Obama Abroad

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Jack999 @ 07/22/2008 12:10:59 AM

    HOLY........John McCain opinion article about Iraq offered to The New York Times as a rebuttal to Democrat Barack Obama had been rejected. ...TO BE FRANK To YOU many AMERICANS ALREADY REJECT HIM MONTHS AGO...........so please stop all this nonsense OK?????

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/22/2008 12:21:01 AM

      McCain will win EASILY. It's not going to be close. Hussein's true nature and past, will continue to be revealed. He is a CROOK and a FRAUD.

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/22/2008 2:56:56 PM

        No HR, McCain won't win.

        • Posted By: News and Notes @ 07/22/2008 3:28:29 PM

          Hubirs... arrogance..... incompetence

          • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/22/2008 7:55:26 PM

            News and Notes, if your comments are for me personally, you don't know me. If your comments are for Obama, wrong again, he's not like that either.

            • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 8:03:45 PM

              Pia, with all due respect, there's no need to know your personally... you have made numerous claims that Obama has the election won. You're entitled to your own opinion of course, but not your own facts....

              Obama has not been elected yet!

              • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/22/2008 8:32:09 PM

                With all due respect to you, I have a right to post my opinion without News and Notes or anyone else commenting that I show arrogance and incompetance. When you post your opinion, do I disrespect you? Have I disrespected News and Notes in my posts to him? No. I have manners. And again, IMO, Obama wins!

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 07/22/2008 8:11:18 PM

    Progress in Iraq was not a (Sole U.S. Military Surge Success)

    Did John McCain Concieve, Create and have Joint Military Cheifs implement his Military Strategy ?

    Ans: No, McCain did Not, McCain only Agreed and Voted Yes to Adding more Troops, His Often Touted (Surge) and its so called Success, In Iraq, but Not Afghanistan

    Majority of the Success goes to the Collective Iraq Citizens and the Sunni's Collective in Iraq.

    That could CHANGE at any MOMENT !!

    look at the Length that it has taken to get to this Touch & Go Moment.

    McCain said "The US Troops should Stay there Indefinitely"

    "For 100 Years, a 1000 years, for as long as it takes" !!!


    He then Clarifies and Follows up his statements with....

    "Were still in Germany, Japan & France"

    He does not Clarify by saying those Countries have Enemies All around them and CHOOSE to have our Presence there....

    Key Word: CHOOSE, Meaning their CHOICE

    Iraq Leaders, President & Prime Minister and the iraqi People want Us Out !!!

    The Bush Government is already Downsizing Troops (5-Brigades) ahead of Schedule.

    Were Withdrawing Anyway.

    Bush has his Infamous "Time Horizons" and

    Obama has his Timetable, Timeline and Time of Exit Strategy.


    Obama has said in the past that we Needed More Troops in Afghanistan and John McCain Shot that fact DOWN !!!

    Last Week Obama says send (2 Brigades) to Afghanistan and later John McCain says Send (3 Brigades)

    Obama says we should have Direct Meetings with opposition Countries (Direct Diplomacy) and Now the Bush Administration, is Iniating Direct Diplomacy-talks with Iran & N. Korea.

    Let John McCain have his One Moment of Solace...Thats all He'll be getting and he's Wearing that One plus he has into the GROUND !!!

    McCain has Not been in Afghanistan in (2) Years and he Talks about Obama...Ha !!

    McCain sure as Hell did Not back the Jim Webb Sponsored and Extensive, VA-GI Bill, that was Supported by Obama and Others, Crossing Both Political Parties and Rightly so.

    McCain what a Great Veteran

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/22/2008 8:10:55 PM

    PART 1 - BARACK OBAMAs FRIEND: Rashid Khalidi (Palestinian Activist)

    Obamas relationship with Rashid Khalidi goes beyond conversation. Khalidis ties to Obama were first exposed by WND in February in a widely cited article.

    According to a professor at the University of Chicago who said he has known Obama for 12 years, the Democratic presidential hopeful befriended Khalidi when the two worked together at the University. The professor spoke on condition of anonymity. Khalidi lectured at the University of Chicago until 2003 while Obama taught law there from 1993 until his election to the Senate in 2004.

    Sources at the university told World Net Daily (WND) that Khalidi and Obama lived in nearby faculty residential zones and that the two families dined together a number of times. The sources said the Obamas even babysat the Khalidi children.

    Khalidi in 2000 held what was described as a successful Fundraiser for Obamas failed bid for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, a fact not denied by Khalidi, who spoke to WND in February.

    As WND reported, an ANTI-ISRAEL Arab group run by Khalidi's wife, Mona, received crucial funding from a Chicago nonprofit, the Woods Fund, for which Obama served as a board member with William Ayers (the notorious terrorist from infamous Weather Underground (VIDEO).
    .
    In 2001, the Woods Fund, which describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a $40,000 grant to Khalidis Arab American Action Network, or AAAN. The fund provided a second grant to the AAAN for $35,000 in 2002.

    Speakers at AAAN dinners and events routinely have taken an ANTI-ISRAEL line.
    The group co-sponsored a Palestinian art exhibit, titled, The Subject of Palestine, that featured works related to what some Palestinians call the Nakba or catastrophe of Israels founding in 1948.

    When Khalidi departed the University of Chicago in 2003, Obama delivered an in-person testimonial at a farewell ceremony reminiscing about conversations over meals prepared by Mona Khalidi.

    According to a Los Angeles Times account, Obama said his talks with the Khalidis served as consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases. It is for that reason that I am hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation ??? a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashids dinner table, but around THIS ENTIRE WORLD.

    (Continued from another of my Posts below)

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 07/22/2008 8:10:27 PM

    http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/22/odierno-mccain-100/

    Gen. Raymond Odierno will take over the Iraq Occupation after General Patraeus...fact

    He told Jim Webb that the US Would Not stay in Iraq Indifinitely.

    This War took enough Lives 1 Million Innocent Iraqi Citizens & Over 4,096 Honorable US Military Men & Women's Lives, Killed under false Pretenses, to get to this point and its still a Touch and Go situation.

    McCain is Wrong, We will NOT stay in Iraq, even if it takes 100 Yrs or More, Iraq is NOT Germany, Japan or Korea and we will Withdraw from Iraq as we are doing Presently, so that Dispells McCain's USA Indifinite Stay in Iraq ...

    Odierno responded that the end point would be when Iraq has a ???self-reliant government, a professionalized security force, and major political reconciliation. Webb asked what the U.S. presence should be if those conditions are met:

    WEBB: Well, what what is the end point of the United States involvement in Iraq? Lets say that Iraq meets the conditions you just talked about. Should there be a United States military presence in Iraq?

    ODIERNO: I think that???s a discussion we would have along several levels. Not only from the MNF-I command or the Central Command level and obviously our civilian leadership to decide what their policy would be in the future toward Iraq.

    WEBB: Do you believe that if those conditions are met, there would be a need for the United States military in Iraq?

    ODIERNO: I do not. I believe what we would want, though, is to maintain obviously military contacts as we do with many countries over the world.

    Watch it:




    Odiernos statement pours cold water on Sen. John McCains (R-AZ) infamous claim that the U.S. should maintain a presence in Iraq, for as much as 100 or 10,000 years. Fine with me,

    McCain says,as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed.

    But as Odierno said today, in the case that those conditions are met (a big if, as Max Bergmann notes), the U.S. military does not need to keep troops in the country.

    Thats a very important clarification, Webb concluded.

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/22/2008 8:10:24 PM

    (Continued from another of my Posts above)

    PART 2 - BARACK OBAMAs Friend Rashid Khalidi (Palestinian Activist)

    Khalidis farewell dinner was replete with ANTI-ISRAEL speakers. One, a young Palestinian American, recited a poem in Obamas presence that accused the Israeli government of terrorism in its treatment of Palestinians and sharply criticized U.S. support of Israel, the Times reported: Another speaker, who reportedly talked while Obama was present, compared ZIONIST SETTLERS ON THE WEST BANK to Osama bin Laden.
    ISRAEL A CONSTANT SORE.

    Just last week, WND noted Obama termed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a "constant sore" in an interview just five days after Khalidi wrote an opinion piece in the Nation magazine in which he called the Palestinian question a RUNNING SORE.

    In his piece, Palestine: Liberation Deferred, Khalidi suggests Israel carried out ETHNIC CLEANSING of Palestinians; writes Western powers backed Israels establishment due to guilt of the Holocaust; laments the Palestinian Authoritys stated acceptance of a Palestinian state ONLY in the WEST BANK, GAZA STRIP and EASTERN SECTIONS OF JERUSALEM; and argues ISRAEL SHOULD BE DISSOLVED and instead a bi-national, cantonal system should be set up in which Jews and Arabs reside.

    During documented speeches and public events, Khalidi has called Israel an apartheid system in creation and a destructive RACIST state. He has multiple times implied support for Palestinian TERROR, calling SUICIDE BOMBINGS A RESPONSE TO ISRAELI AGGRESSION. He dedicated his 1986 book, Under Siege, to those who gave their lives in defense of the cause of Palestine and independence of Lebanon.

    Critics assailed the book as excusing Palestinian terrorism and claim the dedication is in reference to the Palestine Liberation Organization, which at that time committed scores of anti-Western attacks and was labeled by the U.S. as a terrorist group SYMPATHY FOR THE PALESTINIAN CAUSE.

    Speaking in a joint interview with WND and WABC radio, Khalidi was asked about his 2000 fundraiser for Obama. I was just doing my duties as a Chicago resident to help my local politician, Khalidi stated.

    Khalidi said he supports OBAMA for president, because he is the only candidate who has EXPRESSED SYMPATHY FOR THE PALESTINIAN CAUSE.

    Khalidi also LAUDED OBAMA FOR SAYING HE SUPPORTS TALKS WITH IRAN. If the U.S. can talk with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, there is no reason it cannot talk with the Iranians. Asked about Obamas role funding the AAAN, Khalidi claimed he had never heard of the Woods Fund until it popped up on a bunch of blogs a few months ago.
    He terminated the call when petitioned further about his links with Obama. (WONDER WHY?). SOURCE: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=65108

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/22/2008 8:08:05 PM

    PART 1 - BARACK OBAMAS FRIENDS : William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn (Admitted Terrorists of the Weather Underground)

    Obamas Relationships Stemming from his Directorship of the WOODS FUND

    * Obamas Problematic Directorship at Woods Fund with WILLIAM AYERS

    Barack Obama was a director of the Woods Fund board from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the Funds website.

    While the Chicago Sun Times provides a laundry list of Obamas problematic relationships (Rezko, Farrakhan, Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, Austan Goolsbee, list goes on), none may prove more ultimately controversial than fellow Woods Fund Directors William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.

    As others have mentioned, WILLIAM (BILL) AYERS and wife BERNADINE DOHRN were once notorious members of the Weather Underground, TERRORIST BOMBERS who attempted to overthrow the United State Government. http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2008/02/obamas-bill-ayers-problem.html
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=BpDUU3Z7dm4&feature=related
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMOtNHyejrU

    Bill Ayers was Obamas (radical) mentor whom he has known since 1995. The Ayers were principals in Baracks first run for the State Senate. The Ayers hosted a Meet the Candidate dinner/meeting at the Ayers home. Not an attractive character for a President to hang out with and to not answer to what he learned from Ayers after all those years.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fV_h-XwchkY

    William Ayers, quoted on Sept. 11, 2001: Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon.

    [Ayers and Dohrn] disappeared in 1970, after a bomb, designed to kill army officers in New Jersey, accidentally destroyed a Greenwich Village townhouse, and turned themselves into authorities in 1980. They were never prosecuted for their involvement with the 25 bombings the Weather Underground claimed; charges were dropped because of improper FBI surveillance.

    I DO NOT REGRET SETTING BOMBS. I feel we did not do enough, AYERS TOLD the New York Times in 2001. http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/

    Ayers was a terrorist. His wife Bernardine Dohrn was a terrorist. (She knows and worked in the same law firm with Michelle Obama). Ayers has never offered one word of apology. He glories in it, thinks it is terrific. And that to me is not what I would call acceptable or mainstream behavior, said Dan Polsby, a former law professor at Northwestern who is now Dean of George Mason University Law School. If Obama takes a different view on that - well, OK, that is data about Obama.
    SOURCE: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/03/obamas-problematic-directorship-woods.html

    (Continued in another of my posts below)

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/22/2008 8:07:36 PM

    (Continued from another of my Posts above)

    PART 2 Woods Funds Investments (association with Radical Groups):

    Setting aside Obamas relationship with William Ayers, the Board on which they served together deserves additional scrutiny. And, in fact, the Woods Funds INVESTMENTS appear to be quite problematic for Obama.

    * Arab American Action Network (AAAN): Supports expanded rights for illegal aliens and was founded by anti-Israel professor Rashid Khalidi, former director of the PLO press agency and onetime moderator of PLO advisory committee.

    AAAN views the United States as a nation wherein ARAB CITIZENS are routinely MALTREATED. To remedy this perceived societal injustice, the organization aims to challenge government policies that violate the civil, political and human rights OF THE ARAB American and ARAB immigrant community. Among these policies are DETENTIONS, DEPORTATIONS and OTHER ATTACKS on immigrants that result from Homeland Security measures!

    AAANs hostile view of the JEWISH state is further manifest in the organizations reference to Israels creation in 1948 as Al Nakba ( The Catastrophe ).

    Among the current luminaries of AAANs staff are (a) Vice President Ali Abunimah, who maintains the website ElectroicIntifada.com and is a Board member of the Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center, and (b) Executive Director Hatem Abudayyeh, who has condemned the Israeli government and its military killing machine.

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    * American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) is a Radical Quaker organization that supports Americas unilateral disarmament (and that backed) the Vietnamese Communists, Pol Pot, Fidel Castro, and the PLO.

    In fact, AFSC recently formed a partnership with MEChA. MEChA is one of several groups that intend to reclaim Aztlán (the southwestern portion of the United States):
    The AFSC is a Chicana and Chicano student movement directly linked to Aztlán. As Chicanas and Chicanos of Aztlán, they say they are a nationalist movement of Indigenous Gente that LAY CLAIM TO THE LAND THAT IS OURS BY BIRTHRIGHT. As a nationalist movement we seek to free our people from the exploitation of an oppressive society that occupies our land. Put simply, MEChA's mission is straightforward. To overthrow the United States Government and establish a new form of government.

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    SUMMARY

    Put very simply, Obama must explain not only his relationship to Ayers and Dohrn, but also his SUPPORT OF RADICAL GROUPS that support the overthrow of the United States Government. The MainStreamMedia is doing us a huge disservice not focusing more on his past and fully vetting him.
    SOURCE: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=65108

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 07/22/2008 8:07:06 PM

    Jeremiah Wright did NOT say anything Racist, it was Dissention in Opposition of Current & Past US Admniistrations....

    Had he said "God Damn America" that is TRUE, Wright did say that...

    But he Did NOT say "God Damn White America"

    Had Wright said ..."God Damn White America" now that would be "Racism & Racist"

    He was Indicting the Bush Administartion and Current government, which is Comprised of Every Race, Religion & Political Party.


    So You ParaNoid Racist, looking for an Angle of Branding Michelle Obama as Racist...

    When she said "For the 1st time in my Adult Life, I'm Proud to be an American" are Dead Wrong !!

    Are any of YOU PROUD of the the KKK and it's 1000's of Black American Lynchings, with Post Cards sold and used Showing the Brutal Mistreament of Black Americans, Church Bombings, Barring Black Americans from playing MLB, like Jackie Robinson and satchell Page, as well as Others Black Americans, U.S. Southern Jim Crow Laws, Depriving Black Americans the Right to Vote, in a Free Voting Democracy, in the land of the Free and the Brave, are you Proud of the Dixiecrats and the Republican Party welcoming them into their Party, without reservation, knowing what that party stood for !!! Or the U.S. Segregated Miltary Troops, although these Black Americans have Fought and Died in Every War this country has ever participated in, also Viet Nam, The Korean War and The Branch Davidian Killings in Texas, The Assanations of President John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Malcolm X and Marti L. King Jr.....

    Are Any of You Proud of that America ?


    Then I Guess John McCain must be Anti-American also, when he said...

    "I Never Loved America, until I was Deprived of her Company"

    You can Find Racism, Especially when you are a Bonafide "Racist"

  • Posted By: lee226 @ 07/20/2008 7:04:27 PM

    I think they have all the interest in the world to say that they have succedeed since they have been told to leave. They certainly can say...well we have not finished the job and there are still problems here.
    This is PR to save face. Just a month ago we were not ready and now we are....Why would we spend 700 million for an embassy if we did not wanted to stay there for long time?

    • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/20/2008 8:02:53 PM

      ANSWER: Because once the surge worked, which it has, the plan was (is) to carefully withdraw our troops over a period of time, and we will have the need for an Embassy to house our diplomats. And given that, we will be keeping some of our troops in IRAQ to protect that embassy and diplomats. As McCain has said continuously, just like we have done after some other wars, we planned on keeping a presence of troops in Iraq. .

      • Posted By: Evnev8 @ 07/21/2008 12:48:18 PM

        People that shout "The surge worked!" yet fail to even mention that part for the decline in violence was due in part to American Tax Dollars going to Iraqi citizens in order to encourage them to not shot each other have no credibility on the matter.
        If John McCain was right on this and Barack was "Dead Wrong", fine. Point for McCain. But then Barack was right on the initial run up to the war (say what you will about him not being in congress at the time.) and John McCain was "DEAD WRONG".

        Just imagine where the War in Iraq would be if Barack Obama was President? Ha! Trick question. There wouldn't have BEEN a war in Iraq if he were President! Millions of Iraqi's wouldn't have been killed or maimed and we would have NEVER left the job in Afghanistan UNFINISHED.

        • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/22/2008 8:05:56 PM

          The surge worked. McCain pushed for it . It was a success. Now we can start getting our troops home.

  • Posted By: Jack999 @ 07/21/2008 11:33:58 PM

    Http:\\www.fightthesmears.com.........BULLSHIT LIES from "HOLLY VIRGIN"

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/21/2008 11:36:59 PM

      check it out for yourself. Not my words.............................
      ..... http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/07/21/forensics-expert-obama-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery ........

      NOBAMA!!!


      • Posted By: Jack999 @ 07/21/2008 11:47:13 PM

        US Election department NOT STUPID like you and John MCCain Lies.....We already know who you're HOLLY GRAIL........

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/21/2008 11:49:49 PM

          then you should be worried. Hussein is a crook and a fraud. I have told you for months.

          NOBAMA!!!

          • Posted By: Jack999 @ 07/21/2008 11:59:35 PM

            You TOLD IS LIES AND LIES for month already...Why dont you stop your ever continous LIES?

            • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 07/22/2008 12:04:51 AM

              The LIE is who and what, Hussein portrays himself to be. He is a CROOK and a FRAUD. It will all be revealed. He is unelectible. So, go cry a river....NO DON'T...you would want the Nat'l Guard to rescue you.

              NOBAMA!!!

              • Posted By: raddave @ 07/22/2008 6:44:33 PM

                we are still waiting for it to be revealed.

                • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/22/2008 7:56:55 PM

                  Yup and I'm still waiting on that other lie too, the one by Sinclair.

      • Posted By: Jack999 @ 07/21/2008 11:55:45 PM

        http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19451.htm

        John MCain Biggest LIAR.......every Americans already know it....Sick and tired of him...........excepted you and few dogs.

  • Posted By: chindognyc @ 07/21/2008 8:48:29 AM

    They are about to have a big party in Europe for the arrival of Barack Obama, our next President. He has proven himself time after time. The White House is following Obama's advise. McCain still won't explain, why did he say to Sean Hannity that at one time, he too did not love America UNTIL he was deprived of her company. Why did he vote over 65% of the time, against bills that would improve women lives. He headed for the hills when it came to equal pay for women.

    • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/21/2008 9:34:01 AM

      "He has proven himself time after time. "

      Really. Exactly what has BHO done to "Prove himself". By his own admission, he started running for President while he was still getting lost in the Senate halls. B.O. doesn't have a thin resume, he has NO resume.

      And I still want to know why he sat in a pew listening to a racist maniac for twenty years.

      • Posted By: chindognyc @ 07/21/2008 6:02:12 PM

        For the last time, Obama is not a racist. When you become a black person, then talk to Obama.

        • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 7:15:28 PM

          OK, let's say you're right. But his mentor certainly behaves like one. Remember, this is the guy who is in Obama's book, the one who married him and his wife. The one who thinks the KKK runs the government... you know, the same government that created aids to destroy blacks and gays? Why would he hang out with this guy for so many years if he opposed his views?

          And no, I don't need to become black to understand B.O.

      • Posted By: GoHomeFascist @ 07/21/2008 8:37:38 PM

        You have no proof of what was said or not said over the last 20 years in his church, unless you were sitting next to him for the last 20 years. You only believe what you saw in a heavily edited sound bite clip from 2001 and you continually state his pastor is a "racist maniac". It sounds to me that your only qualification to be POTUS is to have a squeeky clean pastor? Get a clue fascist.

        • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 9:59:05 AM

          You believe he sat there for 20 years and didn't hear any of Wright's tirades? Jeeezzz, they were for sale in the gift shop and published on the internet!

          And you call me facist for questioning someone who wants to our president?

          Though I don't know you, you are obviously blind, deaf and completely ingnorant to think B.O. sat there for 20 years and didn't hear a word.

  • Posted By: Jack999 @ 07/22/2008 6:32:21 PM

    Many of us who live in the USA feel much the same. It has been over six years since that small band of terrorists attacked the World Trade Centers, and our country has never been the same since. Our land of freedom and good will has become a land of suspicion and fear. It seems like the terrorists won. They planted the seed of fear in the hearts of our people. Our people allowed that seed to blossom into paranoia, then chose weak leaders willing to sacrifice our sacred freedoms in the name of security. Immediately after the 911 attack, people began to attach US flags on their cars. They pasted small signs on their window and auto bumpers with sayings like, "united we stand", "we shall never forget" and "God bless America". We call this "bumper sticker patriotism". These same people cowered at home, afraid to fly in any airplane, terrified of another attack. They became suspicious of all strangers. Our opportunistic politicians promised to restore our security by enacting precautionary laws and regulations. Slowly, they robbed us of our essential freedoms, all in the name of protection. Anyone who spoke against them was labeled a coward, a traitor or a fool.
    I do not despair. Democracy has a resiliency that allows it to heal itself given enough time. The people of the USA are already beginning to awaken. They realize that our leaders have eroded our basic freedoms in the name of security, and they do not like it. Our last election was a beacon of hope. Many of the conservative exploiters of fear were removed from office. Slowly, our politicians are beginning to restore our cherished freedoms.
    We are not a people who believe in aggression, in torture or in the violation of human rights. The foundation of our government is based on "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". We were once the beacon of hope for oppressed people in other lands and we want to gain that title back. Most of us can see that we erred in allowing our freedom to be sacrificed so cheaply. I think we will fight to restore it. Our courage is slowly returning .

  • Posted By: luckyirish @ 07/21/2008 10:32:47 AM

    I smell fear when people site Obama as racist. Silly white people. I am Irish but grew up in an 80% black part of LA. Don't be afraid people. Black americas agenda mirrors our own. A good job, the ability to educate our children and keep them safe. The desire for opportunity and respect. Shall we continue with Bush's failed policies? Are you better off now than 7 years ago? I am not. Change sounds good. "You have nothing to fear but fear its self." Obama is not a threat to your right to bear arms, swill beer or invest in recliners for your TV pleasure.

    • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/21/2008 12:04:10 PM

      "I smell fear when people site Obama as racist. Silly white people"

      Pardon me, but I am a little leary of a man who wants to be our president, sits in a church with his "mentor", who IS a maniacal racist. He lies about it, saying he had never heard him say those things, then, when he figured out how stupid that was, admitted he did hear them, but he could not disown him. (Which he did later when it became politically expedient for him to do so).

      You, like Obama, just can't image why that bothers most Americans.

      Show me who your friends are, and I'll show you who you are.

      • Posted By: Lety @ 07/21/2008 2:00:29 PM

        Please give it up with the pastor issue!!! Every comment you enter it's the same! Be a little more creative, think of something else.
        Maybe you can't?

        • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/21/2008 3:07:07 PM

          Give me an answer and I'll give it up! Yes, it's important to me why someone who wants to be our president listens to a maniac for 20 years! He either agrees with him, or he's deaf. Those are the only two reasons I can think of that he would stay. Sheesh, even Oprah Winfrey left after a week or two!

          • Posted By: raddave @ 07/21/2008 5:20:59 PM

            Oprah was a member for 2 years, not 2 weeks.

            • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 8:59:16 AM

              Whatever!!!! She left, didn't she?

              • Posted By: raddave @ 07/22/2008 6:20:58 PM

                So did Obama.

              • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/22/2008 3:12:13 PM

                Doesn't matter why or when Oprah left. Maybe she was too busy or too tired. Nobody cares.

                • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 4:39:08 PM

                  She left because she knew the "Reverend" Wright, was insane! Duhhhhh!!!

      • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/21/2008 2:38:59 PM

        What about Sen. McCain going after Pastor Hagee's endorsement for a year, then walking away from it when it became public knowledge that Pastor Hagee preached that Hitler was sent by God to round up Jews? We haven't heard boo from you about it.

        • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/21/2008 3:03:26 PM

          Elizabeth, I agree about Hagee. Yes, McC dumped him when he found out about him, unlike Obama, who sat there for 20 years. Now that that's outta the way, can you tell me why he stayed in that church, knowing what he knew for all that time?

          • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/22/2008 2:42:53 PM

            Sen. Obama need not explain to anyone why he attended his church or listened to Rev. Wright's sermons. It's called freedom of religion. The purpose of a sermon is to provoke thought, not agreement. Your rants about Rev. Wright are beyond stale.

            • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 3:01:51 PM

              Yet you keep replying! You don't have an answer.... and don't give me that crap about freedom of religion. It doesn't wash.

            • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 2:58:12 PM

              Must you spin so? You hide behind the "freedom of region" thing, when one questions the man's associations with the likes of Wright and Farrakahn. My God, the man wants to be the leader of the free world and you give him a pass!

              You're so easy!

      • Posted By: raddave @ 07/21/2008 12:20:41 PM

        I don't know about you, but my friends are not me. I am my own man.

      • Posted By: lee226 @ 07/21/2008 12:13:34 PM

        Bushed....the friends of Bush are the Osama bin laden family they actually do business together.
        But that is not unusual for the Bushes. Back in the war with Hitler the Bushes were doing business with the germans. Business comes first along with money and power of course.

  • Posted By: Jack999 @ 07/22/2008 6:16:41 PM

    Ja ist Herr, Obama amerikanischer Wahrer Oberbefehlshaber

    JA KÖNNEN WIR OBAMA 08

  • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/22/2008 5:37:06 PM

    This is hilarious....
    Couric: But talking microcosmically, did the surge, the addition of 30,000 additional troops ... help the situation in Iraq?

    Obama: Katie, as ??? you've asked me three different times, and I have said repeatedly that there is no doubt that our troops helped to reduce violence. There's no doubt.

    Couric: And I really don't mean to belabor this, Senator, because I'm really, I'm trying ??? to figure out your position. Do you think the level of security in Iraq ???

    Obama: Yes.

    Couric ??? would exist today without the surge?

    Obama: Katie, I have no idea what would have happened had we applied my approach, which was to put more pressure on the Iraqis to arrive at a political reconciliation. So this is all hypotheticals. What I can say is that there's no doubt that our U.S. troops have contributed to a reduction of violence in Iraq. I said that-- not just today, not just yesterday, but I've said that-- previously.

  • Posted By: Chloe123 @ 07/21/2008 1:04:27 PM

    You all who support the "child" are just so naive and forgetful that you have left out one important factor: He is NOT READY FOR CHANGE. He has barely changed his diapers. Please, wake up- get a grip, and grow up before you make A HUGE MISTAKE. Obama spent 20 years hating America, if he didn't wint he primary he would still be Rev Wrights best friend!

    • Posted By: raddave @ 07/21/2008 1:28:19 PM

      Obama is 47, not 17. If elected, he will not be the youngest president. JFK was 44 when he took office. You speak of diapers, Obama is out of diapers, McCain is getting old enough to start wearing diapers again.

      • Posted By: News and Notes @ 07/21/2008 3:10:57 PM

        Kennedy had 14 years in congress when he was elected. Gerald Ford had 25. Others in recent history had been Governors.

        • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 5:30:54 PM

          Correct. Obama has done nothing.

      • Posted By: News and Notes @ 07/21/2008 3:11:28 PM

        Gerald Ford had 25 years when he was sworn in, not elected .He was never elected

    • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/21/2008 1:09:09 PM

      "Obama spent 20 years hating America, if he didn't wint he primary he would still be Rev Wrights best friend!"

      How very, very true.

      • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/21/2008 1:59:40 PM

        Rev. Wright does not hate America, he hates its systemic racism. Thinking Americans 'get' the distinction.

        • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/21/2008 2:19:33 PM

          goddam america. Nawww, he doesn't hate America, does he.

          • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/21/2008 2:42:50 PM

            He said god damn America's for its racism. And he's right.

            • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/21/2008 2:47:24 PM

              You got that straight from the rev. Wright, right? I'll bet you're attractive in your rose colored glasses.

              • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/21/2008 5:38:11 PM

                You probably prefer Hannity's sermons, that know-it-all who not only flunked out of New York University but also out of a Catholic seminary. Rev. Wright has a doctorate from Harvard and is well-respected in theological circles. Sen. Obama need not apologize to you or anyone for attending Rev. Wright's church. Next question?

                • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/21/2008 7:12:03 PM

                  No sense in asking you the next question, as you still can't answer the one I asked. Instead, you go alter course and go off on a tirade about Sean Hannity?

                  • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/22/2008 2:24:21 PM

                    Deliberately distorting Rev. Wright's sermon, ala Hannity's bastardized version of it,, won't convince
                    fair-minded Americans that Rev. Wright is anti-American. Rev. Wright's sermon was critical of
                    America's systemic racism: a distinction incomprehensible to bigots.

                  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/21/2008 9:08:57 PM

                    Sean Hannity deserves it. He has been stuck on gloating on Wright and Obama for months. Playing Wright's video over and over again, is his favorite pastime.

                • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/21/2008 9:07:15 PM

                  Sean Hannity has a buddy who is a neo-Nazi

            • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 07/21/2008 8:33:51 PM

              Second.

            • Posted By: News and Notes @ 07/21/2008 3:12:01 PM

              Defending Wright will not help Obama

              • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/21/2008 5:30:16 PM

                Attacking Obama won't help McCain.

          • Posted By: raddave @ 07/21/2008 5:41:50 PM

            Read the entire quote from Rev. Wright and you will see that he is condeming what he believes is the racism of our Government. "And the United States of America government, when it came to treating her citizens of Indian descent fairly, she failed. She put them on reservations. When it came to treating her citizens of Japanese descent fairly, she failed. She put them in internment prison camps. When it came to treating her citizens of African descent fairly, America failed. She put them in chains, the government put them on slave quarters, put them on auction blocks, put them in cotton field, put them in inferior schools, put them in substandard housing, put them in scientific experiments, put them in the lowest paying jobs, put them outside the equal protection of the law, kept them out of their racist bastions of higher education and locked them into positions of hopelessness and helplessness....[13] The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no, not God Bless America. God damn America ??? that's in the Bible ??? for killing innocent people. God damn America, as long as she pretends to act like she is God, and she is supreme. The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent."

  • Posted By: Chloe123 @ 07/22/2008 6:56:33 AM

    This is absurd. 1st- The fact that we question the inexperiance of Obama and hope he gathers full knowledge in the middle east to attempt to achieve the highest office says clearly he is not ready. He is not qualified. 2- Out of the two candidates, it is obvious McCain has earned and deserves the Presidency compared to his opponent, he has served in the government and the military many, many more years. Americans are of the mindset that they should get what they don''t earn or deserve so they support a man they can relate to, but in supporting Obama it perpetuates the mindframe we are all looking to eventually change. Self reliance, experiance, and ability to make things happen. They call that REAL CHANGE.McCain will create the change people are afraid of, if only they opened their eyes.

    • Posted By: metzlerd @ 07/22/2008 5:30:27 PM

      Serving in the military does not earn you the right to become President. Demonstrating to the voters that you have a firm grasp on the problems that need fixing, and can recognise and come up with solutions is what earns you the right to serve as President. Demonstrating sound leadership capabilities, and the ability to inspire Americans to put forth effort for the common good is what earns you the right to serve as President.

    • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/22/2008 8:01:30 AM

      Don't talk change and try to make it a platform or propaganda tool. Change is a vision not a political stance. McCain will not change the divisiveness of the country, he will only make it worse. McCain dogs Social Security and yet benefits from it. McCain is behind on credit debt and yet talks about taxing working class so people like himself and his wife can maintain their lifestyle. Obama is about changing peoples' lives. He has a grasp on foreign affairs and domestic policy. He knows how to connect with not only U.S. citizens, but with World Leaders alike. If you want to stick with the straight talk, then stick with it, don't come in here talking about change. If you want true genuine, new political ways of thinking change, then vote Obama, but vote nonetheless.

      • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 9:19:53 AM

        Comment: Quote: "Change is a vision not a political stance." Yes, and Obama changes his vision almost daily!

        Quote: "Obama is about changing peoples' lives. He has a grasp on foreign affairs and domestic policy." Which, as mentioned, he changes daily.

        Quote: "Don't come in here talking about change." What??? Didn't you just say....

        • Posted By: Cloudosmoke @ 07/22/2008 9:29:22 AM

          And change is good. However McCain Flip flopping because of Obama's change is a complete repeat of Bush all over again. And Change is the vision of the Obama camp. Change is the political facade of the GOP. The GOP are all of a sudden changing their stance from "Cowboy way, stay the course" to "Change." But if that's the change you want, which is being a nation of whiners, bomb, bomb Iran, Send cigarettes and kill them off (which McCain sounds like a ruthless killer to me), then vote McCain. That's your decision.

  • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 07/22/2008 12:26:35 PM

    I hope Obama's crack team of foreign policy experts is better than he is on the Constitution...

    Obama: "[T]he objective of this trip was to have substantive discussions with people like President Karzai or Prime Minister Maliki or President Sarkozy or others who I expect to be dealing with over the next eight to 10 years."
    I'm sure that pesky 22nd Amendment will be repealed under an Obama Administration anyway.

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 07/22/2008 5:00:10 PM

      "Crack" team???

      Well I knew Obama used cocaine for years, but I didn't know he engaged in it as a team sport, LOL.

  • Posted By: just jerry @ 07/21/2008 12:14:26 PM

    Naive? He isn't naive, he is living in the past as if it were today! The major CHANGE not being discussed is the global economy and the profound impact that is having on people throughout the world; and that is beyond the ability of any one nation or even groups of nations to regulate. An economy based on making profit and accumulating wealth, not in the some beacon of hope satisfying Obama's political idealism.

    Certainly, there are those acting well in this global economy, but none can deny that others aren't, and that those acting badly don't have a profound negative impact globally.

    Consider the mass migrations taking place throughout the world, the immigration "problems" caused by people fleeing unsafe living situations, intolerable economic situations, and seeking a "better" life in countries that for some reason can't develop a workable legal process of immigration that prevents those immigrating from being exploited while also causing significant problems within the nations, or groups of nations they immigrate to as undocumented. The reality of these problems are global, not just in our country.

    They present a new reality that can't be handled by talking to other political leaders, as if they had control over this global economic system - when clearly they don't. What international problems does this lead to?

    Consider the ease with which exploited workers can be recruited as terroists, and the ease with which even the well educated can be recruited as terrorists. And, it isn't just those involved in bad global economic activities that upend the global society; consider as well, the ability of nations, even our own, to ignore international law when it doesn't suit them.

    The realignment of power away from nation states to global economic players who operate outside of the ability of any political system, or nation, or group of nations just isn't something Obama is willing to admit because it makes the world as dangerous a place as McCain says it is. The reality that nation states, even our own, ignore international laws when it isn't in the best interest, just isn't something Obama is willing to admit because it makes the world as dangerous as McCain says it is.

    The clarity between Obama and McCain is shown very simply in McCain's willingness to hold town meetings and talk with people and deal with their reality. Obama is instead someone people go to see perform as an orator, taking them away from reality.

    We can't pretend away reality and make the future better. It is time for someone who can actually deal with reality and is non partisan in his approach to dealing with reality.

    • Posted By: lee226 @ 07/21/2008 12:47:08 PM

      I think if you read the Audacity of Hope book written by Obama, you may find an answer to your question.
      He does speak about global economics. He is much more aware of the global situation that we are.
      But you cannot expect to close the doors of America and become isolated from the rest of the world.
      I do not believe McCain has the knowledge, the abilities or mindset to deal with it in a way that will benfit our country. He may very well have to bring back Cechoslovakia to accomplish that.

      • Posted By: News and Notes @ 07/21/2008 1:26:40 PM

        One shouldn't have to buy someone's book in order to address concerns they have about them

        • Posted By: a_guy_in_NY @ 07/21/2008 1:58:53 PM

          Libraries loan out books for free.

          Get a clue and inform yourself.

          • Posted By: News and Notes @ 07/21/2008 3:15:13 PM

            No, I will not read Obama's book just to put money in his pocket and appease his condescending supporters like you

            • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/21/2008 5:43:11 PM

              Get your ass to a library and stop whining..

              • Posted By: Skypoint @ 07/22/2008 3:34:17 PM

                And I'll bet you were one ot the first in line to read McCain's book, right?

      • Posted By: just jerry @ 07/21/2008 3:31:22 PM

        Close the doors to America? The problem isn't going to be solved by old ways, but by the nonpartisan methods used by McCain. Obama isn't seeking nonpartisan solutions like McCain is, he is trying to win an election just like every oher old politics politician and he is doing that by trying to pretend McCain is a partisan republican instead of the true nonpartisan politician he has shown himself to be.

      • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/21/2008 2:10:24 PM

        What do you mean by 'he may have to bring back Czechoslovakia'?

    • Posted By: Donbury @ 07/21/2008 9:32:04 PM

      Good analysis Jerry. I see Obama as a reactionary who is proposing solutions to 21st Century problems by advocating approaches which failed time after time ALL during the 20th Century. He has little awareness of history. As in: "the bomb dropped on Pearl Harbor" He certainly knows nothing about the history of Afghanistan if he thinks, like many Democrats, that terrorism originated there. And he doesn't seem aware of how Germans responded to charismatic speeches under protection of the "Golden Victory" in the thirties when the enormous crowd was asked to support "total war" Raise your arm. All together now in rapturous adulation, "Heil Hitler. Yes We Can!" Go see "Triumph of the Will" one of the greatest propaganda films of all time, filmed by a star-struck artist caught up in adulation for a man who was going to bring on a new Germany. Charisma followed blindly can lead to the rubble of the Forties. Ask any German. They've paid the price for the last 63 years. Obama's ideas are as old as the smile on the face of the drunkard in the gutter who has forgotten how he got there. Not a viable thought in the lot. We are in a radically different Global context that needs fresh minds. Obama's mind is a retread ready for another five hundred miles. Serviceable, maybe -- but not ready for a hard road.

    • Posted By: Donbury @ 07/21/2008 9:23:48 PM

      Good analysis Jerry. I see Obama as a reactionary who is proposing solutions to 21st Century problems by advocating approaches which failed time after time ALL during the 20th Century. He has little awareness of history. As in: "the bomb dropped on Pearl Harbor" He certainly knows nothing about the history of Afghanistan if he thinks, like many Democrats, that terrorism originated there. And he doesn't seem aware of how Germans responded to charismatic speeches under protection of the "Golden Victory" in the thirties when the enormous crowd was asked to support "total war" Raise your arm. All together now in rapturous adulation, "Heil Hitler. Yes We Can!" Go see "Triumph of the Will" one of the greatest propaganda films of all time, filmed by a star-struck artist caught up in adulation for a man who was going to bring on a new Germany. Charisma followed blindly can lead to the rubble of the Forties. Ask any German. They've paid the price for the last 63 years. Obama's ideas are as old as the smile on the face of the drunkard in the gutter who has forgotten how he got there -- not a viable thought in the lot. We are in a radically different Global context that needs fresh minds. Obama's mind is a retread ready for another five hundred miles. Serviceable, maybe -- but not ready for a hard road.

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/20/2008 11:17:21 PM

    MORE INFO ABOUT WHY IRAN IS A GREAT THREAT:

    It is Irans APOCALYPTIC world view that distinguishes their likelihood to use a nuclear bomb than other governments (US, Israel, etc.) with nuclear weapons capability. See article excerpt below I obtained from a couple sections on this site:
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Threats_to_Israel/Iran.html#threats

    THREATS AGAINST ISRAEL AND AMERICA

    The only way to confront the Zionist enemy is the continuation and fortification of resistance and Jihad, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was quoted as saying September 3, 2005, in a meeting with the militant group Islamic Jihad's secretary general Ramazan Abdullah (AFP, September 3, 2005).

    In October 2005, recently elected PRESIDENT MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD QUOTED AYATOLLAH KHOMEINI AND DECLARED: AS THE IMAM SAID, ISRAEL MUST BE WIPED OFF THE MAP.

    The president added: And God willing, with the force of God behind it, we shall soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism (AP, October 26, 2005).

    President Bush said February 16, 2005 Iran has made it clear that they do not like Israel, to put it bluntly. And the Israelis are concerned about whether or not Iran develops a nuclear weapon, as are we, as should everybody. Clearly, if I was the leader of Israel, and I listened to some of the statements by the Iranian ayatollahs that regarded my security of my country, I would be concerned about Iran having a nuclear weapon, as well. And in that Israel is our ally, and in that we have made a very strong commitment to support Israel, we will support Israel if their security is threatened.

    Irans non-conventional weapons are not a threat only toward Israel, they also pose a danger to the United States and its interests around the world. And the American people recognize this danger. According to a January 2006 Gallup poll, 19% of Americans see Iran as an immediate threat to the United States and another 65% said Iran is a long-term threat.

    On June 15, 2006, Irans defense minister, Mostafa Mohammad Najjar, signed an agreement with his Syrian counterpart, Hassan Turkmani, for military cooperation against what they called the ???COMMON THREATS??? presented by Israel and the United States. Our cooperation is based on a strategic pact and unity against common threats, said Turkmani. We can have a common front against Israels threats.

    (Continued in Reply below)

    • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 07/22/2008 3:18:02 PM

      Paranoia is what gets America into unnecessary wars. Get some rest.

    • Posted By: sharenews @ 07/20/2008 11:20:57 PM

      WOULD IRAN USE THE BOMB?

      Mahmoud Ahmadinejad believes the most important task of the Iranian Revolution was to prepare the way for the return of the Twelfth Imam, who disappeared in 874, bringing an end to Muhammad???s lineage. This imam, the Mahdi or DIVINELY GUIDED ONE, Shiites believe, will return in an APOCALYPTIC BATTLE in which the forces of righteousness will DEFEAT THE FORCES OF EVIL and bring about a new era in which Islam ultimately becomes the dominant religion throughout the world. The Shiites have been waiting patiently for the Twelfth Imam for more than a 1,000 years, but Ahmadinejad believes he can now HASTEN THE RETURN THROUGH A NUCLEAR WAR. Ayatollah Hussein Nuri Hamdani explicitly said in 2005 that THE JEWS should be fought against and forced to surrender to prepare the way for the coming of the Hidden Imam.

      It is this APOCALYPTIC world view, Middle East scholar Bernard Lewis notes, that distinguishes Iran from other governments with nuclear capability.

      OBAMA SAYS: Dont tell me words dont matter!


      OBAMA WORDS: Iran, Cuba, Venezuela -- these countries are TINY compared to the Soviet Union. They DONT pose a serious threat to us!


      TWO Days later . . .


      OBAMA WORDS: Iran is a GREAT threat! Iran is a GREAT threat (REALLY)! Iran is a GREAT threat (I AM NOT KIDDING HERE)!


      WHAT does Obama really believe?? Integrity? What are we supposed to think if he tells us words DO matter and he flip flops on such a major belief issue??.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lx-QcstDcU

      • Posted By: babelfisher14 @ 07/21/2008 1:07:12 AM

        Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a nearly powerless figurehead. He is NOT the leader of Iran. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is. The fact that you don't understand such basic facts makes your "analysis" of the alleged threat from Iran completely worthless.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse