, this cover would worry me too. No matter what story you tell about how this girl is a special circumstance because of her money, no teen is actually paying attention or reading into that part. All they see is a 17 year old mom who's still got the guy and now has the pretty little baby....and that's not how it usually goes. Girls need to know that motherhood is HARD, BOYS LEAVE!!, and life changes when you become a teen mom....point blank.

  • Posted By: Guita_P @ 07/15/2008 10:52:08 AM

    Between this and the movie Juno, I wonder where we'll be in 18-20 years. Or rather, where will these kids of kids be? Having more kids? This makes parenting look like getting a puppy - "Ohh! She's sooo cute!" But what about the rest of their lives?

  • Posted By: 1hotmama @ 07/15/2008 10:17:16 AM

    As a Young mom myself being only 20 and haveing a 3 yr old, i was the same age Jamie Lynn is when i had my daughter (and we did use birth control but that isnt 100% effective), my parents told me to wait had all the sex education classes to, but things happen, my daughters dad and i have been together for 4 1/2 yrs now, and are engaged, i am niether for or against this article, i does give teenagers the wrong image on how in a sense tough it is for a young person to be a parent all the ups and downs, I do how ever think that Jamie will be a better mom than her big sister britney. there is usually one the family i was faced with many roads or paths to take, but having a supporting and loving family and a best friend i have made it through just fine. I finished highschool, and am in my 3 year of college and let me tell you it has been a bumpy road but we made it. To me Jamie is just any other girl and i was ridiculed and what not when i was pregnant but you get over it and through it. i havent read the article just had someone brief me on it and read this online thing. i wish all the best of luck to jamie and her baby, i do think they should wait a few years to be married, my fiance and i are getting married next fall, cant wait. Give it a few years girl and see how things work between you and the dad.

    • Posted By: YouMustThink @ 07/15/2008 10:51:59 AM

      I can see by your misspelling that you didn't finish school. Not a good example for your child!

  • Posted By: doug11111 @ 07/15/2008 10:51:51 AM

    Great, so now celebs are having babies for the ???it??? factor. What happens when ???it??? becomes a child, a teen, an adult? In more cases than not ???it??? becomes part a poster family for despair, destruction, and derailment; money, media and madness. . Too bad the ???it??? factor isn???t a cat. Anyway what???s done is done, hope this does not happen to this ???happy for now??? family and in 5,10,20,50 years they are still going strong.

  • Posted By: Guita_P @ 07/15/2008 10:51:32 AM

    Between this and the movie Juno, I wonder where we'll be in 18-20 years. Or rather, where will these kids of kids be? Having more kids? This makes parenting look like getting a puppy - "Ohh! She's sooo cute!" But what about the rest of their lives?

  • Posted By: non-ya @ 07/15/2008 10:51:27 AM

    She's only known for being "Britney's sister" and "Zoey 101", she's only getting money from publicity stunts like her sister now, such as getting pregnant, getting paid a million dollar for an interview, for normal teenager, that won't happen. Teens need to think about their plans for their future and having a baby should be the last thing on their mind, better parenting needs to play a huge role in teenager's life. There are too many people with lack of education having children and living off from the government and from the real tax payers, watch the movie "Idiocracy", that's where our society is heading towards. Well, legally she is considered an adult, she is responsible for another life, so if she does anything wrong, she is getting charge as an adult. Advise to LS: Watch everything you do because the camera's are on you.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse