SPONSORED BY:

A Smarter Way to Fight

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

News accounts have described the Colombia rescue as an operation with "no apparent precedent," as The Washington Post called it. But the United States and other countries have occasionally used such ruse tactics against terror groups. A deceptive infiltration strategy of this kind led to the 2004 capture of Ammari Saifi, known as Abderrezak le Para, the head of a North African terrorist network affiliated with Al Qaeda, says the U.S. counterinsurgency expert. While Al Qaeda is no doubt much more difficult to infiltrate than the FARC, John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School, a chief proponent of this strategy, cites the case of Qaeda propagandist Adam Gadahn as proof that it is an "open network." "If a confused young man from California can join up with Al Qaeda, think what professional operatives might do," he says. Vickers said he could not comment on such operations, but acknowledged: "That tactic has been used previously."

Another unheralded U.S. player in Colombia has been John Rendon, who became notorious a few years ago for the role that his consulting company, the Rendon Group, played in selling the war against Iraq. Rendon has pushed a policy of reaching out to dissident rebels within the FARC—the way U.S. forces did with Iraq's Sunni militias—and "psyops" that exploit dissension in the group.

But the "soft" side works only when it is accompanied by hard-hitting tactics. As Vice Minister Pinzón describes the shift, the Colombian military once fought the FARC to a standoff with conventional tactics: military outposts in villages and towns. Now those posts are manned by police, and the military is sending Special-Ops commandos into the jungle to keep the FARC running. As a result, the FARC has been hounded across the border to other countries, and in March the group's No. 2, Raul Reyes, was killed in a jungle bivouac in Ecuador. "It's a very good approach and it's paying dividends," says Vickers. And "amplifications" on that approach, he says, are "paying dividends elsewhere."

With Michael Isikoff in Washington

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Trooper101st @ 08/03/2008 11:22:05 AM

    I think in some cases its like this: "He is a S.O.B...but he's our S.O.B......so you can whine and moan about ties to paramilitary groups and right wing death sqauds, but this is wat it is, the US looking out for its own interests. How many people would shed tears if a guy like Chavez took a bullet? He is a troublemaker and a s.o.b., and he's not OUR S.O.B., he's aligning himself and his country with the Soviets....ummm, I mean Russians. Tell me that Putin has good intentions towards the US. Tell me he is not a dictator. You would be wrong on both counts.

  • Posted By: Dollared @ 07/21/2008 2:13:30 PM

    @barchetta,

    Those ties do exist, they are the subject of dramatic disclosures in the Colombian newspapers on a nearly daily basis. It is a fact that the disclosure of these illegal contacts have forced the resignations of members of the Uribe government and members of Uribe's party have resigned from the legislature in disgrace.

    And yes, there are similarities between what happened in El Salvador and what is happening in Colombia. In both cases the US government, headed by Republicans, has aligned itself with the wealthy classes in a Latin American country, trained their military in counter-insurgency, and provided hundreds of millions of dollars in arms, contractor services (mercenaries) and intelligence. And then these Latin American militaries have aligned with shadowy right wing groups in their own countries and committed heinous acts of oppression and mass murder in the course of suppressing both real revolutionaries and legitimate union movements and liberal political activists, all with substantial assistance from US military men, mercenaries, and right wing politicians.

    Only after Reagan left power in the US could peace be achieved in El Salvador. Peace in Colombia is doubtful at any rate - the country has had violent insurgencies for over 100 years of its existence, and millions have been killed.

    But if you think we should keep supporting these guys, go ahead. Just don't use my tax dollars. Just think if we had been smart enough to stay out of Viet Nam and Iraq. There would be no national debt.....

  • Posted By: Barchetta @ 07/21/2008 12:45:49 PM

    It is a wonderful success story for Colombians. And no, we do not want to talk about alleged ties of the Colombian government with paramilitaries because we have talked about this enough and despite all the talk, nothing is true, they just do not exist. An then, is this comment about El Salvador, or about Colombia. Because there is a tendency of some left-wing american and european commentators to treat all the third world contries and conflicts as if they are the same. They are not and it is clear that this particular commentator has no clue about Colombia or its particular situation.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now