Member Comments

• • Reply
  • Report Abuse

  Posted By: Diogenes 08 @ 08/03/2008 3:41:23 PM

  The New Yorker did one thing right, it has caused us to think and talk about the rumors. Unfortunately, we continue to fail in truly looking at the man as determined by his past instead of the man as promoted by his speech writers.
  
  Look at his past voting record, look at his church, look at his family and friends, look at his business associates. Listen to what he has said. (there are 50 American States, and 57 Islamic states) Then ask yourself honestly, is this the man worthy of the rock star worship he has been getting from the media. If he didn???t consider himself in the same category as Spears and Hilton, then why did he change the convention site to a stadium worthy of a rock star?

• • Reply
  • Report Abuse

  Posted By: Jose52 @ 07/22/2008 2:15:19 PM

  Thanks. Just the plain facts! Why are we choosing this loser? Even Hilliary has more gravitas!

• • Reply
  • Report Abuse

  Posted By: Thewhitesmiter @ 07/22/2008 12:19:13 PM

  What's wrong with a satire if it says what needs to be said and what it said is that you have a man whose
  like a little boy, maybe a half-white boy, yes but there's one very aggressive woman at his side and she's the 'by any means necessary' type if you know what I mean. So you've really got to thank the New Yorker's team of artists for coming up with that insightful illustration because as they say, a picture's worth a thousand words.