POLITICS

At Arm’s Length

They used to be close. Kind of. Jesse and Barack's awkward past.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

There was a time when Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama were, to all appearances, good friends. In the '90s, as Obama was rising in Illinoispolitics, he and Jackson would often attend community events and fund-raisers together. They went out to dinner and invited each other to family birthday parties.

In private, though, the relationship was more complicated, and not as close as it seemed. The men had different approaches to politics: Jackson was old school, an unyielding civil-rights-era fighter ever on the lookout for injustice to denounce. Obama—like other younger black politicians who came up after Jim Crow—was less heated, a results-oriented pragmatist who was willing to compromise and who saw the old guard's combative style as obsolete. Obama did not consider the reverend as his mentor; when Obama ran for Congress in 2000, Jackson backed his rival. Yet Obama was careful not to push Jackson away. He was a powerful figure in Chicago, a man better to cultivate than alienate.

Now it's Jackson who has to worry about alienating Obama. After Jackson—foolishly assuming his mike was off between segments on a TV talk show last week—was caught whispering to another guest that he wanted to "cut [Obama's] nuts off" for "talking down to black people," he quickly turned contrite. He said his words were "crude and hurtful." But it was clearly more than just a vulgar offhand remark. As Jackson saw it, Obama's recent comments urging black men to take more responsibility at home were themselves vulgar—not because Obama's sentiments were necessarily wrong, but because Jackson seemed to believe the candidate was publicly demeaning blacks to win favor with whites. In that brief whisper, Jackson conveyed both his own long-simmering misgivings about Obama's style of politics, and the misgivings of one generation of black leaders about the next.

"It's unfortunate that it had to come out this way, but it did have to come out," the Rev. Al Sharpton tells NEWSWEEK. "There's definitely a generational divide going on in the black community, and it's been happening for a while. People who deny it aren't seeing clearly."

Nowhere is that divide more visible than in the relationship between Jackson, 66, and his 42-year-old son, Jesse Jackson Jr. While Jackson Senior somewhat tepidly endorsed Obama's candidacy, Jackson Junior, an Illinois congressman, serves as a national co-chair of the campaign. Last week he delivered an extraordinary rebuke to his father, saying he was "deeply outraged and disappointed in Reverend Jackson's reckless statement." Jackson Junior seemed to take his father's words personally. "Reverend Jackson is my dad and I'll always love him," he said. "He should know how hard that I've worked for the last year and a half [for Obama] … So, I thoroughly reject and repudiate his ugly rhetoric."

Reflecting on the dustup to NEWSWEEK, Rep. Jackson said that his dad's way of doing things is a throwback to another time: "My father and others before him came out of a different tradition and the rules were different, because it was a different game. Sometimes I think the older school loses sight of that. But the point was for us to get to this place, where we were elected to our positions, and that also means following the rules as they are."

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Thewhitesmiter @ 07/22/2008 12:34:38 PM

    Comment: "generational divide"? What a load of hogwash! All it takes is one look at Africa or the inner city and you
    may understand how black men's power struggles become violent whenever money and power are involved. It's just pathetic that the politically correct press cannot state the truth but instead pretends
    that b-tch-ness is something only women are capable of.

  • Posted By: ICYEYES800 @ 07/19/2008 9:47:27 PM

    Comment: BUSH is and always has been a PRESIDENT with some bA^%S..He's tolerated, and might I say honorably, the bashing of the extreme left, those who wish him ill will....BUT, HISTORY will be much more gracious, because among all his credits..EVERYONE has to admit, we haven't had another terrorist attack..Even though most AMERICANS have a short memory and have put it in their distant past...NEXT time it happens, you may be wishing for George W...If Clinton hadn't been so busy keeping interns on their knees in the Oval office, would have had more time to CLEARLY see that the terrorists kept ramping up thier terrorism...SO, we got a guy who KNOWS...when to fold 'em and when to hold 'em....can't blame him for drawing that line and saying NO MORE OF YOUR BULLL>.....I LOVE GEORGE W, I loved his Dad too.....Men with some spine.

  • Posted By: onepoker @ 07/19/2008 1:51:02 PM

    Comment: Floridadave, I think you have a very good point. But also people reading back on the history will not have the context people today have. Many historians will probably look at the sum of Katrina, 911, two wars and come to the conclusion that Bush was unfairly blamed for a bad economy that resulted from major events. They may also see that his proactive stances helped stem the negative effects far sooner than they would have gone away if left alone.

    We have lost 4000 people this is tragic for America but it is no where near the losses of most wars. Our enemy has suffered far greater losses and our president has the safety of our troops as a top priority. History will be written by Liberal historians and they will paint Bush in their own light but when the facts are seperated out by future generations he probably will come out ok.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN

A startup is betting free coffees and groceries will encourage reluctant recyclers.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu