THE LAST WORD

George F. Will

Conservatism: Not TBTF

In recent weeks, two formerly bright lines of political demarcation have become indistinct, to Barack Obama's advantage.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: deh1954 @ 09/19/2008 12:53:46 PM

    Comment: The fact is that we have been ruled by conservatives for the past 40 years, Clinton included. Conservatism was proven a failed government philosophy when the Founding Fathers formed this country and chose a liberal form of government known as Democracy. And conservatism as defined in the context of these times has also proven to be a dismal failure. Unfettered capitalism is a return to the rule of natural law. Under such law, even if we all started from the same position with the same abilities, at the end of each leg of the competition, a settling-up and adjustment would occur that would improve the conditions and abilities of the winners and reduce that of the losers so that the next leg of competition would have the winners starting from a favored position. If you play this game over thousands of legs and scores of generations, you get what we've got right now. Unfettered capitalism is designed to eliminate the middle class by continuing to concentrate wealth and power for the strongest. Human beings created the rule of law to help level the playing field. The conservatives gained and maintained power because they successfully define the discussion so that an argument against a candidate could simply be a label such as "liberal" (simple words for simple minds). Nothing more need be said just as in days past the use of the word "communist" had the same impact, ending the discussion. The fact is that democratic socialism is a better blend of government and economy for the benefit of the most people (exception the uber-rich). As erudite as George Will and others of his ilk can sound, they are just plain wrong. Liberalism has never been proven a failure. Its flaws are a myth: strong on social issues, weak on financial and national security. The best of times have always been during Democratic administrations (not a coincidence as Will implies) especially under FDR and JFK/LBJ. With the exception of Lincoln's presidency, most of the real progress made in our history occurred during these administrations. Liberals have been at a disadvantage because we are not willing to ???swiftboat??? the truth so freely. There has never been a choice so clear as the one between McCain and Obama, not since, uh, Bush and Kerry. It is tragic that after these past 40 years and especially the past 8, that this election is even close. If we could have 40 years of a liberal government and economy, today's times would be something our grandchildren would find difficult to comprehend.

  • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 07/27/2008 11:38:02 PM

    Comment: Doobie Roller, I'm still waiting for Fox News to break at least ONE of the half a dozen things you have blamed Obama for in this forum.

    I can almost see you talking to your church bigot friends about the latest nonsense about Obama and fooling yourselves into thinking it's true. But nothing ever changes, does it? Fox News would LOVE for any of this to be true, but not even them believe this crazy hype you're so intent in believing it's true.

    Besides, the only US president I've seen holding hands with the Muslims you so hate, is the patron saint of all right wing nuts, George bush.

  • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 07/25/2008 5:24:34 PM

    Comment: well i believe your wrong, so i guess i just poked a major hole in your argument. the problem is your applying your moralty and you think its the only moralty that exist. if you have a problem with being gay then don't be gay. if you don't have anything nice to say, go jump

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN

A startup is betting free coffees and groceries will encourage reluctant recyclers.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu