Obama Abroad

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/25/2008 9:33:59 AM

    Latino voters are coming in masses to the Democratic nominee Barack Obama. Sorry about your luck McCain. Independent votes and Swing states will follow suit after Obama crushes McCain in the debates. We support the troops 100% in all they do as my family members and friends in the war zone, we are praying for you day in and day out. God Bless you guys. End the War. Bring them home.

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 1:39:24 PM

      Obama wants to send them to Afghanistan to die.

  • Posted By: josemarti @ 07/25/2008 11:42:29 AM

    Barack means "blessed." With him we will have a new birth of freedom. Real freedom. The freedom that comes from being united by him under one common purpose. He loves us and understands us. We hunger for meaning and he will provide it. With malice towards none and charity towards all, he will reconcile us with the world. However, to whom much is given much is expected and Barack will expect that we will all give according to our abilities and receive according to our needs. That we have found him is the miracle of our lifetime. That he has found us is our good fortune. Onwards to victory. As to McCain, old soldiers never die, they just fade away. Oh what joy awaits us. Cubs win the World Series in October. Obama ascends to the Presidency in November.

    • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/25/2008 11:58:38 AM

      Man what fairy wood are you at! I want to come over there! Sprinkle that fairy dust on me too. LOL. There was only one Christ Jesus, so just stop.

      • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 1:38:19 PM

        Yeah and he is dead.

  • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 9:20:36 AM

    I like this one....apparently Obama decided it was better to go to Paris than visit Troops in Germany.

    ???The senator decided out of respect for these servicemen and women that it would be inappropriate to make a stop to visit troops at a U.S. military facility as part of a trip funded by the campaign,??? Mr. Gibbs said.

    But it's okay when he is spending Tax dollars for essentially a campaign trip? No one will argue that Obama's World Tour is a campaign trip....so why the discrepancy? Why is it okay to be photographed making a 3-pointer, but not okay to take a photo with a soldier that lost his leg from a IED?

    • Posted By: raddave @ 07/25/2008 1:00:52 PM

      One thing, tax payers are not paying for this trip to Europe, his campaign is paying for it. If Obama had gone to visit troops in Germany, then you would have damned him for trying to exploit the wounded troopers for a "Photo-op."

      • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 1:33:09 PM

        Ok I worded this wrong...pulled an Obama. Ha ha....now the first half was paid by taxpayers, under the guise of a "fact finding" trip, which of course Obama already knew the facts ahead of time anyway.

        The second part of the trip was paid by his campaign, which is fine and dandy because I don't have a problem with him wasting all his supporters money....I do want to know if his "extras" in Germany; stage costs, bands, lights, balloons, etc....were paid by him or provided by the Germans....if the Germans gave Obama those things to use, it is ILLEGAL under campaign finance law. Again if he wasted is supporters money on it, I have no problem with that, but if it was "given" to him, then I do because then he would have broken the law... I hope this clarifies what I'm talking about.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 07/24/2008 10:20:21 AM

    Semi-Senile on the "Surge"

    The major Sunni sheik who John McCain said was protected by the surge and subsequently helped lead the Anbar Awakening, was actually assassinated by an al-Qaeda led group in midst of the surge.

    On Tuesday evening, McCain falsely claimed that the downturn in violence in Iraq's Anbar province was a result of the surge, when in fact the surge began months afterward. Moreover, he said, if it weren't for the work of U.S. forces, the major Sunni figure leading that awakening wouldn't have had the protection he needed.

    "Colonel MacFarland was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks," said the Senator. "Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening."

    The Arizona Republican's campaign went further the next day, claiming that the major figures that turned around Anbar province would have been killed had the surge policy not been in place. "If Barack Obama had had his way, the Sheiks who started the Awakening would have been murdered at the hands of al Qaeda," said spokesman Tucker Bounds.

    Sadly, that murder took place even with the surge underway. In September 2007, Abdul Sattar Abu Risha, the sheik widely credited with persuading Sunni leaders to turn against al Qaeda in Iraq, died in a bomb attack in Anbar. His work, prior to then, was held as a major effort in transforming the province from one of Iraq's deadliest areas into one of its safest.

    It was in a September 2006 interview with UPI, when U.S. Army Col. Sean MacFarland first spoke about Sattar's efforts. "Some of the sheikhs have begun to step forward and some of the insurgent groups began to fight against al Qaeda," he said. His reference was Sattar, according to a Reuters article published upon the sheik's death.

    Below is more from the Reuters article on Sattar's death:

    "When U.S. Army Col. Sean MacFarland, working in his Pentagon office last Thursday, heard that a tribal leader had been killed in Iraq's Anbar province, his first reaction was: "Please don't let it be Sattar."
    His fears proved well-founded. A bomb had killed Abdul Sattar Abu Risha, the founder of a movement of Sunni leaders who turned against al Qaeda in Iraq, who are also Sunnis, and transformed Anbar from one of Iraq's deadliest areas into one of its safest.

    MacFarland is in a unique position to offer insights into the movement Sattar led and how it may develop without him. As a brigade commander in Iraq, he was present at the alliance's founding and worked closely with Abu Risha for months.

    "I owe him a lot," MacFarland said. "He was a young guy with a great vision of the future and he was a fast friend of the United States."

    • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 10:37:19 AM

      Omaar -

      You mock John McCain by referring to him as "Semi-Senile".

      He is also unable to raise his arms above his head, due to the injuries which he suffered in Vietnam.
      I'm surprised that you don't also mock him in that regard.

      It's quite ironic - he actually fought for the likes of you to be able to mock an injured honourable veteran.

      Have you no shame?

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 12:04:52 PM

        Davole, calm down. He means because John McCain is forgetful because of his age. It is senility. I am not disrespecting old people when I post this but it is the truth. A large percentage of people in their 70's have some degree of memory loss and John McCain is no expection. You are aware that Barack Obama has been called worst, his wife Michelle has been called worst, she has actually been called a militant terrorist. How do you feel about that?

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 12:20:04 PM

          Davole, regarding John McCain's injuries suffered while he was in captivity, I have posted several times that I admired him for his heroism. I still do but that doesn't mean I support him.

  • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 10:00:57 AM

    Mr. Ethics, Obama needs to take a refresher on campaign contributions....it appears that his gala in Berlin might not be legal in the US.

    Title III: Miscellaneous??????.(Sec. 303) Amends FECA to revise the ban on campaign contributions from foreign nationals to include donations, expenditures, independent expenditures, disbursements for an electioneering communication, as well as contributions or donations to any political party committee.

    Did his campaign pay for the security or bands or balloons in Berlin?

    • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/25/2008 10:34:07 AM

      Sorry, I've been taking care of my health, I would have posted earlier. But see my previous comment about your statements on tax payer money and campaign flip flop statement you made earlier. I remembered that I am not anchored to the computer since there is the internet which McCain knows nothing about since he could raise money here instead of the warmongering campaign slugs backers the GOP like to maintain. These are the guys that ICYEYES love to compliment. We the supporters of Barack Obama will not lie down for we have the voice of reason.

      • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 11:23:14 AM

        What are you talking about....i think you took too much meds.

        No what you fail to understand what I'm saying. This trip is and always was a campaign trip. I have a problem that half the trip was funded with taxpayers money. Considering Obama's flip flop on public campaign financing, it is unethical. The comment above which you conveniently made no mention of in your rebuttal, says that foreign nationals can't make campaign contributions in anyway....what I'm calling into question and which you didn't answer is....Did Obama's Campaign pay for his speech?
        If he did....fine...answers my question and everything is legal....If Obama didn't pay for it....then its ILLEGAL. Plain and simple.
        Please just answer my question.

        • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/25/2008 11:35:52 AM

          Listen, you can ask me a thousand questions about Barack Obama, I don't care. I am not on the defensive. You are. I am pointing out differences. I don't care where McCain goes or what he does or how he does it. Everyone else including McCain takes care of all that and clumsily I might add. If you want to address the issues and promtote McCain then have at it. Just like McCain is always asking questions about the Obama camp, you are to. The Obama Camp just keeps rolling along doing our thing. Don't hate, appreciate.

          • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 11:43:29 AM

            Then why did you respond to my comment? You don't care right?
            Yes the Obama train keeps rollin along because the news won't report all the inconsistencies and fallacies he says during his speeches and interviews.

            You claim to be pointing out differences but in your response the only thing you said about McCain is that he is dumb because he doesn't know the internets... .really? I'm I supposed to vote for Obama because he knows how to Google? That's the only qualification that matters to you?

  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/23/2008 10:36:20 AM

    Z, I left you replies to your posts way down below the page. Thanks. Later.........

    • Posted By: loriw @ 07/23/2008 2:43:22 PM

      Pia,
      I know you keep track of people around here so i'm letting you know I'm going on vacation to a little resort in the Upper peninsula of Michigan. Our cabin has no internet access, we bring no computers, TV or anything so I will not be posting for about 8 days beginning Friday. It will drive me nuts not knowing whats going on but it is very nice not to have these distractions from the work world . I think some sunshine will improve my attitude!

      • Posted By: Davole @ 07/23/2008 7:21:58 PM

        Lori -

        Enjoy a well-deserved vacation.

        Hope to hear from you when you return!

        p.s. - Look out for, and stay clear of - the poison ivy.

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/23/2008 8:43:46 PM

          Hi Davole. Does poison ivy grow in Canada? I lived there but don't remember ever seeing any.

          • Posted By: Davole @ 07/24/2008 3:47:00 AM

            Pia1981 -

            You ask - does poison ivy grow in Canada?
            Sure it does - heck, it's almost as prevalent as our maple trees - just "pulling your leg."

            A few weeks ago, on a different thread on this website, Lori asked me the same question.
            It's somewhat prevalent in the southern woodland areas, and regretably, in the rough and treed sectors of a few golf courses.

            Hey, I noticed that - you actually smile - bella!

            I'll tell you "what" - later on today, I'll savour an espresso after lunch, and dip the cup as a toast to you.

            Ciao for now!

            • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/24/2008 7:15:47 AM

              Bonjour Davole, comment vas tu? Did I spell it right? It's been so long since I lived in Montreal.

              The old poison ivy- I know it well. I came in contact with it years ago and had to seek medical help. I am very allergic to it. It took weeks fo rmy poor skin to recover. I had it on my neck and chest. Got it from my cat's coat.

              I do smile, all day and laugh too. Too much actually. Am I too serious on the blogs?

              Hope to 'see' you on the blogs today, I enjoy your respectable comments. I'm glad that as a Canadian you have taken interest in our election.

              Enjoy the cappucino! Btw, please call me Pia, thanks. A bientot!

              • Posted By: Davole @ 07/24/2008 10:40:57 AM

                Pia -

                Thanks for the invite - it is a pleasure to call YOU Pia!

                But are you actually "hitting" on me by using the familiar "tu"?
                We hardly know each other, although I'm looking forward to getting to know you better.

                You asked in French - How am I doing?
                Come on Pia, you already know the answer - I'm a Conservative (a close cousin to being Republican).
                We're always positive and optimistic - doing just great.
                If I were doing any better, I'd have to clone myself to share some of that with my duplicate.

                Regarding your comment about poison ivy and where on your body it manifest itself - I won't even "go" there. I "take it" that you let your cat roam outside. Mine stays indoors.

                I have never experienced any affliction from poison ivy - on several occasions, I have noticed that any poison ivy plants which I have encountered just seem to whither and droop in surrender as I approach.

                And wow, you admit that you "do smile, all day and laugh too." Then you must actually be a Republican, but you haven't realized it yet. Are you what could be known as a DINO? Gee, that even sounds Italiano!

                You ask whether I think that you are too serious on the blogs - that's for me to know, and for you to "find out".

                You will definitely 'see' me on the blogs today. I enjoy conversing with you, although sometimes I am quite shy (personal computer error - that does not compute).

                Our difference in beverage of choice is understandable. Conservatives and Republicans prefer to face their issues "full strength" (espresso), whereas democrats pend to "water down" or dillute them (cappuccino).

                I must sincerely compliment you - You are very adept at the "Fox-trot", and I do enjoy doing it with you.

                And to "sign off" now - even though you're a tease, I know definitely that I can "out-tease" you.

                • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/24/2008 10:32:17 PM

                  Bon soir Devole. Ca va?

                  Davole, I'm sorry that I wrote the wrong words in french this morning, I didn't know 'tu' was meant for persons more familiar with one another. Like I posted in another comment to you, I haven't lived in Canada in years and I have forgotten some of the language. With this said, I hope I did not give you the impression that I was trying to 'pick' you up. I don't pick up men on the internet. I apologize if I gave you that impression. I did enjoy blogging with you.

                  You mention that if I laugh alot that means I may be Republican. Not really. I did vote Rep in the last two pres. elections. I voted for Pres. Bush. Now I am a diehard Obama supporter. For me he is the best candidate. I support him one hundred percent. I believe he will win. If Hillary had been the nom., I would be supporting Hillary. In any case, no Rep vote for me this time around and perhaps in the next election as well.

                  The Foxtrot? Did we? I prefer rock and roll. Vous? Lol!

                  I hope you enjoyed your espresso. Btw, if I see any negative Obama comments in your posts, be ready for my replies. I will defend him no matter who it is! I did enjoy our conversation today. 'See' ya on the blogs. Au revoir.

                  • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 11:37:56 AM

                    Pia1981 -

                    I was just kidding in my mention regarding "tu" being too familiar.
                    Actually I did enjoy that familiarity, while it lasted.

                    There's no need for you to apologize for anything.
                    You didn't give me any impression, nor did I take any.
                    Likewise, I also did enjoy blogging with you.

                    The Foxtrot is a dance step, whereas rock and roll is a music genre.

                    Yes, I enjoyed my espresso. In fact, thinking of you, I didn't even need any sugar.

                    You've got every right to reply to any of my posts which are critical of Obama.
                    Bring it on!

                    Likewise, I also did enjoy our conversation today. '

                    See you on the blogs. Ciao!

                  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/24/2008 10:45:46 PM

                    PS Davole, I'm sorry for mispelling your name above. Also, do you think you can 'out tease' me? Humm. That remains to be seen. Bonne nuit.

                • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/24/2008 11:36:27 AM

                  Davole, wow, you leave me speechless. I need to recover and then I will most def. reply to all of your comments. Also, I am very busy with my work right to give you a full response. I will later in the day. 'See' you then I hope. Btw, your name is pretty.

              • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/24/2008 7:25:11 AM

                PS Davole, sorry. Enjoy the espresso! I like cappucinos.

        • Posted By: Davole @ 07/24/2008 4:10:28 AM

          Lori -

          Pardon my posting this as a reply to my reply to you, but I wanted to keep it in sequence for you.

          I forgot to mention - with regard to poison ivy, you can "catch it" unknowingly by tromping through or even near the actual poison ivy plants, and then, possibly a few hours later, removing your shoes or boots if they have somehow come in contact with that dreaded plant.
          If you do that, ensure that you wash your hands immediately.

          Since you will be visiting the UP, will you be "indulging in" a "pastie"or two?
          I remember them from my 2 or 3 trips through that locale on my way to Thunder Bay, ON.

          Watch out for the snakes and bears!

          Oh, by the way, I just conversed with a friend of yours - Pia1981. Now that was definitely a vintage year!
          And I was surprised - she doesn't even bite - at least not yet.

          • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/24/2008 7:05:12 AM

            Lol Davole! I try not to bite. I'm not like that.

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/23/2008 8:32:43 PM

        Lori, got you. I got your post on the other article too and responded. Have a fun and safe vacation. Will miss you!.

  • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/25/2008 8:32:13 AM

    This is during the Bush Admin!!!!!!!! There are nuclear weapons being flown across the nation by these people. The reason our soldiers are falling asleep (with launch codes) is because our troops are spread too thin. They are having to work triple shifts because there are not enough staff to fill in.

    The war was unnecessary and now we are in threat from this Administration's incompetence by soldiers falling asleep with tactical information and nuclear launch codes, Nuclear missiles being flown across the country (Lord knows what would happen if one of them were "accidentally" dropped).

    And then there is McCain, Bush's BFF, trying to take over the reigns. There is no national security!!!!!! The main thing we have to fear is McCain since he believes in Bush policy. He has stood behind Bush from the beginning and will continue his Gestapo style policing of the American people. I can't believe there are people willing to vote for this type of governance.

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 9:11:17 AM

      Back for more I take it....
      Triple shifts? So your saying, and I'm sure your an expert, that Air Force soldiers are forced to work 24 hours a day 5 days a week because, the Troops ( Army, Marines) are spread too thin? Please explain to me how that works? Can you provide any links to your claims? Or are you just making crap up for fun?

      Keep playing to FEAR it suits you. McCain = BUSH = WAR = Nuclear Holocaust. that's all you have to play...your criticism tells more about the critic than the person your criticizing.

      Now your comparing Bush and McCain to the Gestapo.....of where is Pia to repudiate this? (chirp chirp)
      If you want to compare anyone with the Nazi....look at the Berlin Crowds yesterday with the Berlin crowds in 1931.

      • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/25/2008 9:27:21 AM

        Glad to see your McCain support, I was getting bored this week. So tell me how does a trained soldier fall asleep with important informatio or for that matter how does a nuclear weapon get carried across the nation with the potential to destroy all of us? Because most of our troops are off fighting a war that should never have been fought. A nuclear weapon was flown over our heads. But I guess that is just another day in the life of Bush and his surrogate/BFF McCain. McCain will keep stressing our troops to the point of exhaustion the same way Bush has because he will want WAR, WAR, WAR. Remember bomb, bomb, bomb Iran, oh believe that, he will do it. Another war to satisfy GOP ego. He is willing to do anything to say we are the Nation to not mess with. No Olive branches extended with him. Just more war and more sabre rattling.

        • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 10:10:35 AM

          Your the expert right? So why can't you answer your own question. You won't believe any answer that defies your own self righteous attitude anyway.
          Here is a reality check, your driving a car that full of chemical that can kill you too! Oh the humanity....you have chemicals in your house/Apt that can kill you or be used to make an IED too.
          Are you a nuclear weapons expert too? Please explain to me how the fail safes on EVERYONE of our nuclear weapons will fail because those air force personnel were sleeping?
          You do know about weapons fail safes do you? It goes like this...every weapon in the US and pretty much every military around the world has this thing that keeps the weapons from being ACCIDENTLY detonating while being handled.

          So please continue to use your FEAR on the unknowing public but don't try to bring it in here....it will only make you look bad.

          As for Bomb Bomb Iran....maybe you can clarify Obama's statement to invade Pakistan, an ally?

          • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/25/2008 10:29:54 AM

            You just said, by the way, you keep sticking your foot in your moth everytime you speak. Read the article posted by Newsweek, "The New Forgotten War" and that will enlighten you to your own question. And back to playing race in politics, ask ICYEYES again. I enjoy our back and forth but you are grasping for straw and you are looking for holes to where there are none. You also stuck you foot in your mouth when you spoke about Obama funding his own trip then in the next paragraph talking about him funding the trip with tax payer dollars. I know you are frustrated but remain calm, the next generation will solve the woes of the blundering Bush/McCain Order.

            • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 11:30:19 AM

              Very cute...you cite an article as your defense yet in that article you call it "more GOP propaganda trying to put McCain on the same playing field as Obama."
              So your defending Obama with GOP propaganda?

              And read my rebuttal above for your Obama's trip.
              Thank you for completely trying to ignore your previous statements the nuclear weapons....maybe I taught you a thing or two...
              Keep playing the FEAR card...your turning into a regular Karl Rove with that.

  • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/25/2008 11:26:16 AM

    Ok dudes and dudettes... Pakistan and Afghanistan are the "re-newed" fronts on the war on terror. The war on Saddam Hussein has been over since he was executed by a war monger. The civil war between the tribes after that should have been quelled by the Iragi Government. Sure you can argue that, "dude, there was no Iraqi government," which would be the big picture, there already was an Iraqi government even though we didn't like that Iraqi government which did not have WMD's nor links to Al Quaida.

    Barack Obama supported the war on terror, he didn't support the war on Saddam Hussein. He saw that it was a mistake to turn our attention away from Afghanistan and Pakistan. McCain was all for going into Iraq. McCain could have cared less about what would happen to Pakistan and Afghanistan since he was busy laying around in hospitals and his sick bed at the time.

    McCain is too frail, can't think on his feet (when we get attacked again on his watch), cannot connect with World Leaders, cannot manage the militaries, Is ready to plunder the land with drilling (destabilizing wildlife even more than it is today), he continues to draw Social Security even though he is ready to axe it along with our benefits, he is quick to judge his fellow countrymen that oppose him and so on and so forth.

    McCain would best be suited to remain in Congress which he is even jeopardizing re-election once he loses this election. So ask yourself GOPers, ex-Hillary supporters (which if you aren't backing Obama, then you turn your back on Hillary who supports him) and anyone else not up to date on the current GLOBAL situations, who do you reakky think is best suited for the leader of the free world?

  • Posted By: MartinCarmel @ 07/24/2008 11:05:40 PM

    This man Obama is the most fabricated used car salesman (with a nice smile and good delivery) the media has ever tried to shove down our throats. And the European "peace at any cost" mentality is playing right into this fraud. America is not fooled by this.

    Obama's lead is down to only 3 points (oh no!) in today's Gallop poll. Hello? Kerry had a 6 point lead over Bush in July 2004. The media's love fest is quickly killing Obama's campaign. (And the TV spots about his racist friend, Rev. Wright, are not even on yet)

    Remember, this is the same nation that re-elected an unpopular George W. Bush in 2004....during....an unpopular war.
    - McCain will win in November.

    Man, the Europeans are really gonna hate us now. (weep, weep)

    • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/25/2008 10:54:34 AM

      At least you like something about Obama, I can't stand McCain. He is bad for this country. He is constantly on the defensive "fabricating" stories about Obama. He is always saying things that are untrue and makes himself look inept. He doesn't represent anything except Bush league tactics. He has stated human life means very little in his Bomb, bomb, Iran... send cigarettes to them and let them smoke themselves to death. If that makes your boat float then you're in for some rough waters.

    • Posted By: raddave @ 07/25/2008 8:14:32 AM

      Bush was not an unpopular president in 2004.

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 10:10:13 AM

        you're right rad, in all fairness, he wasn't. He actually was pretty popular right after 9/11 and I felt that as a country we had finally come together even though it was in grief.

    • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 5:08:04 AM

      MartinCarmel -

      Barack Obama's so-called fact finding mission, after he had already stated his conclusions prior to accumulating the facts, has just morphed into a series of photo-op campaign stops in which Obama criticizes the US, and tries to portray himself as an existing president.

      And the mainstream media dutifully roll out the red carpet for him.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 07/24/2008 8:51:40 AM

    Semi-Senile John McCain on the the Bush Administation having Positive Effect on the Lowering of Gas prices, though in Fact it is the (Speculators) that Dictate Price Increase or Reduction. The Speculators are now Worried about the Congress, Senate, IRS and FBI Probing and Prosecuting them, thats why you SEE a Lowering of the Price at the Pump, Not the Bush Threats of Offshore Oil Drillings....Duh !!!

    Earlier, campaigning in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., McCain credited the recent $10-a-barrel drop in the price of oil to President Bush's lifting of a presidential ban on offshore drilling, an action he has been advocating in his presidential campaign.

    The cost of oil and gasoline is "on everybody's mind in this room," McCain told a town-hall meeting.

    He criticized Obama for opposing drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf.

    Bush recently lifted the executive order banning offshore drilling that his father put in place in 1990. He also asked Congress to lift its own moratorium on oil exploration on the outer continental shelf which includes coastal waters as close as three miles from shore.

    "The price of oil dropped $10 a barrel," said McCain, who argued that the psychology of lifting the ban has affected world markets.

    NOTE: The White House didn't go that far. Presidential SpokesWoman Dana Perino said the PRICE DROP also could reflect diminished demand.

    "I don't know if we fully deserve the credit," Perino said.

    Bush Administration: "We don't PREDICT what HAPPENS in the MARKET," she said. "We can't really tell. Certainly, taking that action would send a signal that at least the executive branch is serious about moving forward and increasing the supply we have in America."

    A barrel of light, sweet crude fell $1.86 to $126.56 on the New York Mercantile Exchange. That's down from more than $140 a barrel earlier in the summer. There are 42 gallons in each barrel.




    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/24/2008 10:09:31 PM

      Excellent Omaar, thank you!

      • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 10:47:49 AM

        Pia1981 -

        Do you condone and praise Omaar's describing John McCain as "Semi_Senile"?

        Omaar offers his explanation as to why the price of oil fell.

        But he neglected to realize that drop in the price of oil occurred exactly on the same day that President George Bush signed the authorization bill to allow drilling for oil.

        Strictly coincidence? Didn't you yourself realize that probable cause?

  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 10:26:57 AM

    Davole, I replied to your comments to me.

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/24/2008 9:23:12 PM


    OBAMA Takes Credit for passing a new bill and referring to the committee that passed it ( Senate Banking Committee) as HIS committee

    OBAMA was not in any part a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs (which he called HIS committee) when speaking to people on his Rock Tour. Talk about audacity. He has a record in the Senate for taking credit for other legislators work. This blatantly proves that case:

    Oops, NoBoma:
    http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Information.Membership

    Oops, another NoBama:
    http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Information.Subcommittees

    VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjzb61wfyN0

    AUDIO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWNKO982ZEc


    The closest he can claim anything about this new bill passed last week is that it included some provisions that he and 2 other senators in the Iran Sanctions Enabling Act of 2007. That is it. Talk about being bombastic. It is amazing the levels he will go and tactics he will use for political expediency.



    • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 5:27:29 AM

      Share -

      This empty suit has to show some accomplishments, even though they are not factually his!

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 7:24:56 AM

        Davole, Obama is no empty suit! Don't get me mad.

        • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 7:44:33 AM

          Pia1981 -

          Yes he is an empty suit - his positions change almost daily, depending on the talking point positions which his 300 policy advisers manipulate this string puppet into saying.

          And you caution me not to make you mad.
          Pia, if I do still have your permission to address you by that name, nobody can MAKE you mad, or MAKE you do anything. That decision is strictly yours to make.

          I hope that you will be reasonable and rational in this matter.

          • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 8:04:00 AM

            Davole, I do like your spiritedness but that doesn't mean that I will excuse you from what you post about Omaar and my candidate. btw, did you read my long post to you from last evening?

            • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 9:25:52 AM

              Pia1981 -

              If you would care to do so, please make a rebuttal to any of the ideas which I have posted, to which you don't agree, or perceive to be unwarranted.
              They are honest, and I do stand behind them.
              I will not apologize for any of my comments just to be thought of as "nice".
              I do have my principles!

              Have you read my reply to Omaar's rant in which I directed a request for you to comment on my reply to him? Do you support what he has said in that blog?
              I will review periodically that reply section to learn your disposition in that regard.

              Pia1981, yes, I did read your long post from last night. I do appreciate the time and effort which you have spent in submitting that reply.

              My intention is to reply to it, but I am "holding off" pending your reply to me as requested in my reply to Omaar.

              I probably will even reply to your comment soon either way.

              Hopefully we still have a mutual respect for each other.
              I still do respect you, infact I like you very much.

              • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 10:15:19 AM

                Davole, I did reply to a couple of your posts in regards to Omaar. I assume you have not seen them.
                I am busy at my work right now but will reply to you in length in a few hours. Oh, you can call me Pia, that is my name. See you later....

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 07/24/2008 7:18:32 PM

    Fellow Viet Nam Vets Chime in on John McCain and his so called "Torture" at the hands of the N. Viet Namese !!!

    A declassified DOD document reports an interview between POW McCain and Dr. Fernando Barral, a Spanish psychiatrist who was living in Cuba at the time. The interview was published in the Havana Granma in January 1970.

    According to the DOD report, the meeting between Barral and McCain (which was photographed by the Vietnamese) took place away from the prison at the office of the Committee for Foreign Cultural Relations in Hanoi. During the meeting, POW McCain sipped coffee and ate oranges and cakes with his interrogator.

    While talking with Barral, McCain seriously violated the military Code of Conduct by failing to evade answering questions "to the utmost" of his ability when he, according to the DOD report, helped Barral by answering questions in Spanish, a language McCain had learned in school.

    1973 - McCain was released from the Hilton on March 15, 1973.

    Two Former POWs Say They Doubt McCain Was Physically Abused

    1999 - March 25, 1999, The Phoenix New Times: Ted Guy and Gordon "Swede" Larson, two former POWs, who were McCain's senior ranking officers (SRO's), at the time McCain says he was tortured in solitary confinement, told the New Times that while they could not guarantee that McCain was not physically harmed, they doubted it.

    "Between the two of us, it's our belief, and to the best of our knowledge, that no prisoner was beaten or harmed physically in that camp [known as "The Plantation"]," Larson says. ". . . My only contention with the McCain deal is that while he was at The Plantation, to the best of my knowledge and Ted's knowledge, he was not physically abused in any way. No one was in that camp. It was the camp that people were released from."

    Big Note: In 1993, during one of his many trips back to Hanoi, McCain asked the Vietnamese not to Make Public the Records they hold Pertaining to Returned U.S. POWs.

    • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 8:04:59 AM

      Omaar -

      Why do you keep reposting your numerous unsubstantiated ridiculous conspiracy comments from one day to the other? Is it because very few viewers even bother to respond?

      Wow - POW McCain actually sipped coffee (how much) and ate oranges (how many?) and cakes (ditto) with his interrogator. It definitely must be against the military code of conduct for a possibly starving POW to engage in such despicable conduct.

      And do you think (no, change that to do you feel) John McCain should have definitely faced the firing squad due to another POW stating "Between the two of us, it's our belief, and to the best of our knowledge, that no prisoner was beaten or harmed physically in that camp [known as "The Plantation"]."

      In case you are not very familiar with the English language, the term "to the best of our knowledge" does not mean definitely. Also, why is John McCain, to this very day, unable to raise his arms above his head?

      You would never be successful as a lawyer in an American civil or military court, if that was the best evidence which you could present..

      And lastly, you assert that in 1993, John McCain asked the Vietnamese to not make available any records pertaining released POWs. Do you have any evidence supporting this claim of yours, and were you actually THERE at the time?

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 8:26:14 AM

        Davole, why have you not asked sharenews the same question? She has posted links to Obama smear sites and you have cheered her on on occasion.

        • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 10:11:42 AM

          Pia1981 -

          I do respect Share, and I do respect you.

          Maybe the answer to your question is that she does contribute a lot of well-researched, factual, and thought provoking articles, and I do believe that they tend to criticize Barack Obama's lack of experience and policies, or frequent revisions and contradictions, whereas Omaar's seem to be more restricted to conspiracy theories, unfounded biased suppositions, and personal attacks against the opposing candidate and any of his supporters.

          If Share were to unduly denigrate Barack Obama on a personal note unrelated to the individual's ability to lead, then I would censure her.

          I realize that you are quite busy with work, but, may I suggest, take the time to reread several of Omaar's comments, and focus on the tone of his criticism. I realize that both you and Omaar support the same candidate, but that doesn't excuse condoning or bupassing his abusive posts.
          Do you accept that distinction?

  • Posted By: jane.simpson.wilson @ 07/24/2008 5:34:29 PM

    His travel abroad was a travesty. Can you imagine RFK pulling the same stint because he was "just" Attorney General under his Brother's Administration. When I visited the wailing wall, ( I am Christian, as Obama claims he is ) I stood at a great distance and did not approach, nor pretend to pray, or understand the sacrament that is the Wailing Wall. I felt it was my place to stay reverently at a distance and observe. The straw that broke my camel's back was seeing Barry Obama at The Wall, with a cap, observing, praying, or whatever the photo-op he was getting. Shame on you Obama. Stay at home, and do your work here, where it really counts. You are a feather-weight abroad, and everyone, but you, seems to know it.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 07/24/2008 5:47:41 PM

      He did pretty well by all accounts.
      I don't think everyone knows it. I don't think many know this. I think that he was respectful and wanted to be a part of what he was seeing and feeling. I don't understand why you would be so negative and judgemental.

      • Posted By: jane.simpson.wilson @ 07/24/2008 8:05:10 PM

        In case you haven't noticed, the light-weight is a one-term Senator, with no experience in the Military, in Justice, or in International Law. I'm not being judgemental, if he had had any experience in any of these areas, he wouldn't be pretending to be someone that he is not.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 07/24/2008 10:20:36 PM

          What is he pretending to be

          • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 4:45:09 AM

            raddave -

            He's pretending to be a serious, qualified, capable candidate for president.

            • Posted By: raddave @ 07/25/2008 10:05:33 AM

              He doesn't have to pretend that. He has already proven himself by WINNING the Democratic Primary.

            • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 7:46:18 AM

              Davole, Obama has all these qualifications. He doesn't pretend. Now McCain, he is a very different story. He has no clue as to what he believes in. His own party doesn't like him. The Evangelicals don't like him. He loses in Nov.

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 7:43:46 AM

          Pretending? You are ridiculous!

    • Posted By: raddave @ 07/24/2008 5:56:08 PM

      You seem to forget that the McCain camp challanged Obama to go overseas, and now you are damning him for it. You also seem to forget that McCain recently traveled to South and Central America and to Mexico.

      • Posted By: jane.simpson.wilson @ 07/24/2008 8:02:59 PM

        McCain also has an advance and serious case of PTSD. The guy is off the beam, a loaded missle. I am not advocated either candidate, I think that they are both out of thier leagues.

        • Posted By: jane.simpson.wilson @ 07/24/2008 8:17:52 PM

          This choice in "08 is a case of worse and worst.

          • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/24/2008 9:30:45 PM

            I am definitely with you on THAT one. : - (

          • Posted By: raddave @ 07/24/2008 10:18:44 PM

            You must be a Clinton supporter

  • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/23/2008 8:54:04 AM

    As for Malaki's recent remarks concerning troop withdrawls....I think I'll stick with what the Generals want...we all know what happens when Politicians start dictating Military strategy. (ie Bush failed attemps in Iraq until the Surge started).

    But Maliki's public utterances do not provide a reliable guide as to when it will be safe to pull out U.S. troops. Better to listen to the military professionals. The Post recently quoted Brig. Gen. Bilal al-Dayni, commander of Iraqi troops in Basra, as saying of the Americans, "We hope they will stay until 2020." That is similar to the expectation of Iraq's defense minister, Abdul Qadir, who says his forces cannot assume full responsibility for internal security until 2012 and for external security until 2018.
    What would happen if we were to pull out much faster, on a 16-month timetable? Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Hammond, commander of coalition forces in Baghdad, says that would be "very dangerous" -- the same words used by Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/22/AR2008072202550.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

    Malaki is a politician who has been saying he can handle Iraq for the last 3 years....he like Obama never wanted the additional Troops from the Surge....yet he like Obama is trying to reap all the benefits....Without the Surge and its successes, Obama nor Malaki could even talk about a troop withdrawal right now.
    Who has the judgment to lead...John McCain, who put his political life on the line for what he believed in.
    Getting into Iraq was a mistake but don't double down on a mistake by punishing the Iraqis. What has Obama put his political life on the line for? Anything?

    • Posted By: raddave @ 07/23/2008 12:51:36 PM

      Your argument that the politicians should not dictate strategy does not hold water. If the President calls for troops to be withdrawn from Iraq, it is not a strategic decision, but a matter of policy. And, as Commander in Chief, the President DOES dictate policy to the Military. As for "listening to the Generals" over the Prime Minister of Iraq. Iraq's P.M. is the democratically elected head of a sovereign state and if he says he wants the U.S to withdraw all combat forces by 2010, then it must be so. The U.S. is no longer an "occupying force" of Iraq and therefore we have no legal authority over the country. Whether Al Maliki listend to his Generals is a matter for the iraqis to consider, not the U.S.

      • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/25/2008 9:34:43 AM

        I like your last line....although I'd put it in context with Obama....Obama doesn't want to listen to our Generals....they all say a timeline is wrong and will lead to bad consequences. Who is a better judge of Military matters a General, Admiral or Politician?
        Please don't rush to answer.....

        I agree a President dictates policy, but policy doesn't dictate strategy....the strategy and tactics have and should always be planned and executed by the Military, they are the experts not politicians....look at the mess Bush and Rummy got us into because they though they knew more than the Generals.....It's funny because that has been a Dem talking point for years....but now it's been conveniently forgotten because Obama knows so much more about military matters than the Generals....it's hypocritical for the Dems to blast Bush for not listening to the Generals, but praise Obama for not listening to the Generals.
        Of course this is my opinion and I know you won't and can't agree with me.

    • Posted By: News and Notes @ 07/23/2008 10:33:26 AM

      Malaki is an incompetent blob, and the handling of this war has been too long, costly, and poorly executed

      • Posted By: raddave @ 07/23/2008 10:10:04 PM

        Hey, we incompetant blobs find that offensive

  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 8:31:12 AM

    Davole, I replied to your PUMA comment. But you already know what the contents are.

  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 8:29:54 AM

    Barack Obama is called 'empty suit' every day on these blogs. In reality, the 'empty suit' is John McCain. Where is McCain? Is he still in the running? He is the invisible candidate. No substance.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/24/2008 7:25:45 PM

    Here's our pal Barack Obama, saying that the Senate Banking Committee....."which is my committee,"... he says they passed some bill about something. Problem is, HE IS NOT ON the Senate Banking Committee at all. Maybe he meant to say he's on the SENATE LIARS COMMITTEE where he passed a bill about MAKING SH*T UP.

    Hussein Obama....Liar Liar Pants on Fire. Well what can you expect from a CROOK and a FRAUD.

    NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: jane.simpson.wilson @ 07/24/2008 8:14:34 PM

      NOBAMA!

      • Posted By: raddave @ 07/24/2008 11:11:21 PM

        GOBAMA!!!!

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/25/2008 12:07:37 AM

          GOBAMA??? Where are you from? Iran?? The proper terminology is..............ROLL TIDE.

          Me though, I say....GO DAWGS!!!!! SIC 'EM....WOOF! WOOF! WOOF!

          A mohammed in the White House??? GOD Forbid. And HE Has.

          NOBAMA!!!

          • Posted By: raddave @ 07/25/2008 8:20:23 AM

            Do you think God cares who is the POTUS? We are not the chosen people.

          • Posted By: raddave @ 07/25/2008 8:19:16 AM

            Hey, if you can say NOBAMA, like you are an Auburn fan. I can say GOBAMA

        • Posted By: jane.simpson.wilson @ 07/24/2008 11:50:20 PM

          No Stinking BARRY OBAMA

          • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 8:11:14 AM

            I see you have manners. McCain would be so proud of his supporters who embarass him. That's why he loses.

        • Posted By: Davole @ 07/25/2008 5:36:26 AM

          raddave -

          I agree - "GOBAMA" - yes, do go, either to the middle east or Europe, and stay there!

          • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 8:09:57 AM

            D, Obama will go only to one place. The White House.

  • Posted By: daisy21 @ 07/23/2008 10:27:40 PM

    How many more articles in Newsweek do we have to endure about the new messiah, Barack Obama? Looking on the website, I see one Obama article after another. Some want to give advice to Obama, some want to laud his wonderful trip, etc. How many covers of Obama has Newsweek run versus McCain?
    The media is becoming quite an embarassment to themselves. It seems instead of covering a Presidential campaign, most media outlets seem to think we are voting for the next American Idol.

    • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 07/24/2008 6:11:31 PM

      EXCITEMENT SELLS!

      Should Sen. Obama apologize for having a personality?

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/25/2008 8:13:58 AM

        Personality! You got that right Seej! These people here are just jealous.

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/24/2008 8:29:13 AM

      As many as Newsweek wants. It is their site. You no like, you no read.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse