What Should Uncle Sam Do?

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Although the use of taxpayer money is regrettable, the novel and aggressive policies that the Federal Reserve has pursued during these fragile economic times have been necessary to maintain financial stability. Certainly [Ben] Bernanke didn't foresee the extent of the credit crisis, but he has acted forcefully since last August to open the discount window to troubled institutions, expand domestic and international lending facilities, and rescue Bear Stearns. These policies have quieted the financial markets and have brought both a significant reduction in short-term rates for borrowers and a reduction in default spreads.

Government bailouts are not without their downside. Promises of bailouts may encourage firms to take excessive risks (what economists call "moral hazard") if they know the government will come to the rescue. That is why the Fed must enact stringent capital requirements, as they do for banks, for any firm for which it provides a safety net.

But moral hazard should not stand in the way of aggressive policy. When the government established deposit insurance in the 1930s, many worried that such legislation would lead to excessive risk-taking by banks. Yet many economists now name deposit insurance as one of the most important economic reforms of the past century.

What the Fed learned from its failure to bail out banks during the Great Depression has kept the financial system intact and the economy functioning during this historic meltdown in the real-estate market. Had the Fed not intervened forcefully, it is quite likely that we would have seen a downward spiral of market prices and economic activity that could have rivaled the 1930s.

No One Is 'Too Big to Fail'

John Snow , former Treasury secretary under George W. Bush, now chairman of Cerberus Capital Management

The current turmoil results from excessive risk-taking and imprudent lending based on the assumption that housing prices would rise indefinitely. We now have a long-overdue correction. Government's proper role is to provide for an orderly adjustment while allowing the underlying market forces to work. Although it is painful and disruptive, the sooner it is resolved, the less injurious the spillover to the rest of the economy will be.

Society benefits when financial institutions take prudent risks. But when they are imprudent, for markets to work institutions must be allowed to fail. We allow banks to fail—witness IndyMac—but there is an orderly system overseen by a strong regulator.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Dredd @ 03/21/2009 7:40:19 AM

    The people are the real Uncle Sam. I am fearful that severe conflicts of interest exist in the business model and structure which must be addressed. Does AIG Iraq, Banque AIG, AIG Dubai, or Swiss bank AIG private bank give you any pause?

    http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2009/03/aig-iraq.html

  • Posted By: Cretin @ 01/23/2009 5:09:47 PM

    Excellent point about Fannie and Freddie, Mr.R........You realise of course the opposition to reguation under Bush, proposed four times and Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd, were butt deep in campaign money, NOT TO MENTION, Barney's 'lover' at Fannie.......The Congress of the United States is getting a pass on it's culpability, with regard to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the obvious corruption. Bundling worthless mortgaes and tossing them off on our Banking System as valuable entities. I listened to your "ramblings" while with Clinton. You are still a left wing apologist who seemingly needs a bad guy to prop up your 'little man complex. Go after the real badguys.....even if they are your friends.

  • Posted By: melbee1971 @ 09/19/2008 10:26:28 AM

    As a public high school teacher, the current state of our public (and private) institutions reflect our values as a society, from my point of view. I ask all readers to consider this comparison of the following American institutions: Wall Street, Financial Powerhouses, and our public schools...

    We are bailing out these failing institutions with taxpayer dollars. The state of our public school system continues to decline. Bailouts and deregulation and more money for failing financial (private) institutions. But increased regulation and LACK of financial support for our PUBLIC SCHOOLS - does this tell us something about our overall priorities as a nation? Are we reaping what our leaders have sown for us?

    Think about this, voters PLEASE! Not just for the sake of your own personal interests, but for the sake of our country.

    Good teachers are being laid off and class sizes are growing. No child left behind is a law that requires improvements without the promised funding to implement these improvements. And our schools are listed as "failing schools" losing support from the federal government who "regulated" the schools in the first place.

    What is left in our public schools is often a stressed out skeleton staff that does not have the resources to properly educate our students, our future, which we would hope will lead us someday.

    More evidence is proving that No Child Left Behind (an unfunded mandate) has actually lead to increasing drop outs of our high school students. PLEASE don't blame the teachers for this. We don't want any child to fail. We are working as hard as we can. We are not "in it for the money."

    Meanwhile, these corporate lobbyists have effectively secured deregulation and what they consider "optimal" conditions for their financial success (deregulation). And a few well-connected people have lined their pockets with enormous amounts of other peoples' money.

    This sort of short-term gain at the expense of long-term growth way of thinking have really infected our entire way of running our society.

    Unfortunately middle and lower class young people (the MAJORITY) of our future do not have the money or the resources to hire corporate lobbyists. Their teachers and their schools have very limited resources. And there is little to NO organized efforts to effectively support the reform and progress to lead our public schools to educate and prepare our future.

    In every other developed and developing country we compare our students' progress with, there is a clear and dedicated effort to improve, fund, and prioritize education. We are and will be competing with these nations. In America, we are starving our schools while bailing out reckless fat cats who've thrived on greed. Is this the American Way? Or have we lost our way?

    Let this be a lesson. Hopefully (as we say in class) we will learn from all of this and use it to improve, grow, and succeed.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.