Posted By: lueman @ 12/01/2008 1:04:42 PM
Someone once said if your unemployed it's a recession if I'm unemployed it's a depression.
Despite parallels with the early 1930s, to use the D word now would be total overkill.
The specter of depression stalks America. You hear the word repeatedly. Are we in a depression? If not, are we headed for one? The answer to the first question is no; the answer to the second is "almost certainly not." The use of "depression" to describe the economy is a case of rhetorical overkill that speaks volumes about today's widespread pessimism and anxiety. A short history lesson shows why.
The Great Depression of the 1930s -- the last time the term rightly applied -- was industrial capitalism's worst calamity. U.S. unemployment peaked at 25 percent in 1933; it averaged 18 percent for the decade. From 1929 to 1933, 40 percent of U.S. banks failed. People lost deposits; businesses and consumers lost access to credit. Over the same period, wholesale prices dropped a third, driving farmers and firms into bankruptcy. Farm foreclosures, shantytowns (called "Hoovervilles," after the president) and bread lines followed.
This was a social as well as economic breakdown. Our present situation bears no resemblance to this. In June, unemployment was 5.5 percent, slightly below the average since 1960 of 5.8 percent. It's true that banks and investment banks -- Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Wachovia -- have suffered large losses. But on the whole, the banking system seems fairly strong. Although profits in the first quarter of 2008 were down 46 percent from 2007, they totaled $19 billion even after $37 billion set aside for loan loss reserves. Overall corporate profits are still running at a near-record annual rate of $1.5 trillion.
As yet, the present economic slowdown does not even approach the harshest post-World War II slump. The back-to-back recessions of 1980 and 1981-82 (as dated by the National Bureau of Economic Research) constituted, for most people, one prolonged downturn. Unemployment peaked at 10.8 percent in late 1982. In 1981 and 1982, housing starts were down almost 50 percent from their 1978 peak. From 1979 to 1982, the economy stagnated; output lurched down, then up and then down. There had been nothing like that since the 1930s.
"Depression" is a term of art. It has no precise definition. Economic historian Barry Eichengreen of the University of California at Berkeley notes that in the 19th century, the word connoted extended periods of declining prices: for example, between the 1870s and the mid-1890s. People associated falling prices with bad times, because in good times, prices tended to be stable. Falling prices meant either too many sellers or too few buyers. After World War II, the term depression lapsed into disuse, because economic downturns became milder and rarely involved general deflation (price declines). "Recession" ascended as the term of preference.
The paradoxical thing about today's economy is its strength. No kidding. Consider all the hand grenades lobbed at it. Higher oil prices. The housing implosion. Large layoffs in affected industries: autos, airlines, construction, mortgage banking. The "credit squeeze" triggered by losses on "subprime" mortgages. Despite all that, the economy hasn't collapsed. It's merely weakened. Output in the first quarter of 2008 was actually 2.5 percent higher than a year earlier.
Someone once said if your unemployed it's a recession if I'm unemployed it's a depression.
I did not grow up in underpriveledged circumstances, nor am I miserable. I'm also reasonably well positioned if the economy continues to go in the direction I expect it to. That said, the don't-worry-be-happy approach won't solve the challenges the country is facing, although life as a bobble head must be blissful. For the last 10-15 years, any time there was a report on economic growth, they mentioned how it was driven by consumer spending. Hmmmm...but weren't real wages falling during that whole period? So...what drove the economy? Home equity. Hmmmm...how did that work out? And, by the way, now that the equity has been sucked out of 80% (my guess) of the houses in this country, what will fuel economic growth when the downturrn starts to level off? From an economic standpoint, I don't think either of the candidates the MSM and major corporations have blessed us with undo the damage that has been done to the economy in the short term. It will take decades.
It willl get much, much, much worse, and then we will be justified in calling it a Depression.
MEDIAJust a year after buying The Wall Street Journal, the press rapscallion has revitalized the fusty paper.
Sponsored by
|
Loading Menu
Discuss