SPONSORED BY:

At Arm’s Length

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

But for the Reverend Jackson, the generational differences with Obama may be as much personal as political—the lament of an elder who believes that he has not been given his due. Friends of Jackson Senior, who asked not to be named talking about private matters, say that the relationship between Jackson and Obama soured as Obama gained stature. Jackson believed Hillary Clinton would win the Democratic nomination. When Obama surged, Jackson began to criticize Obama in public—saying, for example, that John Edwards was a better champion of the poor. "It all comes down to Jesse feeling like Obama didn't really reach out to him for advice during this period," says one of the reverend's friends. "He had run for president and done well. He thought that that should have meant something."

Jackson himself has hinted at these feelings. In an interview with NEWSWEEK last year, he said he rarely spoke to Obama, even though the senator's campaign office wasn't far from his house. "I see the motorcade, so I know when he is in town," Jackson said. In an interview last week, he complained that "we live in an ahistorical country where people don't want to remember or think about what's come before." One of the things people don't remember, Jackson said: his own presidential campaigns in 1984 and 1988, which he believes helped break ground for Obama. "We made great strides in '88," he said. "We beat [Al] Gore and [Dick] Gephardt in areas in Iowa and brought out voters that never felt they had a reason to vote before. These things happened and it is a part of the Obama win as well."

If Jackson can seem wistful about his diminished prominence, he wants it known that he isn't trying to cause trouble for his party or weaken the nominee. "It is ridiculous to think I have any resentment or jealousy toward Obama or any other younger person coming up," he said. "I made a serious mistake … But why would I be jealous? I'm part of the winning team."

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Thewhitesmiter @ 07/22/2008 12:34:38 PM

    "generational divide"? What a load of hogwash! All it takes is one look at Africa or the inner city and you
    may understand how black men's power struggles become violent whenever money and power are involved. It's just pathetic that the politically correct press cannot state the truth but instead pretends
    that b-tch-ness is something only women are capable of.

  • Posted By: ICYEYES800 @ 07/19/2008 9:47:27 PM

    BUSH is and always has been a PRESIDENT with some bA^%S..He's tolerated, and might I say honorably, the bashing of the extreme left, those who wish him ill will....BUT, HISTORY will be much more gracious, because among all his credits..EVERYONE has to admit, we haven't had another terrorist attack..Even though most AMERICANS have a short memory and have put it in their distant past...NEXT time it happens, you may be wishing for George W...If Clinton hadn't been so busy keeping interns on their knees in the Oval office, would have had more time to CLEARLY see that the terrorists kept ramping up thier terrorism...SO, we got a guy who KNOWS...when to fold 'em and when to hold 'em....can't blame him for drawing that line and saying NO MORE OF YOUR BULLL>.....I LOVE GEORGE W, I loved his Dad too.....Men with some spine.

  • Posted By: onepoker @ 07/19/2008 1:51:02 PM

    Floridadave, I think you have a very good point. But also people reading back on the history will not have the context people today have. Many historians will probably look at the sum of Katrina, 911, two wars and come to the conclusion that Bush was unfairly blamed for a bad economy that resulted from major events. They may also see that his proactive stances helped stem the negative effects far sooner than they would have gone away if left alone.

    We have lost 4000 people this is tragic for America but it is no where near the losses of most wars. Our enemy has suffered far greater losses and our president has the safety of our troops as a top priority. History will be written by Liberal historians and they will paint Bush in their own light but when the facts are seperated out by future generations he probably will come out ok.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now