Subsidized in the City

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jamiej6780 @ 07/25/2008 10:24:47 AM

    If mom and dad are paying for you to live, than mom and dad have a say in HOW you live. I refuse to let anyone have that kind of control over me. The only decisions my parents make in my life are the side dishes for Thanksgiving dinner. That I can live with - imposition of morals and financial values, I cannot.

  • Posted By: jamiej6780 @ 07/25/2008 10:22:35 AM

    She hit the nail on the head with the statement about independence. If mom and dad are paying for you, mom and dad still have a say in how you spend their money. I refuse to let my parents have that kind of control over me and am content with my small house, small wardrobe, and ancient car with no air-conditioning. I'm 26 years old and refuse to let me parents have a say in my life. The only way I can justify this is by earning what I spend and only letting them on decisions as big as what sides to serve for Thanksgiving dinner.

  • Posted By: lifesducky @ 07/25/2008 10:22:09 AM

    I completely agree that they shouldn't be getting a allowance from mom & dad, even if they are divorced. I have to pay my bills so should they. I have a 22 year old stepson that expects us to keep giving him money every money, saying that his mom isn't getting the child support anymore so he should just get that money now. I don't think so. But yet he refuses to drink tap water & also critizes everyhting in our lives including the way we live.

  • Posted By: vailres03 @ 07/25/2008 9:38:37 AM

    I absolutely agree with the article. I did not grow up with a 'silver spoon' in my mouth although others who were not as well off as me may have disagreed. I say that only in relative terms- my parents both worked and saved for each of mine and my 4 siblings college educations beginning when we were born. We each ended up with enough money to cover most of college and were able to leave w/ little to no debt depending on which schools we chose. Out of all of my siblings, I have chosen to live in an expensive part of the country, I cannot afford to purchase my own home (or small condo even) without assistance. My parents have offered me sympathy but have already said they will not front a down payment since that would mean assisting the rest of my siblings with a down payment as well- that would add up quickly! I am a member of Gen Y and have found that many parents have helped their children with down payments to purchase condos where I live in addition to paying their credit cards, vehicles, cells phones or portions thereof. This was also typical of my college experience, peers still received an allowance throughout their college careers. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't envious but did find it fascinating. My best friend, who was born w/ the 'silver spoon,' didn't know how to balance a checkbook and even said to me once, "no one can live off of less than $50K a year." FYI- I do right now & I'm 27. I don't believe the intention of this article is to bash those born into a life more fortunate but at the fact is, this country is facing enourmous credit card debt. When it all boils down to it, it is the responsibility of parents to teach and prepare their children for life because parents are not going to be around to hold your hand forever.

    • Posted By: earmstr1 @ 07/25/2008 10:20:06 AM

      I don't think you need to come from a "well off" family to get this kind of parental treatment. There's this mentallity that you don't your kids to go without the things you always wanted, so regardleess of financial situation, there are parents giving it all to their kids, probably at the risk or theiry own financial future and secur retirement. And the cruel irony is that because their kids don't have any sense of financial responsibility, they won't be able to help their parents in retirement.

  • Posted By: sebs112 @ 07/25/2008 10:20:00 AM

    I think half the problem is that we have muddied the waters between "wants" and "needs". You need food, clothes and shelter. You don't need an iPhone, Prada shoes or a NYC apartment with a doorman and an elevator. Those are excesses. In this day and age, excess is what has hurt our country's financial footing. Americans "need" bigger homes, bigger cars, and bigger flatscreens than the Jones next door.

  • Posted By: TxGal21 @ 07/25/2008 10:19:33 AM

    The other side is...if your parents go through bankruptcy right when you enter college at age 18, you have to figure out how you're going to make it through without their help really fast. So I worked my butt off to have a bachelors and masters in 5.5 years, and now I'm an Environmental Scientist at 23 ...and making my own living...without a dime from Mom & Dad.

    It makes me sad to think that young people refuse to "give up their lifestyle" when the true process of making a living is starting with little and hopefully ending with a lot.

  • Posted By: debt_girl @ 07/23/2008 10:49:58 AM

    I agree with the writer's basic premise that young adults should prioritize financial independence over the superfluous comforts their parents subsidize. No arguments. However, Serafino unfairly characterizes her (my) generation based on a very narrow and privileged cross-section to which she herself belongs.
    While I applaud Serafino for achieving financial freedom, it is no surprise to me that her anecdotal evidence shows the opposite trend: After all, Serafino enjoyed "0 years of private-school education" on her parents' dime and has an uncle with a condo in ritzy Tribeca. Naturally her friends come from a background of similar privilege-- only, unlike Serafino, they still take advantage of it. Serafino, however, does her generation a great disservice by focusing on such an elite group of twentysomethings. She conveniently ignores the unprecedented financial burden my generation bares. According to Census Bureau figures, American men in their 30s are earning less than their father's generation did-- a trend that is worsening for those in their 20s.

    Even worse, today's average college graduate leaves school with over $20,000 in student loan debt. Government grants have been replaced with loans, tuition has increased nearly double the rate of inflation, salaries aren't keeping pace with inflation, and 19-29-year-olds are the largest group in this country without health insurance. I am not ashamed to admit my parent's pay nearly half of my monthly $500 student loan balance.







    • Posted By: Portland83 @ 07/23/2008 12:23:16 PM

      Thank you.

      • Posted By: twentyinnyc @ 07/23/2008 6:40:12 PM

        Best response out of the lot.

        • Posted By: wws1983 @ 07/25/2008 10:17:32 AM

          i AGREE. I TOOK THE ARTICLE TO MEAN THAT ONCE YOU HAVE HAD HELP GETTING THRU COLLEGE TO GET YOUR DEGREE AND GET ON YOUR WAY THEN YOU SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN FINANCES ETC. AND NOT DEPEND ON MOM AND DAD TO CONSTANTLY BAIL YOU OUT OF FINANCIAL WOES. SOME DAY THEY ARE GOING TO BE GONE AND WHO WILL BAIL THEM OUT THEN. SOCIETY. THAT IS WHAT IS GOING ON NOW. TRYING TO LIVE LIKE THEY DID WHEN THEY WERE AT HOME IN THEIR TEENS AND EARLY TWENTIES AND NOT HAVIN G THE FINANCIAL SENSE AND STABILITY TO DO IT SO NOW COMES BANKRUPTCY OR MORE BAILING OUT. WHEN MOM AND DAD ARE FINALLY GONE THEN THEY BEST HOPE THEIR IS ENOUGH INHERITANCE TO COVER IT BECAUSE OTHERWISE THEY WILL BE LEAVING NOTHING BUT DEBT FOR THEIR CHILDREN ON DOWN THE ROAD.

      • Posted By: grits4life @ 07/24/2008 2:11:29 PM

        I think most people are missing the point of this article. The author isn't criticising 20+s for being assisted by their parents because they have no choice or because the economy is in such a bad predicament that even if a 20+ worked full time they still wouldn't be able to sustain themselves nor is she criticising young adults who receive additional assistance for necessities when times are hard. She is criticising HER peers for mostly sitting on their asses while their parents are basically paying not only for their necessaties(like rent,groceries,tuition,books) but for their Prada bags and Porsches which is an obvious extreme difference (I mean Prada/groceries. not in the same category of necessasity) don't you think. And while it may be a flaw to assume that her obviously priveledged friends are representative of the whole generation of 20 and 30 somethings it is also a flawed assumption that only wealthy parents spoil their children or fail to prepare them to be financially independent. This article mentions 20+s that have parents footing the bill who are well in their means to do so but I can tell you that I live far on the other end of the spectrum( My parents can barely afford to pay their own bills so my public state college education just as expensive as private seemingly is only possible through means of loans and govt grants) but I know of several kids whose parents are in the same predicament working two jobs even while their college kids are walking around jobless with expensive clothes/cars at their expense. Sometimes these parents take on huge amounts of debt being barely able to take care of themselves let alone afford their spoiling habits. And yes I know that these are trying time for our generation so parental assistance in many cases much warranted(trust me I know) but again this is not the criticism of the article. There are 20,30, and 40 year olds still living with parents not lifting a finger to get a job to take responsibility and not just among the wealthy or middle class but among people who are far from that( trust me I've seen it). The main point of this article is not even to criticize parents for wanting give their kids a running start if their able to or of children for receiving a boost there's nothing wrong with that as long as their being taught to be hard working and responsible with money. The article is criticising those who after receiving that initial boost fail to at least try to a sustain flight on their own but are instead soaring around to expensive heights still clinched on the backs of their parents. An aging bird can only sustain the weight of their fully grown youngins for so long before losing strength and when they finally start nose diving to their inevitable end their youngins still clinched to their backs having never learned to fly on their own will be in a very tough predicament. That is what this article is trying to make an observation and criticism about.

  • Posted By: LoadedBong @ 07/25/2008 10:13:37 AM

    It's true that there are far too many young people who rely heavily on mom and dad.
    It's ridiculous how so many parents feel the need to baby their kids well into adulthood and in doing so, prevent their children from ever truly being independent, self-sufficient and ACCOUNTABLE for their spending/budgeting.
    It's a huge reason as to what is so WRONG with our society today and it is exemplified even more when our government feels the need to "act" as parents who ALLOW such parasitic sponging to run rampant and then BAIL OUT those who are so deep in debt due to their own actions.
    Completely unfair to those who truly do live within their personal financial means and don't sponge off of anyone.
    Yeah, the message being sent is one that has absolutely NO accountability and encourages a generation to live like there is no tomorrow.
    Rude awakenings are the result for many and for many others......an arrogant, self-centered attitude of expectations is the result and its THESE fools who become adults who have absolutely NO concept at frugality, thriftiness, budgeting and their impulsive buying habits.
    It's ok though.....WE, as a nation are deep in debt and so are the people. It's obvious that there are those in society who feel they might as well spend and spend, sink in debt and mirror exactly what our government is sooooo good at!
    They end up in debt or screaming for the government to bail them out if nobody else will anymore.
    PATHETIC LOSERS who expect the world on a silver platter just handed to them for NOTHING!
    PARASITES!
    And to all those "supportive" parents who CHOOSE to fund your adult child's life........if you believe that it is such a good thing or that someday......you figure YOU will NEED your child's financial help in your "Golden Years" or help with your deteriorating health..........DON'T COUNT ON ANYTHING from your kids!
    YOU will be tapped out......they will be tapped out and you WILL be seeking government assistance YOURSELVES!
    Materialism, greed and "keeping up with the Jones's" way of living has GOT to STOP!
    Great.......WE, the taxpayers.......HAVE to bail out YOU LOSER PARASITES and your adult children because YOU couldn't or wouldn't....say NO to your kids!

  • Posted By: Jahzara @ 07/25/2008 9:30:06 AM

    This is a bit of a one sided article. When I graduated from college, I had a difficult time finding a job in my field and had to move back in with my parents. I lived expense free in order to save what I could with the mediocre job I had. I was able to pay off my credit card debt and a couple of medical debts. After I did this, I went back to school. I have just graduated with my MBA. I'm in NJ and I, once again, am finding myself without employment. Thanks to employers not wanting to spend much due to this uncertain economy. Because of my new advanced degree, I am also having a hard time getting a retail job because I'm now OVER qualified. My parents are helping with my expenses, once again. I HATE IT. But without them, I'd be on the streets 1300 miles away from home. I don't even have enough to move back if I wanted to. Unfortunately, there are MANY MANY MANY young people in similar situations. We do what we MUST. We MUST accept assistance in order to have any type of life outside of poverty. Lucky Serafino. Some of us don't have the benefits of having someone with a place to live in for free within the city of our dreams.

    • Posted By: kwei @ 07/25/2008 9:48:33 AM

      I think the article writers issue is more with the people who just EXPECT it. I'd guess you're not out running up CC bills on clothes and shoes while your parents help out. I don't have an issue with parents helping if they can in a situation like yours, but there's a lot of spoiled people out there too.

      • Posted By: NeldaDee @ 07/25/2008 10:13:18 AM

        So you're OVERqualified. RIGHT. If you're so overqualified, don't list all of your qualifications on your applications for retail jobs. Retail certainly isn't the big bucks, but in a management position, you can most certainly get by. Also, you can request an Economic Hardship deferrment on student loans if that's a real problem. Since I was an overqualified retail manager myself for over ten years, I can speak for certain that there are plenty of retail establishments that will hire you, even if you're *gasp* overqualified. Maybe you are thinking that you will get paid a salary that meets all of your current qualifications? Get over that one, sister. Get a real job and get out of your parents' house. Loser with excuses - that's what you sound like.

    • Posted By: sata @ 07/25/2008 9:58:35 AM

      It's not one-sided. She decribes the people who are living off their parents and they don't sound anything like you. She doesn't describe anyone receiving money in order to save or pay off medical debts temporarily until grad school like you were. She's describing people and their parents who abhor unluxurious living. Probably something like the Hilton family. She is plainly not describing people or their parents that find financial indepedence and /or struggle to be character building.
      Don't rip on serafino,
      One more thing take a little piece of advice from someone who has hired and fired: take those overqualifications off your resume . If they advertise for a sales assistant they don't want an MBA holder who is going to try to second guess the boss's decisions. If you get the job and then a management position opens up, submitt a revised resume..

    • Posted By: kmg0921 @ 07/25/2008 9:34:40 AM

      You had help and so did she. What's the difference? She was just lucky to get it accomplished sooner. No need to rush.

  • Posted By: panchosdad @ 07/25/2008 10:12:23 AM

    Reality... Reality NY is an expensive city. This country was built on loans and agreements with other people. KIng's and Queen's, politicians, dictators, you name it The United States more than likely had a lot of hands in the success of this nation. HELLO trillions of current debt that is owed by this country, to our selfs and others. Any of you people that say "no one has helped me " you are all ignorant. Some one taught you that work wthic youv got, some one said yes to your first credit card or first job. Was it some one who had a silver spoon in thier mouth...? maybe. Bottom line is.... What ever any one has to do to survive is the only answer. If a parent wants to pad a trust fund for their silver spooners thats their choice. Stop critisizing for what you did not have for that matter what you can not provide for your self. My mother is a single mom of 4 and helped me buy my first car with a 600.00 cintribution. Should I say Oh thats all youv helped with. NO of course not. What about all the taxes sha paid to public education that allowed me to go k-12 or the taxes she paid to get me a pell grant for the first two years of my college education. Final thought... stop being a bunch of baby winers about every little thing you do you and I'll do me what ever that takes and what ever is a "subsidy"

  • Posted By: AnotherHagman @ 07/25/2008 10:04:35 AM

    |The author's more sensible observations become a bit muddied when, at 25, she indulges in the following pronouncement: "Higher rents and the need for deeper pockets are part of the charm associated with city living, but urban pricing aside, it is possible to live in any city regardless of your age or income; it just takes a little budgeting and prioritizing." I take it she does not associate with longtime business owners whose shops and restaurants are displaced by chain stores and projects financed by overseas money, or with college-educated members of the middle class who struggle simply to get by in an urban area, or with people on fixed incomes, or with immigrants whose communities shatter when a neighborhood gives way to yuppie condos and Starbucks. Hasn't she heard of the mind-bogglinglylong commutes people take to jobs in cities where they no longer can afford to live?

    It's possible the author will never leave the rarefied environment in which she was brought up, but most of us will experience the sobering wake-up calls that health crises, layoffs, economic downturns, and personal and community upheaval tend to provide.

  • Posted By: luneskitten @ 07/25/2008 9:59:16 AM

    Hello, I agree that it is enabling and perhaps unhealthy in the long run for parents to subsidize adult children's lifestyles. I also agree that (in some cases) this is a way of having a larger than normal amount of inuput as to what the 'children' should be doing with their lives. I know parents want the best for their children, but it can be difficult for someone to learn to budget, live solo, etc. when they have not been taught. I know people whose parents did not teach them the first thing about relationships,, looking for a job, applying to school, doing laundry or cooking. Not that these things cannot be figured out by the children, but it makes life quite a bit more overwhelming in addition to finding yourself as a young adult.
    Also, as she points out, Ms. Serafino is very lucky that her parents were able to afford tuition to a prestigious college (or any, for that matter). This is simply not possible for many parents. I know Ms. Serafino did all the work in college and earned her degree by her own hard work, but the point that people often miss is that they may have not even finished (or even got to) college without the financial ride from the parents. I am 34 and am still finishing my degree since I have lived on my own since age 19. I know many people who have had their education financed by parents. A common question is "why didn't you just work your way through college without student loans?" Of course I woked during college, usually two jobs to pay for rent, car, utilites, insurance, food, etc..Living in my parent's home was an abusive situation, and my mental health took priority over staying there free during college . I figured what good was a college degree if I was going to be tramatized for the rest of my life, hence the decision to get out! People who have parents pay for their college simply will not understand what a different situation would entail. It's no fault of their own - how would they know if they have not been in that situation? It is similiar to someone trying to feel what it would be like to be another race - you can imagine and perhaps try to understand what it would be like in their skin, but it is simply impossible to know the real experience. It's easy to say "well, they could be doing this to help their situation, or I would do that if I were them". You can never truly experience a situation in which you have not had to live. I agree with the main points of Ms. Serafino's article, but I feel it is short sighted in not thinking of what circumstances her 'rich' friends may be in. No matter how close the friendship, you can never truly know what the deeper situation may be, or what goes on behind the scenes in someone's life.

  • Posted By: kpicinich @ 07/25/2008 9:25:22 AM

    This is the biggest piece of BS I have ever read. I would LOVE to know what Ms. Serafino does for a living and where exactly she lives (and what type of building). I live in Manhattan in a studio in--admittedly--a nice building. I can't live in a walk up because I have a bad back and knees from a car accident, so an elevator is a must. My parents also required that I live in a doorman building because they did not feel the alternative was safe. Now, if I were to pay my own rent, I would not have any take home pay at the end of the month. I have a fairly sizeable savings, but if I were to cut all financial help from my parents, I would blow through it in a year and have to move back home. Now, I've never set foot in a "designer" store, let alone blown hundreds or thousands of dollars on a shopping spree there. I frequent H&M and Old Navy. I pay my credit card in full each month, have no student loans, and paid for every stick of furniture in my apartment (except for an antique school desk my parents bought 5 years ago for $15). I live a relatively frugal lifestyle: I clip coupons, I love 99 cent stores, I look for cheaper alternatives everywhere, but I still manage to go out with friends for drinks or to the movies; I am not a hermit. All that being said, it's impossible for me to live my life and not have SOME help from my parents. Are there places I could cut back if I absolutely had to? Sure. But that would amount to--at most--$200 a month, which is more than my parents' share of my rent. I work a 9-5 job in advertising and make a modest salary--nothing like those on Wall Street, but certainly not struggling either. I find Ms. Serafino's gall incredible and extremely offensive. Not everyone can live in New York without financial help. Sure, there are those that abuse the privilege, but there are others of us that need it to survive.

    • Posted By: Bear Fan @ 07/25/2008 9:53:25 AM

      Nonetheless, you are an adult receiving financial assistance from your parents. Bottom line...that is sad.

    • Posted By: mco2008 @ 07/25/2008 9:50:36 AM

      You can't live in a walk up because of a bad back and knees and your parents required that you live in a doorman building....??? Fortunately this article is talking about young adults, not about you, so you can calm down.

      Here's the deal. If you can't live in New York without help, then don't live in New York. It isn't rocket science. If people move out of New York because it is too expensive, then pricing will go down. Basic law of supply and demand. So long as demand is artificially inflated, the pricing structure will be incorrect and also artificially inflated.

  • Posted By: Jammy @ 07/25/2008 9:51:56 AM

    If you are "old enough" to live on your own, then you are old enough to pay your own bills. In any case, Mom & Dad won't be around forever; then the dependent ones have the possibly of drowning in their OWN debt since they never learned to be a grown-up.

  • Posted By: MahLi @ 07/24/2008 11:22:12 AM

    As a parent, I see the other end of this situation. I have one child who has been independent since the age of 21, and another who, at 38, is in and out of my home, between jobs. I am 7 years from retirement, with very little savings because I have 'helped' my child instead of helping myself. Now, I am scrambling with 2 jobs to make a future for myself. Wish I had been smarter. Are these kids who are taking from their parents really thinking about what their future is going to be like when they are 50 and their parents are struggling on Social Security and can't help them any more?

    • Posted By: grandmaw June @ 07/25/2008 9:51:36 AM

      I am a granmother of a daughter that has three children. The youngest is 20,going to college,(DAD Paying because of low grades), working two jobs and living on her own paying her own bills with no help with them. The middle girl is 23, just returned home from a divorce with her two children under 6 yrs and is staying at mom and dads but helping by contributing to help with expenses. The older son is 28 haas been back at home for aover a year anad didn't work for over 6months of that time because he wouldn flip burgers or anything else that didn't bring in the "big bucks". He is now working but even when he sees the middle daughter hand money to mon he just turns his head and chooses to ignore that he should be helping too. Neither of the two older children chose to go to college. I applaude the young lady for the story she wrote and wish more of our young people would wake up and get a life on their own and stop using their parents. Who are going to take care of the parents when all the money is gone and their old? Those kids? I bet not!!!! June

  • Posted By: lpeterson333 @ 07/25/2008 7:21:18 AM

    Speaking from a similar background, I don't see anything wrong with Melody's attempts to be self-sufficient, regardless previous support she's received. Why judge someone just because she was lucky enough to have her education paid for by her parents? Instead, I applaud Melody for making the decision to try and make it on her own - even when she doesn't have to.

    • Posted By: Jahzara @ 07/25/2008 9:49:35 AM

      It isn't her attempts to be self sufficient that annoys those who are annoyed. It's the I'm-doing-it-why-can't-you attitude that she seems to be spewing through the article. It's WONDERFUL that she's able to make it. But she's had someone pay for education so she doesn't have to worry about that. Along with that, she had three months of expense free living to save to get her place in NY. Most of us don't have that and that's why we need help from "Mommy and Daddy".

  • Posted By: jl5402 @ 07/25/2008 9:48:27 AM

    This is all too try now a days. I have too many friends who get "support" from their parents. I have one friend who is married and still gets her car insurance paid for. My older brother has had more finanical help then any one person should. He has made so many stupid mistakes, both personally and finanically, but my parents are always their to bail him out. I really do think parents need to stop footing the bill for their kids, but the kids are taking advantage of it.

  • Posted By: scottgc @ 07/25/2008 9:47:04 AM

    I believe that your assistance came at a better time than the assistance your peers are currently receiving. By receiving your education (and most likely, your living expenses) for free, you were set up for a much easier entry into post-college life. In your case, if you were still financially dependent on your parents, I'd say you had a serious problem. You enjoyed some pretty distinct advantages over your indebted peers.

    Personally, I think parents will stop "paying the rent" when higher education funding trends away from loan-based aid and more grant money is available. Until then, our system is saddling new graduates with large amounts of debt right out of the gate. Entry-level salaries haven't exactly kept pace with skyrocketing costs of...everything. It's not hard to see why many of this generation's members are still financially dependent. The world is much more expensive now.

  • Posted By: Cidney @ 07/25/2008 9:45:36 AM

    Sorry, I am a little jaded when it comes to this subject. Back when I was in school, kids in my generatiion couldnt wait to get out on their own and out from under their parents house. These days, young adults are living at home until mid to late 20's some even early 30's. As soon as I was on my own at 17, I had a full time job and a part time job, sometimes 3 jobs to get by. I had to struggle and did without a lot of times but it taught me how to survive in the real world, not depend on "mommy and daddy" to bail me out when I was short on rent or had to eat Top Ramen Noodle soup for weeks on end. Once or twice I asked my parents for as little as 20.00 and was told no, I learned how to deal with that and you will be surprised just what you can do on your own when your back is up against the wall. Sorry, I dont have much pity on those whinning about how they need to live at home with mommy and daddy to pay student loans or whatever. When I hear about a young adult still lving at home, I think LOOSER and move on.

  • Posted By: KSmomofmany @ 07/25/2008 9:44:22 AM

    I just want to put in my own 'two cents' here. I was the daughter who was spoiled- by Kansas standards- with a nice car, money for college (which I didn't complete since I didn't HAVE to pay for it myself), extra spending cash, clothes and even a roof over my head without any obligation for several years after high school. I can honestly tell you when the real world of finances hit me between the eyes and my mother wasn't able to help out any longer- the real world and economy had hurt her tremendously too- I was forced into adulthood and it HURT! I wasn't used to doing without, eating cheap (at home), wearing the same clothes for years at a time, etc but I did it. In fact I raised my daughter doing it and we survived very well. Now as my children are young adults I demand they be responsible early. We provided each of our teens a very used (yet still running) vehicle with insurance but they are responsible for their own gas and once they reach 18 they are required to pay 1/2 of their insurance (all of it once they get out of high school) bill as well. As the kids graduate from high school we encourage them to purchase a newer (more reliable) vehicle with the money they have saved from their part time jobs. In 2005 our oldest daughter purchased a 98 Oldmobile for $4,500 and it is still getting her great gas mileage. For her 21st birthday she didn't get a trip to Europe or even a shopping spree instead she received 2 new tires for her car. That car should last her until she has a full time job and enough saved up for atleast 75% of the price of a new 'used' car. Our other daughters (both 18) have over $6,000 saved up and are still happy driving the 'junkers' we provided while they continue to save even more. On more then one occasion our children have complimented us on how we are making them be responsible for themselves. They have friends with gas cards, new vehicles, allowances, and no jobs and all I can say to that is "What were their parents thinking!?"

    As to the writer of this story- he isn't arrogance in my opinion instead he is mature. A few generations ago people in their early 20's were raising families, buying homes, owning cars and preparing to help take care of their aging parents not 30 and still living off of them. I am proud to say my kids will be just as 'arrogant' as this young person! Remember what goes around.. comes around. Do you young people want to take care of your kids until they are good and ready to do it for themselves?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse