For a man who spews the word CHANGE everywhere he goes, Barack Hussein Obama just can't change himself to bring himself to say he was wrong about the surge. I don't want someone who can't learn from their mistakes (and the first part of learning is admitting a mistake) leading my country.
The mantra of the Democrat presidential candidate seems to consistently be CHANGE, but we don't have a true definition of CHANGE. November 2006; control of Congress changed from the Republicans to the Democrats, Nancy Pelosi took control and all the committee chairs CHANGED. Did we have CHANGE? Gasoline went from $2.35 to $4.25; food has skyrocketed; the stock market has plummeted into bear territory, the mortgage market is in shambles, Pelosi changed from a small government plane to a jet fuel guzzling 747 so she could take more people with her on boondoggles. Barack wants to change the war from Iraq to Afghanistan. The Democrats went on vacation before dealing with the energy crisis, proving that they only care about themselves and not the little people they are supposed to represent (who can???t afford to go on vacation due to high energy costs)
Changing the Channel
Obama bids to get off the defensive in Iraq speech
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
It was Lee Hamilton, the Democrats' wise old man of national security, who let slip the real reason for Barack Obama's big foreign policy speech in Washington on Tuesday. Hamilton was introducing the party's presumptive nominee in front of an audience of foreign policy wonks and Obama fans hosted by the Woodrow Wilson International Center.
Hamilton said he normally brushed off such moments by saying that the distinguished speaker needed no introduction. But then he heard how Obama had recently tried to walk into a local gym but was challenged for some proof of identity. "So I said to myself, whoa," Hamilton told the audience. "Maybe we better get back to the basics here. Our speaker today is Barack Obama. B-A-R-A-C-K. O-B-A-M-A."
Obama smiled wryly, but the occasion for the speech was no joke. Buffeted by GOP charges that he's flip-flopped on the Iraq war, and facing down a bump in the polls for his Republican foe John McCain, Obama knew he needed a strong showing to help stem the criticism on the eve of a major trip abroad-set to encompass not only Iraq and Afghanistan, but the Middle East and Western Europe as well.
According to the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll, 72 per cent say McCain would be a good commander-in-chief; 48 per cent say Obama would be good. Of course, McCain's military service may account for a good chunk of the gap between the two. But that gap is unsettling for Democrats-especially since the same survey showed that 63 percent believe the war in Iraq was not worth fighting, and 51 per cent believe the U.S. has been unsuccessful in taking on the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan.
Obama began his speech by invoking the familiar model of the Marshall Plan-the diplomatic and economic initiatives that helped pave the way for the reconstruction of Europe after World War II. But he quickly cut to the chase, outlining a strategy for coping with the fallout from the Iraq war in the years to come. "What's missing in our debate about Iraq-what has been missing since before the war began--is a discussion of the strategic consequences of Iraq and its dominance of our foreign policy," he said in front of no less than eight Stars and Stripes.
"This war distracts us from every threat that we face and so many opportunities we could seize," Obama argued. "This war diminishes our security, our standing in the world, our military, our economy, and the resources that we need to confront the challenges of the 21st century. By any measure, our single-minded and open-ended focus on Iraq is not a sound strategy for keeping America safe."
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »










Discuss